Test: Xiaomi Poco M3 - En smartphone för 1.500 kronor (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Poco M3
Brand: Xiaomi

Ett bra erbjudande för en liten budget.

En smartphone för 1.500 kronor, fungerar det? I fallet Xiaomi Poco M3 fungerar det rätt så bra. För det priset får du en smartphone med Android 10, en IPS-skärm på 6.53 tum, en trippelkamera, en Snapdragon 662 samt stereoljud. Som en bonus får du också ett gigantiskt batteri på 6000 mAh. Priset inkluderar till och med ett skyddsfodral och skydd för skärmen.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 01/21/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco M3 (Poco M Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Minne

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Skärm

6.53 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, FHD+, Solljus-läge, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 107.5 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Elektronisk kompass, Vibrationsmotor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (band 2/3/5/8), 3G (band B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), Huvud SAR 0,597 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0,807 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.6 x 162.3 x 77.3

Batteri

6000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2" sensorstorlek, f/1.79, 6P lins, AF, 0.8μm pixelstorlek, 1.6μm 4-in-1 Super Pixel) + 2MP makrokamera (1.75μm pixelstorlek, f/2.4, FF) + 2MP djupsensor (1.75μm pixelstorlek, f/2.4), video i upp till 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8MP (1.12μm pixelstorlek, f/2.05)

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 22.5 Watt, USB-C kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddshölje, Skärmskydd, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

198 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g

Pris

169 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78 % v7 ^(old)	01/2021	Xiaomi Poco M3 SD 662, Adreno 610	198 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
77.9 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Motorola Moto G9 Play SD 662, Adreno 610	200 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
79.7 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Realme 7 Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	196.5 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
79.7 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Samsung Galaxy M21 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	188 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
75.1 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Sony Xperia L4 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	178 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	1680x720
79.9 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	199 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	347 (172^min - 352^max) MBit/s +22%
Realme 7 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (209^min - 355^max) MBit/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	304 (285^min - 323^max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	284 (186^min - 366^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G9 Play Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash	237 (21^min - 330^max) MBit/s -17%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	109 (103^min - 114^max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	355 (327^min - 366^max) MBit/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	332 (231^min - 352^max) MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	301 (209^min - 341^max) MBit/s
Realme 7 Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (252^min - 311^max) MBit/s -4%
Motorola Moto G9 Play Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash	239 (26^min - 333^max) MBit/s -21%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	120 (106^min - 124^max) MBit/s -60%

Xiaomi Poco M3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (209-341)

Xiaomi Poco M3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø284 (186-366)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1 Tageslicht-Szene 2 5-facher Zoom Lowlight

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M3

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

Vivo X51

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M3

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

Vivo X51

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M3

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

Vivo X51

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M3

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE

Vivo X51

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3: 5.6 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 8.92 ∆E


414 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	412 cd/m²
418 cd/m²	465 cd/m²	415 cd/m²
421 cd/m²	443 cd/m²	413 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 465 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 428 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 465 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2214:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Xiaomi Poco M3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Motorola Moto G9 Play IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"	Realme 7 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy M21 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Sony Xperia L4 IPS, 1680x720, 6.2"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen		-82%	-65%	9%	-87%	-9%
Brightness middle	465	450 -3%	525 13%	617 33%	429 -8%	553 19%
Brightness	428	428 0%	512 20%	614 43%	404 -6%	527 23%
Brightness Distribution	89	88 -1%	90 1%	95 7%	92 3%	89 0%
Black Level *	0.21	0.23 -10%	0.55 -162%		0.26 -24%	0.12 43%
Contrast	2214	1957 -12%	955 -57%		1650 -25%	4608 108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	5.49 -223%	4.4 -159%	2.11 -24%	6.14 -261%	3.8 -124%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.5	10.19 -191%	6.75 -93%	3.41 3%	10.51 -200%	8.7 -149%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	7.5 -213%	4.3 -79%	2.6 -8%	6.6 -175%	2.2 8%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.495 ^88%	2.3 ^96%	2.073 ^106%	2.23 ^99%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6664 ^98%	8711 ^75%	7472 ^87%	6921 ^94%	8346 ^78%	6727 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

893 Hz

≤ 3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 893 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 893 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	316 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	314 Points -1%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	506 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	349 Points +10%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	150 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	356 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (275 - 316, n=13)	308 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +215%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1275 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1397 Points +10%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	1622 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1322 Points +4%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	883 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1259 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (763 - 1453, n=13)	1299 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +160%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2121 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1208 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1179 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (442 - 498, n=5)	466 Points
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2257 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1565 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1198 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (345 - 376, n=8)	367 Points
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7247 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8610 Points +19%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	14164 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6043 Points -17%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6909 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	11421 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7247 - 8714, n=8)	7986 Points +10%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6042 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6296 Points +4%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	9797 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5892 Points -2%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5251 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	8698 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (5866 - 7184, n=9)	6258 Points +4%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	22329 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	22131 Points -1%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	29819 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23670 Points +6%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	12161 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (22131 - 22897, n=4)	22483 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	23495 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	23379 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	36546 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25024 Points +7%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11549 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (23379 - 24043, n=4)	23648 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19025 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	18647 Points -2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	18136 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19902 Points +5%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	14930 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (18647 - 19804, n=4)	19225 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1797 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1862 Points +4%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3252 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2110 Points +17%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	741 Points -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1797 - 1889, n=9)	1842 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1715 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1743 Points +2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3254 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2092 Points +22%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	680 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1681 - 1765, n=9)	1728 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2161 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2444 Points +13%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3247 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2176 Points +1%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1084 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2161 - 2543, n=9)	2407 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1861 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1891 Points +2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3170 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1662 Points -11%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	836 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1819 - 1914, n=9)	1876 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +497%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1779 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1786 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3148 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1601 Points -10%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	782 Points -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1737 - 1794, n=9)	1775 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1008%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2221 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2384 Points +7%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3249 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1917 Points -14%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1106 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2146 - 2502, n=9)	2330 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1173 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1177 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2722 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1563 Points +33%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	470 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1106 - 1905, n=12)	1220 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +163%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1022 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1022 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2599 Points +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1445 Points +41%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	405 Points -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (974 - 1074, n=12)	1017 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +219%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2424 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2499 Points +3%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3261 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2186 Points -10%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1078 Points -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2108 - 2513, n=12)	2368 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1176 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1184 Points +1%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2784 Points +137%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1650 Points +40%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	536 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (740 - 1197, n=12)	1135 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +560%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1032 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1034 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2682 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1532 Points +48%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	467 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (642 - 1081, n=12)	999 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1018%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2298 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points +4%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3213 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2260 Points -2%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1102 Points -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1588 - 2534, n=12)	2240 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1096 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1114 Points +2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2794 Points +155%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1550 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1089 - 1167, n=12)	1115 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	963 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	974 Points +1%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2788 Points +190%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1439 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (946 - 1005, n=12)	973 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2124 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2250 Points +6%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	2813 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2125 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2124 - 2499, n=12)	2292 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +27%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	369 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (369 - 391, n=11)	378 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)	2840 Points +670%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	369 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (366 - 382, n=8)	370 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)	7533 Points +1941%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	32 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	29 fps -9%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	45 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	31 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (29 - 51, n=10)	39 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +169%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	81 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	35 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (34 - 36, n=10)	35.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +709%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	17 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	33 fps +94%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	42 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (16 - 34, n=10)	25.4 fps +49%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +344%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	52 fps +174%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	18 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (19 - 21, n=10)	19.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +779%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	25 fps +108%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	29 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 - 26, n=10)	18.8 fps +57%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +447%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	33 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16 fps +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=10)	13.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +812%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6.4 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps +103%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	17 fps +166%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (6 - 14, n=10)	9.88 fps +54%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +648%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7 fps -1%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	19 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7 - 7.3, n=10)	7.16 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +903%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7.5 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps +100%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	19 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.2 fps +23%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.4 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4.8 - 15, n=13)	10.5 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +573%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8.3 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8.3 fps 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	21 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +20%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.8 fps -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)	8.27 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	80.3 fps +867%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4.4 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	9 fps +105%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	12 fps +173%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.6 fps +27%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.1 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)	6.43 fps +46%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.6 fps +755%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	7.7 fps +175%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps +25%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	32.3 fps +1054%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	183808 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	177145 Points -4%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	295778 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	180019 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (167471 - 185542, n=9)	177411 Points -3%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4660 Points
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	12399 Points +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4660 - 15832, n=7)	9448 Points +103%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2412 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2406 Points 0%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3182 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2133 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2285 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2243 - 2432, n=11)	2337 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +161%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4834 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4911 Points +2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	5564 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4586 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	5010 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4275 - 5001, n=11)	4862 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +110%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	3454 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	3175 Points -8%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3758 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1759 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2536 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2618 - 3454, n=11)	3039 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +96%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1847 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1806 Points -2%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	3807 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2138 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1845 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1773 - 1887, n=11)	1839 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +815%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1098 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1191 Points +8%
Realme 7 Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192	1288 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1200 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1198 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1023 - 1228, n=11)	1116 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +42%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +276%
Realme 7 (Chrome 86)	36.93 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)	32.43 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	32.04 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=10)	31.5 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	30.64 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	29.95 Points -7%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme 7 (Chrome 86)	70.8 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	53.9 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 53.7, n=9)	49.9 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	49.5 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	49.46 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +366%
Realme 7 (Chome 86)	34.2 runs/min +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chome 85)	29.2 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	29.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=9)	28.4 runs/min -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	27 runs/min -8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)	26.6 runs/min -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	55 Points +4%
Realme 7 (Chrome 86)	55 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=11)	53.2 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	53 Points
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)	52 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	45 Points -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +307%
Realme 7 (Chrome 86)	15814 Points +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	10299 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	9810 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14)	9495 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)	9264 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	9125 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	4664 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	4537 ms *
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)	4444 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3779 - 4650, n=11)	4379 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	3901 ms * +14%
Realme 7 (Chrome 86)	3381 ms * +25%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco M3	Motorola Moto G9 Play	Realme 7	Samsung Galaxy M21	Sony Xperia L4	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-3%	-13%	-38%	-19%	30%	220%
Sequential Read 256KB	509	315.2 -38%	529 4%	487.8 -4%	293.4 -42%	306.6 -40%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) 43%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 261%
Sequential Write 256KB	269.2	187.2 -30%	200 -26%	192.7 -28%	165 -39%	248.1 -8%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 96%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 429%
Random Read 4KB	147	98.4 -33%	153.3 4%	126 -14%	61.2 -58%	65.1 -56%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 30%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 88%
Random Write 4KB	154.1	96.1 -38%	151.3 -2%	124.2 -19%	22.5 -85%	146.9 -5%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) 21%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 101%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	85.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	84.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	84.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	82.3 ?(77.2 - 85.9, n=3) -4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	66.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	62.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	59.1 ?(49.6 - 64.2, n=3) -8%

Xiaomi Poco M3; Armajet; 1.56.8: Ø49.7 (28-60)

Xiaomi Poco M3; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø24.8 (21-26)

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 %

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


34 °C	33.7 °C	34.8 °C
33.3 °C	33.1 °C	37.5 °C
33.2 °C	31.3 °C	33.3 °C

Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C


29.7 °C	30.9 °C	32.9 °C
30 °C	31.3 °C	32.8 °C
30 °C	30.1 °C	30.9 °C

Max: 32.9 °C
Medel: 31 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 27.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco M3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastning	0.5 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt
Hög belastning	3.99 / 6.01 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-47%	-18%	-39%	-34%
Idle Minimum *	0.5	1.2 -140%	0.74 -48%	0.846 ?(0.49 - 1.38, n=10) -69%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -79%
Idle Average *	1.84	1.8 2%	2.17 -18%	2.51 ?(1.5 - 4.92, n=10) -36%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum *	1.87	2.1 -12%	2.2 -18%	2.72 ?(1.63 - 4.95, n=10) -45%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 14%
Load Average *	3.99	6.2 -55%	4.17 -5%	4.99 ?(3 - 7.21, n=10) -25%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -63%
Load Maximum *	6.01	7.9 -31%	6.11 -2%	7.16 ?(5.2 - 9.32, n=10) -19%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -64%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		45tim 56min
WiFi Websurfing		20tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19tim 24min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		6tim 44min

	Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh	Motorola Moto G9 Play 5000 mAh	Realme 7 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Sony Xperia L4 3580 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh
Battery Runtime		-23%	-19%	-6%	-37%	-19%
Reader / Idle	2756			2297 -17%		2294 -17%
H.264	1164			1352 16%		1116 -4%
WiFi v1.3	1249	962 -23%	1006 -19%	1298 4%	783 -37%	867 -31%
Load	404			289 -28%		314 -22%

För

+ Lätt och robust hölje

+ dual-SIM + microSD

+ LTE, Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 5

+ Skyddsfodral och skärmskydd

+ Acceptabel kamera för dagsljus

+ Snabb fingeravtrycksläsare

+ Tillräcklig prestanda för vardagsuppgifter

+ Stereohögtalare

+ Riktigt lång batteritid

Emot

- Saknar NFC

- Känns ibland långsam

- IPS-skärmen är inte särskilt ljusstark

- Spel går bara att köra med vissa begränsningar

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 1.500 kronor

Recension av Xiaomi Poco M3. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med ett pris på 1.500 kronor för versionen med 64 GB är Xiaomi Poco M3 riktigt billig. Till och med varianten med 128 GB är billig och kostar 1.700 kronor. Men med 4 GB RAM och en Snapdragon 662 är den inte direkt en prestandamästare och ibland kan responsen kännas seg. Prestandan räcker trots detta till för vardagsuppgifter och gör det till och med möjligt att spela ett och ett annat spel då och då. Vi hade däremot gärna sett en lite mer ljusstark IPS-skärm, för även om skärmen är bra i övrigt når den snabbt sin gräns utomhus.

Xiaomi Poco M3 har gedigen prestanda och får poäng för höjdpunkter som stereohögtalare och ett stort batteri på 6000 mAh.

Resten av hårdvaran är förvånansvärt utförlig. Den har ett trippelkamera-system som kan ta acceptabla bilder i dagsljus, riktigt stöd för dual-SIM och till och med stereohögtalare, vilket verkligen är sällsynt i den här prisklassen. Men den riktiga höjdpunkten är det stora batteriet på 6000 mAh som ger Xiaomis telefon väldigt lång batteritid. Batteriet kan laddas helt och hållet på under 3 timmar.

Sammanfattningsvis presterar Poco M3 bra, men det är inte den bästa billiga telefonen. Samsung Galaxy M21 är till exempel bättre och den kostar under 2.000 kronor. Samsung erbjuder också ett batteri på 6000 mAh men ger också en betydligt bättre skärm (AMOLED) och stöd för NFC. Däremot har Galaxy M21 inte stereohögtalare.

Xiaomi Poco M3 - 01/15/2021 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Design

81%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

88%

Anslutningar

46 / 70 → 66%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

92%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

13 / 64 → 20%

Programprestanda

60 / 86 → 70%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

51%

Medel

73%

78%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Poco M3 - En smartphone för 1.500 kronor (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 2021-01-21 (Update: 2021-01-21)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Poco M3 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 1.500 kronor

More articles related to this device

Price comparison