Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro - Massor av funktioner och kraft till reapris (Sammanfattning)

Mittenskikts-löpare.

Utmärkt prestanda i förhållande till priset - något som inte bara är typiskt för Xiaomis Redmi-serie utan gäller i ännu större utsträckning för Poco-telefonerna. Poco X3 Pro är inget undantag: för 2.500 kronor får du en snabb Snapdragon SoC, en IPS-skärm på 6.7 tum med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, en fyrdubbel kamera, 6 GB RAM samt 128 GB UFS 3.1-lagring.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Poco X5 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Minne
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glansig: ja, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, 2x2 MIMO, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1, Huvud SAR 0.573 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0.899 W/kg
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G/LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.4 x 165.3 x 76.8
Batteri
5160 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2", f/1.79, 1.6 µm, autofokus); 8 MP ultra-vidvinkelskamera (f/2.2, FOV 119°); 2 MP makrokamera (f/2.4); 2 MP djupsensor (f/2.4); video i upp till 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 33 Watt, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarmanual, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
215 g, Strömförsörjning: 86 g
Pris
250 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
84.6 %
v7 (old)
06/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640
215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
from EUR 250
81.3 %
v7 (old)
01/2021
Motorola Moto G 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
212 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
Alternative specs USD 296.69
80.1 %
v7 (old)
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
from EUR 300
82.2 %
v7 (old)
04/2021
Realme 8 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
176 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
from EUR 299
82.8 %
v7 (old)
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
SD 720G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83.7 %
v7 (old)
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
from EUR 280

Storleksjämförelse

166.1 mm 76.1 mm 9.9 mm 212 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g164 mm 76.5 mm 8.1 mm 193 g162 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 177 g161 mm 74 mm 8 mm 176 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø42.6 (32.8-52.8)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø85.3 (41.8-94)
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (603min - 673max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s -48%
Realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (279min - 332max) MBit/s -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (141min - 293max) MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (481min - 662max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
310 (271min - 334max) MBit/s -36%
Realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (218min - 328max) MBit/s -37%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø485 (425-550)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (326-669)
GPS Test: Sammanfattning
GPS Test: Sammanfattning
GPS Test: Sjö
GPS Test: Sjö
GPS Test: Vägskäl
GPS Test: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 8.22 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 16.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
52 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
31 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 34.97 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 51.98 ∆E
514
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 567 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 524.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: 995:1 (Svärta: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G 5G
LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Realme 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Samsung Galaxy A52
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-30%
-64%
-126%
-42%
-2%
Brightness middle
567
586
3%
527
-7%
581
2%
694
22%
653
15%
Brightness
524
565
8%
499
-5%
563
7%
696
33%
651
24%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
86
-1%
98
13%
98
13%
Black Level *
0.57
0.61
-7%
0.38
33%
Contrast
995
961
-3%
1387
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.74
-74%
3.5
-250%
4.34
-334%
2
-100%
1.2
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.1
4.09
-95%
7.3
-248%
7.15
-240%
6.7
-219%
2.9
-38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
3
-76%
2.9
-71%
4.9
-188%
1.7
-0%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.244 98%
2.29 96%
2.327 95%
2.1 105%
2.25 98%
CCT
6343 102%
6000 108%
6502 100%
7658 85%
6440 101%
6426 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 38 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
657 Points -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points -29%
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
545 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (728 - 784, n=2)
756 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1044 Points +43%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1987 Points -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points -38%
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1694 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1622 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (2657 - 2768, n=2)
2713 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3484 Points +31%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1143 Points -51%
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1198 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1176 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1182 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (2324 - 2649, n=2)
2487 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (611 - 21989, n=45, last 2 years)
8792 Points +278%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1245 Points -53%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points -42%
Realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1237 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1226 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1293 Points -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (2668 - 2830, n=2)
2749 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 18407, n=43, last 2 years)
8338 Points +213%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
125.1 Points +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (62 - 73, n=2)
67.5 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
54.4 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
52.8 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.47 Points -20%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34 Points -45%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco X3 ProMotorola Moto G 5GOppo A73 5GRealme 8 ProSamsung Galaxy A52Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-50%
-58%
-43%
-42%
30%
85%
Sequential Read 256KB
1330
822
-38%
860
-35%
474
-64%
511
-62%
512
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
527
243
-54%
193
-63%
191.7
-64%
267.1
-49%
268
-49%
Random Read 4KB
203.1
157.8
-22%
102.2
-50%
98.5
-52%
135.5
-33%
146.5
-28%
Random Write 4KB
176.9
167.8
-5%
88.1
-50%
84.8
-52%
127.3
-28%
126.7
-28%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; Armajet; 1.59.8: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.8.4a: Ø58.8 (44-60)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro; PUBG Mobile; 1.4.0: Ø30 (29-31)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.4 (3313min - 3471max) %
Hög belastning
 40.4 °C40.5 °C40.3 °C 
 39.1 °C39 °C40 °C 
 36.6 °C37.4 °C39.2 °C 
Max: 40.5 °C
Medel: 39.2 °C
37.7 °C38.8 °C39 °C
36.6 °C38.2 °C38.4 °C
36.4 °C37.6 °C37.9 °C
Max: 39 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.134252831.53124.124.14025.328503640.6632427.18020.62010014.52112510.32716013.646.220011.749.525011.454.231512.458.140010.161.450011.767.563011.567.580010.170.3100010.372.6125010.974.8160012.475.6200010.777.3250011.979.6315012.778400013.180.5500013.178.9630013.672.2800014.369.21000013.669.41250014.1651600014.663.1SPL24.588.3N0.570.9median 12.4median 69.4Delta1.68.8383628.933.923.837.825.337.73940.323.442.619.342.116.143.210.54415.345.71548.29.655.212.459.610.163.511.466.81171.514.574.610.97913.582.210.881.111.481.31280.712.580.91379.213.179.813.675.513.470.913.569.913.970.914.758.624.891.10.683.8median 13median 71.51.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X3 ProOppo A73 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oppo A73 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.79 / 2.21 / 2.26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.17 / 10.09 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
32%
27%
15%
-24%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.79
1.3
-65%
0.58
27%
0.88
-11%
1.05
-33%
0.89 ?(0.79 - 0.99, n=2)
-13%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.5
32%
1.86
16%
1.8
19%
1.8
19%
3.21 ?(2.21 - 4.2, n=2)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
2.1
7%
1.88
17%
1.84
19%
1.85
18%
3.24 ?(2.26 - 4.22, n=2)
-43%
Load Average *
6.17
7
-13%
3.1
50%
2.65
57%
4.2
32%
7.03 ?(6.17 - 7.88, n=2)
-14%
Load Maximum *
10.09
8.9
12%
5.01
50%
4.86
52%
6.29
38%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
39tim 32min
WiFi Websurfing
14tim 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 13min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 36min
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Realme 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
62%
14%
-2%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2372
2093
-12%
1489
-37%
H.264
973
1027
6%
1232
27%
WiFi v1.3
879
1056
20%
1426
62%
1006
14%
836
-5%
753
-14%
Load
276
289
5%
283
3%

För

+ Ljusstark IPS-skärm med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz
+ IP53-certifiering
+ UFS 3.1-lagring
+ NFC
+ Bra GPS
+ Snabb Snapdragon 860 SoC
+ Stereohögtalare
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Ej 5G
- Endast hybrid Dual-SIM
- Svag makrolins
- Stryps vid belastning

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 2.500 kronor

Recension av Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.
Recension av Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Poco X3 Pro visar sig vara en värdig representant för Xiaomis Poco-serie, för även den ger mycket för pengarna. En höjdpunkt är att den har en Snapdragon 860 SoC, som är en aning utdaterad tekniskt sett men som har prestanda som ligger över genomsnittet för mittenskiktet.

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro är en riktigt snabb mittenskiktstelefon med massor av funktioner till ett lågt pris.

Poco X3 Pro får också poäng för en IPS-skärm med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, gedigen batteritid, snabb UFS 3.1-lagring samt en huvudkamera på 48 MP som tar bra bilder i dagsljus. Dessutom har den mindre viktiga men ändå trevliga detaljer som IP53-certifiering, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, NFC, IR-sändare, notis-LED samt stereohögtalare.

Listan över brister är också ganska liten för Xiaomis smartphone: makrokameran på 2 MP känns knappt användbar på grund av den låga upplösningen och Poco X3 Pro kommer varken med 5G eller OLED-skärm. Vill man ha detta kan man till exempel titta på Poco F3, som kostar runt 3.500 kronor och har ännu högre prestanda.

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro - 05/25/2021 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Design
84%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
53 / 70 → 75%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
60 / 64 → 94%
Programprestanda
78 / 86 → 91%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
60%
Medel
79%
85%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro - Massor av funktioner och kraft till reapris (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2021-06- 2 (Update: 2021-06- 2)