Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF granskning: Bärbar dator för spel med låg effekt RTX 4060

Energisparare.

Den kompakta Cyborg 15 är inte utformad för högsta prestanda, men rörlighet, lång batteritid och låg energiförbrukning spelar en stor roll. Med Core i7-12650H och GeForce RTX 4060 kan du ändå spela alla aktuella spel smidigt på Cyborg 15.

MSI:s bärbara dator för mobilt spelande vill inte - och kan inte heller - sätta några nya prestandarekord. TheCore i7-12650Hoch GeForce RTX 4060körs med konservativa effektgränser och en låg TGP (45 Watt), vilket resulterar i en ganska låg strömförbrukning. Ett 120-watts nätaggregat är allt som behövs för den bärbara datorn. Bland konkurrenterna finns bärbara datorer som t.ex Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617, denAorus 15 XE5, denMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, denHP Victus 15och Schenker XMG Fusion 15.

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF (Cyborg 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12650H 10 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 78 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1470 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 45 W TDP ( including 10 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3141, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 867 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC256
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm combo audio port, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 22.9 x 359 x 250
Batteri
53.5 Wh, 4700 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), Norton 360 (trial), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.98 kg, Strömförsörjning: 488 g
Pris
1799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.4 %
v7 (old)
04/2023
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2 kg22.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.2 %
v7 (old)
02/2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg27 mm16.00"1920x1200
85.5 %
v7 (old)
12/2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08/2022
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
82.9 %
v7 (old)
03/2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
v7 (old)
01/2023
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.6 mm15.60"1920x1080

Fodral - A12VF med 180 graders öppningsvinkel

De flesta delar av kompaktfodralet är tillverkade av plast, och metall används endast på baksidan av locket. MSI använder sig av en huvudsakligen diskret design och den bärbara datorn skulle inte se fel ut i professionella kontorsmiljöer. Den svarta grundfärgen luckras upp av några genomskinliga delar av höljet, som t.ex. höljetbotten, och tangentbordsbelysningen i turkosblått ger också lite färg.

Den bärbara datorn avslöjar inga fel i tillverkningen. Spalterna är jämna och vi märker inga materialutsprång. Även om basenheten och locket kan vara skeva håller sig detta inom ramarna. Gångjärnen håller locket stadigt på plats, med en maximal öppningsvinkel på 180 grader. Den bärbara datorn kan öppnas med en enda hand.

MSI:s bärbara dator har samma mått som konkurrenterna, men är en av de lättare bärbara speldatorerna i 15,6-tumsformatet.

Storleksjämförelse

360 mm 244 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 252 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 250 mm 22.9 mm 2 kg358 mm 255 mm 23.6 mm 2.3 kg356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Utrustning - MSI:s bärbara dator har ingen Thunderbolt-anslutning

Anslutningsutrustningen är begränsad, med två tillgängliga USB-A-portar (USB 3.2 Gen 1) och en enda USB-C-port (USB 3.2 Gen 1). Den sistnämnda har även stöd för DisplayPort. Tillsammans finns det två videoutgångsalternativ (1x DP, 1x HDMI). Dessutom finns det en kombinerad ljudport, en Gigabit Ethernet-port och en öppning för ett kabellås. En läsare för lagringskort finns inte tillgänglig.

Vänster sida: plats för ett kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombiport
Vänster sida: plats för ett kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombiport
Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C; DisplayPort), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, strömport
Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C; DisplayPort), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, strömport

Kommunikation

Överföringshastigheterna för WLAN som bestämts under optimala förhållanden (utan ytterligare WLAN-enheter i närheten och med ett kort avstånd mellan den bärbara datorn och serverdatorn) är utmärkta och motsvarar kapaciteten hos WLAN-chippet (Intel AX201). Trådbundna nätverksanslutningar hanteras av ett Gigabit Ethernet-chip (RTL8168/8111; 1 Gbit/s) från Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1606 (1267min - 1656max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1529 (623min - 1608max) MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=72)
1276 MBit/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)
1230 MBit/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1119 (873min - 1194max) MBit/s -30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s -43%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
MediaTek MT7921
816 (759min - 856max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1679 (1634min - 1714max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1666 (840min - 1685max) MBit/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=77)
1413 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)
1392 MBit/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s -46%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
MediaTek MT7921
811 (699min - 859max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1670, n=3)
993 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1267-1656)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1119 (873-1194)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (759-856)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1634-1714)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1584 (817-1646)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø810 (699-859)

Webbkamera

Webbkameran (0,9 MP, max. 1 280 x 720 pixlar) har inget mekaniskt skydd. Den kvalitet som den levererar är standard. Färgnoggrannheten är bristfällig, och med en färgavvikelse på cirka 16 missas målet DeltaE < 3.

ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: 16.28 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 26.71 ∆E

Tillbehör

Den bärbara datorn innehåller inga ytterligare tillbehör förutom den vanliga dokumentationen (snabbstartsinstruktioner och garantiinformation).

Underhåll

När du har tagit bort alla skruvar på botten kan du ta bort botten av höljet med hjälp av ett litet verktyg eller en spatel. Men du måste vara försiktig, eftersom den hålls av ganska fasta plastklämmor. Efter att ha tagit bort botten får du tillgång till arbetsminnesbankerna (båda upptagna), SSD (PCIe 4), BIOS-batteri, WLAN-modul, fläkt, högtalare och batteri.

Cyborg 15 hårdvara
Cyborg 15 hårdvara

Garanti

MSI erbjuder en tvåårig garantiperiod för den bärbara 15,6-tumsdatorn i Tyskland. Du kan också köpa en garantiförlängning med ett eller två år för cirka 120 och 250 euro (~133 och 276 dollar).

Inmatningsenheter - Cyborg skiljer på WASD-tangenterna för spel

Tangentbord

De platta och mjuka tangenterna på det upplysta chiclet-tangentbordet har en kort slaglängd och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Tangentmotståndet är hyfsat. Tangentbordet har en viss liten eftergivenhet när du skriver, men det visar sig inte vara irriterande. Som typiskt för MSI-enheter är "Fn"-tangenten inte placerad på samma position som vanligt på andra tangentbord för bärbara datorer. Den enfärgade tangentbordsbelysningen erbjuder tre steg av ljusstyrka och styrs via en funktionstangent. På det hela taget levererar MSI ett tangentbord som lämpar sig för vardaglig användning.

Pekplatta

Den släta ytan på den multitouchbara klickplattan (~12 x 7,5 cm, ~4,7 x 2,8 tum) underlättar för fingrarna att glida. Den reagerar på inmatningar i hörnen och har dessutom en kort slaglängd och en tydlig tryckpunkt.

Cyborg 15 tangentbord
Cyborg 15 tangentbord

Skärm - FHD-panel med låg färgrymdstäckning

Subpixelgaller
Subpixelgaller

144 Hz-panelen i 16:9-format ger endast medelmåttiga svarstider. Å andra sidan är det positivt att den inte visar PWM-flimmer vid alla ljusstyrkor. Ljusstyrkan och kontrasten på den matta 15,6-tums FHD-skärmen missar motsvarande mål på >1 000:1 respektive 300 cd/m², även om kontrasten kommer nära.

Konkurrenterna gör ett bättre jobb här, och resten av enheterna i vårt jämförelsefält har ljusare skärmar.

241
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
226
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B156HAN15.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 247 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 233.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 250 cd/m²
Kontrast: 988:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.94
ΔE Greyscale 2.16 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
61%
93%
56%
-10%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
42.3
69.4
64%
95.2
125%
67.3
59%
38.1
-10%
42
-1%
sRGB Coverage
62.6
97.8
56%
99.9
60%
96.7
54%
56.8
-9%
62.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.7
70.9
62%
84.5
93%
68.2
56%
39.3
-10%
43.4
-1%
Response Times
26%
37%
49%
-84%
-77%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
22 ?(9, 13)
17 ?(8, 9)
23%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
35%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
47%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-76%
35.2 ?(18, 17.2)
-60%
Response Time Black / White *
14 ?(7, 7)
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
28%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
39%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
50%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-91%
27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6)
-94%
PWM Frequency
Screen
31%
1%
-8%
-28%
-13%
Brightness middle
247
308
25%
336
36%
326
32%
261
6%
284.3
15%
Brightness
234
293
25%
316
35%
303
29%
258
10%
262
12%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
89
0%
89
0%
92
3%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.25
0.23
8%
0.34
-36%
0.33
-32%
0.19
24%
0.17
32%
Contrast
988
1339
36%
988
0%
988
0%
1374
39%
1672
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.78
1.47
61%
3.36
11%
2.73
28%
5.57
-47%
4.52
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.42
2.98
54%
6.67
-4%
9.54
-49%
20.6
-221%
18.67
-191%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.94
1.02
74%
0.74
81%
1.36
65%
4.63
-18%
1.55
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.16
2.2
-2%
4.7
-118%
5.2
-141%
3.19
-48%
4.1
-90%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.228 99%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.45 90%
2.3 96%
CCT
6906 94%
6228 104%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6146 106%
6529 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
39% / 37%
44% / 26%
32% / 14%
-41% / -32%
-30% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Vid leverans är skärmens färgåtergivning mycket hygglig, med en avvikelse på 3,8 som knappt missar målet DeltaE < 3. En kalibrering ökar visserligen färgavvikelsen, men den ger också en mer balanserad gråskala.

Panelen kan inte täcka färgrymderna AdobeRGB (44 %), sRGB (63 %) och DCI-P3 (42 %). Den lämpar sig därför inte för tillämpningsscenarier som är beroende av färgprecision. Konkurrenter som t.ex Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617och XMG Fusion 15är mer lämpliga här, och deras skärmar kan täcka sRGB-färgrymden.

CalMAN - Färgkontrollant
CalMAN - Färgkontrollant
CalMAN - Gråskala
CalMAN - Gråskala
CalMAN - Mättnad
CalMAN - Mättnad
CalMAN - ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - Mättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - Mättnad (kalibrerad)
Cyborg vs. sRGB
Cyborg vs. sRGB
Cyborg vs. AdobeRGB
Cyborg vs. AdobeRGB
Cyborg mot DCI P3
Cyborg mot DCI P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS-panelens betraktningsvinklar är stabila och den kan läsas enkelt från alla vinklar. Utomhus kan innehållet på skärmen läsas när solen inte är för stark.

Cyborgen utomhus
Cyborgen utomhus
Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln
Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln

Föreställning - Alder Lake och Ada Lovelace i ett hårt koppel

Med Cyborg 15 A12VF-serien erbjuder MSI bärbara bärbara datorer för mobilt spelande som använder den GeForce Bärbar dator med RTX 4060grafikkärna i en lägre strömkonfiguration med en TGP på 45 watt. Detta åtföljs av Alder Lake-processorer från Intel. Prispunkterna för de A12VF-modeller som finns tillgängliga vid tidpunkten för detta test ligger mellan cirka 1 250 och 1 800 euro (~1 382-1 989 dollar). Priset på vår testenhet ligger i den övre delen av denna skala.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia Systeminfo
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testförhållanden

Med den förinstallerade programvaran MSI Center (se bilder) eller med tangentkombinationen "Fn" + "F7" kan du växla mellan de fyra prestandaprofilerna (se tabellen nedan). Vi använde profilen "Extreme Performance" för benchmarks och "Super Battery" för batteritesterna. Alternativt finns också en AI-baserad "Smart Auto"-funktion som automatiskt väljer den profil som passar bäst för det aktuella användningsscenariot.

Extrem prestanda Balanserad Silent Mode Super Battery
Effektgräns 1 55 Watt 45 Watt 20 Watt 15 Watt
Effektgräns 2 78 Watt 70 Watt 20 Watt 15 Watt
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center
MSI-center

Processor

TheCore i7-12650Halder Lake-processorn består av sex Performance-kärnor (hyperthreading, 2,3-4,7 GHz) och fyra Efficiency-kärnor (ingen hyperthreading, 1,7-3,5 GHz), vilket ger totalt sexton logiska CPU-kärnor.

Vid nätdrift kör CPU:n CPU-testerna i Cinebench R15-benchmark vid medelhöga till höga (multitråd) och höga till maximala (enkeltråd) klockfrekvenser. Vid batteridrift sjunker prestandan för en tråd något (205 poäng) och prestandan för flera trådar sjunker mer markant (994 poäng). Sammantaget ligger benchmarkresultaten något över genomsnittet för CPU:n som vi hittills fastställt.

CB15-slingtestet visar att konstant belastning av flera trådar gör att Turbohastigheten sjunker något efter den andra körningen och att processorn inte kan hålla en konstant nivå.

Flertrådig (nätdrift)
Flertrådig (nätdrift)
Entrådig (nätdrift)
Entrådig (nätdrift)

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1776 (1635.52-2155.04)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (Extreme Performance)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (Extreme Performance)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (balanserad)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (balanserad)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (tyst läge)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (tyst läge)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (Super Battery)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (Super Battery)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
84.7 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.4 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
66.8 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
66.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
66.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
62.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
 
59.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
52.9 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21953 Points +54%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15271 (12272min - 15271.4max) Points +7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
14252 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (5362 - 15537, n=14)
11525 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points -25%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)
1893 Points +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
1758 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (1428 - 1808, n=14)
1722 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8336 Points +51%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5921 Points +8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
5506 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (2106 - 6009, n=14)
4459 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points -25%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
727 Points +7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
681 Points 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
679 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (552 - 696, n=14)
664 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -15%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3433 Points +59%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points +26%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
2696 (1935.64min - 2695.78max) Points +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
2155 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (753 - 2253, n=14)
1770 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points -28%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +14%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points +6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points +2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (206 - 261, n=14)
245 Points +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
243 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -6%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * -24%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (222 - 553, n=15)
300 Seconds * -20%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
250 Seconds *
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * +6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
234 Seconds * +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
169.7 Seconds * +32%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85566 MIPS +54%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS +11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS +7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
55420 MIPS
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
50905 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (27053 - 59034, n=14)
46612 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6318 MIPS +10%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5826 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
5765 MIPS
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (5265 - 6116, n=14)
5635 MIPS -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15073 Points +37%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points +16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
11041 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
10348 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (6478 - 11284, n=16)
9797 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points -25%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1897 Points +7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
1781 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (1590 - 1797, n=16)
1743 Points -2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps +9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
16.1 fps
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
16.1 fps 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.7 fps -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (6.62 - 17.4, n=16)
13.8 fps -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps -20%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -51%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.3 s * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * -20%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (35.1 - 58.5, n=14)
42.9 s * -10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
39.1 s *
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (0.4584 - 0.515, n=14)
0.478 sec * -2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4715 sec * -0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.47 sec *
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4368 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
197.73 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2155 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
243 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5506 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
679 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1758 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14252 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
78.4 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
68.3 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.7 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59.4 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
 
54.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21914 KRay/s +74%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
16661 KRay/s +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
15620 KRay/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12692 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
12590 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (5422 - 15620, n=14)
10778 KRay/s -14%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106726 Points +55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
101275 Points +47%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76434 Points +11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68900 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62814 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (26386 - 76434, n=14)
55072 Points -20%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4910 MB/s +64%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
3494 MB/s +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3244 MB/s +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2992 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2876 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (1479 - 3244, n=14)
2392 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
117145 Points +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
104709 Points +23%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points +21%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
102409 Points +21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87225 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84959 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (59278 - 89537, n=14)
77353 Points -9%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13258 Points +55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
12691 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points +4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8694 Points +2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8557 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8415 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (4690 - 8726, n=14)
7255 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55209 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53700 Points +71%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37738 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points +18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31516 Points 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
31425 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (15001 - 37738, n=14)
26632 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s +108%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109216 MB/s +68%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66845 MB/s +3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65015 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
64725 MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
60410 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (32702 - 92530, n=14)
59831 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1367 MB/s +53%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
891 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
883 MB/s -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
879 MB/s -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s -3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
808 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (443 - 891, n=14)
700 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11803 KRay/s +76%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
8923 KRay/s +33%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
8448 KRay/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s +2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6790 KRay/s +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
6708 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (3096 - 8448, n=14)
5885 KRay/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40243 MPixel/s +11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
37023 MPixel/s +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36156 MPixel/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (22046 - 44164, n=14)
31632 MPixel/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
27871 MPixel/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s -26%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19764 MPixel/s -45%

Systemets prestanda

Du kan inte förvänta dig en extrem prestanda från det smidigt fungerande systemet, eftersom det fokuserar mer på andra aspekter som kompakt storlek, mobilitet och låg energiförbrukning. Den hårdvara som används kan dock hantera krävande tillämpningsområden som rendering, videobearbetning och spel. Överföringshastigheterna för arbetsminnet ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-4800 RAM-minne. De åtföljs av goda PC-Mark-resultat.

Arbetsminnet körs i dubbelkanalläge.
Arbetsminnet körs i dubbelkanalläge.
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7803 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points +3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
7098 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
7098 Points 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6918 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10833 Points +2%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
10669 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
10669 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10401 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points +4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
9931 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
9931 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9904 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9053 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12134 Points +32%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points +18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9542 Points +4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
9159 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
9159 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)
1910 Points +6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1798 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1798 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1656 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)
1809 Points +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1718 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1718 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1595 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)
2097 Points +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1936 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1936 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1826 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points -13%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)
1709 Points +4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1651 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
1651 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1383 Points -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5364 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6432 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
7098 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65434 MB/s +15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
56679 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (43261 - 69735, n=14)
51052 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
42004 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69366 MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65453 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (47313 - 67412, n=14)
55861 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s -25%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46966 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67198 MB/s +20%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s +4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
56131 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (45617 - 59361, n=14)
53407 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44756 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * -3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.9 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12650H
  (71.6 - 103.9, n=14)
83.6 ns * +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
78.7 ns * +13%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Det standardiserade Latency Monitor-testet (webbsurfning, 4k-videoåtergivning, Prime95 hög belastning) avslöjar några tydliga fördröjningar, och systemet verkar inte lämpat för video- och ljudbearbetning i realtid. Framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kan leda till vissa förbättringar eller till och med göra saker och ting värre.

Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs * -491%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * -167%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1554.9 μs * -27%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1219.9 μs *
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +80%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringslösning

MSI har utrustat Cyborg med en PCIe 4 SSD (M.2-2280) från Samsung med en lagringskapacitet på 1 TB. Även om den levererar bra överföringshastigheter är den inte en av toppmodellerna bland SSD:er.

Även om det finns plats för en andra SSD i den bärbara datorn sparar MSI på den nödvändiga slitsen för att ansluta den. Detta beslut är svårt att motivera i en bärbar dator i den här prisklassen. Möjligheten att lägga till en andra lagringsmodul har blivit standard vid det här laget, särskilt för en bärbar dator för spel.

En PCIe 4 SSD fungerar som systemenhet.
En PCIe 4 SSD fungerar som systemenhet.
Den saknar en plats för en andra SSD.
Den saknar en plats för en andra SSD.
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3669 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3053 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 677.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 465 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2761 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2764 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 82.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 236.1 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
93.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
87 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.4 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
61.5 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
60 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
57.5 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
52.4 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
 
48.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s +59%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s +56%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3702 (3637.58min - 3701.54max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s +32%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2641 (2618.08min - 2641.4max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (2497 - 2698, n=4)
2591 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s -13%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s +67%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3812 MB/s +49%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3113 (2869.67min - 3113.43max) MB/s +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s +13%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2567 (2503.61min - 2566.81max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (1892 - 2642, n=4)
2338 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s +93%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s +89%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6719 (5699.43min - 6719.47max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6323 MB/s +74%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s +28%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s +26%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (3622 - 3660, n=4)
3641 MB/s 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
3629 (3340.34min - 3628.78max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s +78%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4857 (4829.1min - 4856.73max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s +72%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s +57%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s +21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s +21%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2813 (2739.96min - 2813.36max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (2408 - 2986, n=4)
2776 MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
83.2 (76.7min - 83.24max) MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
80.9 (75.58min - 80.91max) MB/s -3%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (59.3 - 83.2, n=4)
70.8 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s -57%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -62%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s +39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
267 (258.43min - 266.75max) MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
239 (229.28min - 238.84max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s -24%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (80.9 - 239, n=4)
168.7 MB/s -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
129.2 (127.83min - 129.15max) MB/s -46%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s +104%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2571 MB/s +22%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2116 (2103.16min - 2115.54max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1678 (1211.7min - 1678.15max) MB/s -21%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (460 - 2116, n=4)
1423 MB/s -33%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
903 (865.18min - 903.16max) MB/s -57%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s +87%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2137 MB/s +11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1923 (1866.75min - 1922.74max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1509 MB/s -22%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (192.1 - 1923, n=4)
1155 MB/s -40%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
372 (363.89min - 371.6max) MB/s -81%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points +63%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points +6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
5577 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5285 Points -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4020 Points -28%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (2242 - 5577, n=3)
3625 Points -35%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3576 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points +3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2279 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1726 Points -24%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1322 Points -42%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (812 - 2279, n=3)
1304 Points -43%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3814 Points +77%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3723 Points +73%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3361 Points +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points +45%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points +12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2151 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (1015 - 2151, n=3)
1680 Points -22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1456 Points -32%
Seq Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5592.23 MB/s +78%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5171.96 MB/s +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s +58%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4111.85 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s +27%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3792 MB/s +21%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
3136.99 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (2793 - 3137, n=3)
2938 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3881.37 MB/s +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s +47%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3311.86 MB/s +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s +18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2772 MB/s +9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2554.35 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2232.79 MB/s -13%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (1759 - 2554, n=3)
2147 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
106.98 MB/s +44%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
74.2 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.91 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
66.29 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (34.6 - 74.2, n=3)
59.3 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51.2 MB/s -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s -34%
4K Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
289.15 MB/s +39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
225 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
207.87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
189.98 MB/s -9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
169.96 MB/s -18%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (66.5 - 208, n=3)
152.8 MB/s -26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s -27%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2909.44 MB/s +54%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2539.3 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1890.81 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1296 MB/s -31%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (463 - 1891, n=3)
951 MB/s -50%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
838.49 MB/s -56%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3193.44 MB/s +89%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3144.88 MB/s +86%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2967.73 MB/s +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s +15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1688.15 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (618 - 1688, n=3)
1312 MB/s -22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
954 MB/s -43%
Access Time Read
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
0.102 ms *
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (0.035 - 0.109, n=3)
0.082 ms * +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.07 ms * +31%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.056 ms * +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * +45%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms * +51%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.046 ms * +55%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.029 ms * +72%
Access Time Write
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.108 ms * -260%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms * -250%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.074 ms * -147%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -58%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
  (0.03 - 0.049, n=3)
0.03667 ms * -22%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
0.03 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +27%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB: Ø3610 (3316.15-3652.15)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø7001 (6418.71-7045.97)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø6108 (4190.96-6688.07)

Grafikkort

TheGeForce RTX 4060 bärbar datorgPU har 3 072 shaders, en 128-bitars buss och 8 192 MB snabbt GDDR6-minne. MSI konfigurerar en TGP på 45 watt (35 watt + 10 watt dynamisk), vilket är ett värde i den nedre delen av dess kapacitet. Men TGP:n används åtminstone fullt ut, enligt vårt The Witcher 3 -test. Den bärbara datorn erbjuder inget dGPU-läge.

Det är inte förvånande att benchmarkresultaten ligger under det nuvarande genomsnittet för RTX 4060 GPU:er, men vi måste överväga dem i samband med strömförbrukningen. Med en TGP som är mer än dubbelt så hög är RTX 4060 GPU:n (TGP: 105 Watt) i denMSI Katana 17resultat som "bara" är 30-40 procent högre i genomsnitt. Detta innebär att RTX 4060 med 45 watt körs mycket effektivt här.

MSI Center erbjuder överklockningsalternativ för GPU och grafiklagring, men endast när profilen "Extreme Performance" är aktiverad (du måste klicka på kugghjulssymbolen). Du använder alltid det här alternativet på egen risk, och om det uppstår problem eller instabilitet måste du ta bort överklockningen.

Fire Strike (nätdrift, extrem prestanda)
Fire Strike (nätdrift, extrem prestanda)
Fire Strike (batteridrift, extrem prestanda)
Fire Strike (batteridrift, extrem prestanda)
Fire Strike (nätverksdrift, balanserad)
Fire Strike (nätverksdrift, balanserad)
Fire Strike (nätdrift, tyst läge)
Fire Strike (nätdrift, tyst läge)
Fire Strike (nätdrift, Super Battery)
Fire Strike (nätdrift, Super Battery)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
95.2 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
87.4 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
85.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
80.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
78.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
75 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
74.7 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
67.1 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
47.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +56%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37151 Points +32%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
36323 Points +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=56)
34832 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
33988 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32235 Points +15%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
30959 Points +10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
28136 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
19416 Points -31%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
177440 Points +25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
159354 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
150582 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (81407 - 180228, n=28)
149832 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
143583 Points +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
142065 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137434 Points -3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
98739 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +49%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28374 Points +35%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
27681 Points +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=53)
25748 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
25514 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24766 Points +18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
23443 Points +11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
21062 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14628 Points -31%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +75%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10623 Points +42%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H
10299 Points +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=55)
9936 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9080 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9048 Points +21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
8500 Points +14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
7484 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
5481 Points -27%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
48240 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
26146 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
57304 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18086 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7918 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
48 Seconds * -85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
27 Seconds * -4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
26 Seconds *
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
24 Seconds * +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=52)
23 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
83 Seconds * -63%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
53 Seconds * -4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
51 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=52)
43.2 Seconds * +15%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40 Seconds * +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * +28%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
559 Seconds * -29%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
441 Seconds * -1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
435 Seconds *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
416 Seconds * +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
404 Seconds * +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds * +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=52)
311 Seconds * +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)
294 Seconds * +32%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths +58%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
1834 mpaths +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1387 - 1817, n=28)
1711 mpaths +23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
1455 mpaths +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
1387 mpaths
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
679 mpaths -51%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +61%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
1378 mpaths +41%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
1194 mpaths +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (957 - 1294, n=29)
1170 mpaths +20%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
975 mpaths
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
552 mpaths -43%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (8364 - 21065, n=28)
12813 mpaths +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10101 mpaths +1%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
9997 mpaths
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9590 mpaths -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7572 mpaths -24%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
713 mpaths +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (483 - 715, n=45)
632 mpaths +29%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
558 mpaths +14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
490 mpaths
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
480 mpaths -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
456 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
83 mpaths -83%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21537 ksamples +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (12680 - 32360, n=45)
19596 ksamples +29%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
15234 ksamples
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
14759 ksamples -3%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14684 ksamples -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
13494 ksamples -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11804 ksamples -23%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)
127541 Points +45%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
123594 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
109157 Points +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (5039 - 112238, n=52)
99381 Points +13%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
88192 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
87670 Points -1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
68271 Points -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
66133 Points -25%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=120, last 2 years)
72712 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28838 - 87612, n=30)
62733 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
48699 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
26646 Points
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)
48002 Points +218%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (4237 - 103262, n=14)
47863 Points +217%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
15085 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (74966 - 97976, n=14)
91157 Points +16%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
78356 Points

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Den bärbara datorn är utformad för FHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar. Du kan använda högre upplösningar om du ansluter motsvarande bildskärm - men endast med delvis reducerade inställningar. Bildfrekvensen i de spel vi testade ligger under det genomsnitt som vi fastställt för RTX 4060 GPU:er.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.9 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
85 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
77 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
75.2 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
66.3 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +66%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
104.7 (88min) fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (77 - 159.7, n=42)
100.4 fps +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.1 (21.9min, 25.6P0.1, 52.5P1) fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.8 (38.7min, 41.3P0.1, 60.8P1) fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
91 (77min) fps +18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps +7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77.4 (66min) fps
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.7 (51min) fps -29%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115.6 (3.67min, 83.3P1) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)
113.7 fps +27%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
112.1 (8min, 62.5P1) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (76.9 - 126.3, n=47)
107.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 (16.4min, 66.7P1) fps +12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.2 (4.55min, 55.6P1) fps +3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.3 (20.5min, 55.6P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps -4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.1 (6.87min, 47.6P1) fps -18%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)
119.9 fps +56%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104.6 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (75.1 - 109.8, n=50)
97.3 fps +27%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.1 fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.8 fps +22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
82.8 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
78.2 fps +2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76.9 fps
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.7 fps -29%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
229 fps +67%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
188.5 (48.7min, 134P1) fps +37%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
185.1 (15.5min, 136.7P1) fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (135.3 - 210, n=49)
181.3 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
165.6 (39.1min, 131.2P1) fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps +18%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
148.7 (20.2min, 114.3P1) fps +8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
137.3 (59.3min, 93P1) fps
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.4 (34.3min, 73.6P1) fps -29%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
156.3 (132.3min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (115 - 183.8, n=52)
145 fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.5 (121.3min) fps +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.8 (121.1min) fps +4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.4 (113.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
125.3 (106.2min) fps -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
123.8 (108.4min) fps -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
110 (85.8min) fps -19%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
118.9 fps +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)
108.4 fps +12%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.3 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (60.7 - 141.1, n=53)
102.1 fps +5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97 fps 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.8 fps
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.9 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.8 fps -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55 fps -43%

För att utvärdera om bildfrekvensen förblir i stort sett konstant under en längre tidsperiod kör vi spelet "The Witcher 3" i cirka 60 minuter i Full-HD-upplösning och med maximala kvalitetsinställningar. Spelkaraktären flyttas inte. Vi märker inte någon minskning av bildfrekvensen.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø75.3 (71-79)
Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.3 (92-105)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø52.9 (49-56)
GPU-värden under vårt The Witcher 3 -test
GPU-värden under vårt The Witcher 3 -test
lågmed.högultra
GTA V (2015) 185.8 181.5 164.9 89.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 321.6 235.7 140.7 77.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 161.7 152.6 140 135.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 172.8 105.6 76.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 141.3 120.8 96.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 168 116 109 102
Strange Brigade (2018) 395 206 160.5 137.3
God of War (2022) 57.5 52 41.8
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 186 145 141 108
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 88.5 72.3 63.5 57.9
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 114.4 113.7 112.7 108.4
F1 22 (2022) 169.8 162.3 124.7 48.7
The Quarry (2022) 116.9 88.1 72.7 57.2
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 71.1 70.3 67.7 65.6
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 103 93 70 68
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 89.2 82 72.5 66.4
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 112.8 82.4 77.8 54.4
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 104.9 92.6 74.9 65
High On Life (2023) 163.2 123 92.1 71.2
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 148.6 117.9 59.2 50.3
Dead Space Remake (2023) 62.8 61 53.7 53.3
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 108 87.7 74.2 62.5
Returnal (2023) 84 80 72 62
Atomic Heart (2023) 133.9 103.3 62.8 49.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 152.3 136.9 101.6 100
Sons of the Forest (2023) 78.2 61.5 59.5 58.5
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) 106.9 75.9 69.4 50.9
The Last of Us (2023) 74.6 62.5 55.4 45.2

Utsläpp - Den bärbara datorn från MSI värms upp måttligt

Bullernivåer

Cyborgs maskinvara är konfigurerad för låg energiförbrukning och därmed också för låg värmeutveckling. Även om vi bör förvänta oss ett tystgående kylsystem här, finner vi ett visst utrymme för förbättringar i detta avseende.

I genomsnitt ligger ljudutvecklingen under speldrift på en måttlig nivå. Den bärbara datorn kan dock bli mycket högljudd vid toppbelastning. I läget "Extreme Performance" kan den maximala ljudnivån öka upp till 56,3 dB(A). När det gäller ljudutvecklingen kan profilen "Balanced" rekommenderas.

Vad som är mer irriterande visar sig vara beteendet under tomgångsdrift och i vardaglig drift (kontor, Internet): Fläkten går ständigt i ett tydligt hörbart område och vi mäter ljudnivåer på upp till 38 dB(A). Detta gäller för alla prestandaprofiler med undantag för profilen "Super Battery", som ofta låter fläkten vara avstängd.

MSI Center ger viss begränsad tillgång till fläktkontrollen, men endast med profilen "Extreme Performance" aktiverad (du måste klicka på kugghjulssymbolen). Profilerna "Auto" och "Cooler Boost" (med fläkten konstant på full hastighet) är tillgängliga. Dessutom kan du också justera fläktkurvan.

MSI Center - fläktkontroll
MSI Center - fläktkontroll
MSI Center - fläktkontroll
MSI Center - fläktkontroll

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
27 / 37.5 / 38 dB(A)
Hög belastning
56.3 / 56.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 27 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.933.640.539.425.92531.637.942.643.331.63137.640.144.349.737.64026.937.336.438.426.95025.241.740.538.925.26322.531.641.539.322.58017.524.630.632.517.510020.526.533.531.920.512519.825.632.432.319.816018.127.430.229.718.120016.72530.431.316.725016.424.132.131.816.431516.825.135.23516.840015.324.635.235.915.350015.124.133.332.915.163015.223.934.134.315.280015.126.438.538.415.110001525.937.738.115125014.727.640.841.414.7160014.328.94443.914.3200014.629.446.546.614.6250014.62746.746.814.6315014.425.347.247.314.4400014.524.146.346.514.5500014.422.544.144.414.4630014.421.943.443.414.4800014.321.843.943.914.31000014.422.443.944.114.41250014.422.140.240.214.41600014.221.229.229.714.2SPL26.884.33856.256.326.8N0.863.42.810.310.40.8median 14.7median 25.1median 38median 38.4median 14.7median 13.8Delta0.64.46.46.12.513hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Noise
20%
14%
14%
22%
20%
off / environment *
27
24
11%
24
11%
26
4%
24
11%
24.8
8%
Idle Minimum *
27
24
11%
26
4%
26
4%
24
11%
26.2
3%
Idle Average *
37.5
25
33%
28
25%
28
25%
24
36%
29.2
22%
Idle Maximum *
38
28
26%
30
21%
31
18%
24
37%
29.4
23%
Load Average *
56.3
42
25%
48
15%
45
20%
37.71
33%
29.9
47%
Load Maximum *
56.3
50
11%
52
8%
48
15%
54.55
3%
45.5
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
52
46
45.75
41.1

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturer

Den bärbara datorn värms upp måttligt i bästa fall. De högsta temperaturerna (40 till 47,5 °C, 104 till 117,5 °F) uppnås vid tre mätpunkter under stresstestet. Vid daglig drift håller sig temperaturerna inom det gröna området.

 42.3 °C47.5 °C37.8 °C 
 31.1 °C40.1 °C33.9 °C 
 24.6 °C25.1 °C24.8 °C 
Max: 47.5 °C
Medel: 34.1 °C
33.6 °C35.5 °C24.9 °C
30.3 °C29.6 °C22.4 °C
24.1 °C24.9 °C25.1 °C
Max: 35.5 °C
Medel: 27.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  40.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.1 °C / 2 F).
Värmeutveckling under belastning (överst)
Värmeutveckling under belastning (överst)
Värmeutveckling vid tomgångsdrift (överst)
Värmeutveckling vid tomgångsdrift (överst)
Värmeutveckling Witcher 3 (överst)
Värmeutveckling Witcher 3 (överst)
Värmeutveckling under belastning (botten)
Värmeutveckling under belastning (botten)
Värmeutveckling vid tomgångsdrift (nedre delen)
Värmeutveckling vid tomgångsdrift (nedre delen)
Värmeutveckling Witcher 3 (nederst)
Värmeutveckling Witcher 3 (nederst)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-32%
-34%
-37%
-22%
16%
Maximum Upper Side *
47.5
54
-14%
46
3%
52
-9%
47
1%
37.2
22%
Maximum Bottom *
35.5
47
-32%
57
-61%
63
-77%
48
-35%
35.4
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
27.7
40
-44%
38
-37%
37
-34%
35
-26%
22.4
19%
Idle Bottom *
29.5
40
-36%
42
-42%
38
-29%
38
-29%
22.6
23%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Cyborg under stresstestet.
Cyborg under stresstestet.

Stresstestet (med Prime95 och Furmark igång konstant) är ett extremt scenario för att utvärdera systemets stabilitet under full belastning. Processorn (P: 3,3-3,5 GHz, E: 2,8 GHz) och grafikprocessorn (1 000-1 500 MHz) börjar testet med medelhöga klockfrekvenser, och värdena sjunker under testets gång.

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett hyfsat ljud, men det innehåller knappt någon bas. För en bättre ljudupplevelse rekommenderas hörlurar eller externa högtalare.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.938.725.92531.639.631.63137.642.837.64026.935.626.95025.236.225.26322.532.122.58017.526.817.510020.52920.512519.837.219.816018.148.818.120016.752.516.725016.463.216.431516.866.716.840015.369.915.350015.169.115.163015.269.415.280015.173.515.110001571.415125014.77114.7160014.365.714.3200014.671.714.6250014.670.214.6315014.467.514.4400014.568.214.5500014.473.414.4630014.476.214.4800014.375.914.31000014.477.814.41250014.473.214.41600014.262.714.2SPL26.884.326.8N0.863.40.8median 14.7median 69.4median 14.7Delta0.65.40.637.242.237.239.847.447.932.137.440.640.326.430.324.635.626.135.823.142.523.946.922.952.421.861.414.961.51265.712.670.413.373.612.971.510.872.310.672.110.37110.47111.164.511.670.112.274.912.166.312.95812.557.412.25411.846.311.145.72582.40.753.3median 12.2median 64.52.99hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Cyborg 15 A12VFAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Bärbar dator för spel med bra batteritid

Effektförbrukning

På det hela taget är MSI:s bärbara dator mycket effektiv när det gäller energiförbrukning. Över hela belastningsområdet är förbrukningen lägre än hos konkurrenterna. Den går igenom våra The Witcher 3 - och stresstester med en relativt konstant strömförbrukning. Strömförsörjningen är tillräckligt stor med 120 watt.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6 / 8.8 / 11.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 89 / 99 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-222%
-84%
-30%
-40%
-73%
-108%
Idle Minimum *
6
8
-33%
31
-417%
12
-100%
8.5
-42%
5.1
15%
11.6 ?(3 - 33, n=47)
-93%
Idle Average *
8.8
11
-25%
35
-298%
17
-93%
10.2
-16%
15.1
-72%
16.1 ?(6.9 - 35, n=47)
-83%
Idle Maximum *
11.9
16
-34%
46
-287%
24
-102%
11.3
5%
18.9
-59%
20.4 ?(7.6 - 45, n=47)
-71%
Load Average *
89
97
-9%
120
-35%
106
-19%
84
6%
114.5
-29%
93.1 ?(59 - 190, n=46)
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90.3
161.5
-79%
202
-124%
159.9
-77%
128
-42%
113.9
-26%
Load Maximum *
99
168
-70%
268
-171%
208
-110%
189
-91%
165.8
-67%
210 ?(99 - 364, n=47)
-112%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø90.3 (84.9-100)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø96.9 (87.3-117.9)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.04 (3.28-11.8)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø80.2 (67.9-108.3)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø97.8 (73.6-108.3)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø71.2 (67.9-78.6)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø86.8 (63.9-121.5)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.22 (1.154-10.8)

Batteritid

I WLAN-testet där webbplatser laddas via skript och videotestet med kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny (H.264-kodning, FHD) som körs i en slinga uppnår den bärbara 15,6-tumsdatorn körtider på 7:32 timmar respektive 8:00 timmar. Under båda testerna är den bärbara datorns energisparfunktioner inaktiverade och skärmens ljusstyrka minskas till cirka 150 cd/m². För att köra videotestet avaktiveras även de trådlösa kommunikationsmodulerna.

Den bärbara datorn från MSI erbjuder en bra batteritid överlag, trots den relativt lilla batterikapaciteten på 53,5 Wh. Det faktum att det inte kan hålla jämna steg med den TUF Gaming A16beror på kombinationen av ett stort 90-Wh-batteri och den energieffektiva AMD APU som den bärbara datorn erbjuder. Om vi beräknar körtiden per Watthour ligger Cyborg före.

Batteriet har en kapacitet på 53,5 Wh.
Batteriet har en kapacitet på 53,5 Wh.
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
13tim 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 111)
7tim 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 20min
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
24%
-20%
-4%
-41%
-69%
-26%
Reader / Idle
817
1212
48%
601
-26%
931
14%
155
-81%
H.264
480
371
-23%
448
-7%
264
-45%
WiFi v1.3
452
724
60%
410
-9%
446
-1%
260
-42%
127
-72%
Load
140
90
-36%
112
-20%
109
-22%
89
-36%
65
-54%

För

+ matt 144-Hz-skärm (FHD)
+ kompakt, lätt (2 kg), mobil
+ PCIe 4 SSD
+ utbytbart/utökbart arbetsminne
+ utveckling med låg värme
+ låg energiförbrukning
+ bra batteritid

Emot

- mörk skärm
- låg färgrymdstäckning
- kan bli högljudd vid belastning
- utrymme för endast ett enda lagringsmedium
- ingen kortläsare för lagring
- ingen Thunderbolt
- ingen Power Delivery

Slutsats - Bärbar dator för spel med låg energiförbrukning

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF, testenhet tillhandahållen av MSI Tyskland.
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF, testenhet tillhandahållen av MSI Tyskland.

MSI Cyborg 15 fokuserar på en kompromiss mellan prestanda, mobilitet och strömförbrukning. På grund av de reducerade prestandainställningarna är Core i7-12650Hoch GeForce RTX 4060presterar under sin kapacitet. Trots detta är deras beräkningskraft fortfarande tillräcklig för FHD-spel vid höga till maximala inställningar även då.

Även om vi gillar konceptet med Cyborg 15, lämnar genomförandet fortfarande utrymme för förbättringar. En aktuell högklassig GPU erbjuder fortfarande tillräcklig prestanda för FHD-spel även vid en låg TGP på 45 watt.

Strömförbrukningen, som är låg för en bärbar dator för spel, kan översättas till en bra batteritid. Realistiska värden på 7-8 timmar är fortfarande möjliga, trots den relativt lilla batterikapaciteten på 53,5 Wh. Tyvärr erbjuder USB-C-porten inget stöd för Power Delivery, vilket skulle vara en vettig funktion i fallet Cyborg.

Även om den bärbara datorn inte blir särskilt varm är dess maximala ljudnivå på den vanliga höga nivån för klassen bärbara datorer. Dessutom förblir fläkten ständigt hörbar vid tomgångsdrift. Vi hade förväntat oss mer här. Detta kan vara priset för att avstå från en andra fläkt tillsammans med motsvarande heatpipe. Förutom kylsystemet utgör skärmen (FHD, 144 Hz, IPS) en annan svaghet hos den bärbara datorn, där ljusstyrkan och färgomfångstäckningen visar sig vara för låg.

Ett alternativ kan vara Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617. Den erbjuder en jämförbar datorprestanda, men får en betydligt längre batteritid, bättre skärm och en lägre maximal ljudutveckling. Å andra sidan förbrukar den bärbara datorn betydligt mer ström under belastning än Cyborg 15.

Pris och tillgänglighet

I USA finns versioner av Cyborg 15 A12VF för närvarande tillgängliga för 1099,99 dollar från BestBuy och Abttill exempel. De tillgängliga versionerna av Cyborg 15 är listade på MSI, men den exakta konfigurationen för vår testenhet visas inte i USA.

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF - 04/09/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
75 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
80%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
54 / 80 → 68%
Vikt
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Batteri
76 / 95 → 80%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
96%
Programprestanda
91%
Temperatur
90 / 95 → 95%
Ljudnivå
53 / 90 → 59%
Audio
75%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Medel
74%
82%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF granskning: Bärbar dator för spel med låg effekt RTX 4060
Sascha Mölck, 2023-04-15 (Update: 2023-04-15)