Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - En drömskärm för den prismedvetne köparen (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Brand: Xiaomi

En överraskande skärm.

Redmi Note 8 är ytterligare en instegstelefon från Xiaomi, men den här modellen omdefinierar vilken kvalitetsnivå man kan förvänta sig av en skärm på en telefon för under 2.000 kronor. Skärmen är ljusstark, kontrastrik och passar till och med för den som är känslig för PWM. Redmi Note 8 är dock inte bara goda nyheter, vilket vår recension konstaterar.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 11/19/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Minne

6 GB

Skärm

6.30 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Kompass, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, USB Typ C, OTG, status-LED, Miracast

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 158.3 x 75.3

Batteri

4000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 8 MP, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. Camera2 API: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0

Övrigt

Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Skyddsfodral, MiUI, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp - 1.089 W/kg, Huvud - 0.191 W/kg. DRM Widevine: L1 (EU) L3 (China), fanless

Vikt

190 g, Strömförsörjning: 51 g

Pris

200 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Enhetsöversikt

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.2 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 SD 665, Adreno 610	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78.4 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610	173.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.09"	1560x720
80.7 % v6 ^(old)	04/2019	Nokia 4.2 SD 439, Adreno 505	161 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.71"	1520x720
75.5 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	Samsung Galaxy A20e Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2	141 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.80"	1560x720
75 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	LG K50 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	170 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.26"	1520x720
70.9 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Gigaset GS195 SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322	180 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.18"	2246x1080
84.6 % v6 ^(old)	05/2019	Honor 20 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	164 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.21"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	303 (242^min - 355^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (2^min - 282^max) MBit/s -43%
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 (51^min - 59^max) MBit/s -82%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 (47^min - 58^max) MBit/s -82%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (23^min - 50^max) MBit/s -87%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (24^min - 40^max) MBit/s -88%
Gigaset GS195 GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25.7 (18^min - 33^max) MBit/s -92%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	339 (320^min - 349^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (18^min - 227^max) MBit/s -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (47^min - 67^max) MBit/s -82%
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (53^min - 57^max) MBit/s -82%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.6 (44^min - 57^max) MBit/s -84%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (35^min - 52^max) MBit/s -84%
Gigaset GS195 GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 (43^min - 53^max) MBit/s -85%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Översikt

GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Cykeltur runt en sjö

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 7.95 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 16.92 ∆E


624 cd/m²	639 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
632 cd/m²	656 cd/m²	647 cd/m²
658 cd/m²	652 cd/m²	639 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 658 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 642.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 656 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1215:1 (Svärta: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1"	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8"	LG K50 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"	Gigaset GS195 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-191%	-114%	-160%	-89%	-155%	-92%	8%
Brightness middle	656	348 -47%	445 -32%	475 -28%	489 -25%	487 -26%	455 -31%	593 -10%
Brightness	643	355 -45%	424 -34%	473 -26%	453 -30%	507 -21%	456 -29%	587 -9%
Brightness Distribution	95	91 -4%	91 -4%	93 -2%	85 -11%	84 -12%	94 -1%	94 -1%
Black Level *	0.54		0.26 52%	0.35 35%	0.42 22%	0.55 -2%	0.58 -7%
Contrast	1215		1712 41%	1357 12%	1164 -4%	885 -27%	784 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	5.86 -433%	5.9 -436%	6.8 -518%	4.75 -332%	5.67 -415%	4.43 -303%	0.9 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	15.6 -550%	9.3 -288%	13.4 -458%	7.75 -223%	13.54 -464%	6.81 -184%	2 17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	3.6 -64%	6.8 -209%	8.7 -295%	4.6 -109%	8.2 -273%	5.4 -145%	1.5 32%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.232 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.33 ^94%	2.164 ^102%	2.27 ^97%	2.248 ^98%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6263 ^104%	7051 ^92%	8443 ^77%	9385 ^69%	7510 ^87%	7569 ^86%	7336 ^89%	6548 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	314 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	177 Points -44%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	155 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (313 - 315, n=3)	314 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +196%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1327 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	809 Points -39%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	832 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1327 - 1392, n=3)	1366 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +127%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	363 Points
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	272 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 371, n=3)	368 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +1050%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1495 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1536 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1212 Points -19%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	773 Points -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1537 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points +69%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=3)	1509 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +267%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5366 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5663 Points +6%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3714 Points -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3480 Points -35%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5335 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points +28%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5134 - 5663, n=3)	5388 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +181%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5122 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5144 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3271 Points -36%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2680 Points -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2631 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5122 - 5144, n=2)	5133 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +134%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7446 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points +7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points -7%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4635 Points -38%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	6601 Points -11%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7388 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points +10%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6498 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points -18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4052 Points -38%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	4644 Points -29%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5829 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points +7%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	23534 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11565 Points -51%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10547 Points -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points +51%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	24654 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11427 Points -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10826 Points -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points +89%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	20354 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12075 Points -41%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	9674 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points -5%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1728 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points -57%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	480 Points -72%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	585 Points -66%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	795 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points +85%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +143%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1607 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points -60%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	423 Points -74%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	503 Points -69%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	667 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points +98%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2378 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	911 Points -62%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1362 Points -43%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2441 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points +36%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1778 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points -57%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	742 Points -58%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	732 Points -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1360 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points +86%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +525%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1668 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points -60%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	701 Points -58%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	644 Points -61%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1233 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points +99%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1082%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2348 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points -60%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1407 Points -40%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2124 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points +40%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1114 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points -53%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	305 Points -73%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	349 Points -69%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	841 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points +97%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +177%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	967 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	257 Points -73%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	288 Points -70%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	710 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2408 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points -32%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	897 Points -63%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1371 Points -43%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2378 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points +34%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	493 Points -57%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	457 Points -60%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	958 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points +107%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +585%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	980 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points -55%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	434 Points -56%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	383 Points -61%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	829 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points +122%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1077%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2298 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points -29%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points -59%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1401 Points -39%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2109 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points +41%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1036 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points -42%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1365 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1140, n=12)	1074 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	898 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points -45%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1220 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 995, n=12)	933 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +245%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2250 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points -10%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2336 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2185 - 2444, n=12)	2281 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +20%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps +58%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps -6%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	26 fps -21%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	36 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps +76%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10)	35.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +162%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	36 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps -44%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	19 fps -47%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	39 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps +114%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10)	35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +678%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	17 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps +100%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps +18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	17 fps 0%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10)	20.7 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +344%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	19 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps +5%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps -42%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	9.8 fps -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10)	19.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +770%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	12 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps +117%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps +17%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 fps -17%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	13 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10)	14.6 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +448%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	13 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps -50%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6 fps -54%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	14 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +802%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps +113%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps +41%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.9 fps -36%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.8 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps +113%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	7.69 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +684%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.9 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps -39%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2.8 fps -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.7 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +132%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)	7.07 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +923%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps +108%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps +8%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.8 fps -6%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3 fps -58%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +588%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps -51%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.7 fps -54%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3.2 fps -60%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +98%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +885%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	4.4 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps +107%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps +9%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.1 fps -7%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1.9 fps -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps +111%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +750%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2.8 fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps -50%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps -50%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1.2 fps -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps +118%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +1043%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.44 (3.6^min - 21.99^max) fps
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.16 fps -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 ()	7.44 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.65 (3.4^min - 18.65^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	10.74 fps +62%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.62 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps +104%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12.1 fps +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2)	8.7 fps +31%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.24 (5.77^min - 20.65^max) fps
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11.99 fps +46%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.41 fps -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps +105%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14.3 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2)	10.1 fps +23%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1092 Score -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	552 Score -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score +76%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1681 Score +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2)	1113 Score -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +413%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2254 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points +13%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1608 Points -29%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	323 Points -86%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2220 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points +48%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9)	2271 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +179%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5006 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3372 Points -33%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2165 Points -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5238 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9)	4825 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +103%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2808 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points +13%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2008 Points -28%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	661 Points -76%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3096 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points +65%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9)	2681 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +141%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1881 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	893 Points -53%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	778 Points -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1462 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points +89%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9)	1906 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +799%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	937 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points +49%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1106 Points +18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 Points -99%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9)	1101 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +67%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	95835 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9)	171951 Points +1%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	41127 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (62570 - 71112, n=9)	68985 Points -3%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9335 Points -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (32489 - 34855, n=9)	33693 Points +2%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	28689 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (27018 - 44461, n=9)	36247 Points -5%
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	16684 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (26864 - 45742, n=9)	32727 Points +19%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +293%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	30.69 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.65 Points
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	30.01 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)	29.2 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.49 Points -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.92 Points -48%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	51.1 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	51 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	50.3 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)	47.5 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	39.08 Points -22%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	27.09 Points -46%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	22.82 Points -55%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +342%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	33 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.8 runs/min
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)	29.5 runs/min -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)	28.9 runs/min -6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.63 runs/min -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	18.23 runs/min -41%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +186%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	62 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	52 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)	50.9 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points -8%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points -27%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	26 Points -50%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +295%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	9591 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	9405 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)	8901 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points -21%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points -49%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	4258 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	12799 ms * -181%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768 ms * -114%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546 ms * -22%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	4853 ms * -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)	4783 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4584 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	4562 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	Xiaomi Mi A3	Nokia 4.2	Samsung Galaxy A20e	LG K50	Gigaset GS195	Honor 20 Lite	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		26%	-41%	-16%	-28%	-46%	-3%	0%	443%
Sequential Read 256KB	297.6	502 69%	220.4 -26%	300.4 1%	263.4 -11%	107.3 -64%	288.1 -3%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) -5%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 518%
Sequential Write 256KB	160.5	184 15%	18.17 -89%	103.6 -35%	78.9 -51%	29.42 -82%	200.9 25%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 21%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 788%
Random Read 4KB	84.8	126.9 50%	17.51 -79%	79.8 -6%	52.1 -39%	28.43 -66%	38.7 -54%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) -2%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 227%
Random Write 4KB	91.2	117.4 29%	4.31 -95%	13.18 -86%	12.03 -87%	4.97 -95%	73.1 -20%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) -40%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 239%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	86.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	78.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	75.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	65.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 25%	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 22%	58.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18%	66.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 27%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) 17%

PUBG Mobile

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; Balanced: Ø24.7 (20-26)

Asphalt 9: Legends

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; High Quality: Ø14.8 (9-23)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8; Standard / low: Ø20.3 (12-31)

Dead Trigger 2

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Ø59.6 (49-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.9 °C	36.2 °C	33.5 °C
35.3 °C	35 °C	33.8 °C
35.2 °C	34.7 °C	34 °C

Max: 36.2 °C
Medel: 34.6 °C


32.6 °C	32.5 °C	35.3 °C
32.3 °C	32.4 °C	34.8 °C
31.8 °C	33.3 °C	34.5 °C

Max: 35.3 °C
Medel: 33.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 26.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (126% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastning	0.62 / 1.77 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning	3.42 / 6.14 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-34%	-1%	14%	18%	-48%	-36%	-24%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	0.62	0.8 -29%	0.74 -19%	0.66 -6%	0.7 -13%	1 -61%	0.9 -45%	1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11) -64%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -44%
Idle Average *	1.77	2 -13%	1.9 -7%	1.63 8%	1 44%	2.1 -19%	1.6 10%	1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11) -7%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	3.3 -83%	2.21 -23%	1.67 7%	1.8 -0%	3.2 -78%	2.2 -22%	2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11) -31%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 10%
Load Average *	3.42	4.1 -20%	3.04 11%	2.77 19%	2.4 30%	4.7 -37%	6 -75%	3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11) -10%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -89%
Load Maximum *	6.14	7.7 -25%	4.15 32%	3.66 40%	4.5 27%	9 -47%	9.1 -48%	6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11) -8%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -60%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		35tim 39min
WiFi Websurfing		13tim 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14tim 19min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 37min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	-16%	-11%	0%	6%	-17%
Reader / Idle	2139	1724 -19%		1432 -33%
H.264	859	1023 19%		753 -12%
WiFi v1.3	824	985 20%	696 -16%	715 -13%	822 0%	872 6%	685 -17%
Load	217	297 37%		250 15%

För

+ IPS-skärm av hög kvalitet

+ dual-SIM

+ microSD-kortplats

+ 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

+ bra monohögtalare

+ välbyggd

+ ser lyxig ut

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

+ snabbt WiFi

Emot

- endast BT 4.2?

- UFS-lagring finns bara på Pro-modellen

- den Kinesiska modellen saknar LTE Band 20 och Widevine L3

- svaga kameror för toppmodellen

- ergonomin

Omdöme - Ett totalt sett starkt koncept

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 8. Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Redmi Note 8 är ytterligare en framgångsrik instegstelefon från Xiaomi som har rejält med kraft för den som har en budget att förhålla sig till. Xiaomi har inkluderat utomordentlig hårdvara för priset på runt 1.500 kronor även om det är värt att tänka på att det priset bara gäller den importerade versionen. Konstruktionen och hantverket är av hög kvalitet och vi gillade den stora IPS-skärmen. Även om den sistnämnda inte har samma kontrastförhållande som en OLED-panel använder den inte PWM för att reglera ljusstyrkan vilket är en bonus för personer som är känsliga för den typen av flimmer.

Xiaomi har knappt behövt skära ner på några andra områden heller, men toppmodellen med 128 GB lagring och 6 GB RAM kostar nästan lika mycket som Mi 9T och Mi 9 SE. Även om Redmi Note 8 matchar sina Mi-syskon på många områden kan den inte konkurrera när det kommer till kameran.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 är en framgångsrik instegstelefon. Se bara till att du köper rätt version.

Ett ord om att köpa den importerade varianten från Kina. För det första kan garantiärenden och returer bli kostsamma på ett annat sätt än för en lokalt köpt telefon. För det andra kan den Kinesiska versionen av Redmi Note 8 bara strömma DRM-skyddat innehåll i standardupplösning, en nackdel som den Europeiska modellen inte lider av. Till sist har den Kinesiska modellen inte Google Play-tjänsterna förinstallerade även om de kan installeras i efterhand. Men det är få telefoner för under 2.000 kronor som erbjuder så mycket som Redmi Note 8, så vi kan helhjärtat rekommendera att ta en titt på den Europeiska versionen om du oroar dig över problemen med den Kinesiska modellen.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - 11/12/2019 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Design

84%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

91%

Anslutningar

46 / 70 → 66%

Vikt

89%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

89%

Spelprestanda

13 / 64 → 20%

Programprestanda

57 / 86 → 67%

Temperatur

92%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

60%

Medel

74%

79%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - En drömskärm för den prismedvetne köparen (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-11-19 (Update: 2019-11-19)

Enhetsöversikt

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Asphalt 9: Legends

Dead Trigger 2

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Ett totalt sett starkt koncept

More articles related to this device

Price comparison