Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G - 5G för den lilla budgeten (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

Deal eller ingen deal?

Den minsta versionen av Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T kostar på en del ställen mindre än 2.300 kronor. Det som gör den speciell: Redmi Note 9T är en av de billigaste, om inte den billigaste, 5G-telefonen. Trots det låga priset verkar övrig funktionalitet också vara bra. Detta är tillräcklig anledning att ta en närmare titt på Xiaomis 5G-telefon.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 02/16/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 800U 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

Minne

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Skärm

6.53 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, FHD , Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 108.2 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, Linjär motor, IR-sändare, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/18/26/12/17/19/38/40/41/42), 5G (Band n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78/n79), Huvud SAR 0.592 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0.937 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.05 x 161.9 x 77.3

Batteri

5000 mAh Litiumpolymer, 18 Watt-laddning

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP huvudkamera (1/2" sensor, f/1.9, AF, 4-in-1 Super Pixel) 2 MP djupsensor (f/2.4) 2 MP makrokamera (f/2.4, FF), videoinspelning i upp till 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP selfie-kamera (f/2.25), videoinspelning i upp till 1080p@30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Nätadapter på 22.5W, USB-kabel (Typ A/C), SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

199 g, Strömförsörjning: 62 g

Pris

269.9 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.7 % v7 ^(old)	02/2021	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3	199 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
80 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus SD 765, Adreno 620	207 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2520x1080
80.1 % v7 ^(old)	01/2021	Oppo A73 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3	177 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
80.1 % v7 ^(old)	12/2020	Realme 7 5G Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
80.1 % v7 ^(old)	01/2021	Samsung Galaxy A42 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	193 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	1600x720
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618	215 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Realme 7 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Oppo A73 5G DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	646 (590^min - 656^max) MBit/s +92%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	633 (589^min - 676^max) MBit/s +88%
Realme 7 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	346 (334^min - 352^max) MBit/s +3%
Oppo A73 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	341 (323^min - 361^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	336 (271^min - 355^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	328 (323^min - 332^max) MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	666 (646^min - 677^max) MBit/s +82%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	636 (500^min - 675^max) MBit/s +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	366 (336^min - 379^max) MBit/s
Realme 7 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	355 (300^min - 365^max) MBit/s -3%
Oppo A73 5G Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	340 (313^min - 353^max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 (307^min - 340^max) MBit/s -10%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø361 (336-379)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (271-355)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1 Daylight-Scene 2 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


539 cd/m²	544 cd/m²	520 cd/m²
524 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	547 cd/m²
514 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	554 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Max: 572 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 540.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.49 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 572 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1362:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7"	Oppo A73 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Realme 7 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy A42 5G AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.6"	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		13%	3%	-15%	14%	8%
Brightness middle	572	461 -19%	527 -8%	490 -14%	466 -19%	623 9%
Brightness	540	458 -15%	499 -8%	455 -16%	462 -14%	600 11%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	87 -3%	84 -7%	85 -6%	93 3%
Black Level *	0.42	0.52 -24%	0.38 10%	0.69 -64%		0.54 -29%
Contrast	1362	887 -35%	1387 2%	710 -48%		1154 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.1	1.01 75%	3.5 15%	4.01 2%	2.06 50%	1.8 56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.2	2.1 81%	7.3 35%	8.1 28%	6.14 45%	4.7 58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.5 40%	2.9 -16%	2.6 -4%	1.8 28%	3.3 -32%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.23 ^99%	2.105 ^105%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6525 ^100%	6701 ^97%	6502 ^100%	6828 ^95%	6444 ^101%	6712 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	600 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	596 Points -1%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	516 Points -14%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	598 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	658 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	567 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (596 - 606, n=4)	600 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1021 Points +70%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	1781 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1954 Points +10%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	1638 Points -8%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	1778 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1979 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1787 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1776 - 1805, n=4)	1785 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3404 Points +91%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	1459 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1022 Points -30%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	1575 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1120 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points -25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1459 - 2136, n=4)	1814 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 21892, n=44, last 2 years)	7478 Points +413%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	1935 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1095 Points -43%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	1537 Points -21%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	2089 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1252 Points -35%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1291 Points -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1935 - 2146, n=4)	2062 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 18407, n=38, last 2 years)	7575 Points +291%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	10527 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	9914 Points -6%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	10673 Points +1%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	16039 Points +52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8773 Points -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (10527 - 16039, n=2)	13283 Points +26%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	8738 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	8756 Points 0%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	7395 Points -15%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	11047 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	8063 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8101 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (8738 - 11047, n=2)	9893 Points +13%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	42735 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	23548 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	30852 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	39850 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	40955 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U ()	30852 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	62756 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	29682 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	34605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	56286 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	56640 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U ()	34605 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	20156 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	13664 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	22364 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	19708 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20797 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U ()	22364 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4401 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3521 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	4299 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4044 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3784 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (4204 - 4372, n=3)	4292 Points
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4654 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3694 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	4609 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4189 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3917 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (4609 - 4889, n=3)	4772 Points
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3498 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3024 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3479 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3607 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3382 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (2908 - 3479, n=3)	3193 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4484 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3377 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	4206 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4120 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3918 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (4206 - 4467, n=3)	4350 Points
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4865 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3497 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	4457 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4298 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4086 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (4457 - 5012, n=3)	4811 Points
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3512 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3014 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3512 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3597 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3095 - 3512, n=3)	3281 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3015 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2529 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3146 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2828 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2713 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3142 - 3365, n=3)	3218 Points
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)	3075 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2963 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2418 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3063 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2667 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2559 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3063 - 3317, n=3)	3202 Points
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)	3259 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3445 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3011 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3473 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3588 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3436 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (2881 - 3545, n=3)	3300 Points
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)	3280 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3236 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2653 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3262 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2990 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2865 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3262 - 3291, n=3)	3278 Points
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)	7934 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3165 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2561 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3201 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2845 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2735 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3201 - 3304, n=3)	3268 Points
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)	11805 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3457 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3037 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3497 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3636 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3438 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3205 - 3497, n=3)	3320 Points
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)	4663 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2814 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2410 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3027 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2611 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2506 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (2955 - 3099, n=3)	3027 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=70, last 2 years)	2836 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2844 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2354 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3029 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2548 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2427 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3029 - 3163, n=3)	3096 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=70, last 2 years)	3089 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2802 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2631 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3022 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	2858 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (2550 - 3022, n=3)	2822 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=70, last 2 years)	2696 Points
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	1233 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	835 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1602 - 1607, n=2)	1605 Points
Average of class Smartphone (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)	2859 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	1207 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	720 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1579 - 1586, n=2)	1583 Points
Average of class Smartphone (413 - 22004, n=182, last 2 years)	7761 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	58 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	75 fps +29%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	55 fps -5%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	59 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (58 - 59, n=3)	58.7 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	79 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	86 fps +9%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	67 fps -15%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	83 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	91 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	91 fps +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (79 - 83, n=3)	81.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	289 fps +266%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	47 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	44 fps -6%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	37 fps -21%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	48 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	59 fps +26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps -28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (44 - 48, n=3)	46.3 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +62%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	44 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	50 fps +14%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	37 fps -16%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	51 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	46 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	45 fps +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (44 - 51, n=3)	48.7 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	170.1 fps +287%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	31 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	29 fps -6%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	24 fps -23%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	31 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	56 fps +81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (31 - 31, n=3)	31 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.6 fps +115%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	33 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	33 fps 0%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	27 fps -18%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	35 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	33 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	33 fps 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (33 - 35, n=3)	34 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120.8 fps +266%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	16 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	16 fps 0%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	13 fps -19%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	18 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	33 fps +106%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (16 - 18, n=3)	17 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.7 fps +204%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	17 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	19 fps +12%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	15 fps -12%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	20 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	19 fps +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (17 - 20, n=3)	19 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +328%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	19 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	18 fps -5%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	15 fps -21%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	20 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	33 fps +74%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (19 - 20, n=4)	19.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.6 fps +172%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	21 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	21 fps 0%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	17 fps -19%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	22 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	20 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20 fps -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (21 - 22, n=4)	21.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	82.4 fps +292%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	12 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	11 fps -8%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	9.2 fps -23%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	12 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	21 fps +75%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (12 - 12, n=4)	12 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.5 fps +221%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	7.3 fps
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	7.5 fps +3%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	6.1 fps -16%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	8 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	7.4 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7.5 fps +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (7.3 - 8.1, n=4)	7.85 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	33.2 fps +355%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	279244 Points
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	253013 Points
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	331094 Points
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	299167 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	279048 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U ()	331094 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	3379 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3845 Points +14%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	3019 Points -11%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3350 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3708 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3477 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3350 - 3442, n=3)	3390 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +88%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	6380 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	6745 Points +6%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	5692 Points -11%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	6052 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	7052 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	6542 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (6052 - 6975, n=3)	6469 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +60%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	4838 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4775 Points -1%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	4185 Points -13%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	4877 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4543 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4041 Points -16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (4528 - 4877, n=3)	4748 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	3205 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4697 Points +47%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	2687 Points -16%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	3161 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4017 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3960 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3161 - 3400, n=3)	3255 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +441%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096	1318 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1456 Points +10%
Oppo A73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192	1297 Points -2%
Realme 7 5G MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144	1349 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1468 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1395 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (1307 - 1349, n=3)	1325 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +19%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +208%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)	54.7 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	52.6 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	48.57 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	39.54 Points
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	34 Points -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (28.1 - 39.5, n=2)	33.8 Points -15%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 68)	28.09 Points -29%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)	94.5 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	90.6 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	88.5 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	79 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (51.4 - 83.5, n=3)	71.3 Points -10%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	70.1 Points -11%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)	51.4 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +269%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chome 87)	47.6 runs/min +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	45.2 runs/min +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	43.9 runs/min +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	37.8 runs/min
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	37.7 runs/min 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (26.3 - 37.8, n=2)	32.1 runs/min -15%
Realme 7 5G (Chome 86)	26.3 runs/min -30%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +216%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	78 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)	75 Points +60%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	72 Points +53%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (45 - 58, n=3)	50 Points +6%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	49 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	47 Points
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)	45 Points -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37721 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)	17899 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	17398 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	16629 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	16302 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (9999 - 18123, n=3)	14917 Points -10%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	14886 Points -10%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)	9999 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)	4695 ms * -42%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)	4059 ms * -23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3013 - 4695, n=3)	3669 ms * -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)	3298 ms *
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	2764 ms * +16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	2673 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)	2665 ms * +19%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus	Oppo A73 5G	Realme 7 5G	Samsung Galaxy A42 5G	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-20%	-40%	-27%	-3%	-34%	-2%	106%
Sequential Read 256KB	913	885 -3%	860 -6%	877 -4%	963 5%	506 -45%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -20%	1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 104%
Sequential Write 256KB	483.5	180.2 -63%	193 -60%	188.4 -61%	476 -2%	173.1 -64%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 9%	1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 200%
Random Read 4KB	171.1	138.1 -19%	102.2 -40%	92.6 -46%	168.5 -2%	123.4 -28%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 12%	279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 63%
Random Write 4KB	197	119.3 -39%	88.1 -55%	95.1 -52%	147.7 -25%	112.6 -43%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -6%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	87.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%		84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	86.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -10%	82.3 ?(77.2 - 85.9, n=3) -2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%		63.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	67.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -13%	59.1 ?(49.6 - 64.2, n=3) -7%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.7.00: Ø60.6 (59-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.4 (54-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max; 2.1.0.3849: Ø30 (28-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G; PUBG Mobile; 1.2.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


36.4 °C	36 °C	35.2 °C
35.4 °C	35.2 °C	36.1 °C
34.5 °C	34.6 °C	36 °C

Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C


31.5 °C	33.2 °C	35 °C
30.6 °C	32.6 °C	33.4 °C
31 °C	32.4 °C	32.5 °C

Max: 35 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 25.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (114.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.23 Watt
Låg belastning	0.68 / 2.16 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning	3.63 / 5.78 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh	Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A42 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-59%	14%	-61%	-28%	9%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	1.5 -121%	0.58 15%	1.6 -135%	0.93 -37%	0.787 ?(0.68 - 0.91, n=3) -16%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -30%
Idle Average *	2.16	2.1 3%	1.86 14%	2 7%	2.47 -14%	1.693 ?(1.17 - 2.16, n=3) 22%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 33%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	2.9 -32%	1.88 15%	2.6 -18%	2.51 -14%	1.737 ?(1.23 - 2.2, n=3) 21%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average *	3.63	6.7 -85%	3.1 15%	7.1 -96%	5.62 -55%	3.41 ?(2.76 - 3.85, n=3) 6%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -80%
Load Maximum *	5.78	9.2 -59%	5.01 13%	9.5 -64%	6.93 -20%	5.1 ?(4.57 - 5.78, n=3) 12%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -72%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		59tim 24min
WiFi Websurfing		18tim 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20tim 16min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 02min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh	Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh	Realme 7 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A42 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh
Battery Runtime		-36%	26%	-9%	-12%	-11%
Reader / Idle	3564	1549 -57%			2015 -43%	2427 -32%
H.264	1216	581 -52%			1103 -9%	1188 -2%
WiFi v1.3	1133	914 -19%	1426 26%	1026 -9%	967 -15%	1116 -2%
Load	302	252 -17%			364 21%	280 -7%

För

+ 5G and NFC

+ dual SIM, VoLTE och VoWiFi

+ Låga SAR-värden

+ Stereohögtalare

+ IR-sändare och ljudanslutning

+ Bra kamera i dagsljus

+ Väldigt lång batteritid

+ Snabb mittenskikts-SoC

+ Snabb laddning på 18 Watt

Emot

- Ej IP-certifierad

- Endast 4 GB RAM

- Ingen vidvinkelslins

- Endast 60 Hz-skärm

Omdöme - Budgetsmartphone med få kompromisser

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med Redmi Note 9T har Xiaomi satt ihop ett totalt sett lockande paket som är extra intressant för alla som letar efter en billig 5G-smartphone. För tillfället är det i princip omöjligt att hitta en sådan till ett lägre pris. Men realme 7 5G med 128 GB lagring är väldigt nära Xiaomis telefon i fråga om pris. 64 GB-versionen av Redmi Note 9T kostar några kronor mindre och förtjänar därför vid skrivande stund titeln som billigast 5G-smartphone.

Xiaomis Redmi Note 9T 5G har en stark helhet till ett lågt pris.

Även om vi bortser från 5G är paketet totalt sett bra, men konkurrenterna har också en del att säga. Låt oss börja med att titta på vilka ytterligare fördelar Redmi Note 9T har: den har onekligen ett väldigt uthålligt och snabbladdat batteri på 5.000 mAh, en gedigen IPS-skärm samt en snabb SoC från MediaTek som sätter press på andra mittenskiktstelefoner. Dessutom har den trevliga extrafunktioner som VoLTE/VoWiFi, stereohögtalare, ljudanslutning samt en IR-sändare.

Om du inte verkligen behöver 5G har Redmi Note 9T inte den bästa handen i det här prisskiktet. Stark konkurrens kommer från Xiaomi själva: Xiaomi POCO X3 NFC har 6 GB RAM istället för 4, en bättre kamera samt en 120 Hz-skärm och är en aning billigare än Redmi Note 9T.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G - 02/09/2021 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Design

83%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

89%

Anslutningar

49 / 70 → 70%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

92%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

26 / 64 → 40%

Programprestanda

72 / 86 → 84%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 79%

Camera

56%

Medel

75%

80%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G - 5G för den lilla budgeten (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 2021-02-16 (Update: 2021-02-16)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Budgetsmartphone med få kompromisser

More articles related to this device

Price comparison