Test: realme 6 Pro - Skryt med höga siffror (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
79.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
81.3 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Lite Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2310x1080 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Oppo A91 | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraZoom (5-fach)UltraweitwinkelLowLight
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 442 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1195:1 (Svärta: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35
Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Huawei P40 Lite IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 9% | 11% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 442 | 594 34% | 478 8% | 622 41% |
Brightness | 419 | 613 46% | 448 7% | 612 46% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 87 -3% | 94 4% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.49 -32% | 0.56 -51% | |
Contrast | 1195 | 976 -18% | 1111 -7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 6.1 -0% | 3 51% | 3.98 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.7 | 10.6 -9% | 5.6 42% | 7.33 24% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 7 -19% | 4.1 31% | 4.5 24% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.206 100% |
CCT | 7631 85% | 7370 88% | 7282 89% | 7361 88% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 114.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2336 Hz | ≤ 38 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (9027 - 13821, n=7) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Oppo A91 | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (7673 - 10181, n=7) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59 - 70, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=171, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (71 - 86, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=171, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (34 - 39, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=171, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (35 - 42, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=171, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (24 - 29, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=171, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (25 - 31, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=171, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (253274 - 288306, n=5) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59.7 - 94.7, n=5) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (53 - 78, n=5) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11846 - 17734, n=5) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2532 - 3577, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81) | |
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Realme 6 Pro | Oppo A91 | Huawei P40 Lite | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 15% | -10% | 10% | 258% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 513 | 505 -2% | 913 78% | 496.6 -3% | 760 ? 48% | 1834 ? 258% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 203.3 | 185.3 -9% | 181.7 -11% | 214.8 6% | 297 ? 46% | 1422 ? 599% |
Random Read 4KB | 158.7 | 145.6 -8% | 157.3 -1% | 137 -14% | 152.9 ? -4% | 278 ? 75% |
Random Write 4KB | 154 | 28.55 -81% | 175.4 14% | 123.6 -20% | 131.6 ? -15% | 310 ? 101% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86.4 ? | 77.2 ? -11% | 82.6 ? -4% | 74.5 ? -14% | 76 ? -12% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.4 ? | 60.3 ? -5% | 70.6 ? 11% | 54.9 ? -13% | 59.6 ? -6% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Realme 6 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P40 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.02 / 0.19 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.92 / 1.79 / 1.88 Watt |
Hög belastning |
5.41 / 7.59 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 8% | -22% | 4% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.92 | 0.82 11% | 0.79 14% | 1.5 -63% | 0.982 ? -7% | 0.895 ? 3% |
Idle Average * | 1.79 | 1.73 3% | 2.14 -20% | 2.1 -17% | 1.94 ? -8% | 1.447 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.88 | 1.75 7% | 2.23 -19% | 2.5 -33% | 2.06 ? -10% | 1.608 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 5.41 | 2.33 57% | 3.6 33% | 5.2 4% | 4.02 ? 26% | 6.41 ? -18% |
Load Maximum * | 7.59 | 5.97 21% | 5.17 32% | 7.5 1% | 6.16 ? 19% | 9.61 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 1031 | 605 -41% | 1007 -2% | 1187 15% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Rejäl Smartphone
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
realme 6 Pro levererar precis vad den lovar i vårt test och kan därför stå som en rejäl konkurrent till andra liknande enheter. Systemprestandan motsvarar den installerade hårdvaran och de övriga komponenterna gör sitt jobb ordentligt. 90 Hz-skärmen säkrar ett pluspoäng, men resulterar också i ett aningen högre pris än andra jämförbara smartphones.
Den som köper realme 6 Pro får precis vad tillverkaren lovat, inklusive en 90 Hz-skärm och tilltalande färger.
Även om den är lockande visuellt sett märks ett par brister på materialvalen. Detta gäller i synnerhet den skyddande filmen på skärmen, som inte bara är känslig för repor utan också gör dra-och-släpp manövrar svårare att utföra. Kameran sticker ut ganska långt på baksidan, men det kompenseras ganska väl av det inkluderade silikonfodralet. I slutändan är realme 6 Pro en rejäl smartphone till ett bra pris som vi inte har någon större anledning att klaga på.
Realme 6 Pro
-
06/15/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker