Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) recension - Kompakt AMD subnotebook nu med Ryzen 8000 och ljusstarkare skärm

Många hamnar och bra underhållsmöjligheter.

Schenker VIA 14 Pro har uppdaterats och kommer nu med AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS och en ljusstarkare IPS-skärm. Tillverkaren har också tagit till sig av kritiken mot det smutsiga höljet och använder nu en annan beläggning. De omfattande anslutningsmöjligheterna och de två platserna för M.2 SSD-enheter har behållits.

Schenker har uppdaterat sin kompakta AMD-subnotebook VIA 14 Pro och jämfört med den gamla modellen (vi testade Linux-versionen) Tuxedo Pulse 14), en ny processor, en ljusstarkare skärm och en ny beläggning för höljet, som ska vara mindre känsligt för smuts.

Baspriset för Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) är 1 099 euro med tre års garanti (utan operativsystem). För detta levereras den som standard med AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB RAM, en 500 GB SSD och den matta 2,8K IPS-panelen som standard. Vår testkonfiguration är konfigurerad med 2 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro och Windows-förinstallationen, vilket höjer priset till 1 275 euro.

I den här artikeln kommer vi att fokusera på skillnaderna mot den gamla modellen, den ljusare skärmen och naturligtvis prestandan och effekterna på utsläppen. Omfattande information om fodralet, funktionerna och inmatningsenheterna finns i vår recension av Tuxedo Pulse 14.

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Grafikkort
AMD Radeon 780M, Kärna: 2700 MHz, Minne: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1
Minne
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard
Skärm
14.00 tum 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixlar 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, glansig: nej, 120 Hz
Moderkort
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Hårddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB 
, 1802 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kortläsare: microSD
Nätverk
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.5 x 313.5 x 222
Batteri
60 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: HD + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 100W PSU, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.4 kg, Strömförsörjning: 260 g
Pris
1275 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.1 %v8
07/2024
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1.4 kg18.5 mm14.00"2880x1800
83.5 %v8
06/2024
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.3 kg17.08 mm14.20"2880x1920
85.5 %v8
07/2024
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
88.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
88.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03/2024
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1.5 kg16 mm14.00"2880x1800
89 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01/2024
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1.4 kg18 mm14.00"2880x1800

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

Skillnader jämfört med föregångaren

Inte ens den nya beläggningen kan helt förhindra fingeravtryck.
Inte ens den nya beläggningen kan helt förhindra fingeravtryck.

I princip har ingenting förändrats på höljet. En kritikpunkt från oss när vi testade Tuxedo Pulse 14 var de mycket känsliga ytorna, på vilka fingeravtryck och smuts snabbt syntes och som inte heller var lätta att rengöra. För att motverka detta problem används nu en ny beläggning för att minska fingeravtryck. Resultatet är också något bättre, men fingeravtryck är fortfarande bättre och du måste rengöra fodralet ofta. Vi skulle fortfarande vilja se en ytterligare silverfärgad version.

Vi lade märke till den gröna statuslampan för webbkameran på Tuxedo Pulse 14, vilket också ledde till ett litet grönt skimmer i bilderna. Via 14 Pro, å andra sidan, använder en vit LED, som inte heller märks på bilderna. Bildkvaliteten för 720p-webbkameran är dock fortfarande dålig överlag.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

313.5 mm 222 mm 18.5 mm 1.4 kg313 mm 222 mm 18 mm 1.4 kg311.5 mm 226 mm 17.08 mm 1.3 kg312 mm 221 mm 16 mm 1.5 kg312 mm 220 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg312.4 mm 220.1 mm 14.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a)
Vänster: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a)
Höger sida: Kensington Lock (Nano Saver), microSD-läsare, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3,5 mm ljud
Höger sida: Kensington Lock (Nano Saver), microSD-läsare, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3,5 mm ljud
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
76.2 MB/s +314%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years)
52.8 MB/s +187%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
19.5 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
90.8 MB/s +304%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years)
64.3 MB/s +186%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
23.6 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.5 MB/s
Networking
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1257 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1625 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
968 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1416 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1667 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)
ColorChecker
20.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): 14.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.35 ∆E

Skärm - IPS-panelen är nu ljusare

Subpixel-struktur
Subpixel-struktur
Synlig blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
Synlig blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen

VIA 14 Pro förlitar sig fortfarande på en matt IPS-panel med en upplösning på 2 880 x 1 800 pixlar i 16:10-format och en frekvens på 120 Hz. Det är samma panel-ID som på Tuxedo Pulse 14, men ljusstyrkan har ökats. Schenker anger 400 cd/m², men vår testenhet överträffar klart denna specifikation med ett genomsnitt på 467 cd/m². Detta gör den också över 100 cd/m² ljusare än Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. Svartnivån ligger på goda 0,29 cd/m², vilket resulterar i ett mycket bra kontrastförhållande på cirka 1 600:1.

Det subjektiva bildintrycket av panelen är överlag hyfsat och ljusa områden framstår fortfarande som något korniga, och det finns också små halos. PWM används inte och svarstiderna är obetydliga, men inte särskilt snabba.

474
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 466 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1607:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2"
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Display
2%
1%
21%
27%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
70.1
72.42
3%
70.3
0%
98.6
41%
99.9
43%
71.1
1%
sRGB Coverage
97.7
99.79
2%
99.7
2%
99.9
2%
100
2%
98.7
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.3
73.94
2%
72.1
0%
87.3
21%
98.9
37%
73.2
1%
Response Times
24%
3%
95%
97%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.1 ?(14.9, 16.2)
7 ?(3.5, 3.5)
77%
32.7 ?(14.8, 17.9)
-5%
1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62)
96%
0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3)
98%
37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5)
-22%
Response Time Black / White *
17.1 ?(7, 10.1)
22 ?(18.5, 3.5)
-29%
15.2 ?(5.1, 10.1)
11%
1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59)
93%
0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33)
96%
23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7)
-35%
PWM Frequency
238 ?(100)
480 ?(99)
240 ?(99)
Screen
181%
13%
320%
-5%
14%
Brightness middle
466
373
-20%
418
-10%
387
-17%
411
-12%
340
-27%
Brightness
467
377
-19%
408
-13%
386
-17%
414
-11%
338
-28%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
90
-4%
98
4%
99
5%
84
-11%
Black Level *
0.29
0.015
95%
0.3
-3%
0.01
97%
0.16
45%
Contrast
1607
24867
1447%
1393
-13%
38700
2308%
2125
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
1.47
41%
1.6
36%
1
60%
2.8
-12%
1.7
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.1
2.49
59%
2.5
59%
2.4
61%
5.5
10%
3
51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.3
1.78
-37%
1.1
15%
2.2
-69%
1.3
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.7
59%
2
51%
1.4
66%
1.8
56%
2.9
29%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.179 101%
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
7386 88%
6556 99%
6851 95%
6466 101%
6319 103%
6729 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
69% / 120%
6% / 9%
145% / 217%
40% / 20%
-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Vi mätte panelen med den professionella mjukvaran CalMAN och från fabrik har panelen ett synligt blått skimmer i kombination med en färgtemperatur som är för kall, även om detta har en positiv effekt på den maximala ljusstyrkan. Färgvisningen är dock redan okej. Med vår kalibrering (profilen finns tillgänglig för gratis nedladdning ovan) kan vi förbättra visningen avsevärt, men den maximala ljusstyrkan sjunker till cirka 425 cd/m². Tillsammans med den fullständiga sRGB-täckningen är den bärbara datorn också lämplig för redigering av bilder/videor.

CalMAN Gråskala
CalMAN Gråskala
CalMAN-mättnad
CalMAN-mättnad
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN gråskala kalibrerad
CalMAN gråskala kalibrerad
CalMAN mättnad kalibrerad
CalMAN mättnad kalibrerad
CalMAN ColorChecker kalibrerad
CalMAN ColorChecker kalibrerad
jämfört med sRGB
jämfört med sRGB
mot P3
mot P3
jämfört med AdobeRGB
jämfört med AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.9 ms rise
↘ 16.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8782 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Utomhus (ljus dag, inget direkt solljus)
Utomhus (ljus dag, inget direkt solljus)
I solen
I solen

Bortsett från direkt solljus kan den matta panelen också användas utomhus på ljusa dagar. IPS-skärmens betraktningsvinkelstabilitet är god.

Betraktningsvinklar
Betraktningsvinklar

Prestanda - AMD Ryzen 8000 och 32 GB RAM

 
 
 

Testförhållanden

VIA 14 Pro (M24) är den första bärbara datorn från Schenker utan kommandocentral; i stället kan energiprofilerna växlas med F3-tangenten. Den aktiva energiprofilen visas då kort på skärmen. Totalt finns tre profiler tillgängliga: Tyst, Balanserad och Prestanda. Vi har sammanfattat motsvarande TDP-värden och prestandadata i följande tabell. Vi har utfört följande benchmarks och mätningar med Performance-profilen.

Energiprofil CPU TDP CB R23 Multi Time Spy Grafik max. Fläktvolym
Tyst 25 -> 15 watt 10.593 poäng 2.492 poäng 30,6 dB(A)
Balanced 45 -> 35 watt 15.250 poäng 2.877 poäng 36,2 dB(A)
Power 54 watt 16.330 poäng 2.915 poäng 43,6 dB(A)

Processor - Ryzen 7 8845HS

Processorn ändrades från den AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS till Ryzen 7 8845HS, som fortfarande använder 8 Zen4-kärnor (16 trådar) med en maximal klockhastighet på 5,1 GHz. Föga förvånande är prestandan därför också jämförbar och alla jämförelseenheter ligger mycket nära varandra totalt sett. Prestandan är mycket bra i både flerkärniga och enkärniga tester och det finns inga flaskhalsar här, inte ens med krävande uppgifter. I batteriläge är den maximala förbrukningen begränsad till 35 watt, vilket är anledningen till att prestandan för flera kärnor är 12% lägre.

Ytterligare CPU-benchmarks kan hittas här.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
85.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
84.6 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
83.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
83 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
81.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
80.3 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
78.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
67.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17077 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16387 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (15026 - 18037, n=9)
16246 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16145 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
15889 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
15515 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
13888 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=60, last 2 years)
11728 Points -28%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1776 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1774 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1746 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1623 - 1783, n=9)
1746 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1742 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1716 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=60, last 2 years)
1666 Points -6%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6575 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6424 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5883 - 7026, n=9)
6359 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6251 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6231 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6061 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
5414 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=56, last 2 years)
4557 Points -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
690 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
685 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (673 - 698, n=9)
685 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
679 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
678 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
677 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=56, last 2 years)
635 Points -7%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2731 (2302.42min - 2731.12max) Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2595 (2132.08min - 2595.21max) Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2342 - 2908, n=9)
2570 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2568 (2508.31min - 2568.38max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2555 (2513.19min - 2555.42max) Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2482 (2389.2min - 2482.31max) Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2176 (2149.96min - 2176.16max) Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=62, last 2 years)
1994 Points -22%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
280 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (269 - 283, n=9)
277 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
274 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
268 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
258 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
250 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=57, last 2 years)
248 Points -10%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=60, last 2 years)
359 Seconds * -83%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
226 Seconds * -15%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
218 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
216 Seconds * -10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
208 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (179 - 216, n=9)
201 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
196 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * +2%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
68354 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (64759 - 74664, n=9)
68234 MIPS 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
67444 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
66807 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
65072 MIPS -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
61780 MIPS -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
61047 MIPS -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=53, last 2 years)
49020 MIPS -28%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6403 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6278 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6274 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5197 - 6714, n=9)
6258 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
6205 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=55, last 2 years)
5481 MIPS -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5372 MIPS -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5245 MIPS -16%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13417 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12940 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12700 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11073 - 14014, n=13)
12872 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12796 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12643 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12578 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2244 - 15220, n=54, last 2 years)
11611 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
11279 Points -13%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2510 - 2698, n=11)
2613 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2612 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2555 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2604 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2552 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2540 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (960 - 3130, n=49, last 2 years)
2487 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2372 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2369 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13137 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12189 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11516 - 12726, n=10)
11947 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11802 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11780 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11754 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=56, last 2 years)
10127 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
9897 Points -16%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1965 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1945 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1942 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1765 - 2004, n=10)
1917 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1875 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=56, last 2 years)
1779 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1754 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1750 Points -11%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
20.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (18.6 - 22.7, n=9)
20.1 fps -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.5 fps -6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
19.4 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.6 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
17 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=55, last 2 years)
13 fps -37%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.2 s * -78%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=55, last 2 years)
54.7 s * -23%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (44.5 - 77, n=9)
51.4 s * -16%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
50.4 s * -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
47.8 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.1 s * -6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
44.5 s *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
43.9 s * +1%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=55, last 2 years)
0.519 sec * -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.478 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4753 sec * -1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4716 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=9)
0.456 sec * +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
0.4521 sec * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4477 sec * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4464 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2568 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
176.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
277 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
93.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
92.5 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
92.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
76.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69.5 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
67.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
57.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
26362 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (23708 - 29544, n=9)
26003 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25961 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
24712 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
22269 KRay/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
14196 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13188 KRay/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1141 - 32888, n=55, last 2 years)
12868 KRay/s -51%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
110027 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (99659 - 125873, n=9)
109759 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
107613 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
103755 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
93550 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75664 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69098 Points -36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6838 - 123315, n=55, last 2 years)
61106 Points -43%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (4503 - 5180, n=9)
4750 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4732 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4646 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4627 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
4132 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3507 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3348 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (444 - 5287, n=55, last 2 years)
2894 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (109458 - 124695, n=9)
116101 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
115682 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
114899 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
114236 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
99874 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89759 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
82364 Points -29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11579 - 115682, n=55, last 2 years)
80954 Points -30%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
15226 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14941 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14062 - 15519, n=9)
14917 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14385 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
13731 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9873 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9291 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (744 - 18418, n=55, last 2 years)
8287 Points -46%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58765 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (53436 - 67367, n=9)
58623 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
57671 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
55540 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
49687 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
37090 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
33802 Points -41%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3366 - 65433, n=55, last 2 years)
31734 Points -45%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
161430 MB/s +87%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
124284 MB/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67393 - 172642, n=9)
101422 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86256 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
76247 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
73336 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67393 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=55, last 2 years)
60840 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1085 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1058 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1021 MB/s -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1005 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (627 - 1080, n=9)
968 MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.9 - 1379, n=55, last 2 years)
749 MB/s -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
627 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
468 MB/s -56%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13999 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13896 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (12361 - 15911, n=9)
13825 KRay/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13100 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
11637 KRay/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7521 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
6835 KRay/s -51%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (610 - 17495, n=55, last 2 years)
6680 KRay/s -52%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
51390 MPixel/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
40779 MPixel/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (38580 - 41668, n=9)
40204 MPixel/s +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6569 - 53954, n=55, last 2 years)
39784 MPixel/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
39002 MPixel/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
38837 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
38580 MPixel/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
35861 MPixel/s -7%

Systemets prestanda

Resultaten i systembenchmarks är överlag bra och VIA 14 Pro var alltid en responsiv följeslagare i vardagen. Även om RAM-minnet inte kan uppgraderas är 32 GB redan installerat som standard, vilket bör vara tillräckligt för de allra flesta användare under många år framöver.

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7428 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7120 - 7641, n=6)
7339 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7157 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
7120 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
7045 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
7028 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=48, last 2 years)
6416 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11168 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (10685 - 11570, n=6)
10978 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
10946 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
10894 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
10855 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10732 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
10685 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years)
10496 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10449 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
10279 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9787 - 10482, n=6)
10195 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
9969 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
9787 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
8837 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
8804 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=48, last 2 years)
8614 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
9823 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
9812 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9346 - 10009, n=6)
9589 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
9423 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
9367 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8873 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years)
8009 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1852 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1840 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1810 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1652 - 1939, n=6)
1800 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1779 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1698 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1694 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 1971, n=53, last 2 years)
1575 Points -11%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1784 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1770 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1745 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1562 - 1872, n=6)
1728 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1716 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1658 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1598 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1875, n=53, last 2 years)
1518 Points -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1999 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1978 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1942 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1822 - 2040, n=6)
1942 Points 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1925 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1909 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1842 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (385 - 2210, n=53, last 2 years)
1725 Points -11%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1721 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1703 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1456 - 1849, n=6)
1621 Points +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1612 Points +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1523 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1428 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
1377 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=53, last 2 years)
1350 Points -11%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
440 Points +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
324 Points +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
308 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (295 - 334, n=6)
307 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 448, n=55, last 2 years)
304 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
295 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
278 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
276 Points -10%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
319 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (245 - 314, n=6)
264 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
254 Points +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 325, n=53, last 2 years)
254 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
248 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
247 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
247 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
245 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
544 ms * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (501 - 664, n=6)
543 ms * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
531 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
530 ms * -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1104, n=62, last 2 years)
530 ms * -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
518 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
516 ms *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
508 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7120 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
93396 MB/s +35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
76766 MB/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
76483 MB/s +11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14916 - 108756, n=55, last 2 years)
69680 MB/s +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
69522 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
69160 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
67660 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (61459 - 70235, n=9)
67465 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
84853 MB/s +70%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
70384 MB/s +41%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15948 - 122210, n=55, last 2 years)
66982 MB/s +34%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (49866 - 61976, n=9)
58787 MB/s +18%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
58321 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
50572 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
49971 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
49866 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
107658 MB/s +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
93323 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
93239 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
93229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (68425 - 93239, n=9)
85673 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16513 - 112837, n=55, last 2 years)
72540 MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
67847 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58692 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
187.8 ns * -75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.4 ns * -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
114.5 ns * -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.4 - 187.8, n=55, last 2 years)
107.3 ns * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
107.1 ns *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
106 ns * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
101.8 ns * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (82.5 - 117, n=9)
96.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

I vårt standardiserade latensprov (surfing på Internet, 4K YouTube-uppspelning, CPU-belastning) visar testenheten med den aktuella BIOS-versionen inga begränsningar. Även om en drivrutin misslyckas något, är det viktiga latensvärdet för avbrott-till-process mycket lågt.

LatencyMon - Översikt
LatencyMon - Översikt
LatencyMon - Drivrutin
LatencyMon - Drivrutin
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1219.5 μs * -156%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1102.5 μs * -131%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1045.4 μs * -119%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
848.9 μs * -78%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
476.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Två platser för M.2-2280 SSD-enheter
Två platser för M.2-2280 SSD-enheter

VIA 14 Pro erbjuder två snabba PCIe 4.0-kortplatser för M.2 2280 SSD-enheter. En 500 GB SSD är installerad i grundkonfigurationen, men vår testenhet innehåller 2 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro (tilläggsavgift 138 euro). 990 Pro uppnår höga överföringshastigheter och prestandan förblir helt stabil även under långvarig belastning. Efter den första uppstarten har användaren 1,76 TB till sitt förfogande. Ytterligare SSD-benchmarks kan hittas här.

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7124 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6890 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 388 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1211 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
89.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
 
87.6 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
71.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
70.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
69.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
52.5 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
45.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
44.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4269 (4234.28min - 4269.44max) MB/s +29%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4057 (4023.18min - 4057.01max) MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
3322 (3294.63min - 3322.45max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3300 (3279.05min - 3299.87max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (2985 - 3322, n=2)
3154 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 4501, n=55, last 2 years)
2946 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2498 (2465.72min - 2497.5max) MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2379 (2365.59min - 2378.73max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4695 (4542.57min - 4694.68max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (4138 - 5099, n=2)
4619 MB/s +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4317 (4288.28min - 4317.37max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
4138 (4046.54min - 4137.79max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3660 (3614.13min - 3659.97max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 5344, n=55, last 2 years)
2950 MB/s -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2604 (2525.41min - 2604.03max) MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2211 (2136.92min - 2210.59max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
6844 (6027.53min - 6843.85max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (5761 - 7102, n=2)
6432 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
5761 (5244.77min - 5760.67max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
5251 (4849.66min - 5251.27max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 7155, n=55, last 2 years)
5089 MB/s -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4911 (4608.27min - 4910.87max) MB/s -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4504 (3696.49min - 4504.05max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3857 (3120.3min - 3857.29max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
6810 (6778.41min - 6809.87max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (6801 - 6810, n=2)
6806 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4955 (4919.92min - 4955.1max) MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4676 (4556.48min - 4675.9max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4467 (4437.85min - 4466.6max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 6810, n=55, last 2 years)
3997 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3105 (3076.1min - 3105.46max) MB/s -54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2871 (2734.06min - 2871.34max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
82.2 (81.81min - 82.16max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
77.8 (73.1min - 77.81max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (67.3 - 80.7, n=2)
74 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
67.3 (66.81min - 67.29max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
62.2 (61.77min - 62.19max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.27 - 87.4, n=55, last 2 years)
61.5 MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
58.8 (58.1min - 58.81max) MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
34.6 (34.41min - 34.64max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (159.4 - 352, n=2)
256 MB/s +61%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
245 (242.81min - 244.56max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
221 (220.34min - 221.44max) MB/s +39%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
205 (203.95min - 205.23max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 360, n=55, last 2 years)
161 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
159.4 (155.73min - 159.37max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
157.7 (151.37min - 157.68max) MB/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
112.5 (111.01min - 112.51max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4286 (4274.43min - 4286.07max) MB/s +313%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3460 (3433.29min - 3460.15max) MB/s +234%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (1037 - 5735, n=2)
3386 MB/s +227%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
3048 (2829.43min - 3047.69max) MB/s +194%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.1 - 4286, n=55, last 2 years)
1303 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1037 (1017.69min - 1037.34max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
909 (848.35min - 908.51max) MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
850 (824.69min - 850.28max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4189 (4136.14min - 4188.97max) MB/s +769%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3266 (3227.93min - 3265.61max) MB/s +578%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2980 (2752.98min - 2980.38max) MB/s +518%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (482 - 4869, n=2)
2676 MB/s +455%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.2 - 4189, n=55, last 2 years)
900 MB/s +87%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
482 (476.35min - 481.55max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
435 (416.7min - 435.33max) MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
375 (355.65min - 375.1max) MB/s -22%
AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
8892 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (6556 - 10745, n=2)
8651 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
7325 Points +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
6556 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4927 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (515 - 8892, n=54, last 2 years)
4389 Points -33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3819 Points -42%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3408 Points -48%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3307 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2782 Points +100%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (1391 - 3980, n=2)
2686 Points +93%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1784 Points +28%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
1391 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (246 - 3307, n=54, last 2 years)
1387 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1217 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1195 Points -14%
Score Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (4469 - 4734, n=2)
4602 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
4469 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3972 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3203 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153 - 4469, n=54, last 2 years)
2349 Points -47%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2223 Points -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
2070 Points -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1632 Points -63%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
5525 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (4336 - 5066, n=2)
4701 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
4336 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4310 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4109 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (448 - 5525, n=54, last 2 years)
3976 MB/s -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3675 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
3304 MB/s -24%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (3714 - 5119, n=2)
4416 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4104 MB/s +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4004 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
3714 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2791 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (99 - 4961, n=54, last 2 years)
2598 MB/s -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2172 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1828 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
72.3 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (64.2 - 77.8, n=2)
71 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
64.2 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19.8 - 96.2, n=54, last 2 years)
58.7 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
58.5 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
57.8 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51 MB/s -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
49.9 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (192.8 - 307, n=2)
250 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
192.8 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
180.6 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 256, n=54, last 2 years)
178.1 MB/s -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
177.1 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
173.1 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
167.9 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
161 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
2682 MB/s +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2301 MB/s +158%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (893 - 3395, n=2)
2144 MB/s +140%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1315 MB/s +47%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (181.8 - 2682, n=54, last 2 years)
931 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
893 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
806 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
798 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (3905 - 3915, n=2)
3910 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
3905 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3410 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2743 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (105.9 - 3905, n=54, last 2 years)
1907 MB/s -51%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
1719 MB/s -56%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1639 MB/s -58%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1238 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.058 ms * -190%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.02 - 0.167, n=54, last 2 years)
0.05709 ms * -185%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (0.02 - 0.052, n=2)
0.036 ms * -80%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.027 ms * -35%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
0.024 ms * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.023 ms * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
YMTC PC300-1TB
0.11 ms * -450%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
0.108 ms * -440%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.1 ms * -400%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.017 - 0.352, n=54, last 2 years)
0.07513 ms * -276%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
0.025 ms * -25%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
0.02 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
  (0.013 - 0.02, n=2)
0.0165 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02905808701160145017402030232026102900319034803770406043504640493052205510Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)

Grafikkort

Ryzen 8000-serien förlitar sig fortfarande på den välkända Radeon 780Msom drar nytta av RAM-minnets dubbelkanaliga konfiguration. IGPU är mycket lämplig för daglig användning och spel är också möjligt, även om du ofta måste vara nöjd med låga detaljer i aktuella titlar. I de syntetiska benchmarks, den nya Intel Arc Graphics iGPU (med 8 Xe-kärnor) något bättre än 780M, men spelprestandan är på samma nivå.

Grafikprestandan förblir helt stabil även under långvarig belastning, och vårt Cyberpunk 2077-test (30 minuter) visar inte heller någon prestandaförlust. I batteriläge reduceras dock GPU-prestandan minimalt (~11%). Ytterligare GPU-benchmarks finns tillgängliga i vårt teknikavsnitt.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
93 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
90 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
87.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
85.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
84.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
82.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
71.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13734 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13524 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13321 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13316 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
12999 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=52)
12432 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12375 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=52, last 2 years)
9580 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9548 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
8538 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8513 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
8441 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8438 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8345 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=54)
7724 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=56, last 2 years)
6888 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3671 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3411 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3027 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2915 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2876 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2847 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=54)
2713 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (999 - 4501, n=57, last 2 years)
2519 Points -14%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34669 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
31025 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
30818 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
27410 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
29233 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15316 - 33077, n=49)
28815 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
28473 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10125 - 52427, n=48, last 2 years)
26600 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26058 Points -15%
3DMark 11 Performance
13077 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7731 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
3234 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
2788 poäng
Hjälp
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (241 - 1127, n=57, last 2 years)
558 Seconds * -78%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
385 Seconds * -23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 664, n=50)
375 Seconds * -19%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
369 Seconds * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
352 Seconds * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
341 Seconds * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
336 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
314 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years)
294 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
223 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
93.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
92.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88.3 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
87.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
87.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
74.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
72.4 pt
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (3.56min, 19.2P1) fps +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.1 (3.98min, 18.9P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 (3.05min, 18.2P1) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (2.69min, 16.4P1) fps -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.6 (2.88min, 15.9P1) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.81 - 53, n=52, last 2 years)
19.2 fps -26%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.6 fps +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.4 fps -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
26.5 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.9 - 44.2, n=58, last 2 years)
23.1 fps -20%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
58 fps +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49.6 (35.6min, 39P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
48.9 (6.3min, 16.2P1) fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.1 (10.9min, 15.3P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 70.7, n=58, last 2 years)
39.6 fps -19%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.1 (75.2min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
76.8 (67.2min) fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
75.1 (65.6min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
75 (63.4min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
74 (46.7min) fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=60, last 2 years)
61.9 fps -18%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
35.2 (33.9min) fps -53%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
39.5 fps +28%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
35.4 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.7 - 97.1, n=54, last 2 years)
34.1 fps +10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.3 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.7 fps +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
31 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.9 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

05101520Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 147.5 133.8 64.1 26.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 122.9 102.7 84.1 75.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 75.6 38.2 28.8 20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 53 38.1 30.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 155 66 57 49
F1 23 (2023) 85.9 76.7 53 11.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 40.1 31.5 25.8 25.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 41.5 32.2 25.8 22.4
F1 24 (2024) 85.9 71.9 51.4 11.1

Utsläpp & Energi

Bullerutsläpp

Kylning av VIA 14 Pro
Kylning av VIA 14 Pro

Kylningen av VIA 14 Pro sker med hjälp av två fläktar och volymen beror till stor del på den valda energiprofilen. I viloläge och vid enkla uppgifter är enheten mestadels tyst, även i prestandaläget. Under högre belastning märks dock de två fläktarna tydligt och ett maximum på 43,6 dB(A) är inte särskilt tyst. Resultaten för de andra energiprofilerna listas i följande tabell. Fläktarna förblir avaktiverade under mycket lång tid, särskilt i Quiet-profilen. Det fanns inga andra elektroniska ljud i vår testenhet.

Energiprofil 3DMark 06 Cyberpunk 2077 Stresstest
Tyst Fläkt av 28,8 dB(A) 30,6 dB(A)
Balanserad 36,2 dB(A) 36,2 dB(A) 36,2 dB(A)
Ström 36,2 dB(A) 43,6 dB(A) 43,6 dB(A)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A)
Hög belastning
36.2 / 43.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.943.642.935.12535.734.338.229.43131.830.733.630.64033.230.433.337.75031.130.830.429.36331.23027.328.28029.224.722.825.210026.225.323.722.512524.122.921.820.616023.222.120.120.520025.224.421.921.825025.423.622.221.831526.923.317.81940029.423.51516.85003124.212.815.463030.324.513.514.580031.424.813.314100029.824.512.113.4125031.724.812.313.8160033.726.611.914.2200032.426.112.213.525003224.312.613.6315031.423.71313.8400031.623.513.413.7500031.724.113.514.3630033.223.213.815.2800030.819.513.714.51000026.717.413.914.31250022.715.213.714.31600017.714.21313.8SPL43.636.225.826.7N4.62.50.80.9median 30.3median 23.7median 13.5median 14.3Delta3.61.52.42.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Noise
1%
3%
2%
1%
9%
off / environment *
25.7
25.11
2%
23.8
7%
25.1
2%
23.9
7%
23.5
9%
Idle Minimum *
25.7
25.11
2%
23.8
7%
25.1
2%
23.9
7%
23.5
9%
Idle Average *
25.7
25.11
2%
23.8
7%
25.1
2%
23.9
7%
23.5
9%
Idle Maximum *
25.7
27.2
-6%
27.1
-5%
25.1
2%
23.9
7%
25.1
2%
Load Average *
36.2
31.3
14%
34.9
4%
35.9
1%
44.3
-22%
32.4
10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
43.6
43.7
-0%
Load Maximum *
43.6
46.61
-7%
43.7
-0%
42.2
3%
44.3
-2%
37.3
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.3
41.3
34.9

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Höljet på VIA 14 Pro värms knappt upp i viloläge och under lätta uppgifter, men detta förändras under belastning. På undersidan uppmätte vi nästan 50 °C i mittområdet både under spel och i stresstestet, vilket är anledningen till att du inte bör placera enheten på låren i ett sådant scenario. Tangentbordsområdet blir också märkbart varmt med upp till 43 °C, men här finns inga begränsningar. I stresstestet arbetar processorn med en konstant effekt på 54 watt.

På den negativa sidan noterade vi 100-watts strömförsörjning, som skiljer sig något från Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3-strömförsörjningen. Även om den bärbara datorns totala förbrukning under stresstestet är cirka 92 watt och därför ännu inte ligger på strömförsörjningens gräns, är temperaturer på strax under 60 °C definitivt för höga.

Stresstest för CPU/iGPU-data
Stresstest för CPU/iGPU-data
 44.1 °C44.6 °C43.2 °C 
 41.7 °C43.6 °C40.1 °C 
 31.9 °C33 °C32.8 °C 
Max: 44.6 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
44.6 °C50.9 °C42.2 °C
39.3 °C50 °C34.4 °C
34.3 °C35.5 °C32.6 °C
Max: 50.9 °C
Medel: 40.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  59.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (ovansida)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (ovansida)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (undersida)
Stresstest av yttemperaturer (undersida)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat
-6%
-2%
2%
11%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.6
45.2
-1%
43.7
2%
43.1
3%
39.6
11%
41.5
7%
Maximum Bottom *
50.9
49.2
3%
49.4
3%
50.2
1%
38.6
24%
45.7
10%
Idle Upper Side *
26.5
29.6
-12%
27.7
-5%
25.8
3%
24.8
6%
24.7
7%
Idle Bottom *
26.3
30.2
-15%
28.6
-9%
26.4
-0%
25.3
4%
24.9
5%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.946.72538.236.83133.637.34033.334.75030.431.66327.3298022.824.910023.727.312521.833.116020.133.520021.941.625022.243.631517.850.3400155350012.85663013.560.480013.370.6100012.172.2125012.371.2160011.965.8200012.270.6250012.667.531501368400013.469.6500013.567.2630013.868.9800013.771.41000013.968.31250013.766.1160001361.3SPL25.880.9N0.848.5median 13.5median 66.1Delta2.410.546.442.244.437.53534.334.63233.135.529.530.1362928.229.623.725.634.92027.147.122.139.85520.349.660.721.655.266.418.759.365.214.158.863.813.158.367.712.661.377.414.171.177.812.67275.612.470.376.312.269.667.91262.167.612.561.665.612.559.765.912.659.965.813.159.764.713.158.970.413.364.369.813.363.96413.357.966.313.160.561.212.955.258.71252.683.125.177.154.80.638median 65.9median 13.1median 59.73.81.53.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Den högre ljusstyrkan i panelen märks inte negativt jämfört med Tuxedo Pulse 14 och den maximala förbrukningen på 94 watt är också något lägre. Allt som allt finns det inga överraskningar här och den medföljande 100 watt strömförsörjningen är tillräckligt dimensionerad. Förbrukningen när den är avstängd har dock fortfarande inte förbättrats och 0,8 watt är lite högt.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.8 / 0.86 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 63.2 / 94.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Power Consumption
11%
2%
27%
5%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
4.8
4.4
8%
4.4
8%
3.6
25%
5.3
-10%
5.6
-17%
Idle Average *
8.7
5.6
36%
9.2
-6%
6.6
24%
7.2
17%
9.2
-6%
Idle Maximum *
9.2
12.5
-36%
9.6
-4%
7.4
20%
7.5
18%
9.7
-5%
Load Average *
63.2
52.1
18%
62.6
1%
47.1
25%
65.6
-4%
65.2
-3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
81.3
71.5
12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
80.2
71.9
10%
Load Maximum *
94.5
67.3
29%
101.7
-8%
54.3
43%
89.6
5%
101
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.7
47.4
73
70

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)

Batteriets livslängd

Batteritiderna i kombination med 60 Wh-batteriet är inte dåliga i sig, men VIA 14 Pro får se sig slaget av konkurrenterna. Frekvensen har endast ett minimalt inflytande på batteritiderna, vilket också framgår av följande tabell. Ljusstyrkan på 150 cd/m² för WLAN- och videotestet motsvarar 32% av den maximala ljusstyrkan på testenheten.

Frekvens WLAN-test 150 cd/m² WLAN-test maximal ljusstyrka
60 Hz 9:31 timmar 6:16 timmar
120 Hz 9:28 timmar 6:06 timmar
Laddningsprocess
Laddningsprocess
Information om batteriet
Information om batteriet

En full laddning med påslagen enhet tar 141 minuter. 80% av kapaciteten är tillgänglig igen efter ca 55 minuter.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
9tim 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 04min
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
118%
73%
66%
55%
6%
51%
H.264
612
1251
104%
1046
71%
1031
68%
595
-3%
WiFi v1.3
571
758
33%
888
56%
774
36%
710
24%
620
9%
Load
64
194
203%
101
58%
123
92%
110
72%
72
13%

För

+ mycket hög systemprestanda
+ bra 120 Hz IPS-skärm utan PWM
+ 32 GB RAM-minne som standard
+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4 för upp till 8 TB lagringsutrymme
+ bekvämt tangentbord
+ bra utbud av anslutningar

Emot

- ingen USB 4.0
- långsam microSD-kortläsare
- Fodralet är känsligt för fingeravtryck
- dålig 720p webbkamera
- RAM lödd
- höga strömförsörjningstemperaturer

Omdöme - Schenker VIA 14 Pro nu med en ljusstarkare skärm

I recension: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Testanordning tillhandahållen av: Schenker Tyskland
I recension: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Testanordning tillhandahållen av: Schenker Tyskland

Med VIA 14 Pro erbjuder Schenker en snabb och kompakt 14-tums enhet, som förutom den kraftfulla Ryzen-processorn och standard RAM-konfigurationen på 32 GB framför allt kännetecknas av de goda expansionsmöjligheterna (2x M.2-2280). Det finns också ett tillräckligt antal portar tillgängliga, även om du måste klara dig utan moderna standarder som USB 4.0. MicroSD-kortläsaren är dock mycket långsam och den svaga 720p-webbkameran är inte längre uppdaterad. Trots den nya ytan är fingeravtryck fortfarande ett problem.

Den nya Ryzen-processorn erbjuder gott om prestanda och den snabba Radeon 780M GPU, men det finns ingen fördel jämfört med den gamla Ryzen 7 7840HS i föregångarmodellen. Den stora uppgraderingen för modellåret 2024 är IPS-skärmen, som nu är betydligt ljusstarkare. Tillverkarens specifikation ökar från 300 till 400 cd/m², och vår testenhet nådde till och med ett genomsnitt på strax under 470 cd/m². Efter kalibrering är bildkvaliteten också mycket bra.

Schenker VIA Pro 14 är en snabb 14-tums bärbar dator och erbjuder nu en ljusstarkare IPS-skärm, vilket är mycket lämpligt för produktiva aktiviteter. Pris-prestanda-förhållandet är anständigt, men det finns några områden där du måste göra uppoffringar (ingen USB 4.0, svag webbkamera, långsam kortläsare).

Jämfört med konkurrenterna får VIA 14 Pro särskilt bra betyg med sitt 32 GB RAM-minne och två SSD-kortplatser, vilket är ovanligt för 14-tumsmodeller. En del av konkurrenterna erbjuder dock OLED-paneler och har även fördelar när det gäller batteritid. Tuxedo erbjuder nu även den identiska Pulse 14 Gen4 med Linux från 1 230 euro.

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) - 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Design
85 / 98 → 87%
Tangentbord
88%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
60 / 74 → 81%
Vikt
70 / 20-77 → 88%
Batteri
87%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
53 / 75 → 70%
Programprestanda
86 / 92 → 93%
Temperatur
81%
Ljudnivå
85%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
23 / 75 → 31%
Medel
62%
85%
Subnotebook - Vägt medel
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
76.9%
Repairability
90%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) recension - Kompakt AMD subnotebook nu med Ryzen 8000 och ljusstarkare skärm
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-13 (Update: 2024-07-13)