Test: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 613 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1088:1 (Svärta: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Maze Alpha X IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Ulefone Power 3 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Gigaset GS370 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -93% | -4% | 1% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 620 | 497 -20% | 494 -20% | 627 1% | 472 -24% |
| Brightness | 612 | 478 -22% | 485 -21% | 622 2% | 468 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 87 -9% | 87 -9% | 82 -15% | 92 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.6 -5% | 0.33 42% | 0.41 28% | 0.73 -28% |
| Contrast | 1088 | 828 -24% | 1497 38% | 1529 41% | 647 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 11.6 -235% | 5.1 -47% | 4.5 -30% | 6.8 -97% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.88 | 22.1 -180% | 9.9 -26% | 7 11% | 14.5 -84% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 13.5 -246% | 3.5 10% | 5.1 -31% | 8.2 -110% |
| Gamma | 2.073 106% | 2.93 75% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7230 90% | 9955 65% | 7253 90% | 7201 90% | 7924 82% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Maze Alpha X | |
| Ulefone Power 3 | |
| Honor 9 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
| Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12) | |
| Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | Maze Alpha X | Ulefone Power 3 | Honor 9 Lite | Gigaset GS370 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | 36% | 136% | 15% | 51% | 1442% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270 | 247.4 -8% | 294.6 9% | 269.6 0% | 284.9 6% | 274 ? 1% | 1867 ? 591% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 194.5 | 162.2 -17% | 214.9 10% | 138.2 -29% | 182.4 -6% | 176.2 ? -9% | 1451 ? 646% |
| Random Read 4KB | 79.5 | 70.3 -12% | 61.4 -23% | 68.4 -14% | 48.4 -39% | 59.4 ? -25% | 279 ? 251% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.1 | 11.61 64% | 21.25 199% | 66.8 841% | 17.1 141% | 32 ? 351% | 311 ? 4280% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.4 | 81 ? -4% | 81.8 ? -3% | 83.1 ? -2% | 76.5 ? -9% | 77.4 ? -8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.5 | 74 ? 24% | 71.9 ? 21% | 71.9 ? 21% | 56.1 ? -6% | 58.3 ? -2% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 31 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
| minimal | 54 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.7 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.2 / 7.2 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS370 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 31% | 21% | 24% | 13% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.9 -29% | 0.79 -13% | 0.85 -21% | 0.77 -10% | 0.981 ? -40% | 0.885 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 2.8 | 2.14 24% | 1.82 35% | 2 29% | 1.58 44% | 1.985 ? 29% | 1.451 ? 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.4 | 2.18 36% | 1.87 45% | 2.04 40% | 1.73 49% | 2.27 ? 33% | 1.608 ? 53% |
| Load Average * | 4.2 | 3.96 6% | 2.7 36% | 3.23 23% | 3.59 15% | 3.51 ? 16% | 6.55 ? -56% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 5.81 19% | 3.62 50% | 4.93 32% | 5.69 21% | 5.38 ? 25% | 9.92 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh | Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS370 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 21% | 177% | 21% | -2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 497 | 603 21% | 1376 177% | 601 21% | 487 -2% |
| Reader / Idle | 1624 | 965 | |||
| Load | 240 | 253 | |||
| H.264 | 622 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus har ett modernt 18:9-skärmformat med tunn infattning, bra röstkvalitet, utmärkt högtalare, högkvalitativt hölje och hyfsade prestandavärden.
Men du får inte ha för höga förväntningar på kameran och batteritiden. För mindre tekniska användare kan det också vara svårt att lista ut att det inbyggda energisparläget blockerar GPS-funktionen i en del appar. Surfar man mycket på nätet kommer man kanske inte vara nöjd med Redmi 5 Plus, det finns betydligt snabbare enheter för det.
Trots att en del funktioner känns lite ojämna så är Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus ett bra erbjudande.
Borde du köpa denna smartphone från Xiaomi? Vi hade sagt ja. Om du kan leva med svagheterna vi nämnt så erbjuder den här telefonen ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. Även om detta på papperet inte längre är riktigt så bra som för några av dess föregångare så fungerar många saker såsom garantin bättre nu.
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
- 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
