Test: Xiaomi Redmi S2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Kontrast: 771:1 (Svärta: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.309
Xiaomi Redmi S2 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 13% | 38% | -14% | 18% | |
Brightness middle | 501 | 393 -22% | 761 52% | 417 -17% | 453 -10% |
Brightness | 483 | 365 -24% | 723 50% | 421 -13% | 459 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 90 0% | 88 -2% | 93 3% |
Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.29 55% | 0.69 -6% | 0.61 6% | |
Contrast | 771 | 1355 76% | 1103 43% | 684 -11% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.74 | 5.28 8% | 2.4 58% | 6.1 -6% | 2.6 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.53 | 9 -6% | 5.2 39% | 11.2 -31% | 9.2 -8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.2 21% | 1.8 66% | 7.1 -34% | 1.6 70% |
Gamma | 2.309 95% | 2.6 85% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 7895 82% | 7086 92% | 6312 103% | 8362 78% | 6356 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | |
Huawei Y7 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67) | |
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Nokia 6 2018 | |
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi S2 | Huawei Y7 2018 | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Nokia 6 2018 | Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -25% | 17% | -16% | -27% | -22% | 623% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 261.4 | 256 -2% | 286.6 10% | 272.6 4% | 208.4 -20% | 242 ? -7% | 1839 ? 604% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 117.7 | 71.5 -39% | 216.1 84% | 118.3 1% | 100.6 -15% | 100.5 ? -15% | 1425 ? 1111% |
Random Read 4KB | 52.5 | 38.8 -26% | 58.4 11% | 38.78 -26% | 24.54 -53% | 43.2 ? -18% | 277 ? 428% |
Random Write 4KB | 68.7 | 9.5 -86% | 62.8 -9% | 15.3 -78% | 10.68 -84% | 22.4 ? -67% | 309 ? 350% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.8 ? | 85 4% | 83.7 ? 2% | 83.4 ? 2% | 81.4 ? 0% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.9 ? | 61.5 1% | 62.1 ? 2% | 61.3 ? 1% | 65.7 ? 8% | 52.9 ? -13% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Inställningar | Värde | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Inställningar | Värde | ||
high | 30 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi S2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.05 / 0.4 Watt |
Låg belastning | 2 / 2.6 / 3.5 Watt |
Hög belastning |
4.6 / 6.7 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi S2 3080 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 26% | 41% | 44% | 48% | 31% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2 | 0.9 55% | 0.5 75% | 0.67 66% | 0.81 59% | 0.981 ? 51% | 0.894 ? 55% |
Idle Average * | 2.6 | 1.9 27% | 1.78 32% | 1.76 32% | 1.26 52% | 1.985 ? 24% | 1.456 ? 44% |
Idle Maximum * | 3.5 | 2.3 34% | 1.81 48% | 1.78 49% | 1.3 63% | 2.27 ? 35% | 1.616 ? 54% |
Load Average * | 4.6 | 4.7 -2% | 3.3 28% | 2.82 39% | 2.87 38% | 3.51 ? 24% | 6.45 ? -40% |
Load Maximum * | 6.7 | 5.7 15% | 5.14 23% | 4.56 32% | 4.82 28% | 5.38 ? 20% | 9.8 ? -46% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi S2 3080 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 35% | 92% | 88% | 62% | |
H.264 | 910 | 687 -25% | 542 -40% | 675 -26% | 868 -5% |
WiFi v1.3 | 1127 | 624 -45% | 702 -38% | 942 -16% | 608 -46% |
Load | 89 | 245 175% | 404 354% | 362 307% | 301 238% |
Reader / Idle | 1305 | 1846 | 1833 | 1616 |
För
Emot
I våra tester visar sig Redmi S2 vara en bra mittenskiktstelefon som stolt kan marschera genom leden av konkurrenter. För att attrahera selfie-fantaster har Xiaomi utrustat vår testenhet med en riktigt bra framåtriktad kamera; ett unikt säljargument jämfört med dess konkurrenter. Även huvudkameran lämpar sig för enstaka foton.
Prestandatesternas resultat kan intyga att telefonens goda systemprestanda borde vara tillräcklig för nästan varje tänkbart app-scenario. Den som letar efter ett kap eller gillar enheter med gedigen, grundläggande hårdvara kommer vara nöjd med Xiaomis senaste modell i Redmi-serien och kan med säkerhet tacka ja till detta erbjudande.
Xiaomi Redmi S2 är en bra mittenskiktstelefon. Med sin högupplösta framåtriktade kamera är enheten inte bara lämplig för selfie-fantaster; tack vare god systemprestanda kan den även tilltala andra intresserade köpare.
Xiaomi Redmi S2
- 07/11/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker