Test: Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G - Snabbare än en Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra? (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % | 10/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G Dimensity 820, Mali-G57 MP5 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2400x1080 | |
82.9 % | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
78.8 % | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2 | 152 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 | |
79.6 % | 06/2020 | Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
79.8 % | 01/2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
75.7 % | 05/2020 | Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.55" | 1600x720 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Nokia 5.3 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraLow LightHauptkameraWeitwinkel![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/e/2/csm_Farbchart_high_4aa8b64242.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/4/a/csm_Farbchart_low_1c5955ad8f.jpg)
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 608 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.291
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 24% | 19% | -30% | -27% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 608 | 610 0% | 554 -9% | 442 -27% | 594 -2% | 523 -14% |
Brightness | 608 | 579 -5% | 559 -8% | 419 -31% | 613 1% | 482 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 92 -4% | 92 -4% | 90 -6% | 89 -7% | 86 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.46 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 1.8 55% | 2 50% | 6.1 -53% | 6.1 -53% | 6.22 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.65 | 3 74% | 7.7 34% | 9.7 17% | 10.6 9% | 10.56 9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.5 24% | 1.6 52% | 5.9 -79% | 7 -112% | 8 -142% |
Gamma | 2.291 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.226 99% |
CCT | 7023 93% | 6864 95% | 6589 99% | 7631 85% | 7370 88% | 8856 73% |
Contrast | 1649 | 1195 | 1137 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 227.3 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=7, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A41 | Realme 6 Pro | Oppo A91 | Nokia 5.3 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -41% | -44% | -31% | -43% | -45% | -29% | 65% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 999 | 498.1 -50% | 299.9 -70% | 513 -49% | 505 -49% | 299.5 -70% | 760 ? -24% | 1717 ? 72% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 479.5 | 171.1 -64% | 211.1 -56% | 203.3 -58% | 185.3 -61% | 243.2 -49% | 297 ? -38% | 1322 ? 176% |
Random Read 4KB | 239.4 | 122.6 -49% | 84 -65% | 158.7 -34% | 145.6 -39% | 109.1 -54% | 152.9 ? -36% | 265 ? 11% |
Random Write 4KB | 289.6 | 112.9 -61% | 72.5 -75% | 154 -47% | 28.55 -90% | 45.2 -84% | 131.6 ? -55% | 292 ? 1% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.5 ? | 76.7 ? -9% | 83 ? -2% | 86.4 ? 2% | 77.2 ? -9% | 77.3 ? -9% | 76 ? -10% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.5 ? | 54.9 ? -15% | 67 ? 4% | 63.4 ? -2% | 60.3 ? -7% | 60.7 ? -6% | 59.6 ? -8% |
PUBG mobile
Dead Trigger 2
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A41 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Låg belastning | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hög belastning |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 820 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | 33% | 13% | 32% | 0% | 14% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.75 53% | 0.96 40% | 0.92 42% | 0.82 49% | 1.6 ? -0% | 0.902 ? 44% | |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 2.19 -15% | 1.57 17% | 1.79 6% | 1.73 9% | 1.9 ? -0% | 1.448 ? 24% | |
Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.24 -7% | 1.61 23% | 1.88 10% | 1.75 17% | 2.1 ? -0% | 1.608 ? 23% | |
Load Average * | 5.1 | 3.88 24% | 2.93 43% | 5.41 -6% | 2.33 54% | 5.1 ? -0% | 6.1 ? -20% | |
Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 5.97 33% | 4.97 44% | 7.59 15% | 5.97 33% | 8.9 ? -0% | 9.04 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G 4520 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 804 | 1175 46% | 650 -19% | 1031 28% | 605 -25% | 876 9% |
För
Emot
Omdöme för Redmi 10X 5G - A stark Redmi-smartphone
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Tack vare en MediaTek Dimensity 820 är 5G-versionen av Redmi 10X en spännande mittenskiktstelefon med ett lågt pris. För runt 2.000 kronor har Redmi-telefonen relativt hög prestanda, snabb lagring och snabbt WLAN. Dessutom har den en fingeravtrycksläsare som fungerar riktigt bra och som är en av de snabbaste, kanske till och med den snabbaste, i sin prisklass.
Redmi 10X är en utmärkt smartphone för 2.000 kronor.
Tyvärr är det inte särskilt troligt att Redmi 10X 5G kommer att hitta vägen till Europa, vilket gör att man får acceptera begränsningarna som kommer med en importerad telefon och en Kinesisk version av MiUI.
Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich