Notebookcheck Logo

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 recension - Multimediabärbar dator med 120 Hz-skärm och Core Ultra 7

Intel eller AMD trots allt?

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 är en stor bärbar multimediadator som är utrustad med en av de senaste Meteor Lake-processorerna, en 120 Hz-skärm och moderna anslutningsmöjligheter. Lenovo erbjuder dock även en AMD-modell och vi vill ta reda på vilken som är det bästa valet.

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 är en stor bärbar multimediamaskin med den senaste hårdvaran och Lenovo låter köparna välja mellan aktuella Core Ultra-processorer från Intel och Ryzen 8000-chip från AMD. Efter att tidigare ha testat den mindre 14-tums modellen med en AMD-processor, tar vi nu en närmare titt på den större IdeaPad Pro 5 16 som är utrustad med den senaste Core Ultra 7 155H inklusive dess Arc Graphics. För ett pris på cirka 1 400 USD får du även 32 GB RAM, en 1 TB SSD samt en matt 120 Hz IPS-panel med en upplösning på 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar. Du kan som tillval välja IdeaPad med dedikerade GPU:er från Nvidia (RTX 3050 bärbar dator & RTX 4050 bärbar dator).

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 (IdeaPad Pro Serie)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Grafikkort
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kärna: 2250 MHz, 31.0.101.5333
Minne
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, glansig: nej, 120 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, 1024 GB 
, 887 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kortläsare: SDXC
Nätverk
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17.5 x 356 x 251
Batteri
84 Wh, 5285 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 100W USB-C PSU, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.891 kg, Strömförsörjning: 385 g
Pris
1300 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2024
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.9 kg17.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
85 %
v7 (old)
01/2024
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg18.4 mm16.00"1920x1200
89.7 %
v7 (old)
04/2024
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.9 kg15.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
88.1 %
v7 (old)
12/2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.6 %
v7 (old)
10/2023
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000
84.9 %
v7 (old)
02/2024
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm15.60"2880x1620

Hölje - Aluminium med lätt knarrande ljud

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 har ett snyggt grått aluminiumhölje som utan problem kan användas i professionella miljöer. Dess ramar är smala men den har en kamerapuckel som inte är särskilt attraktiv. Det är åtminstone praktiskt, eftersom det gör att du kan öppna den bärbara datorns lock superlätt. Fingeravtrycksmärken är inte ett alltför stort problem på enhetens släta ytor.

När det gäller kvalitet får IdeaPad Pro bra betyg, men vi noterade ett enstaka knarrande ljud från gångjärnen när vi hanterade vår testenhet. På tal om gångjärn, de är i allmänhet väljusterade och tillåter en maximal öppningsvinkel på cirka 170 grader. Basenheten är mycket stabil, medan vi kunde provocera fram lite lätt krusning på skärmen när vi applicerade mycket tryck på locket.

Storleksmässigt skiljer sig konkurrenterna inte mycket från varandra - det är bara MSI Prestige som är märkbart djupare. Med en vikt på knappt 1,9 kg är vår testenhet dock en av de tyngsta enheterna, tillsammans med RedmiBook Pro. Strömförsörjningen på 100 watt väger ytterligare 385 gram.

Storleksjämförelse

358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg358 mm 231 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg356.7 mm 248.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 251 mm 17.5 mm 1.9 kg358.2 mm 246.4 mm 13 mm 1.2 kg355 mm 248 mm 15.9 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Anslutningsmöjligheter - Thunderbolt 4 och HDMI 2.1

Lenovo har utrustat IdeaPad med alla viktiga anslutningar. Intel-modellen har en modern Thunderbolt 4-anslutning, medan en av dess USB-C-portar måste användas för att leverera ström. Konfigurationer med Nvidia GPU:er har en extra SlimTip-anslutning på vänster sida för kraftfullare strömförsörjning. Vid daglig användning kommer du troligen att vara nöjd med båda de vanliga USB-A-portarna och behöver inte sträcka dig efter en adapter.

Vänster: HDMI 2.1, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4, Power Delivery), USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Vänster: HDMI 2.1, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4, Power Delivery), USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, 3,5-mm audio, USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/s), USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbit/s, strömförsörjd)
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, 3,5-mm audio, USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/s), USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbit/s, strömförsörjd)

SD-kortläsare

På enhetens högra sida finns en fullfjädrad SD-kortläsare som i kombination med vårt referenskort (Angelbird AV Pro V60) uppnår en genomsnittlig överföringshastighet på 75-85 MB/s.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182.5 MB/s +146%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.1 MB/s +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
74.1 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60)
24.6 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
221.2 MB/s +153%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.7 MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.5 MB/s
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60)
36.6 MB/s -58%

Kommunikation

Lenovo har installerat en uppdaterad WiFi 6E-adapter, nämligen AX211-modulen från Intel. Under vårt test levererade den höga och stabila överföringshastigheter med hjälp av vår referensrouter från Asus. Vi hade heller aldrig några problem med signalstyrkan i praktisk användning. IdeaPad har inte stöd för Wi-Fi 7.

Networking
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1656 (min: 1459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1666 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼98%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1658 (min: 1616) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1693 (min: 1623) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼53%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼80%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
537 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1443 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 1053) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 1094) MBit/s ∼88%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1391 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1656 (1459-1743)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1617-1687)

Webbkamera

Nästan alla bärbara datorer från Lenovo har en kamerapuckel vid det här laget och det är inte annorlunda på den nya IdeaPad Pro 5 16. Dess 1080p-kamera tar hyfsade foton i bra ljusförhållanden och den har också ett mekaniskt skydd. Dessutom kan den komma åt en IR-sensor för ansiktsigenkänning via Windows Hello. Den stöder dessutom alla de nya webbkamerastudioeffekterna (mjuk fokus, ögonkontakt, huvudspårning) - och det gör AMD-modellen också.

ColorChecker
2.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9: 8.68 ∆E min: 2.67 - max: 17.71 ∆E

Underhåll

Den nedre luckan är säkrad med Torx-skruvar (T5). På insidan finns den kompakta M.2-2242 SSD-enheten samt en extra M.2-2280-kortplats (båda PCIe 4.0) som gör det möjligt att billigt utöka lagringsutrymmet i den bärbara datorn. Vid behov kan WLAN-modulen och batteriet också bytas ut, medan RAM-modulen är fastlödd.

Internt bygge
Internt bygge
Utbytbar WLAN-modul
Utbytbar WLAN-modul
Primär M.2-2242 SSD
Primär M.2-2242 SSD

Inmatningsenheter - En dedikerad numerisk knappsats

IdeaPad Pro 5 16:s mörkgrå tangentbord känns lika lätt att skriva på som på den mindre 14-tumsmodellen, vilket innebär att den hamnar strax bakom de dyrare ThinkPad-datorerna eller bra konkurrenter som Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro. Tangentlyften är tillräcklig och tangenttryckningarna är exakta, men på det stora hela känns tangentbordet lite skakigt och tangenthattarna skulle behöva vara lite fastare. Den större IdeaPad Pro 5 16 har dessutom en dedikerad numerisk knappsats och vit bakgrundsbelysning med två intensitetsinställningar som kan aktiveras automatiskt via en sensor.

Inmatningsenheter
Inmatningsenheter
Bakgrundsbelysning för tangentbord
Bakgrundsbelysning för tangentbord

Klickplattan mäter 13,5 x 8 cm och erbjuder tillräckligt med utrymme för inmatningar. Ytan är fin och slät och vi hade inga problem med att använda den under vårt test - bara ljudet som uppstår när man trycker ned den nedre delen är mycket högt och verkar lite billigt. Vi rekommenderar att du bara knackar på plattan för inmatningar.

Skärm - 120 Hz IPS

Sub-pixel matris
Sub-pixel matris
Lätt blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen (visas något förbättrad)
Lätt blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen (visas något förbättrad)

Köpare av den 16-tums Lenovo bärbara datorn kan välja mellan en OLED-panel eller en IPS-panel vars tekniska specifikationer skiljer sig ganska mycket från varandra. Vår testenhet är utrustad med en IPS-panel med högre upplösning (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar), men den når bara en ljusstyrka på 350 nits och erbjuder sRGB-täckning. OLED-panelen har å andra sidan en mycket lägre upplösning (2 048 x 1 280 pixlar) men kan bli så ljusstark som 400 nits och täcker P3-färgrymden. Subjektivt ser IPS-panelen bra ut men färgerna verkar lite bleka. I det här avseendet kan IdeaPad inte hålla jämna steg med OLED-paneler eller till exempel P3-IPS-panelen som är installerad i RedmiBook Pro. Ljusa områden ser dock inte korniga ut, vi noterade inget IPS-flimmer och dess svarstider är snabba och fina. Rörelser drar också nytta av den höga frekvensen (120 Hz).

Med en genomsnittlig ljusstyrka på 368 cd/m² överträffar panelen de värden som anges av tillverkaren och dess svartvärde är 0,31 cd/m², vilket leder till ett maximalt kontrastförhållande på nästan 1 200:1. Dessa värden är okej, men inte mer. Blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen är inte ett alltför stort problem.

361
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
NE160QDM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 385 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 367.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 368 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1187:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
NE160QDM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Display
4%
33%
29%
39%
36%
Display P3 Coverage
63.3
66.7
5%
98.8
56%
96.7
53%
99.9
58%
99.93
58%
sRGB Coverage
95.2
96.5
1%
100
5%
99.8
5%
100
5%
100
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.3
68.8
5%
89.9
38%
84.6
30%
100
53%
95.52
46%
Response Times
-102%
-102%
-229%
93%
84%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15 ?(7.4, 7.6)
31 ?(14.4, 16.6)
-107%
39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4)
-161%
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-229%
0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29)
96%
2 ?(1, 1)
87%
Response Time Black / White *
10.3 ?(5.6, 4.7)
20.3 ?(10.6, 9.7)
-97%
14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2)
-42%
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-229%
1 ?(0.55, 0.45)
90%
2 ?(1, 1)
81%
PWM Frequency
238.8
240
Screen
-1%
5%
-7%
2%
154%
Brightness middle
368
349
-5%
520
41%
473.6
29%
379.8
3%
370.4
1%
Brightness
368
340
-8%
510
39%
456
24%
383
4%
376
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
80
-12%
93
2%
87
-4%
98
8%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.31
0.24
23%
0.35
-13%
0.19
39%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1187
1454
22%
1486
25%
2493
110%
18520
1460%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
2.8
-17%
2.9
-21%
5.9
-146%
4.7
-96%
1.51
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.5
7.3
-12%
6.2
5%
9.37
-44%
7.51
-16%
2.89
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.8
0.7
12%
1.1
-38%
0.89
-11%
0.55
31%
3.36
-320%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
4.9
-9%
4.3
4%
7.3
-62%
0.8
82%
2.1
53%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.2 100%
2.19 100%
1.9 116%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6324 103%
7328 89%
7422 88%
7260 90%
6381 102%
6536 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-33% / -14%
-21% / -4%
-69% / -31%
45% / 27%
91% / 119%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN gråskala
CalMAN gråskala
CalMAN-mättnad
CalMAN-mättnad
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN gråskala kalibrerad
CalMAN gråskala kalibrerad
CalMAN mättnad kalibrerad
CalMAN mättnad kalibrerad
CalMAN ColorChecker kalibrerad
CalMAN ColorChecker kalibrerad

Tillverkarens kalibrering visar inga större färgavvikelser, men vi uppmätte en liten röd färgnyans och dess färgtemperatur är lite för varm. Med hjälp av vår egen kalibrering kunde vi avsevärt förbättra skärmens avbildning (motsvarande profil kan laddas ner gratis ovan), vilket ledde till extremt låga gråskala- och färgavvikelser. Tillsammans med den fullständiga sRGB-täckningen kan du redigera foton och videor på ett bra sätt.

jämfört med sRGB
jämfört med sRGB
mot P3
mot P3
jämfört med AdobeRGB
jämfört med AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.6 ms rise
↘ 4.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

I solen
I solen
Utomhus (ljus dag utan direkt solljus)
Utomhus (ljus dag utan direkt solljus)

Utomhus märker du snabbt hur begränsad skärmens ljusstyrka är och den skulle behöva vara mycket ljusare för att göra det bekvämt att arbeta utomhus under ljusare dagar. När det gäller betraktningsvinklar märker du bara en betydande kontrastförlust när du tittar på IPS-panelen från diagonalt ovan, men detta bör inte vara i vägen i vardagen.

Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln
Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln

Prestanda - Core Ultra 7 med LPDDR5x RAM

 
 

Testförhållanden

Lenovo erbjuder alla de välkända energiprofilerna(batterisparläge, auto, prestanda), men prestandaläget ger ingen fördel i konfigurationer utan en dedikerad GPU - bara högre fläktar. Vi genomförde därför följande benchmarks och mätningar med hjälp av det förinställda autoläget. Batterisparläget kan också användas för enkla uppgifter utan problem, eftersom profilerna enkelt kan växlas mellan med hjälp av tangentkombinationen Fn+Q.

Processor - Core Ultra 7 155H

Core Ultra 7 Core Ultra 7 155H är en del av Intels senaste Meteor Lake-generation och är efterföljaren till Core i7-13700H. I IdeaPad Pro 5 får processorn förbruka 70 watt under korta stunder och 50 watt under längre perioder av belastning. Detta gör att dess flerkärniga prestanda är mycket bra och överlag något bättre än den mindre IdeaPad Pro 5 14 med Ryzen 7 8845HS (60/50 watt). Dess enkelkärniga prestanda är lika bra, men du bör vara medveten om att Meteor Lake-chip inte riktigt erbjuder någon extra prestanda jämfört med de gamla Raptor Lake-modellerna, men tack vare en förändrad kärnarkitektur arbetar de mycket mer effektivt under låg belastning i synnerhet. I batteriläge förblir CPU-prestandan stabil. Ytterligare CPU-benchmarks kan hittas i vår tekniska sektion.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2651 (2550.53-2701.61)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1949 (1809.79-2490.19)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2289 (2208.24-2361.97)
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51)
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2242 (2190.82-2500.94)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
80 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
79 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
76.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
75.2 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
73.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
72.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
71.3 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
68 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17780 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17401 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
15889 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
15591 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15013 (14365.6min - 15012.9max) Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=47)
14916 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13984 Points -21%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12032 (9372.55min - 12032.4max) Points -32%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
1963 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1777 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1772 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1759 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points -1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=47)
1726 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1719 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1716 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6947 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6671 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6231 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5857 Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=45)
5791 Points -17%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5741 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
5435 Points -22%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4740 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
759 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
691 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
677 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
669 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
668 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
667 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=45)
665 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
629 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2745 (2259.12min - 2745.18max) Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2702 (2550.53min - 2701.61max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2555 (2513.19min - 2555.42max) Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2501 (2190.82min - 2500.94max) Points -7%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2490 (1809.79min - 2490.19max) Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=51)
2445 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points -10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2362 (2208.24min - 2361.97max) Points -13%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1986 (1515.15min - 1985.51max) Points -26%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
274 Points +2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
268 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
268 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
257 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=47)
249 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
236 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
239 Seconds * -23%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=43)
234 Seconds * -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
216 Seconds * -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
214 Seconds * -10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
214 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
195 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
190 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68535 MIPS
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68254 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
65072 MIPS -5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64527 MIPS -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
63244 MIPS -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
61847 MIPS -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=45)
58973 MIPS -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
54022 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
6328 MIPS +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6274 MIPS +15%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6041 MIPS +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5486 MIPS +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
5460 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5458 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=45)
5343 MIPS -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5291 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13501 Points +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years)
13411 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13291 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
13225 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12727 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
12611 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12578 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=50)
12279 Points -8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10763 Points -19%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2807 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2716 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years)
2652 Points +8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2562 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2540 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2459 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2414 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=47)
2378 Points -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13276 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12975 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
12604 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12499 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=47)
12016 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
11817 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11802 Points -9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9516 Points -27%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
2020 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1949 Points +7%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1933 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1875 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1814 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1801 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=47)
1753 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20.3 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.5 fps -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.6 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.4 fps -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
17.1 fps -16%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.9 fps -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)
16.4 fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.4 fps -24%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)
49 s * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.1 s * -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.9 s * -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45.7 s * -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.1 s *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
43.4 s * +2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
38.6 s * +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
36.1 s * +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.504 sec * -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)
0.4819 sec * -4%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4723 sec * -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4692 sec * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4626 sec *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4593 sec * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4464 sec * +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4276 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2702 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
160.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
268 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6947 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
691 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1777 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17780 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
993 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83.8 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
83.6 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
81.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
79.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
78.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
77.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
17924 KRay/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17004 KRay/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
15218 KRay/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14829 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14429 KRay/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
14272 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=45)
13101 KRay/s -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
12685 KRay/s -25%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87764 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78381 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78360 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
77094 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
73606 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72714 Points -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=45)
69488 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65478 Points -25%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3969 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3616 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3545 MB/s -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3519 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3391 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3389 MB/s -15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=45)
3244 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3022 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
108292 Points +27%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
103776 Points +21%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
96417 Points +13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93266 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90849 Points +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88106 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85567 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=45)
83491 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12063 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10647 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10170 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10012 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9329 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9324 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=45)
9119 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8738 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
43855 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
40720 Points -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
38412 Points -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
37438 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36169 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
35833 Points -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=45)
33738 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31662 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
113879 MB/s +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83176 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=45)
78240 MB/s -6%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
76481 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75995 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72068 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68004 MB/s -18%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
54432 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1160 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1058 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1041 MB/s -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
995 MB/s -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=45)
960 MB/s -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
935 MB/s -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
872 MB/s -25%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
822 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9347 KRay/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8903 KRay/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8102 KRay/s -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7952 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7836 KRay/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7584 KRay/s -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6921 KRay/s -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=45)
6848 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
53611 MPixel/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
52218 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=45)
46541 MPixel/s -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46208 MPixel/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40459 MPixel/s -25%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40251 MPixel/s -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36585 MPixel/s -32%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
31055 MPixel/s -42%

Systemets prestanda

Subjektivt sett är den bärbara datorns prestanda imponerande och inmatningar utförs utan märkbara latenser, men i rättvisans namn kan detsamma sägas om nästan alla moderna enheter. Dess RAM kan inte uppgraderas och du bör hålla detta i bakhuvudet om du bestämmer dig för att gå till modellen med 16 GB RAM. Du kan välja maximalt 32 GB RAM.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
7186 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7033 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
6994 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6952 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6472 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
6190 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
11664 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
11289 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11193 Points -1%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11156 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
10964 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10816 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
10099 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
8927 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8705 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
8470 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7979 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7594 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
9999 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
9993 Points
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9720 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
8347 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
7905 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7573 Points -24%
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2090 Points +35%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1811 Points +17%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1804 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1771 Points +15%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1769 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)
1703 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1546 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2030 Points +40%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1798 Points +24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1722 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1704 Points +18%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1693 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1616 Points +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1447 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2151 Points +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2041 Points +10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1928 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1916 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)
1909 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1848 Points
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1821 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points -2%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2094 Points +89%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1775 Points +60%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1572 Points +42%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1556 Points +41%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1474 Points +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1435 Points +30%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
1106 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
321 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
315 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years)
312 Points +9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
306 Points +7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
299 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
285 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
279 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points -3%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
348 Points +34%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
263 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
259 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)
259 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
252 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
250 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
528 ms * -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
525 ms * -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
522 ms * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
517 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)
510 ms * +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
498 ms * +4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
456 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7186 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
94158 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93443 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=45)
83293 MB/s -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80951 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
68580 MB/s -27%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68255 MB/s -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62899 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57062 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87063 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85824 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=45)
79984 MB/s -8%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75886 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
69599 MB/s -20%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58557 MB/s -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
55510 MB/s -36%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50373 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91257 MB/s +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75937 MB/s
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75909 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=45)
72558 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
69752 MB/s -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69292 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69181 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58061 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (120.2 - 233, n=45)
144.2 ns * -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.9 ns * -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
137.6 ns *
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
135.9 ns * +1%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
115.9 ns * +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
106.6 ns * +23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102.3 ns * +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
88.9 ns * +35%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

I vårt standardiserade latensprov (surfing på webben, 4K YouTube-uppspelning, CPU-belastning) visade testenheten med den aktuella BIOS-versionen inga begränsningar vid användning av ljudapplikationer i realtid. Även om en drivrutin visade en avböjning var det viktiga värdet "avbrott till processlatens" lågt.

LatencyMon - översikt
LatencyMon - översikt
LatencyMon - drivrutiner
LatencyMon - drivrutiner
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
998 μs * -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
824.4 μs *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
622.4 μs * +25%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
600.7 μs * +27%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
580.3 μs * +30%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
527.2 μs * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Vårt testexemplar är utrustat med en kompakt M.2-2242 SSD från Samsung (PM9C1a) med en lagringskapacitet på 1 TB, varigenom användarna har 887 GB fritt att använda efter första uppstarten av enheten. PCIe-4.0 SSD:s överföringshastigheter är mycket bra och vi noterade inga begränsningar även under långvarig belastning. För okomplicerad lagringsexpansion kan användarna använda ytterligare en M.2-2280-kortplats (även PCIe 4.0). Fler SSD-riktmärken listas här.

Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5693 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2525 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 223 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 79.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 199.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 489 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
85.8 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
85.4 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
76.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
59 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
55.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
53.2 pt
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
 
51.8 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
50.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4393.32min - 4432.27max) MB/s +37%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4315 (4249.57min - 4315.1max) MB/s +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3237 (3127.1min - 3236.53max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2608 - 3434, n=8)
3082 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2970 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2550 (2480.3min - 2550.14max) MB/s -21%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2534 (2495.65min - 2534.16max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2254 (2201.38min - 2254.23max) MB/s -30%
seq write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4432 (4395.44min - 4431.7max) MB/s +52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3877 (3852.68min - 3877.42max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3092 MB/s +6%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2700 - 3445, n=8)
3030 MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3024 (2941.45min - 3024.09max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2916 (2664.35min - 2915.5max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2330 (2272.26min - 2329.73max) MB/s -20%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1505 (1276.71min - 1504.84max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7107 (6650.61min - 7107.46max) MB/s +38%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6418 (5867.84min - 6417.66max) MB/s +25%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (4845 - 6188, n=8)
5617 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5486 MB/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
5148 (4531.57min - 5148.3max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4921 (3974.96min - 4921.18max) MB/s -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4899 (4572.84min - 4898.89max) MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3727 (3040.66min - 3726.94max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5249 (5168.16min - 5248.53max) MB/s +34%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4927 (1087.79min - 4927.05max) MB/s +26%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (3448 - 4698, n=8)
4251 MB/s +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4169 MB/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3925 (3848.76min - 3924.82max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3880 (3869.46min - 3880.36max) MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3326 (3267.12min - 3325.66max) MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2409 (2377.61min - 2408.59max) MB/s -39%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.5 (81.19min - 81.46max) MB/s +59%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
77.3 (74.57min - 77.3max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
62.9 MB/s +23%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.4 (58.57min - 61.39max) MB/s +20%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (46.5 - 83.6, n=8)
61 MB/s +19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
60.7 (60.49min - 60.66max) MB/s +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
54.8 (51.93min - 54.84max) MB/s +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
51.2 (49.25min - 51.22max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
378 (372.97min - 377.71max) MB/s +445%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
279 (266.75min - 279.17max) MB/s +302%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
202 (200.14min - 201.86max) MB/s +191%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
193 (186.4min - 192.95max) MB/s +178%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
170.9 MB/s +146%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.2 (164.63min - 167.17max) MB/s +141%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (69.4 - 165.9, n=8)
122 MB/s +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
69.4 (65.86min - 69.42max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3839 (3251.93min - 3838.52max) MB/s +892%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2928 (2922.85min - 2927.86max) MB/s +657%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2923 (2892.49min - 2922.92max) MB/s +655%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1684 (1639.23min - 1684.06max) MB/s +335%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1357 MB/s +251%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (387 - 997, n=8)
772 MB/s +99%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
663 (616.18min - 663.42max) MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
387 (351.99min - 386.95max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3115 (3077.16min - 3114.78max) MB/s +1254%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3063 (2744.16min - 3062.6max) MB/s +1232%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
1380 (1115.15min - 1380.3max) MB/s +500%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1142 (1093.19min - 1142.3max) MB/s +397%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1025 MB/s +346%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
491 (479.11min - 490.6max) MB/s +113%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (230 - 613, n=8)
418 MB/s +82%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
230 (216.81min - 229.87max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
7876 Points +102%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7524 Points +93%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
7463 Points +92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5061 Points +30%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4549 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
4369 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (3328 - 4794, n=8)
3939 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
3893 Points
Score Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2901 Points +227%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2885 Points +225%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2677 Points +202%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1630 Points +84%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1511 Points +70%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1314 Points +48%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (887 - 1351, n=8)
1074 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
887 Points
Score Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3532 Points +35%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3528 Points +35%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
3132 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2660 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2650 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2619 Points
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1785 - 2825, n=8)
2365 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2107 Points -20%
Seq Read
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
5796.32 MB/s +23%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5528.24 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
4728 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4248 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
4105 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3992.32 MB/s -16%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (2676 - 4728, n=8)
3992 MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3252 MB/s -31%
Seq Write
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
4720.45 MB/s +61%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4449.45 MB/s +52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
3445 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2934 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2749 MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2714 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1873 - 2934, n=8)
2608 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1951.27 MB/s -33%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
97.4 MB/s +52%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.33 MB/s +8%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
66.45 MB/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
64.1 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (56.9 - 75.5, n=8)
62.9 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
59.9 MB/s -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
46.9 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
328 MB/s +103%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
230.09 MB/s +42%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
221.3 MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.3 MB/s +18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
182.5 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (148.9 - 228, n=8)
179.2 MB/s +11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
178.71 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
161.7 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2377 MB/s +579%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2255.03 MB/s +544%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2054.46 MB/s +487%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1144 MB/s +227%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1138 MB/s +225%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
855.29 MB/s +144%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (350 - 815, n=8)
612 MB/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
350 MB/s
4K-64 Write
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2904.81 MB/s +34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
2859 MB/s +32%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
2430.22 MB/s +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2233.12 MB/s +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2195 MB/s +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
2164 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (1378 - 2365, n=8)
1929 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1653 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (0.025 - 0.12, n=8)
0.073 ms * -97%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.0551 ms * -49%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -43%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.047 ms * -27%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.037 ms * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.037 ms *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.029 ms * +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.022 ms * +41%
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.101 ms * -288%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.068 ms * -162%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06104 ms * -135%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
0.053 ms * -104%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
  (0.018 - 0.079, n=8)
0.04475 ms * -72%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
0.031 ms * -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.026 ms *
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5265 (4532.36-6169.85)

Grafikkort

GPU-Z Intel Arc Graphics
GPU-Z Intel Arc Graphics

Vår testenhet har inget dedikerat grafikkort, vilket är anledningen till att den enbart förlitar sig på den nya Arc Graphics med 8 Xe-kärnor. Den nya iGPU från Intel visar avsevärt förbättrad prestanda jämfört med den gamla Iris Xe Graphics G7 och tack vare dess höga effektgränser är dess resultat imponerande och IdeaPad blev faktiskt en av de snabbaste enheterna med den nya Arc Graphics som vi har testat hittills. Den nya Arc-grafiken slog till och med AMD:s Radeon 780M i de syntetiska testerna.

Under speltesterna noterade vi inga problem med tappade bildrutor på IdeaPad. Tydligen uppstår dessa problem främst i långsammare implementationer med lägre effektgränser. Testerna visade också att Intel fortfarande har en del arbete att göra med sina drivrutiner, eftersom vi inte noterade någon verklig fördel jämfört med Radeon 780M i våra speltester. Trots detta är dess övergripande spelprestanda bra och du kan spela ett brett utbud av spel med medelhöga till höga detaljer vid 1080p. Även nuvarande spel som Cyberpunk 2077 körs anständigt - men med låga detaljer. Du kan till och med förbättra den bärbara datorns prestanda genom att använda XeSS-uppskalning om du ser till att spelen stöder denna programvara.

Dess grafikprestanda minskar inte under kontinuerlig belastning eller i batteriläge. Ytterligare GPU-benchmarks kan hittas här.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65.7 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.6 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
57.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
56.3 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
50.7 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
35.6 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
35.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13539 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13381 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13316 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12520 Points -8%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -11%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11636 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9692 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9650 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8796 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8438 Points -13%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -14%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7156 Points -26%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5988 Points -38%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5982 Points -38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3770 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3656 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3511 Points -7%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2847 Points -24%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2363 Points -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -53%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1782 Points -53%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 122560, n=85, last 2 years)
60173 Points +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33472 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
32710 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32496 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32336 Points -3%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
31117 Points -7%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17193 - 37639, n=41)
30130 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20674 Points -38%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20293 Points -39%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Multimedia
  (9994 - 112310, n=57, last 2 years)
52106 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35957 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35855 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35606 Points -1%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (17911 - 39941, n=41)
32332 Points -10%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
26557 Points -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26058 Points -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17221 Points -52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17018 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
13943 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9084 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
4176 poäng
Hjälp
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
460 Seconds * -36%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)
430 Seconds * -27%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
421 Seconds * -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
380 Seconds * -12%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
374 Seconds * -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
344 Seconds * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
339 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
57.4 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
56.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
54.7 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
44.1 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps +112%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.5 (28min, 28.99P1) fps +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.5 (24min, 24P1) fps
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.2 (22min) fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.1 (23min, 24P1) fps -2%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (18min) fps -20%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 (16min, 16P1) fps -34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.5 (14min, 14P1) fps -39%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)
53.5 fps +234%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (3.56min, 19.2P1) fps +70%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21 (3.16min, 14.5P1) fps +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
16 (2.73min, 11.4P1) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
15.9 (2.93min, 11.4P1) fps -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.8 (4.99min, 6.13P1) fps -32%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.6 (3.8min) fps -34%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +67%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.6 fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.4 fps -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 fps -11%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.6 fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.2 fps -30%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
19.1 fps -37%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
87.4 fps +59%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
53 fps -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.1 (10.9min, 15.3P1) fps -13%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.1 (5min, 20.8P1) fps -16%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.3 (7.5min, 9.37P1) fps -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.5 (5.9min, 8.29P1) fps -48%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.3 (5.5min, 8.1P1) fps -49%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
80.6 (55.9min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
79.8 (51.5min) fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
76.8 (67.2min) fps -5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
75.6 (49.1min) fps -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65.6 (56.3min) fps -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65 (54.9min) fps -19%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.4 (52min) fps -24%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.8 fps +99%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.8 fps +19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.5 fps +18%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37.8 fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33.5 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
32.4 fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
31 fps -7%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.3 fps -10%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø25.5 (24-28)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 174.1 169.3 40.3 16
The Witcher 3 (2015) 160 99 58 25.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 103.8 95.5 85.2 80.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 85.9 45.2 30.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 52.6 40.8 33.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 91 54 49 46 33
Strange Brigade (2018) 207 88 74 55
F1 23 (2023) 82.1 75.3 50.7 14.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 36.5 28.4 24.6 21.9

Utsläpp - IdeaPad är för högljudd under belastning

Bullerutsläpp

Två fläktar
Två fläktar

De två fläktarna är ofta avaktiverade eller knappt hörbara i viloläge och under mindre krävande uppgifter. Men så snart processorn eller iGPU:n utsätts för mer belastning blir enheten snabbt högljudd och vi uppmätte mellan 36,5 och maximalt 44,4 dB(A) under de olika testscenarierna, vilket redan är ganska högt för konfigurationen utan dGPU. I prestandaläget uppmätte vi som mest 46,4 dB(A) och i batterisparläget noterade vi betydligt tystare 32,8 dB(A). Det kom inga andra elektroniska ljud från vår testenhet.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
24.1 / 24.1 / 28.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
44.4 / 44.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 24.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.841.945.53437.52531.335.636.830.232.93132.431.132.328.8314034.73035.12732.55029.627.127.129.130.36326.627.12727.228.88024.52623.322.126.21002526.321.120.226.912524.328.122.220.827.216022.625.418.11823.220024.528.521.921.426.325026.230.422.319.427.231525.131.719.115.126.140026.832.618.612.727.150027.635.217.911.327.163026.932.717.811.22680026.632.817.710.326.7100026.533.417.210.226.4125026.434.317.610.226.8160026.534.617.110.527.4200026.534.115.910.826.8250024.233.314.711.325.6315022.632.914.411.823.8400021.830.214.311.821.6500020.529.614.112.420.6630018.629.213.712.318.5800015.425.913.612.515.61000014.623.813.412.714.71250014.118.814.212.313.61600013.116.113.311.912.6SPL36.544.428.224.136.9N2.54.910.62.6median 24.5median 30.4median 17.2median 12.3median 26.1Delta3.53.82.72.13.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise
14%
9%
-5%
1%
-3%
off / environment *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
24.5
-2%
23.4
3%
25.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
24.5
-2%
24.1
-0%
25.3
-5%
Idle Average *
24.1
23.2
4%
24.4
-1%
26.3
-9%
24.3
-1%
25.3
-5%
Idle Maximum *
28.2
24
15%
24.4
13%
26.3
7%
28
1%
25.3
10%
Load Average *
44.4
28
37%
32
28%
36.5
18%
41
8%
43.5
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
36.5
31.9
13%
30.6
16%
46.3
-27%
40.9
-12%
Load Maximum *
44.4
36.2
18%
39.7
11%
52.9
-19%
40.9
8%
50.75
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Fördelen med de högljudda fläktarna kan ses i den bärbara datorns yttemperaturer, som förblev mycket svala även under spel och i stresstestet - vi uppmätte inte mer än 39 °C vid något tillfälle. De höga fläkthastigheterna är därför inte riktigt nödvändiga. I vårt stresstest med kombinerad CPU/iGPU-belastning stabiliserades processorns strömförbrukning snabbt på 55 watt efter initialt 70 watt och förblev sedan stabil på denna nivå.

Stresstest för CPU/iGPU-data
Stresstest för CPU/iGPU-data
 35.7 °C36.3 °C32.6 °C 
 34.5 °C34.6 °C29.1 °C 
 24 °C25.2 °C24.6 °C 
Max: 36.3 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C
39.1 °C37.8 °C29.8 °C
31.5 °C38.3 °C28.1 °C
24.5 °C25.1 °C24.8 °C
Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 31 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  44.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 19.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (överst)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (överst)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (botten)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (botten)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-9%
-10%
-11%
-19%
-53%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.3
40.3
-11%
40.3
-11%
48.8
-34%
41.6
-15%
51.5
-42%
Maximum Bottom *
39.1
45.1
-15%
45.9
-17%
47.6
-22%
46.6
-19%
62.4
-60%
Idle Upper Side *
24.9
26.6
-7%
26.3
-6%
24.2
3%
30.4
-22%
41.7
-67%
Idle Bottom *
26.1
27.1
-4%
27.9
-7%
23.6
10%
31
-19%
37.2
-43%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna (2x 2 watt) erbjuder ett rimligt ljud och är också bland de bättre i vår jämförelsegrupp. Naturligtvis finns det ännu bättre ljudsystem i bärbara datorer, men dessa är vanligtvis reserverade för dyra multimediaenheter som MacBook Pro 16 eller Asus ROG Zephyrus G16.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034462530.237.63128.838.3402741.75029.131.36327.229.58022.129.610020.232.512520.8381601837.320021.446.925019.45431515.162.940012.768.350011.369.263011.270.580010.373100010.271.4125010.269.5160010.566.7200010.870.8250011.367.7315011.867.6400011.864.1500012.469.3630012.369.7800012.567.51000012.768.21250012.3671600011.967.4SPL24.181.1N0.652.6median 12.3median 67.6Delta2.16.53534.526.930.83030.12831.126.22625.424.417.930.316.236.514.643.512.144.913.15214.854.41659.512.365.110.166.310.270.89.376.59.2749.573.59.766.610.368.310.770.911.273.211.574.111.869.31266.512.16912.269.611.966.811.566.123.283.50.558.9median 11.8median 66.81.85.937.740.428.937.130.933.438.533.429.233.527.933.823.237.624.142.819.147.21949.818.354.718.559.51663.41566.111.366.510.771.310.37810.176.49.973.410.671.110.970.711.665.611.665.311.967.612.167.612.474.812.570.712.469.612.466.111.657.424.283.80.660.2median 12.1median 66.52.35.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9Huawei MateBook D 16 2024Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Krafthantering - Mycket uthållighet

Strömförbrukning

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 är ganska sparsam när det gäller förbrukningen i viloläge - vi noterade maximalt 9,9 watt. Under stresstestet uppmätte vi en toppförbrukning på 101 watt i början, som sedan planade ut på 88 watt efter cirka 1,5 minuter. Vid spel kan du förvänta dig 60-90 watt (beroende på CPU-belastningen). Den medföljande 100-watts strömförsörjningsenheten är därför fortfarande tillräckligt kraftfull.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.38 / 0.52 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.5 / 9.6 / 9.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 62.7 / 101.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
2%
-18%
-4%
-15%
-28%
-7%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
4.7
-34%
4.2
-20%
3
14%
7.1
-103%
5.73
-64%
5.41 ?(1.8 - 10.3, n=37)
-55%
Idle Average *
9.6
9.5
1%
11.6
-21%
9.5
1%
10.1
-5%
14.5
-51%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
10%
Idle Maximum *
9.9
10.1
-2%
12.3
-24%
12
-21%
18.6
-88%
15.6
-58%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-22%
Load Average *
62.7
49.7
21%
61.9
1%
68.3
-9%
45.3
28%
40.5
35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.8
60
-8%
57
-2%
59.8
-7%
39.5
29%
74.9
-34%
Load Maximum *
101.2
66.3
34%
140.6
-39%
104.8
-4%
52.9
48%
94
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.8 (54.1-57.8)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø95.3 (81.7-101.8)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.14 (6.13-8.63)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89.4 (75.2-99.2)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.4 (95.8-98.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø30 (24.5-51.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.5 (95.5-97.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø59.9 (57.7-63)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø50.6 (48.4-52.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.38 (4.06-7.67)

Körtider

Batteriet på 84 Wh ger IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 mycket bra drifttider när du är borta från ett eluttag. I vårt WLAN-test med en anpassad ljusstyrka på 150 cd/m² (motsvarar 67% av testenhetens maximala ljusstyrka) och en uppdateringsfrekvens på 60 Hz klarade testenheten 12:36 timmar (11:28 timmar vid 120 Hz) och hela 09:46 timmar vid full ljusstyrka (08:11 timmar vid 120 Hz). I videotestet vid 150 cd/m² blev de nya Meteor Lake-chipens fördel återigen uppenbar och vi noterade strax under 16 timmar. Under belastning kan batteriet dock tömmas på 68 minuter om du anstränger dig. En full laddning med enheten påslagen tar 93 minuter, varvid 80% av kapaciteten är tillgänglig igen efter 53 minuter.

Information om batteriet
Information om batteriet
Laddningskurva
Laddningskurva
Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
12tim 36min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
9tim 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 57min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 08min
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 84 Wh
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-1%
50%
95%
-56%
43%
4%
H.264
957
835
-13%
1308
37%
537
-44%
WiFi v1.3
756
674
-11%
983
30%
1100
46%
336
-56%
510
-33%
Load
68
83
22%
124
82%
166
144%
209
207%

För

+ hög och stabil prestanda (CPU & iGPU)
+ Thunderbolt 4 och HDMI 2.1
+ exakt färgåtergivning
+ inget PWM-flimmer på IPS-panelen
+ långa drifttider
+ två SSD-platser
+ låga yttemperaturer

Emot

- rAM-minne på löddret
- något klapprigt tangentbord
- fläktarna är högljudda på iGPU-modeller

Utlåtande - Mycket bra implementering av Meteor Lake

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 recension. Testapparat tillhandahållen av:
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 recension. Testapparat tillhandahållen av:

Lenovos IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 är en stor bärbar multimediadator som kan använda den nya Meteor Lake-processorn väl och inte lider av några riktiga misstag inom något område. Dess prestanda är bra och vi noterade ingen större skillnad jämfört med AMD Ryzen-processorn i detta avseende, vilket är anledningen till att ditt val sannolikt kommer att handla om tillgänglighet och pris i synnerhet. Den bärbara datorn är utrustad med en av de snabbaste modellerna i den nya Arc Graphics-serien och vi noterade inga som helst problem med grafikprestandan under vårt test.

Dess hölje drar nytta av användningen av aluminium, men vi märkte några knarrande ljud från vårt testexemplars gångjärn, vilket dämpar dess annars goda kvalitet. Trots skärmens fördelar (exakta färger, matt yta, 120 Hz, snabba svarstider, inget PWM-flimmer) är den inte heller utan brister - subjektivt kan dess bildkvalitet helt enkelt inte leva upp till högkvalitativa IPS-paneler (som i RedmiBook Pro 16) eller OLED-skärmar. Den kan fås med en OLED-skärm, men den erbjuder bara något över Full HD-upplösning.

IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 kan använda Intels nya Meteor Lake-processor mycket bra, men när det gäller IPS-skärmen i synnerhet hade vi önskat oss en panel av lite högre kvalitet. Däremot gör den stora bärbara multimediadatorn inga misstag när det gäller körtider och anslutningsmöjligheter.

Ytterligare fördelar inkluderar den bärbara datorns andra M.2 SSD-kortplats samt dess mycket goda batteritid - särskilt när man tittar på dess värden med en justerad ljusstyrka. Å andra sidan är dess RAM lödd på, vilket kan bli särskilt problematiskt om du väljer baskonfigurationen med 16 GB RAM. Du kan som tillval få IdeaPad Pro med dedikerade GPU:er (i bästa fall RTX 4050 bärbar dator), men vi vet inte vilken inverkan detta har på enhetens utsläpp. På vår iGPU-modell var de yttemperaturer vi mätte superlåga även under belastning, vilket säkert lämnar lite utrymme att andas - men dess fläktar är redan extremt högljudda. Allt som allt är det totala paketet inte riktigt lika attraktivt som för 14-tums modellendär dess högre pris också spelar en roll i detta.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Pris och tillgänglighet

Den nya IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 kan konfigureras och köpas direkt via Lenovos webbplats. AMD-versionen erbjuds för närvarande för 914,99 USD.

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 - 05/06/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
69 / 80 → 86%
Vikt
64 / 20-72 → 85%
Batteri
90 / 95 → 94%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
82 / 90 → 91%
Programprestanda
95 / 90 → 100%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
85 / 95 → 90%
Audio
81%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Medel
80%
88%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16 G9 recension - Multimediabärbar dator med 120 Hz-skärm och Core Ultra 7
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-05- 8 (Update: 2024-05- 8)