Test: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro - Massor av funktioner och kraft till reapris (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2021 | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro SD 860, Adreno 640 | 215 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Motorola Moto G 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 212 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Oppo A73 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2021 | Realme 8 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 176 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 04/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A52 SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: 995:1 (Svärta: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G 5G LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Oppo A73 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Realme 8 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A52 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -30% | -64% | -126% | -42% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 567 | 586 3% | 527 -7% | 581 2% | 694 22% | 653 15% |
| Brightness | 524 | 565 8% | 499 -5% | 563 7% | 696 33% | 651 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 86 -1% | 98 13% | 98 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.61 -7% | 0.38 33% | |||
| Contrast | 995 | 961 -3% | 1387 39% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.74 -74% | 3.5 -250% | 4.34 -334% | 2 -100% | 1.2 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 4.09 -95% | 7.3 -248% | 7.15 -240% | 6.7 -219% | 2.9 -38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3 -76% | 2.9 -71% | 4.9 -188% | 1.7 -0% | 1.8 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.244 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.327 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6343 102% | 6000 108% | 6502 100% | 7658 85% | 6440 101% | 6426 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2404 Hz | ≤ 38 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (10095 - 11699, n=3) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 () | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (46152 - 46413, n=2) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (62 - 73, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (110.2 - 128.1, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (59 - 61.3, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (90 - 96, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (23902 - 28456, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (1603 - 2155, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Motorola Moto G 5G | Oppo A73 5G | Realme 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -30% | -50% | -58% | -43% | -42% | 30% | 80% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1330 | 822 -38% | 860 -35% | 474 -64% | 511 -62% | 512 -62% | 1600 ? 20% | 1839 ? 38% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 527 | 243 -54% | 193 -63% | 191.7 -64% | 267.1 -49% | 268 -49% | 756 ? 43% | 1425 ? 170% |
| Random Read 4KB | 203.1 | 157.8 -22% | 102.2 -50% | 98.5 -52% | 135.5 -33% | 146.5 -28% | 244 ? 20% | 277 ? 36% |
| Random Write 4KB | 176.9 | 167.8 -5% | 88.1 -50% | 84.8 -52% | 127.3 -28% | 126.7 -28% | 243 ? 37% | 309 ? 75% |
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Oppo A73 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.79 / 2.21 / 2.26 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
6.17 / 10.09 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5020 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | 32% | 27% | 15% | -24% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.79 | 1.3 -65% | 0.58 27% | 0.88 -11% | 1.05 -33% | 0.89 ? -13% | 0.894 ? -13% |
| Idle Average * | 2.21 | 1.5 32% | 1.86 16% | 1.8 19% | 1.8 19% | 3.21 ? -45% | 1.456 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.26 | 2.1 7% | 1.88 17% | 1.84 19% | 1.85 18% | 3.24 ? -43% | 1.616 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 6.17 | 7 -13% | 3.1 50% | 2.65 57% | 4.2 32% | 7.03 ? -14% | 6.45 ? -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.09 | 8.9 12% | 5.01 50% | 4.86 52% | 6.29 38% | 10.4 ? -3% | 9.8 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | Realme 8 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5020 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 20% | 62% | 14% | -2% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2372 | 2093 -12% | 1489 -37% | |||
| H.264 | 973 | 1027 6% | 1232 27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 879 | 1056 20% | 1426 62% | 1006 14% | 836 -5% | 753 -14% |
| Load | 276 | 289 5% | 283 3% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 2.500 kronor
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Poco X3 Pro visar sig vara en värdig representant för Xiaomis Poco-serie, för även den ger mycket för pengarna. En höjdpunkt är att den har en Snapdragon 860 SoC, som är en aning utdaterad tekniskt sett men som har prestanda som ligger över genomsnittet för mittenskiktet.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro är en riktigt snabb mittenskiktstelefon med massor av funktioner till ett lågt pris.
Poco X3 Pro får också poäng för en IPS-skärm med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, gedigen batteritid, snabb UFS 3.1-lagring samt en huvudkamera på 48 MP som tar bra bilder i dagsljus. Dessutom har den mindre viktiga men ändå trevliga detaljer som IP53-certifiering, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, NFC, IR-sändare, notis-LED samt stereohögtalare.
Listan över brister är också ganska liten för Xiaomis smartphone: makrokameran på 2 MP känns knappt användbar på grund av den låga upplösningen och Poco X3 Pro kommer varken med 5G eller OLED-skärm. Vill man ha detta kan man till exempel titta på Poco F3, som kostar runt 3.500 kronor och har ännu högre prestanda.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- 05/25/2021 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
