Test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - En 5G-smartphone med en 120 Hz-skärm till reapris (Sammanfattning)
Jämförelseenheter
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | Realme XT SD 712, Adreno 616 | 183 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | ||
81.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Xiaomi Mi 9T SD 730, Adreno 618 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.39" | 2340x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Nokia 7.2 SD 660, Adreno 512 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
79.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 159 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.15" | 2312x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Realme XT | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Realme XT | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 658 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1343:1 (Svärta: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Realme XT Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 7.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition IPS, 2312x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -64% | -1% | -47% | -16% | -40% | |
Brightness middle | 658 | 414 -37% | 589 -10% | 604 -8% | 589 -10% | 507 -23% |
Brightness | 643 | 414 -36% | 589 -8% | 593 -8% | 589 -8% | 481 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 96 3% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 88 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.4 18% | 0.38 22% | |||
Contrast | 1343 | 1510 12% | 1334 -1% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.4 -144% | 2.5 -39% | 5.1 -183% | 2.22 -23% | 4.72 -162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 11.2 -155% | 4.9 -11% | 10.3 -134% | 8.24 -87% | 7.84 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.3 -13% | 1.6 58% | 6.4 -68% | 2.6 32% | 5.5 -45% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.111 104% | 2.158 102% |
CCT | 6255 104% | 6532 100% | 6544 99% | 8149 80% | 6508 100% | 7596 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 43 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (4227 - 8690, n=8, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (7838 - 19281, n=8, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (3187 - 7017, n=8, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Realme XT | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Realme XT (Chrome 79) | |
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | Realme XT | Xiaomi Mi 9T | Nokia 7.2 | Samsung Galaxy A51 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -12% | -55% | -17% | 48% | 17% | 214% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 890 | 483.8 -46% | 492.7 -45% | 290.8 -67% | 496.1 -44% | 800 -10% | 760 ? -15% | 1839 ? 107% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 312.8 | 173.7 -44% | 179.2 -43% | 161.4 -48% | 184.9 -41% | 391.1 25% | 297 ? -5% | 1425 ? 356% |
Random Read 4KB | 96.8 | 112.5 16% | 128.6 33% | 79.6 -18% | 110.8 14% | 198.7 105% | 152.9 ? 58% | 277 ? 186% |
Random Write 4KB | 101 | 25 -75% | 107.8 7% | 13.38 -87% | 104.4 3% | 171.6 70% | 131.6 ? 30% | 309 ? 206% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9: Legends
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Realme XT audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.66 / 2.37 / 2.42 Watt |
Hög belastning |
6.8 / 7.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Realme XT 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 38% | 44% | 1% | 11% | 1% | 9% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.66 | 0.55 17% | 0.54 18% | 0.77 -17% | 0.9 -36% | 0.95 -44% | 0.965 ? -46% | 0.894 ? -35% |
Idle Average * | 2.37 | 1.39 41% | 0.95 60% | 2.32 2% | 1.7 28% | 2.1 11% | 1.899 ? 20% | 1.456 ? 39% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.42 | 1.44 40% | 1.08 55% | 2.41 -0% | 1.8 26% | 2.4 1% | 2.07 ? 14% | 1.616 ? 33% |
Load Average * | 6.8 | 2.97 56% | 2.7 60% | 4.44 35% | 5.2 24% | 4.2 38% | 3.98 ? 41% | 6.45 ? 5% |
Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 4.92 34% | 5.4 28% | 8.79 -17% | 6.6 12% | 7.7 -3% | 6.19 ? 17% | 9.8 ? -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Realme XT 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | 25% | -29% | 1% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 2083 | 2138 3% | 1689 -19% | 1359 -35% | ||
H.264 | 734 | 1208 65% | 846 15% | 802 9% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 802 | 718 -10% | 991 24% | 570 -29% | 698 -13% | 719 -10% |
Load | 243 | 258 6% | 289 19% | 223 -8% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Xiaomi omdefinierar återigen smartphonemarknadens mittenskikt
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Redmi K30 ser inte bara bra ut; den är också otroligt välutrustad för ett utgångspris på runt 3.000 kronor. 5G-stöd och en 120 Hz-skärm, som exempel, fanns tidigare bara på flaggskeppstelefoner. Den nya Sony IMX686 bildsensorn presterade också bra vid fotografering i dagsljus och sätter en ny standard för smartphone-kameror från mittenskiktet. Det nya Qualcomm-chippet har dessutom tillräckligt med prestanda för moderna spel.
Om Xiaomi börjar sälja en europeisk motsvarighet till Redmi K30 5G kan du nog inte hitta något bättre alternativ för 3.000 kronor just nu.
Även om det är mycket som talar för Redmi K30 5G stötte vi på några problem med vår recensionsenhet. Om vi ignorerar begränsningarna som kommer med att använda en Kinesisk version i Europa så saknar Redmi K30 också fördelarna man får av en OLED-skärm. I praktiken innebär detta att Redmi K30 har ett svagare kontrastförhållande än sina konkurrenter och den har dessutom IPS-typiska ljuscirklar. Skärmen använder också PWM, men så är även fallet med det flesta OLED-paneler. Mikrofonerna på vår recensionsenhet övertygade heller inte, men en andra recensionsenhet borde kunna bekräfta huruvida detta är ett isolerat problem. Totalt sett är Redmi K30 5G en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon som vi hoppas att snart få se i Europa.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
- 02/17/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich