Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Brand: Xiaomi

Quality does not have to be expensive.

Med Redmi Note 5A Prime erbjuder Xiaomi en robust enhet på 5.5 tum till ett lågt pris. Utöver en selfiekamera på 16 MP kommer den med en infraröd sensor och kostar under 2.000 kronor. I den här recensionen klarar vi upp vilka kompromisser som har behövt göras på grund av dess låga rekommenderade pris.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/24/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Minne

3 GB

Skärm

5.50 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 267 PPI, kapacitiv, native pen support, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD, upp till 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (B2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (B1/2/5/8), 4G FDD-LTE (B1/3/4/5/7/8/20), 4G TDD-LTE (B38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 153 x 76.2

Batteri

3080 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 32 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 240 tim

Operativsystem

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1080p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED-blixt, 1080p@30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: 1 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-laddare, MicroUSB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (huvud): 0,504 W/kg, SAR-värde (kropp): 1,683 W/kg

Vikt

153 g, Strömförsörjning: 55 g

Pris

200 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.6 MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 MBit/s
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.1 MBit/s -1%
Gigaset GS185 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.7 MBit/s -4%
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 MBit/s +5%
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 MBit/s +2%
Gigaset GS185 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.8 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 MBit/s -16%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Sony A77

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

Testkarta (detalj) - Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime


474 cd/m²	480 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	469 cd/m²	459 cd/m²
455 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	455 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 463.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 469 cd/m²
Kontrast: 782:1 (Svärta: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Alcatel 3X IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	HTC Desire 12 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Gigaset GS185 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		18%	-26%	1%	-43%
Brightness middle	469	429 -9%	418 -11%	701 49%	426 -9%
Brightness	464	421 -9%	414 -11%	720 55%	412 -11%
Brightness Distribution	92	84 -9%	93 1%	87 -5%	86 -7%
Black Level *	0.6	0.13 78%	0.7 -17%	0.5 17%	0.7 -17%
Contrast	782	3300 322%	597 -24%	1402 79%	609 -22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.31	4.86 -47%	4.2 -27%	4.97 -50%	5.3 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.68	8.83 -32%	8.3 -24%	13.31 -99%	10.2 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	6 -150%	4.7 -96%	3.3 -38%	6.3 -163%
Gamma	2.155 ^102%	2.231 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.2 ^100%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6626 ^98%	8103 ^80%	7394 ^88%	8056 ^81%	8073 ^81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	45762 Points
Alcatel 3X	31718 Points -31%
Umidigi S2 Lite	43125 Points -6%
Gigaset GS185	37339 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (42643 - 46814, n=11)	44884 Points -2%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	57683 Points
Alcatel 3X	42032 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	56497 Points -2%
Umidigi S2 Lite	56639 Points -2%
Gigaset GS185	45092 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (56672 - 59326, n=4)	57644 Points 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	Points
Alcatel 3X	4711 Points
HTC Desire 12 Plus	5393 Points
Umidigi S2 Lite	4371 Points
Gigaset GS185	3961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4316 - 5438, n=10)	4876 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	3702 Points
Alcatel 3X	3210 Points -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	4759 Points +29%
Umidigi S2 Lite	3348 Points -10%
Gigaset GS185	3229 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3538 - 3928, n=11)	3737 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	948 Points
Alcatel 3X	206 Points -78%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1158 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	886 Points -7%
Gigaset GS185	676 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (282 - 1072, n=9)	792 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +586%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1774 Points
Alcatel 3X	1302 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	2898 Points +63%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1870 Points +5%
Gigaset GS185	1217 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1489 - 1980, n=9)	1734 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +483%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	791 Points
Alcatel 3X	982 Points +24%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	849 Points +7%
Umidigi S2 Lite	840 Points +6%
Gigaset GS185	617 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (557 - 1224, n=9)	831 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +792%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	788 Points
Alcatel 3X	150 Points -81%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	965 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	645 Points -18%
Gigaset GS185	440 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (591 - 789, n=9)	759 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +2184%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	729 Points
Alcatel 3X	9 Points -99%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	756 Points +4%
Umidigi S2 Lite	607 Points -17%
Gigaset GS185	632 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (10 - 744, n=9)	543 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +116%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	678 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	741 Points +9%
Umidigi S2 Lite	624 Points -8%
Gigaset GS185	683 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (637 - 691, n=10)	663 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +727%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2576 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3272 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite	2671 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185	1871 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2210 - 2889, n=10)	2610 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +512%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2204 Points
Alcatel 3X	Points -100%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1762 Points -20%
Gigaset GS185	1460 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1782 - 2512, n=8)	2115 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +470%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	9915 Points
Alcatel 3X	3418 Points -66%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12604 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9774 Points -1%
Gigaset GS185	6125 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (8137 - 9961, n=10)	9688 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	10202 Points
Alcatel 3X	2898 Points -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12347 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9716 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185	5474 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7924 - 10302, n=10)	9970 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	9027 Points
Alcatel 3X	9188 Points +2%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13596 Points +51%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9984 Points +11%
Gigaset GS185	10496 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7095 - 9345, n=10)	8887 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	602 Points
Alcatel 3X	151 Points -75%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	810 Points +35%
Umidigi S2 Lite	547 Points -9%
Gigaset GS185	68 Points -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (465 - 635, n=11)	599 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +598%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	533 Points
Alcatel 3X	125 Points -77%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	716 Points +34%
Umidigi S2 Lite	477 Points -11%
Gigaset GS185	54 Points -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (404 - 566, n=11)	525 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +789%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1107 Points
Alcatel 3X	538 Points -51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1504 Points +36%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1127 Points +2%
Gigaset GS185	867 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (995 - 1360, n=11)	1188 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	320 Points
Alcatel 3X	94 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	441 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite	378 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (230 - 341, n=11)	313 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +839%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	265 Points
Alcatel 3X	76 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	367 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite	317 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (188 - 281, n=11)	258 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +1095%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	1148 Points
Alcatel 3X	546 Points -52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1521 Points +32%
Umidigi S2 Lite	1170 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1016 - 1340, n=11)	1192 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +184%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	20 fps
Alcatel 3X	9 fps -55%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	34 fps +70%
Umidigi S2 Lite	25 fps +25%
Gigaset GS185	13 fps -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (9.7 - 28, n=11)	20.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +333%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	17 fps
Alcatel 3X	4.9 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	21 fps +24%
Umidigi S2 Lite	17 fps 0%
Gigaset GS185	7.6 fps -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11 - 25, n=11)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +1641%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	15 fps
Alcatel 3X	5 fps -67%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	18 fps +20%
Umidigi S2 Lite	13 fps -13%
Gigaset GS185	5.6 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.5 - 16, n=11)	11.1 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +407%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	7.6 fps
Alcatel 3X	2.2 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	9.2 fps +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite	6.9 fps -9%
Gigaset GS185	2.8 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.6 - 15, n=11)	7.51 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +2203%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	11 fps
Alcatel 3X	3.1 fps -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13 fps +18%
Umidigi S2 Lite	9.9 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3.5 - 12, n=11)	8.68 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +506%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	4.9 fps
Alcatel 3X	1.3 fps -73%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	6 fps +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.6 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.3 - 5, n=11)	4.11 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +2437%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	5.6 fps
Alcatel 3X	1.6 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	7 fps +25%
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.8 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 5.9, n=11)	4.21 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +784%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	2.7 fps
Alcatel 3X	0.77 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3.4 fps +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite	2.4 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 2.8, n=11)	2.55 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +2670%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS185 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	22.16 Points +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	19.18 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (16.5 - 20.6, n=11)	18.2 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	17.76 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	17.55 Points
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	15.41 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1071%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	3993 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	3506 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	3293 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2689 - 3314, n=11)	3112 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	3084 Points -6%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	2838 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	17275 ms * -27%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)	13666 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)	13586 ms *
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	13114 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11007 - 13586, n=11)	12667 ms * +7%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	11572 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime	Alcatel 3X	HTC Desire 12 Plus	Umidigi S2 Lite	Gigaset GS185	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-19%	-2%	-19%	-25%	-6%	969%
Sequential Read 256KB	287.1	260.5 -9%	252.8 -12%	271 -6%	275.7 -4%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -16%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 557%
Sequential Write 256KB	120.3	127.7 6%	135.6 13%	75 -38%	45.54 -62%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -16%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 1123%
Random Read 4KB	47.87	26.05 -46%	65.7 37%	36.4 -24%	31.71 -34%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -10%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 481%
Random Write 4KB	17.15	9.62 -44%	9.16 -47%	11.6 -32%	9.05 -47%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 31%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 1713%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	77.5 -8%	84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	51.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	59.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	56.5 -6%	59.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -12%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


42.3 °C	38.7 °C	38.8 °C
40.9 °C	37.5 °C	40.6 °C
39.9 °C	37.8 °C	38.8 °C

Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 39.5 °C


34.9 °C	39.4 °C	42.6 °C
35.8 °C	38.9 °C	40 °C
35.9 °C	38.9 °C	39.5 °C

Max: 42.6 °C
Medel: 38.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 40.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastning	1.8 / 2.4 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning	4 / 6.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-11%	31%	10%	35%	3%	3%
Idle Minimum *	1.8	2 -11%	0.68 62%	0.8 56%	0.54 70%	1.369 ?(0.57 - 4.02, n=11) 24%	0.881 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Average *	2.4	2.5 -4%	2.05 15%	1.6 33%	1.74 27%	2.55 ?(1.4 - 6, n=11) -6%	1.463 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years) 39%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	3.2 -10%	2.12 27%	3.5 -21%	1.78 39%	2.86 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=11) 1%	1.618 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	4	5.2 -30%	3 25%	4.6 -15%	3.55 11%	4.38 ?(2.89 - 7.34, n=11) -10%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -64%
Load Maximum *	6.3	6.3 -0%	4.57 27%	6.5 -3%	4.66 26%	5.95 ?(4 - 9.6, n=11) 6%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) -57%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		10tim 47min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime 3080 mAh	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Gigaset GS185 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	647	675 4%	545 -16%	645 0%	658 2%

För

+ gedigen batteritid

+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda

+ infraröd sensor

Emot

- skärm med lågt kontrastförhållande

- ingen USB Typ C

Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime erbjuder ett gediget smartphone-paket för användare som lägger stor vikt vid en bra framåtriktad kamera. I dom flesta prestandatester överträffar denna Xiaomi-telefon enheter från samma prisskikt när det kommer till systemprestanda; det är bara grafiskt krävande applikationer som körs aningen långsammare på Redmi-telefonen.

Intresserade köpare får en smartphone med bra batteritid, en skärm på 5.5 tum och en hyfsad kamera. Redmi Note 5A Prime är mer än tillräckligt kapabel att hantera enstaka foton, enklare applikationer och mindre krävande spel.

Xiaomis Redmi Note 5A Prime är en bra smartphone för den genomsnittlige användaren och briljerar med ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime - 07/15/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Design

74%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

79%

Anslutningar

41 / 60 → 68%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

93%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

21 / 63 → 33%

Programprestanda

29 / 70 → 41%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

88 / 91 → 97%

Camera

75%

Medel

72%

81%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison