Notebookcheck Logo

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 gaming laptop recension - En riktig konkurrent till Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16

Kärnverksamhet inom spel.

Schenkers Core 16 (Tongfang GM6XG7X) är en fantastisk bärbar dator för spel som inte behöver gömma sig för någon av sina konkurrenter i övre mellanklassen tack vare sin AMD Ryzen 7 och RTX 4070 (eller RTX 4060) och en hel rad andra fantastiska funktioner som ett valfritt mekaniskt tangentbord.

Den sista XMG Core, som vi också testade, varXMG Core 15(88 %) från ett år sedan - då med enRTX 3060. Nu har Schenker tagit fram en 16-tums version av Core. Vi kommer att ta en titt på allt som har förändrats, bortsett från skärmstorleken.

Vi kommer att jämföra Core 16 med Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8, Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41, HP Omen Transcend 16, MSI Stealth 16 Studio och HP Victus 16.

XMG Core 16
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP, Geforce 537.13, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SK Hynix DDR5-5600
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE0AF0 (), IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz
Moderkort
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Hårddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, 860 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset jack, Kortläsare: Full SD Card Reader
Nätverk
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.1 x 358.4 x 266.8
Batteri
99 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: Full-HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo Speaker, Tangentbord: mechanical keyboard with RGB backlight, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti, Pickup and Return
Vikt
2.39 kg, Strömförsörjning: 628 g
Pris
2230 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.1 %
v7 (old)
06/2023
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg27.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
v7 (old)
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
v7 (old)
07/2023
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.1 %
v7 (old)
09/2023
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24 mm16.10"1920x1080

Fodral och anslutningsmöjligheter - Den eleganta Core 16

Den här bärbara datorn har det Schenker-typiska eleganta tillvägagångssättet - allt hålls i mörkgrått. Den hårdare basen och mjukare bottenplattan är tillverkade av plast, och det glänsande displaylocket är tillverkat av metall. Det senare är lite av en fingeravtrycksmagnet. Locket kan öppnas upp till 135 grader.

Allt verkar ganska stabilt och dess konstruktion är bra. Den vänstra undersidan knarrade bara första gången vi försökte vrida den.

Den har en genomsnittlig storlek och vikt - jämförbar med Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16.

Långsam SD-kortläsare
Långsam SD-kortläsare

Den bärbara speldatorn har alla de viktigaste portarna, inklusive en komplett SD-kortläsare. Tyvärr har USB-C-porten inte stöd för Thunderbolt, Power Delivery eller DisplayPort. För det senare har den bärbara datorn en dedikerad MiniDisplayPort. Enheten kan inte laddas via USB-C och USB-A-porten på vänster sida är fortfarande av typ 2.0!

Den tidigare nämnda SD-kortläsaren är tyvärr en mycket långsam sådan - långsammare än på alla föregångare och konkurrenter. Åtminstone har den en alls.

Intel AX200 stöder WiFi 6, men endast inom 5 GHz-frekvensen. Dess överföringshastigheter är bra och relativt stabila.

12 korsskruvar (alla lika stora), lätt att öppna
12 korsskruvar (alla lika stora), lätt att öppna
2 DDR5 RAM-platser
2 DDR5 RAM-platser
Wifi-modul AX200
Wifi-modul AX200
Kylplatta för de 2 SSD-platserna på bottenplattan
Kylplatta för de 2 SSD-platserna på bottenplattan

Storleksjämförelse

369 mm 259 mm 24 mm 2.4 kg363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg360.1 mm 279.9 mm 27.9 mm 2.7 kg358.4 mm 266.8 mm 26.1 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 260 mm 19.95 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
158 (154.8min - 166.31max) MB/s +355%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +176%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.3 MB/s +131%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
34.7 (33.73min - 34.77max) MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
180.68 MB/s +407%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +237%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
87.5 MB/s +146%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
35.62 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1679 (1470min - 1802max) MBit/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1325 (977min - 1480max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (429 - 1748, n=23)
1164 MBit/s -22%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
MediaTek MT7921
714 (679min - 745max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1725 (1685min - 1740max) MBit/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)
1392 MBit/s -12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1364 (675min - 1404max) MBit/s -14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (451 - 1746, n=23)
1274 MBit/s -20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
MediaTek MT7921
726 (714min - 732max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1674 (1337min - 1789max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1612 (1573min - 1655max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1490 (1301min - 1671max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1446 (1206min - 1531max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=69, last 2 years)
1432 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (1006 - 1696, n=5)
1388 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1726 (876min - 1760max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1585 (1559min - 1625max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (1347 - 1700, n=5)
1536 MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1513 (1467min - 1553max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=69, last 2 years)
1491 MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1446 (731min - 1469max) MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1490 (1301-1671)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1674 (1337-1789)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1585 (1559-1625)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (876-1760)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)
ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
16 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23): 7.31 ∆E min: 1.12 - max: 15.96 ∆E

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniska tangenter eller membrantangenter

På den här bärbara datorn kan du välja mellan mekaniska tangenter, som de som vår testmodell har, eller ett "tyst membrantangentbord". Båda kommer med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning - men endast det mekaniska tangentbordet har individuellt RGB-belysta tangenter. Den tystare membranversionen har endast RGB-belysning i en zon.

Det mekaniska tangentbordet har endast tystare membranbrytare när det gäller funktionstangenterna. Alla andra tangenter har en bra tryckpunkt och ger tydlig återkoppling. Du måste gilla det höga ljudet när du skriver och det är verkligen inte lämpligt att ta med dig till ett bibliotek.

Som vanligt har Schenker implementerat en mycket snygg layout utan några accenter. Allt ryms i sex raka tangentrader - inklusive den numeriska knappsatsen. Detta innebär att du kan hitta allt superlätt - vanligtvis är tangenterna ganska små (cirka 1,45 x 1,45 cm).

Pekplattan är lite på den lilla sidan (ca 11,7 x 7,2 cm) men den är fin och smidig, även om dina fingrar inte är helt torra. Du kan (av)aktivera pekplattan genom att dubbelklicka på det övre vänstra hörnet och en mini-LED visar dess aktuella status. De integrerade klickknapparna ger bra feedback men de är inte alltför högljudda. Ibland fastnar klicket lite, vilket innebär att det inte släpps omedelbart när du släpper taget efter att ha dragit och släppt.

Tangentbordet
Tangentbordet
Bakgrundsbelysning
Bakgrundsbelysning
De mekaniska tangenterna
De mekaniska tangenterna
Och här upplyst
Och här upplyst
Växling mellan effekt- och prestandaläge
Växling mellan effekt- och prestandaläge
Pekplattan
Pekplattan

Display - Välkänd 16:10 1 600p IPS-panel

Av allt att döma använder Schenker samma matta 1:10 240-Hz-skärm med 1 600p-upplösning på alla sina 16-tumsmodeller. Detta innebär att vi såg samma BOE-panel påSchenker Vision 16 ProochXMG Neo 16.

Skärmen uppnår verkligen bra värden. Den har en ljusstyrka på 350 nits och ett kontrastvärde på strax över 1 000:1. SRGB-skärmen är tillräckligt snabb och vi noterade inte någon PWM. Du kan se lite backlight bleeding, men inget alltför dåligt.

En sak som vi noterade är att ändring av ljusstyrkan via specialknapparna endast träder i kraft när du släpper knapparna igen, vilket är lite irriterande.

Subpixel-array
Subpixel-array
Synlig men inte irriterande blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen längs kanterna
Synlig men inte irriterande blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen längs kanterna
352
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE0AF0 () tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 382 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 358.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 372 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1139:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Display
3%
0%
24%
21%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
68.3
70.4
3%
67.9
-1%
99.2
45%
96.4
41%
66.7
-2%
sRGB Coverage
98.6
99.6
1%
99.1
1%
100
1%
99.7
1%
98
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
72.6
4%
69.9
0%
87.6
26%
84.8
22%
69
-1%
Response Times
5%
21%
-214%
41%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
47%
11 ?(5, 6)
17%
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-100%
4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2)
67%
13.3 ?(6, 7.3)
-1%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-38%
5 ?(2, 3)
24%
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-327%
5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4)
15%
8.2 ?(4.5, 3.7)
-24%
PWM Frequency
3506 ?(100)
Screen
26%
18%
195%
-30%
17%
Brightness middle
376
355.3
-6%
520
38%
791.1
110%
424
13%
308
-18%
Brightness
358
340
-5%
494
38%
800
123%
411
15%
285
-20%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
91
3%
95
8%
88
0%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.32
3%
0.39
-18%
0.04
88%
0.37
-12%
0.25
24%
Contrast
1139
1110
-3%
1333
17%
19778
1636%
1146
1%
1232
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.74
1.13
59%
1.94
29%
4.37
-59%
3.04
-11%
1.3
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.78
2.78
59%
5.62
17%
10.39
-53%
7.5
-11%
2.76
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.88
0.32
64%
0.74
16%
1.04
-18%
3.04
-245%
0.92
-5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.57
1.4
61%
2.94
18%
6.5
-82%
4.34
-22%
1.7
52%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
2.37 93%
2.28 96%
2.32 95%
2.167 102%
CCT
7246 90%
6372 102%
6443 101%
6000 108%
6952 93%
6767 96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 18%
13% / 14%
2% / 100%
11% / -9%
1% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Med hjälp av vår Xrite-färgmätare och Calman-programvaran kunde vi kraftigt förbättra skärmens goda (men inte helt optimala) färgåtergivning direkt från förpackningen, vilket ledde till att färg- och gråskalans DeltaE-värden (normavvikelser) sjönk till 1. Detta innebär att skärmen är lämplig för redigering av foton - åtminstone i sRGB-färgrymden.

Gråskala
Gråskala
Mättnad
Mättnad
Färgkontroll
Färgkontroll
Gråskala kalibrerad
Gråskala kalibrerad
Mättnad kalibrerad
Mättnad kalibrerad
ColorChecker kalibrerad
ColorChecker kalibrerad
sRGB
sRGB
DisplayP3
DisplayP3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.1 ms rise
↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Utomhus kan du läsa bra på displayen i skuggiga områden när du är direkt vänd mot den.

Ute i skuggan
Ute i skuggan
Utvändigt i sneda vinklar
Utvändigt i sneda vinklar
Relativt stabila IPS-betraktningsvinklar. Viss ljusstyrka går förlorad vid visning från extrema vinklar.
Relativt stabila IPS-betraktningsvinklar. Viss ljusstyrka går förlorad vid visning från extrema vinklar.

Prestanda - Stark RTX 4070 med Ryzen 7

RTX 4070RTX 4070är det som gör Core 16 till en bärbar speldator. Enheten kan också vara av intresse för yrkesverksamma och kreativa - men sRGB-färgrymden kanske inte räcker för dessa människor och DisplayP3 täcks inte.

Jämfört med den mer utbredda kombinationen med en Intel-processor har den här enheten en AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSinstallerad. Den avancerade processorn, tillsammans med dess 32 GB RAM och grafikkort, gör faktiskt enheten mer till en avancerad spelbärbar dator. Nästan alla aktuella spel kan spelas smidigt i sin ursprungliga 1 600p-upplösning och med maximala detaljer.

bestware.com, Schenkers beställningswebbplats, kan du konfigurera den bärbara datorn i stor utsträckning, välja mellan olika SSD- och RAM-tillverkare och mycket mer. Du måste ha detta i åtanke, eftersom vårt test endast tar hänsyn till vår specifika konfiguration.

 

Villkor för testning

I Schenker-enheternas Control Center kan du ställa in förinställda prestanda samt manuellt ställa in individuella prestandaparametrar. Det innebär att du kan ändra den bärbara gamingdatorns beteende så att det passar dina individuella behov. Detsamma gäller för andra inställningar, t.ex. tangentbordsbelysning, laddningsbeteende och display.

Huvudmeny
Huvudmeny
Profiler för prestanda
Profiler för prestanda
Manuellt läge
Manuellt läge
Ytterligare inställningar
Ytterligare inställningar

Processor

AMD:s Ryzen 7 7840HShar 8 Zen 4-kärnor och tack vare SMT adderas detta till 16 trådar. Kärnorna klockar från 3,8 GHz (basklocka) upp till 5,1 GHz (single-core boost). Detta gör den till den näst snabbaste processorn från Pheonix-serien, bakomRyzen 9 7940HS.

80 watt i overboost
80 watt i overboost
55 watt i Enthusiast
55 watt i Enthusiast
35 watt i balanserad
35 watt i balanserad
25 watt i batteriläge
25 watt i batteriläge

I jämförelse är dess prestanda på en liknande nivå somCore i7-13700H. HPVictus 16är långsammare med denna CPU ochMSI Stealth 16 Studiomed samma CPU är snabbare. Intels HX-processorer, särskilt den mycket dyrarei9-13900HX, tar helt klart ledningen.

Under det kontinuerliga Cinebench R15-testet noterade vi ingen prestandaförlust - den förblev konsekvent hög även efter de första körningarna. På så sätt nådde processorn en konstant TDP på 80 watt.

I entusiastläget startade körningarna på 65 watt och sjönk sedan till 55 watt. I balanserat läge höll den bara 50 till 55 watt under en kort tid, sedan sjönk den ner till 35 watt.

I batteriläget uppmätte vi 30 watt under en kort tid i början, sedan 25 watt. Cinebench R15-resultatet sjönk från 2 681 till 1 730 - en nedgång med 35 procent.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
71.1 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
67 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
 
63.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
63.4 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
55.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
53.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21812 Points +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
20034 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (15515 - 17214, n=17)
16414 Points -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
15410 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
14131 Points -18%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)
1887 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1854 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (1718 - 1812, n=17)
1768 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
1687 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1546 Points -13%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8300 Points +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
7674 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (6061 - 6744, n=17)
6414 Points -4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
5895 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5502 Points -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
725 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
719 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (661 - 705, n=17)
686 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
649 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
601 Points -12%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3417 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
2854 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (2473 - 2729, n=17)
2598 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2328 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
2317 (2203.13min - 2316.56max) Points -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (270 - 286, n=17)
278 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
247 Points -9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
245 Points -9%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
219 Seconds * -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
215 Seconds * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (185 - 229, n=18)
198.6 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
170.8 Seconds * +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
169 Seconds * +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85207 MIPS +17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
76344 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (59538 - 73035, n=18)
69127 MIPS -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
65405 MIPS -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61191 MIPS -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (6049 - 6754, n=18)
6561 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6305 MIPS -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
6125 MIPS -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5584 MIPS -16%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
5559 MIPS -16%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
14993 Points +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
13239 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (8446 - 12339, n=20)
11674 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
11504 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9683 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (1837 - 2017, n=20)
1966 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1892 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1829 Points -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
1685 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1555 Points -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.5 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (11.7 - 21.8, n=18)
19.8 fps -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.7 fps -9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -19%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.6 fps -23%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s *
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
61.5 s * +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
54.6 s * +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
53.4 s * +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (38.3 - 68.3, n=18)
48.6 s * +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +44%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.504 sec * -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.4958 sec * -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4498 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=18)
0.4394 sec * -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2681 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
161.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
270 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6656 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
686 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1767 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17205 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
 
87.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
81.9 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (24712 - 28921, n=19)
26587 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21786 KRay/s -21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17934 KRay/s -35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17161 KRay/s -38%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14470 KRay/s -48%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (103755 - 123167, n=19)
113567 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106398 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105483 Points -11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81656 Points -31%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72193 Points -39%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4884 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (4293 - 5155, n=19)
4797 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4080 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3492 MB/s -29%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3326 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
116767 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (105028 - 125820, n=19)
116128 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108729 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105597 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91638 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (13857 - 15525, n=19)
14941 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13223 Points -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13097 Points -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11050 Points -27%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8677 Points -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (55540 - 65812, n=19)
60589 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58232 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53561 Points -15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44154 Points -30%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36179 Points -43%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (67389 - 177158, n=19)
132175 MB/s +49%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109083 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81504 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66484 MB/s -25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55915 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1359 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (949 - 1123, n=19)
1065 MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1032 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
950 MB/s -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
906 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (13100 - 15599, n=19)
14270 KRay/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11734 KRay/s -21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9680 KRay/s -34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9094 KRay/s -38%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7770 KRay/s -47%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46114 MPixel/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40082 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39045 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (17615 - 41516, n=19)
37735 MPixel/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27554 MPixel/s -31%

Systemets prestanda

Tillsammans med Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16och HP Omen Transcend 16kom Core 16 ut på topp när det gällde systemprestanda. Subjektivt sett går allt också smidigt.

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8167 - 8183, n=2)
8175 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7329 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7220 Points -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7158 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10934 - 11250, n=2)
11092 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10707 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10579 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10491 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10179 - 10526, n=2)
10353 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
9376 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9146 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
8974 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12908 - 12920, n=2)
12914 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10860 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10558 Points -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10358 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1789 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1694 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1535 Points -9%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1705 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1629 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1508 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1936 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1862 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1637 Points -12%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1635 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1435 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1337 Points -7%
PCMark 10 Score
8183 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69289 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (30937 - 72158, n=19)
66323 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65188 MB/s -4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60917 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47903 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s +39%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73950 MB/s +22%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70121 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69056 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (30497 - 62147, n=19)
58070 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50111 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (34590 - 93323, n=19)
84045 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71464 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
66928 MB/s -21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61520 MB/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54955 MB/s -35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.1 ns * -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
94 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.5 ns * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
  (85.1 - 112, n=19)
92.4 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

I jämförelse är Core 16 en av få bärbara speldatorer som inte behöver kämpa med några latenser enligt LatencyMon. Åtminstone kunde verktyget inte identifiera några ovanligt höga latenser i vårt test - mycket bra! Vår 4K/60 fps YouTube-video spelades upp smidigt och utan tappade bildrutor. Endast Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16presterade lika bra inom detta område.

YouTube
YouTube
LatencyMon huvud
LatencyMon huvud
LatencyMon drivrutiner
LatencyMon drivrutiner
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
18226.8 μs * -2608%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1697 μs * -152%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * -126%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1312.1 μs * -95%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Schenker har installerat en 1-TB Samsung 990 Pro i enheten. Denna SSD är en av de snabbaste modellerna som finns tillgängliga - i vårSSD bästa lista,ligger den på 4:e plats. I Core 16 används den inte riktigt till sin fulla potential, men den är fortfarande extremt snabb. Dessutom förblir dess prestanda konsekvent under en lång tidsperiod, i motsats till den lika snabba SSD-enheten iLenovo Legion Pro 5 16.

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD-kopia
AS SSD-kopia
Crystaldiskmark
Crystaldiskmark
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7129 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5731 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 435 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 386 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 422 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1171 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.4 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
88.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
69.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
65.1 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3520 (3490.23min - 3519.95max) MB/s +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3470 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3349 (938.07min - 3349.15max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2735 (2694.63min - 2735.3max) MB/s -21%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4485 (775.32min - 4484.81max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3807 MB/s +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3641 (3537min - 3640.66max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2220 (2186.31min - 2219.63max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6661 (6037.07min - 6660.97max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6460 (6020.84min - 6459.94max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6313 MB/s -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6169 (5196.32min - 6168.56max) MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s -16%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5355 (5315.44min - 5354.87max) MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s -29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4803 (4344.79min - 4802.73max) MB/s -30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2216 (2187.96min - 2215.64max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.9 (64.79min - 67.93max) MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
56.6 (54min - 56.56max) MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
48.4 (47.92min - 48.42max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
253 (250.9min - 252.85max) MB/s +73%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +67%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
159.6 (158.36min - 159.58max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
142.3 (140.08min - 142.3max) MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -13%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +287%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s +216%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3311 (3243.78min - 3311.19max) MB/s +207%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3013 (755.04min - 3013.06max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2568 MB/s +138%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1004 (933.19min - 1004.48max) MB/s -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s -13%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +760%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 (1172min - 2736.15max) MB/s +562%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s +526%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2193 (2174.06min - 2193.44max) MB/s +431%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2130 MB/s +416%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
488 (476.91min - 488.32max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8963 Points +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8452 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points +34%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7774 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6745 Points +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6198 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
4988 Points -20%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3449 Points +115%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3174 Points +98%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2959 Points +85%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points +79%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points +53%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1603 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1480 Points -8%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3832 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3812 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3723 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3331 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2858 Points -25%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5621.18 MB/s +29%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5588.41 MB/s +28%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5265.97 MB/s +21%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5185.49 MB/s +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5126 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4938 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4362 MB/s
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s +40%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4546 MB/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010.3 MB/s +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3900.46 MB/s +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3875.81 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3376 MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2831.66 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.46 MB/s +20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.7 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
62.76 MB/s +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.43 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
61.2 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
54.59 MB/s -11%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.54 MB/s +16%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
209.28 MB/s +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
207 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
181.9 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
177.87 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
137.9 MB/s -24%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2813.87 MB/s +155%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2593.07 MB/s +135%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2378 MB/s +115%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s +70%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1105 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
909.92 MB/s -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
892.37 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3498.72 MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3293 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3219.74 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3195.33 MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2669 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2526 MB/s -23%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2365.53 MB/s -28%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.079 ms * -259%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05538 ms * -152%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.052 ms * -136%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * -54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.031 ms * -41%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.027 ms * -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.023 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.064 ms * -191%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -145%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04826 ms * -119%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.029 ms * -32%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.02 ms * +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * +9%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

Grafikkort

Den härNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GPU för bärbar datorkan dra nytta av hela 140 watt (115 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost). Alternativt kan du få den bärbara datorn för lite mindre med enRTX 4060. I den syntetiska 3DMarks tog Core 16 ledningen över sina konkurrenter - dess prestanda låg cirka 13 procent över det typiska RTX 4070-genomsnittet i vår databas.

I batteriläge återstod endast 16 407 poäng från de ursprungliga 32 810 poäng som uppnåddes när vi körde Fire Strike igen - en nedgång med 50 procent.

Core 16 är också snabb när du spelar - men den kom inte ut på topp den här gången. Detta beror sannolikt på de CPU-tunga spelen som DOTA 2. Här uppnådde en hel del konkurrenter bättre CPU-prestanda.

I balanserat läge uppförde den sig konstigt när den körde The Witcher 3: Spelet kördes med cirka 117 fps, vilket är nästan lika snabbt som i overdrive. Detta innebar också att fläktarna inte riktigt gick tystare. Efter ungefär en minut sjönk bildfrekvensen plötsligt ner till 30 och fläktarna gav bara ifrån sig ljud på 28 dB. Det verkar som om det här läget inte är helt optimerat.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
93.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.4 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
91.6 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
91.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
90.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
87.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
86.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
45606 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43857 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
41302 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
41090 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
40995 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=61)
40495 Points -11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
39951 Points -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
38784 Points -15%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
175566 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
169253 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
163483 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
157673 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=26)
145806 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
143245 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
32810 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
30936 Points -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30239 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30051 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
29853 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=64)
29065 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
27343 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13040 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12617 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
11960 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11955 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
11868 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=62)
11625 Points -11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11168 Points -14%
3DMark 11 Performance
36692 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
65883 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
28810 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
12909 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24 Seconds * -20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=61)
21.5 Seconds * -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
21 Seconds * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
19 Seconds * +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds * +5%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=64)
40.5 Seconds * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=182, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds * -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
35 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
33 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
32 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
379 Seconds * -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
364 Seconds * -22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
299 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
298 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=61)
289 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
92.5 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.3 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.8 (114min) fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 fps -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.2 (98min) fps -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (102min) fps -7%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.9 (3.81min, 76.9P1) fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.7 (4.54min, 76.9P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.1 (4.31min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112.8 (4.13min, 66.7P1) fps -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.4 (36.1min, 71.4P1) fps -16%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.9 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=180, last 2 years)
119.9 fps -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps -8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.3 fps -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.1 fps -13%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
223 (89min, 167.8P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
218 (57.2min, 162.5P1) fps
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
208 (60.7min, 153.8P1) fps -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
200 (31.2min, 147.4P1) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
192.6 (25.1min, 144.3P1) fps -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
192 (24.8min, 138.8P1) fps -12%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182 (152.8min) fps +35%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
168.4 (146.6min) fps +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.7 (131.1min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
150.5 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
134.8 (119.8min) fps
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (112.7min) fps -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.8 (97.8min) fps -15%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
132.9 fps +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps +38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110.2 fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)
108.1 fps +26%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.4 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.5 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.3 fps -11%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
597 (520min) fps +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
500.9 (442min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (314 - 617, n=25)
463 fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 718, n=95, last 2 years)
458 fps +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
452.3 fps +24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
364.2 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
322.5 (274min) fps -11%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
415.1 (392min) fps +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
390.5 fps +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
375.9 (351min) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=98, last 2 years)
365 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (123.3 - 449, n=26)
348 fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
291.5 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
257.3 (239min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
245.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)
242 fps -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
226.7 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (123.9 - 268, n=40)
226 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
222.7 (209min) fps -9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
213.3 (182min) fps -13%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.8 (114min) fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 fps -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.2 (98min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (102min) fps -7%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
lågmed.högultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 185.4 174.1 116.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 364.2 291.5 245.2 120 92
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 161.2 153.5 142.2 134.8 136.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 215 171.4 124.8 91
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 123.7 108.3 85.5 85.7
Strange Brigade (2018) 367 302 249 218
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 77.2 55.3

Utsläpp & energi - Den svala Core 16 med uthållighet

Utsläpp av buller

I viloläge snurrar fläktarna ofta inte alls - särskilt i balanserat läge. Även i overdrive är detta ofta fallet, men här snurrar fläktarna ibland också snabbt.

Under belastning ökar Core 16:s ljudnivåer stadigt och inte i stora språng. Detta innebär att dess ljudnivåer förblir relativt låga under genomsnittlig belastning, till exempel i den första 3DMark06-benchmarkscenen.

Under kontinuerliga spelsessioner kan det bli ganska mycket högre, men konkurrenterna når liknande ljudnivåer - Acer Nitro 16 blir faktiskt outhärdligt högljudd. MSI Stealth 16 Studio och särskilt den svagare HP Victus 16 förblir tystare.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
23 / 28.48 / 28.48 dB(A)
Hög belastning
30 / 54.12 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.931.933.92530.533.730.53136.541.436.54026.726.926.75024.122.624.16337.832.537.88027.419.927.41002721.12712527.714.827.71602915.52920032.621.732.625035.418.135.431534.113.734.140038.612.338.650038.711.438.763042.510.942.580042.910.142.9100042.39.942.31250449.544160042.510.342.5200041.410.341.4250041.410.841.4315042.911.242.9400042.511.342.5500041.911.541.9630036.81236.880003412.8341000030.916.330.91250026.114.326.11600022.312.822.3SPL53.524.153.5N9.10.69.1median 38.6median 12median 38.6Delta6.52.26.541.434.939.337.636.733.432.130.128.130.327.426.824.223.923.725.220.423.62022.421.720.821.220.325.323.522.623.122.625.225.220.723.223.226.92418.220.220.926.224.117.517.417.427.12615.615.314.829.228.316.514.115.429.429.916.81414.73330.818.215.515.734.832.118.213.313.836.933.417.111.510.837.232.916.511.911.136.835.415.59.29.239.536.714.89.79.540.838.114.49.69.442.93814.19.79.643.136.412.21010.141.237.313.110.410.442.936.912.910.910.842.338.71311.111.144.43612.611.711.64235.612.811.9124233.812.911.711.841.930.413.612.212.239.127.413.211.711.835.624.612.21111.131.248.426.223.223.253.86.40.80.50.59.3median 33.4median 14.4median 11.7median 11.6median 39.14.62.121.95hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Noise
5%
-6%
-12%
5%
-8%
off / environment *
23
23.2
-1%
25.7
-12%
22.9
-0%
24
-4%
25
-9%
Idle Minimum *
23
23.2
-1%
25.7
-12%
29.1
-27%
24
-4%
28
-22%
Idle Average *
28.48
23.2
19%
25.7
10%
29.1
-2%
24
16%
29
-2%
Idle Maximum *
28.48
26.2
8%
26.3
8%
29.1
-2%
24
16%
30
-5%
Load Average *
30
31.4
-5%
33.9
-13%
45.7
-52%
34.81
-16%
43
-43%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.12
48.4
11%
54.3
-0%
44.05
19%
46
15%
Load Maximum *
54.12
53.8
1%
62
-15%
54.3
-0%
51.57
5%
48
11%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Schenker betonar att man använder termisk pasta med flytande metall. Core 16 blir aldrig riktigt varm - vi uppmätte hot spots på 46 °C runt mitten av baksidan under kontinuerlig belastning. Vänster sida och WASD-tangenterna verkar bli lite varmare än höger sida. 39 °C under belastning är fortfarande bra.

 43 °C46 °C43 °C 
 40 °C43 °C35 °C 
 27 °C27 °C27 °C 
Max: 46 °C
Medel: 36.8 °C
39 °C44 °C44 °C
28 °C33 °C30 °C
25 °C26 °C26 °C
Max: 44 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  59 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Witcher topp
Witcher topp
Witcher strömförsörjning
Witcher strömförsörjning
Witcher botten
Witcher botten
Stress topp
Stress topp
Stress strömförsörjning
Stress strömförsörjning
Stress nedåt
Stress botten
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
8%
-3%
-1%
-26%
-10%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
41.8
9%
41.5
10%
47.4
-3%
60
-30%
51
-11%
Maximum Bottom *
44
41.4
6%
51.8
-18%
54.4
-24%
61
-39%
54
-23%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
31.6
1%
28.4
11%
38.2
-19%
37
-16%
Idle Bottom *
33
30.4
8%
34.5
-5%
29.2
12%
37.7
-14%
29
12%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna har varken hög volym, mycket bas eller balanserade låg- och mellanregister. Endast diskanten är balanserad och linjär. Hörlurar eller ett externt system bör användas för en bättre ljudupplevelse. Ett headsetuttag och ett mikrofonuttag finns tillgängliga för anslutning av det förstnämnda.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203631362533.931.833.93137.437.237.44033.629.733.65031.62731.66330.221.830.28023.517.623.510024.418.324.412525.712.925.716042.211.242.220052.415.552.42505813.15831555.99.955.9400538.55350059.18.459.1630687.268800707.870100067.58.567.5125069.28.669.21600719.371200068.19.968.1250065.510.765.5315066.71166.7400068.511.368.5500060.911.660.9630065.811.765.8800063.611.863.61000068.211.868.21250064.711.764.71600057.41157.4SPL79.422.679.4N46.30.446.3median 64.7median 11median 64.7Delta7.61.77.633.736.633.727.826.227.822.824.222.821.619.321.619.220.619.223.423.423.421.720.421.721.218.621.22818.62838.218.338.246.518.246.552.318.852.358.617.958.664.918.964.964.818.764.867.917.567.973.617.773.674.318.374.370.417.570.471.316.171.368.514.968.56714.66764.214.564.263.413.763.466.712.266.768.11268.165.211.765.257.412.557.453.611.953.647.911.147.980.927.780.9490.949median 64.8median 17.5median 64.89.12.69.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

I viloläge är strömförbrukningen måttlig - vi är vana vid högre värden från de senaste XMG-modellerna. När du spelar är förbrukningen kopplad till prestandan, vilket är anledningen till att den här bärbara datorn ligger mellanLenovo Legion Pro 5och HP Omen Transcend 16å ena sidan, och mellan MSI Stealth 16 Studiooch HP Victus 16å andra sidan.

Vi uppmätte en kortvarig maximal förbrukning på 280 watt - 230-watts strömförsörjningen (nu FSP istället för LiteOn) kan kämpa ganska mycket med detta. Core förbrukar dock i genomsnitt 179 watt när den kör The Witcher 3 i Full HD Ultra, vilket innebär att strömförsörjningen bör ha tillräckliga reserver för spel och den kan alltid ladda den bärbara datorn på ett tillförlitligt sätt. Vi mätte dock en förbrukning som konstant var över 230 watt under de första minuterna av stresstestet - se kurvan nedan.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.7 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 11 / 15.2 / 16 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 64 / 280 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-26%
-19%
-82%
-6%
1%
-22%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
11
8.1
26%
11.6
-5%
19.2
-75%
11
-0%
8
27%
12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=52)
-13%
Idle Average *
15.2
15.9
-5%
15.6
-3%
22.7
-49%
18
-18%
13
14%
17.5 ?(4.6 - 35.1, n=52)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
16
37.2
-133%
16.5
-3%
55.4
-246%
19
-19%
22
-38%
24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=52)
-51%
Load Average *
64
90.9
-42%
155
-142%
128.4
-101%
91
-42%
86
-34%
98.2 ?(59.2 - 178, n=52)
-53%
Witcher 3 ultra *
179
189.6
-6%
154.8
14%
206
-15%
130
27%
141.8
21%
Load Maximum *
280
263.5
6%
205
27%
292
-4%
228
19%
233
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø179 (165.22-211.94)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø189.6 (178.6-202)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø154.8 (151.7-164.2)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø209 (119.15-279.86)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø190.7 (148.9-264)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø181.6 (150.2-215)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.3 (10.513-15.76)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.6 (8.19-21.9)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.2 (6.7-17.5)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø119.6 (116.33-121.43)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø147.3 (143.4-160)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.7 (82.83-112.88)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø146.3 (139.7-154.4)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø112.9 (64.19-116.81)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø174.3 (168.88-181.28)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø211 (203-215)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø181.8 (170.33-191.61)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø190.6 (186.4-199)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.3 (13.916-21.789)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.5 (7.11-23.4)

Körtider

Schenker har installerat ett 99 Wh-batteri i den bärbara datorn. DenLenovo Legion Pro 5 16har bara en 80 Wh-modell, men vissa konkurrenter som MSI Stealth 16eller HP Omen Transcend 16har batterier med samma kapacitet.

Trots detta saknar vi ett energisparläge i kontrollcentret - balanserat läge är det lägsta tillgängliga läget. Det leder fortfarande till bra drifttider. Vår H.264-kodade film spelades i en kontinuerlig slinga i över 8 timmar med reducerad ljusstyrka. Core uppnådde också nästan 8,5 timmar i WLAN-testet vid 150 nits. Endast Acer Nitro 16 kunde hålla jämna steg här.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
8tim 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 9min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 23min
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-55%
-6%
-50%
-11%
-15%
-33%
H.264
609
614
1%
462
-24%
WiFi v1.3
501
240
-52%
540
8%
250
-50%
466
-7%
426
-15%
Load
143
61
-57%
105
-27%
73
-49%
142
-1%
Reader / Idle
392
729
375
661

För

+ val mellan mekaniskt tangentbord och membrantangenter
+ 1 600p sRGB-skärm med mycket låga DeltaE-värden
+ kraftfull RTX 4070 (13 % över genomsnittet)
+ mycket snabb SSD (Samsung 990 Pro)
+ håller sig relativt sval
+ bra körtider

Emot

- Balanserat läge (när du spelar)
- pekplattans klick kan fastna lite
- strömförsörjningen närmar sig sin gräns vid maximal belastning

Omdöme - En bra gaminglaptop utan några större svagheter

XMG Core 16, tillhandahållen av Schenker
XMG Core 16, tillhandahållen av Schenker

16-tums bärbara datorer med RTX 4070 kostar från ca 1 600 USD. Detta gör inte Core 16 helt billig (se nedan). I gengäld levererar den bra 3D-prestanda, en av de snabbaste SSD-enheterna på marknaden, ett mekaniskt tangentbord som tillval, en bra 1 600p sRGB-panel med låga DeltaE-värden och mycket mer. Det är en väl avrundad gaming-laptop vars prestanda är precis lagom. För ännu bättre prestandanivåer skulle det behöva vara en HX-processor, eftersom RTX 4070 presterar utmärkt.

Du måste ta en närmare titt på enheten för att hitta några kritikvärdiga punkter. Dess 230-watts strömförsörjning kan vara överbelastad i extrema scenarier - åtminstone körde den över sina specifikationer i ganska många minuter under vårt stresstest. När vi spelade visade sig detta inte vara något problem. Dess balanserade läge har inte riktigt fulländats, vilket bara fungerade riktigt efter en minuts spelande och prestandan sjönk ner till batterinivå.

XMG Core 16 visade sig vara en bra bärbar speldator i alla våra tester, med sin kraftfulla RTX 4070 och mycket välkalibrerade sRGB-skärm.

Core 16:s största konkurrent ärLenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8som gjorde lika bra ifrån sig på många områden men kostar mindre. Å andra sidan har den inte riktigt lika bra körtider.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Du kan köpa Schenkers bärbara datorer via bestware.com. Vår konfiguration kostar ca 2 360 USD.

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) - 10/05/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Design
83 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
87%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
65 / 80 → 81%
Vikt
61 / 10-66 → 90%
Batteri
83 / 95 → 87%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 94%
Ljudnivå
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
72%
Medel
82%
89%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > SCHENKER XMG Core 16 gaming laptop recension - En riktig konkurrent till Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16
Christian Hintze, 2023-10-11 (Update: 2023-10-11)