Notebookcheck Logo

Recension av Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model från början av 2022 - Kompakt spellaptop med snabb skärm

En ännu vassare rakhyvel.

Nya Razer Blade 15 har helt nya 12:e generationens Intel-processorer och en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti. Tillsammans med en blixtsnabb 360 Hz-panel utlovar detta en otroligt jämn skärm. Ta reda på hur det lilla chassit klarar av den kraftfulla hårdvaran i följande recension.
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook

Razer Blade 15 2022, vårmodellen Razer Blade 15 2022, är utrustad med de senaste Intel- och Nvidia-chipsen och lovar iterativa förbättringar för den populära serien av bärbara 15-tums gamingdatorer. Den största skillnaden mellan den modell som recenseras här och den tidigare recenserade Blade 15 2022 är 1080p 360 Hz-panelen, så läsarna kan hålla sig till den här recensionen för detaljer om de i stort sett identiska fysiska specifikationerna. Blade 15:s direkta konkurrenter är bland annat andra högpresterande bärbara 15,6-tums gamingdatorer med hög prestanda, t.ex Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22, den Asus ROG Strix Scar 15, den MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS och MSI Vector GP66 12UGS.

Ytterligare recensioner av Razer:

Blade 15 Profimodell Frühjahr 2022 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1125 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 511,69, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, Quad-channel DDR5-4800
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, glansig: nej, 360 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4
Ljudkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm headset, Kortläsare: SD card reader
Nätverk
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.99 x 355 x 235
Batteri
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: 1080p webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR camera
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Razer Synapse, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.09 kg, Strömförsörjning: 646 g
Pris
4099 Kr
Länkar
Razer hemsida
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelse av potentiella konkurrenter

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.3 %
v7 (old)
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.1 %
v7 (old)
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440

v (old)
03/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.3 %
v7 (old)
09/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.5 %
v7 (old)
02/2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.9 %
v7 (old)
03/2022
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

Hölje - Kompakt och lämplig för resor

I fallet ser vi återigen den välbekanta, smidiga metallkonstruktionen som Blade-serien ursprungligen gjorde sig känd för. Stabilitet, utförande och torsionsbeständighet är alltså fortfarande utmärkta. Baksidan är den höga känsligheten för fingeravtryck

Razer Blade 15 är en mycket kompakt bärbar dator på 15,6 tum och är både mindre och tunnare än de flesta av sina konkurrenter. I synnerhet ROG Strix Scar 15 och XMG Neo 15 E22 är betydligt tjockare och cirka 100-200 g tyngre än vår 2,1 kg tunga granskningsenhet.

Storleksjämförelse

❌
360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Hårdvara - Blade 15 har moderna anslutningsmöjligheter

Det finns inga stora överraskningar när det gäller anslutningsmöjligheter. Värt att nämna är den fullfjädrade SD-kortläsaren och HDMI-porten, som stöder version 2.1. Till skillnad från många konkurrenter som t.ex XMG Neo 15 E22finns det ingen dedikerad LAN-port här. Men detta kan rättas till via en Thunderbolt-dockapparat om det behövs.

Till vänster: strömkontakt, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3,5 mm ljudkontakt
Till vänster: strömkontakt, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3,5 mm ljudkontakt
Just det: SD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, låsbar port
Just det: SD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, låsbar port

SD-kortläsare

SD-kortläsarens prestanda är på en hög nivå. I det sekventiella AS-SSD-läsningstestet med vårt microSD AV PRO 128GB V60-kort inträffade ett fel på vår granskningsenhet

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s -56%

Kommunikation

Den integrerade Killer Wi-Fi 6E 1690i-modulen gav mycket snabba överföringshastigheter när den var ansluten till vår testrouter Asus GT-AXE11000. Bluetooth 5.2-stöd finns också

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s -20%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Webbkamera


ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
16 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: 12.53 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.39 ∆E

Underhåll

Efter att ha tagit bort sex Torxskruvar (T5) har man tillgång till båda RAM-modulerna, batteriet, WLAN-modulen och (efter att ha tagit bort ytterligare ett skydd) M.2 SSD-modulen

Razer Blade 15 2022 - inre arbete

Inmatningsenheter - Stor klickplatta och snyggt tangentbord

Tangentbord

Tangentbordet har RGB-tangentbelysning med 16 ljusstyrkor (inklusive "off") och halvhöga pil-upp- och pil-ned-tangenter, vilket gör att Razer kan placera hela tangentbordet i ett rektangulärt område centrerat mellan högtalaröppningarna. Tangenterna erbjuder en platt tangentväg och tyst, dämpat skrivljud. Tangentmotståndet är måttligt och tangentbordets mitt ger knappt efter när man skriver.

Razer Blade 15 2022 - Inmatningsenheter
Razer Blade 15 2022 - Bakgrundsbelysning

Pekplatta

Pekplattan har en yta på cirka 13x8 cm och ger en utmärkt glidning med fingrarna. Klickarna kännetecknas av en kort tangentväg och tydlig haptisk återkoppling

Skärm - Snabb panel med begränsat färgspektrum

Subpixel
Subpixel

I vår recensionsmodell finns en matt IPS-panel i full HD med en ursprunglig upplösning på 1920x1080 pixlar och en uppdateringsfrekvens på 360 Hz. Alternativt finns en QHD 240 Hz- och en 4K 144 Hz-skärm, som alla ska täcka DCI-P3-färgrymden. QHD-modellen har även stöd för Nvidia G-Sync och Advanced Optimus.

Ljusstyrkan på 315 cd/m² i genomsnitt är mer än tillräcklig för de flesta tillämpningsscenarier och tillsammans med ett hyfsat svartvärde på 0,24 resulterar det i en kontrast på 1 375:1 över genomsnittet i klassjämförelsen. Svarstiderna från grått till grått är särskilt korta och vi kunde inte upptäcka någon PWM.

311
cd/m²		294
cd/m²		305
cd/m²
324
cd/m²		330
cd/m²		320
cd/m²
321
cd/m²		320
cd/m²		307
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
TL156VDXP02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 330 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 330 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1375:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6"		MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
33%
31%
31%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
99.1
52%
97.6
49%
96.4
48%
70.1
7%
sRGB Coverage
85.1
99.9
17%
99.9
17%
99.7
17%
99.5
17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.4
86.8
29%
85.3
27%
85.6
27%
72.1
7%
Response Times
-123%
-119%
-122%
-10%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-235%
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
-235%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-226%
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
-40%
5.8 ?(3.4, 2.4)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-10%
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
-3%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-18%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
20%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-54%
-38%
-77%
-87%
-45%
Brightness middle
330
286
-13%
295
-11%
304.3
-8%
272
-18%
353.1
7%
Brightness
315
271
-14%
277
-12%
286
-9%
253
-20%
325
3%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
62
-30%
76
-15%
87
-2%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.24
0.25
-4%
0.28
-17%
0.33
-38%
0.25
-4%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1375
1144
-17%
1054
-23%
922
-33%
1088
-21%
929
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
2.74
-86%
2.36
-61%
2.76
-88%
3.73
-154%
2.24
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.73
5.21
-91%
4.24
-55%
5.57
-104%
9.43
-245%
5
-83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.63
2.52
-300%
2.38
-278%
0.98
-56%
1.02
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.1
39%
3.43
-91%
4
-122%
6.5
-261%
4
-122%
Gamma
2.282 96%
2.2 100%
2.44 90%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.24 98%
CCT
6499 100%
6408 101%
6266 104%
6844 95%
6485 100%
6864 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-48% / -45%
-79% / -54%
-56% / -60%
-22% / -51%
-16% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

I vår konfiguration täcker Razer Blade 15 endast 85 % av sRGB-färgrymden. Med tanke på tillverkarens påstående om "upp till 100 %" förväntade vi oss mer här.

CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)

Vid leverans ligger DeltaE-avvikelserna i färgrymden för gråskalor och färger redan i det ideala intervallet (mindre än 3) och kan förbättras till 0,63 respektive 0,8 genom efterföljande kalibrering

Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs P3
Razer Blade 15 vs P3

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Tack vare en ljusstyrka på över 300 cd/m² är skärmen även lämpad för utomhusbruk så länge du håller dig i skuggan

Användning utomhus
Användning utomhus
Betraktningsvinkel
Betraktningsvinkel

Visningsvinklarna är utmärkta. Även vid branta vinklar förvrängs knappt färgerna och kontrasterna på IPS-displayen

Prestanda - Razer gaming laptop med bästa hårdvara

Vår Razer Blade 15 är utrustad med en Intel Core i7-12800H och en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Det finns också 32 GB DDR5 RAM i fyrkanalsläge och en 1 TB PCIe 4.0 SSD. I kombination med 4K-panelen finns den bärbara datorn alternativt tillgänglig med Core i9-12900H.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z - Huvudkort
CPU-Z - Minne
CPU-Z - SPD
GPU-Z - Intel
GPU-Z - Nvidia
HWiNFO
 

Testvillkor

För att få nya insikter under testningen utförde vi alla mätningar med Synapse-profilen "Balanced". Detta gör att GPU:n arbetar med en maximal TGP på cirka 95 W och begränsar även CPU:n. Du kan hitta de maximalt uppnåeliga poängen i vår annan granskning.

Processor

Intel Core i7-12800H är en helt ny 12:e generationens Intel-processor med stöd för DDR5 RAM-minne. DDR5-funktionen gör det möjligt för de två RAM-modulerna att fungera i fyrkanalsläge.

Razer Blade 15 har sämre förutsättningar att hålla jämna steg med konkurrenterna när det gäller CPU-prestanda i läget "Balanserad" än utan prestandabegränsningar. Även den nominellt svagare Core i7-12700H i XMG Neo 15 E22 slår vår recensionsenhet i båda scenarierna i Cinebench R15 flerspråkigt test. Att vissa benchmarks med en enda tråd blir bättre beror förmodligen på att temperaturgränserna nås före TDP-gränserna. Turbo Boost är bara aktiv under en kort tid.

Cinebench R15 multi-thread-testet ger samma poäng i batteriläge med den profil vi valde.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
83.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
75 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
74 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.6 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
66.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
66 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
56.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.3 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +125%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points +89%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17940 Points +83%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
16812 (15129.6min - 16812.1max) Points +72%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points +52%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9777 - 16597, n=5)
14387 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points +38%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1887 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1796 - 1859, n=5)
1824 Points +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1803 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +123%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points +87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6651 Points +78%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6594 Points +76%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3741 - 6433, n=5)
5443 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
730 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (690 - 714, n=5)
703 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
693 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points -17%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +120%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2844 (2577.65min - 2843.74max) Points +82%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points +80%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2449 (2349.62min - 2449.33max) Points +56%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1566 - 2697, n=5)
2236 Points +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (242 - 269, n=5)
260 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points -3%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (192 - 306, n=5)
233 Seconds * +24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * +26%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
197 Seconds * +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
187 Seconds * +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds * +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +45%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +92%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS +64%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
69454 MIPS +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
66678 MIPS +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (44553 - 68930, n=5)
59950 MIPS +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +7%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6071 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5726 - 5976, n=5)
5835 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5804 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points +43%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13033 Points +36%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points +29%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
12382 Points +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9607 - 12940, n=5)
11957 Points +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1883 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1739 - 1842, n=5)
1790 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1718 Points -7%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +102%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps +79%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.8 fps +69%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.6 fps +68%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (11.7 - 19.4, n=5)
16.3 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * -22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (41.3 - 51.5, n=5)
45.1 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.3 s * +6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (0.4442 - 0.4715, n=5)
0.4562 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec * -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.448 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * +3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4218 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1566 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3741 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
695 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1799 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9777 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
81.1 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.8 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
57.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +276%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s +63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9023 KRay/s +55%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5839 - 15206, n=5)
8773 KRay/s +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8506 KRay/s +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s +31%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5839 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +285%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points +262%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (27801 - 80002, n=5)
43634 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41116 Points +48%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
38603 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points +32%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27801 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +144%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3192 MB/s +59%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3031 MB/s +51%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (2013 - 3684, n=5)
2749 MB/s +37%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2013 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +37%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106194 Points +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97910 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (85965 - 108084, n=5)
96746 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85965 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points +41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9899 Points +41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9756 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (7027 - 9658, n=5)
8839 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7027 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points +253%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +241%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points +70%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24769 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (15765 - 38179, n=5)
23653 Points +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
23055 Points +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
15765 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99638 MB/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96687 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65871 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (55371 - 73928, n=5)
61463 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +95%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s +65%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1081 MB/s +54%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1069 MB/s +52%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (701 - 1047, n=5)
926 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
701 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +263%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s +165%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s +72%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5237 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3257 - 8559, n=5)
4904 KRay/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4883 KRay/s +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3257 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39921 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39666 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (31329 - 40992, n=5)
38291 MPixel/s -3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27416 MPixel/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s -36%

Systemets prestanda

Systemprestandan är solid, enligt PCMark 10-testerna. Vid daglig användning är driftshastigheten jämn och det finns inga märkbara fördröjningar, vilket är anledningen till att du kan använda läget "Balanserad" utan att behöva oroa dig.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
8004 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7313 - 7744, n=3)
7588 Points +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10943 Points +3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10847 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10597 - 10814, n=3)
10706 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10141 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9470 - 9675, n=3)
9575 Points -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9495 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
12541 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10351 - 12306, n=3)
11587 Points +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
11488 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points -5%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1768 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1719 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1868 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1633 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6657 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
7009 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
7313 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61946 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (48643 - 62522, n=5)
59483 MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45395 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65341 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65277 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (56629 - 66199, n=5)
63902 MB/s -2%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49035 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66256 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65772 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (50923 - 66074, n=5)
62637 MB/s -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46932 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 ns *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (89.3 - 95.2, n=5)
36.9 (89.3min - 95.2max) ns * +61%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Enligt LatencyMon kan DPC-returtiderna vara för höga för ljud- och videoredigering i realtid i den konfiguration vi testade

LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivrutiner
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs *
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
3882 μs * +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs * +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * +71%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

En 1 TB Samsung PM9A1 M.2 SDD med PCIe 4.0 är installerad i vår recensionsenhet, vilket resulterar i mycket höga dataöverföringshastigheter. Eftersom PCIe 4.0 SSD "CA6-8D1024" från SSSTC installerades i vår första Blade 15-prövningsenhetenkan enhetsmodellerna och överföringshastigheterna skilja sig åt.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7096.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5251.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 863.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 631.75 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4212.51 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3980.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 92.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 242.96 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.2 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
87.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
84.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
72.1 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
68.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
24.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s -18%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2119 (2058.22min - 2119.13max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s -71%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s -8%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3405 (3386.69min - 3404.63max) MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s -32%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3563 (3099.47min - 3563.48max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s -74%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4931.24min - 4938.77max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3448 (3378.51min - 3448.14max) MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.6 (86.51min - 90.63max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s -15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
69.5 (66.71min - 69.49max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
408 (406.25min - 408.46max) MB/s +62%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (240.11min - 252.24max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3493 (3465.14min - 3493.06max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s -35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1844 (1840.41min - 1844.18max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s -87%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3354 (3320.28min - 3353.86max) MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2645 (2612.9min - 2645.36max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s -77%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8556 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8103 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points -23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
6130 Points -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points -78%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3482 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3054 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points -21%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2008 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points -79%
Score Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3325 Points -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3087 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points -75%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5450 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5205 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
5022 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3080 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s -66%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4795 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3936 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s -16%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2997 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2466 MB/s -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s -73%
4K Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
81.9 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.55 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
80.4 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s -11%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
70 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s -73%
4K Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
352 MB/s +75%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
302.8 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
201.1 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
193.7 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
124.2 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2855 MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2451.55 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
1880 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s -24%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s -24%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1630 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439.4 MB/s -82%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2950.05 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2542 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2435 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2221 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
651 MB/s -78%
Access Time Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.07 ms * -59%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.043 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
0.033 ms * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.025 ms * +43%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * +48%
Access Time Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
0.425 ms * -1924%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.341 ms * -1524%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * -176%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -126%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.022 ms * -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.012 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

GPU

Mobilen Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti med 16 GB VRAM tillhör Ampere Refresh-generationen. Baserat på 3DMark-benchmarks resulterar användningen av läget "Balanserad" i ett prestandaförlust på cirka 10-20 procent. Små nedgångar kan ses i bildfrekvensutvecklingen i The Witcher 3, men detta hade subjektivt sett en minimal inverkan på spelupplevelsen.

Prestandan är begränsad i batteriläge. En körning på Fire Strike gav fysik- och grafikresultat på 12 888 respektive 10 344 i batteriläge, jämfört med 21866 och 25240 i nätverksläge.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
97.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
95.6 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
93.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
89.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
87.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
76.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
76.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
76.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
43546 Points +38%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
40880 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39782 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
37438 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32525 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
31565 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
167720 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
160517 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
153993 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=26)
145836 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
144470 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
138996 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
134948 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
78421 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32703 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points +25%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
29729 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
28601 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26956 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
25240 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25169 Points 0%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12320 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points +23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
11739 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11396 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
11071 Points +15%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9758 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
9646 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
25091 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
158195 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43351 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21106 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
9596 poäng
Hjälp

Spelprestanda

Gming-benchmarks är naturligtvis svagare i balanserat prestandaläge. De absoluta bildfrekvenserna är dock fortfarande tillräckligt höga för en smidig spelupplevelse, så du behöver inte nödvändigtvis köra Blade 15 i högpresterande läge.

The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)
243 fps +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
223.9 (214min) fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (144 - 268, n=28)
220 fps +41%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
213.7 (196min) fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
212.4 fps +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
189.5 (186min) fps +22%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
166 (146min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
155.5 (115min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
121 fps +35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
114.6 (108min) fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
107.2 (99min) fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105.8 (100min) fps +18%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
90.4 (78min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
89.3 (64min) fps
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
179 (3.57min, 125P1) fps +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
177 (3.71min, 125P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (153.4 - 184.3, n=28)
175.1 fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
170 (3.61min, 111P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years)
169.6 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
153.4 (4.65min, 100P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
150 (21.4min, 100P1) fps -2%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
123 (4.38min, 83.3P1) fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
118 (4.44min, 76.9P1) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
105 (21.6min, 71.4P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
94.5 (9.87min, 66.7P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
92.4 (7.56min, 62.5P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
115 fps +27%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
115 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
106 fps +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105 fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
90.4 fps
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
87 (53min) fps -4%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)
256 fps +53%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
244 (113min, 182P1) fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (156 - 255, n=29)
219 fps +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
205 (74.7min, 147P1) fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
191 (54.2min, 128P1) fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
175 (95.7min, 131P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
167.6 (110.5min, 127P1) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +53%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
213 (67.3min, 162P1) fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (42.3 - 224, n=41)
187.3 fps +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
184 (33.3min, 131P1) fps +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
174 (26.8min, 123P1) fps +16%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
153 (77.1min, 115P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
149.8 (29.6min, 114.2P1) fps

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)
lågmed.högultra
GTA V (2015) 178.7 170.7 153.4 92.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 316 200 155.5 89.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 59.9 59.9 59.9 59.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 148.3 119.4 90.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 124.3 109.5 93.4
Strange Brigade (2018) 361 212 167.6 149.8

Utsläpp - Värmeledande hölje

Buller

Fläktarna är tröga och låter komponenterna bli lite varma innan de börjar fungera. I synnerhet är den genomsnittliga ljudnivån under belastning märkbart lägre i balanserat läge. Ljudnivån hos vår första Blade 15 (läge: maximal prestanda) låg inom det vanliga intervallet. Inget spolningsvisslande upptäcktes i vår recensionsenhet.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
26 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Hög belastning
37 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.540.137.834.637.7253536.636.235.434.33144.645.446.541.345.14029.330.330.427.129.75026.528.425.32737.66331.628.930.627.734.2802423.22421.428.310021.619.419.42025.512521.620.720.817.828.6160222219.118.329.520023.621.72520.825.625025.623.824.423.430.131526.623.321.721.52940024.619.814.614.428.550024.720.617.11828.76302619.215.315.931800261813.413.332.9100026.818.513.413.633.5125026.518.511.811.733.1160027.517.911.611.534.6200027.517.111.911.435250026.215.412.512.934.9315024.81412.613.235.140002013.712.913.231.4500019.114.213.514.230.5630018.214.31414.626.6800016.81413.414.223.81000014.813.31314.121.81250014.112.912.61317.51600013.812.712.412.614.4SPL36.829.226.426.444.6N2.51.20.80.84.7median 24.6median 18median 13.4median 14.2median 29.5Delta432.62.44.235.63535.634.437.634.441.640.441.631.931.431.930.230.430.232.329.432.328.225.528.231.72831.731.222.231.232.419.232.434.423.334.435.923.935.938.814.538.840.714.740.741.411.341.440.39.640.342.19.742.143.31043.342.99.542.941.29.841.241.410.541.442.410.442.443.910.343.942.811.242.842.311.642.338.311.638.333.811.733.829.511.829.524.61224.619.611.419.653.624.353.69.30.69.3median 40.3median 11.6median 40.35.33.75.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
-2%
-8%
-12%
-2%
off / environment *
26
25.4
2%
24
8%
25.5
2%
24
8%
22.9
12%
Idle Minimum *
26
26.2
-1%
24
8%
25.5
2%
31
-19%
23.4
10%
Idle Average *
27
26.2
3%
24
11%
25.5
6%
32
-19%
23.4
13%
Idle Maximum *
29
28.4
2%
27.76
4%
37.1
-28%
35
-21%
27.4
6%
Load Average *
37
44.7
-21%
38.81
-5%
39.2
-6%
48
-30%
36
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
44.7
-2%
54.2
-23%
50.5
-15%
43
2%
58.2
-32%
Load Maximum *
45
51.9
-15%
54.18
-20%
51.8
-15%
48
-7%
58
-29%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

På grund av metallkonstruktionen och de kraftfulla komponenterna blir höljet relativt varmt vid måttlig belastning. Den bärbara datorn värms också upp kraftigt via kontrollytorna när man till exempel spelar The Witcher 3.

Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Hög belastning
 48 °C53 °C50 °C 
 47 °C48 °C37 °C 
 43 °C43 °C36 °C 
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 45 °C
49 °C53 °C53 °C
44 °C45 °C42 °C
42 °C42 °C43 °C
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 45.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
3%
-3%
8%
11%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
50
6%
52
2%
43.4
18%
54
-2%
40.2
24%
Maximum Bottom *
53
47
11%
68
-28%
48.2
9%
59
-11%
43.8
17%
Idle Upper Side *
36
37.4
-4%
32
11%
35.2
2%
26
28%
34.8
3%
Idle Bottom *
38
38.4
-1%
36
5%
37
3%
27
29%
37
3%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

I vårt stresstest laddade vi systemet samtidigt med Prime95 och FurMark. Processorn inledde testet med klockfrekvenser för P- och E-kärnan på cirka 2 respektive 1,9 GHz och stabiliserades vid 1,7 respektive 1,5 GHz och vid cirka 85 °C under längre tidsperioder. GPU:n började vid cirka 1 100 MHz och jämnade så småningom ut sig vid 640 MHz och vid en kärntemperatur på 77 °C

Högtalare

Högtalarna är ojämnt inställda. Det rosa brusdiagrammet visar det betydligt flackare frekvensfallet hos MacBook Pro 16, som är en av de bästa bärbara datorerna i den här disciplinen. Externa ljudenheter kan anslutas via Bluetooth, USB eller 3,5 mm-porten

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.640.12535.438.73141.345.34027.134.4502733.76327.734.48021.433.91002035.712517.846.116018.352.720020.857.125023.465.331521.568.240014.471.25001873.863015.976.280013.380.2100013.679.6125011.781.1160011.581.5200011.483.5250012.982.8315013.279.8400013.271.4500014.276630014.677.2800014.272.21000014.178.7125001373.21600012.666.2SPL26.491.6N0.892.5median 14.2median 76Delta2.46.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Inga uppgifter om körtid

Effektförbrukning

Förbrukningsvärdena för tomgångskonsumtion på i genomsnitt 19 W är betydligt lägre än för de tidigare granskade Razer Blade 15 (36.4 W). Detta beror sannolikt på den mer ekonomiska prestandaprofilen och den lägre skärmupplösningen. I Witcher 3, är den totala förbrukningen cirka 13 procent lägre.

Den maximala förbrukningen av 230 W strömförsörjningen under det samtidiga utförandet av Prime95 och FurMark var 179 W. Strömförsörjningen på 230 W är tillräckligt stor.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.2 /  Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 17 / 19 / 25 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 108 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU		MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-48%
-14%
-2%
5%
-34%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
17
33.2
-95%
14
18%
11.2
34%
11
35%
17.5
-3%
13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
19
36.4
-92%
18
5%
16.4
14%
16
16%
20.1
-6%
19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
25
37.6
-50%
19
24%
29.4
-18%
23
8%
47.3
-89%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years)
-7%
Load Average *
108
116.7
-8%
115
-6%
106.2
2%
110
-2%
107.3
1%
106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years)
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
150
172
-15%
228
-52%
189
-26%
151
-1%
225
-50%
Load Maximum *
179
228.6
-28%
307
-72%
213.6
-19%
230
-28%
277.7
-55%
249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (143-155)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø145.5 (138-161)

{

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67.7 (65.1-83.5)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø84.3 (65.1-96.2)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.8 (138-142)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø144.2 (140-150)

Batteritid

I vårt verkliga WLAN-test uppnår Blade 15 en drifttid på 4:53 timmar. Knappast någon konkurrent kan hålla jämna steg med den 7:20 timmar långa drifttiden för Blade 15 Asus ROG Strix Scar 15, medan MSI Vector GP66 också erbjuder en längre drifttid trots ett mindre batteri (65 Wh mot 80 Wh).

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 04min
WiFi Websurfing
4tim 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5tim 56min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 02min
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
0%
47%
19%
-5%
-12%
8%
Reader / Idle
484
668
38%
467
-4%
473
-2%
567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years)
17%
H.264
356
413
16%
413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years)
16%
WiFi v1.3
293
292
0%
403
38%
440
50%
324
11%
342
17%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)
28%
Load
122
228
87%
85
-30%
96
-21%
61
-50%
85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years)
-30%

För

+ snabb skärm med hyfsad maximal ljusstyrka
+ hög spelprestanda
+ bra hantverk
+ kompakt hölje och nätadapter
+ snabb SD-kortläsare

Emot

- höga yttemperaturer
- högtalarna gör inte prisklassen rättvisa
- ingen Advanced Optimus (endast QHD-modellen)

Omdöme

Recension av Razer Blade 15 från Våren 2022. Recensionsexemplar från Razer Germany.
Recension av Razer Blade 15 från Våren 2022. Recensionsexemplar från Razer Germany.

Blade 15 är en mycket kompakt och välgjord bärbar dator. Anslutningsmöjligheterna är lika moderna som de nya chipen från Intel och Nvidia och avrundas väl av en snabb SD-kortläsare. Skärmen erbjuder en otroligt smidig visuell representation och en hyfsad maximal ljusstyrka, men till skillnad från QHD-modellen saknas Advanced Optimus och färgomfånget kunde vara lite bättre. Med tanke på målgruppen är det sistnämnda dock acceptabelt.

Benchmarks i läget "Balanced" ger en intressant bild. I praktiken är prestandan ofta mer än tillräcklig och ljudnivån är betydligt lägre. Dock blir chassits ytor snabbt mycket varma.

Om du letar efter en snygg och kompakt spellaptop med en exceptionellt snabb skärm ska du inte leta längre. Temperaturkänsliga användare bör dock vara försiktiga här.

En annan punkt för kritik är högtalarna: Många billigare bärbara datorer erbjuder bättre ljud. Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 är ett mindre kompakt AMD-baserat alternativ till Razer Blade 15 med mycket längre batteritid. För användare som ofta är på språng och behöver mycket prestanda kan Razer Blade 15 fortfarande vara rätt val.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Vår konfiguration av Razer Blade 15 finns för närvarande på B&H Photo Video för 3,699.99 USD eller via den officiella Razer-webbplatsen för samma pris.

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 - 05/04/2022 v7 (old)
Marius Schell

Design
87 / 98 → 89%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
69 / 80 → 86%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Batteri
64 / 95 → 67%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
96%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
73 / 95 → 77%
Ljudnivå
86 / 90 → 96%
Audio
79%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Medel
78%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model från början av 2022 - Kompakt spellaptop med snabb skärm
Marius Schell, 2022-05- 5 (Update: 2022-05- 5)