Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) recension - Kompakt AMD subnotebook nu med Ryzen 8000 och ljusstarkare skärm

Name: SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Brand: SCHENKER

Många hamnar och bra underhållsmöjligheter.

Schenker VIA 14 Pro har uppdaterats och kommer nu med AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS och en ljusstarkare IPS-skärm. Tillverkaren har också tagit till sig av kritiken mot det smutsiga höljet och använder nu en annan beläggning. De omfattande anslutningsmöjligheterna och de två platserna för M.2 SSD-enheter har behållits.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/13/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD AI Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Zen 4

Schenker har uppdaterat sin kompakta AMD-subnotebook VIA 14 Pro och jämfört med den gamla modellen (vi testade Linux-versionen) Tuxedo Pulse 14), en ny processor, en ljusstarkare skärm och en ny beläggning för höljet, som ska vara mindre känsligt för smuts.

Baspriset för Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) är 1 099 euro med tre års garanti (utan operativsystem). För detta levereras den som standard med AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB RAM, en 500 GB SSD och den matta 2,8K IPS-panelen som standard. Vår testkonfiguration är konfigurerad med 2 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro och Windows-förinstallationen, vilket höjer priset till 1 275 euro.

I den här artikeln kommer vi att fokusera på skillnaderna mot den gamla modellen, den ljusare skärmen och naturligtvis prestandan och effekterna på utsläppen. Omfattande information om fodralet, funktionerna och inmatningsenheterna finns i vår recension av Tuxedo Pulse 14.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Grafikkort

AMD Radeon 780M, Kärna: 2700 MHz, Minne: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1

Minne

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard

Skärm

14.00 tum 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixlar 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, glansig: nej, 120 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB

, 1802 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kortläsare: microSD

Nätverk

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.5 x 313.5 x 222

Batteri

60 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webbkamera: HD + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 100W PSU, 36 Månader Garanti

Vikt

1.4 kg, Strömförsörjning: 260 g

Pris

1275 Kr

Länkar

SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 %	v8	07/2024	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
83.5 %	v8	06/2024	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	17.08 mm	14.20"	2880x1920
85.5 %	v8	07/2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	16 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01/2024	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	2880x1800

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

Skillnader jämfört med föregångaren

Inte ens den nya beläggningen kan helt förhindra fingeravtryck.

I princip har ingenting förändrats på höljet. En kritikpunkt från oss när vi testade Tuxedo Pulse 14 var de mycket känsliga ytorna, på vilka fingeravtryck och smuts snabbt syntes och som inte heller var lätta att rengöra. För att motverka detta problem används nu en ny beläggning för att minska fingeravtryck. Resultatet är också något bättre, men fingeravtryck är fortfarande bättre och du måste rengöra fodralet ofta. Vi skulle fortfarande vilja se en ytterligare silverfärgad version.

Vi lade märke till den gröna statuslampan för webbkameran på Tuxedo Pulse 14, vilket också ledde till ett litet grönt skimmer i bilderna. Via 14 Pro, å andra sidan, använder en vit LED, som inte heller märks på bilderna. Bildkvaliteten för 720p-webbkameran är dock fortfarande dålig överlag.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4a)

Höger sida: Kensington Lock (Nano Saver), microSD-läsare, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3,5 mm ljud

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.2 MB/s +314%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)	54.3 MB/s +195%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.5 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	90.8 MB/s +304%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)	72.6 MB/s +223%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	23.6 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	22.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1257 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1625 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	968 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	951 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1416 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1667 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)

ColorChecker SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): 14.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.35 ∆E

Skärm - IPS-panelen är nu ljusare

VIA 14 Pro förlitar sig fortfarande på en matt IPS-panel med en upplösning på 2 880 x 1 800 pixlar i 16:10-format och en frekvens på 120 Hz. Det är samma panel-ID som på Tuxedo Pulse 14, men ljusstyrkan har ökats. Schenker anger 400 cd/m², men vår testenhet överträffar klart denna specifikation med ett genomsnitt på 467 cd/m². Detta gör den också över 100 cd/m² ljusare än Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. Svartnivån ligger på goda 0,29 cd/m², vilket resulterar i ett mycket bra kontrastförhållande på cirka 1 600:1.

Det subjektiva bildintrycket av panelen är överlag hyfsat och ljusa områden framstår fortfarande som något korniga, och det finns också små halos. PWM används inte och svarstiderna är obetydliga, men inte särskilt snabba.


474 cd/m²	478 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
462 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
452 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	454 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 466 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1607:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		2%	1%	21%	27%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	70.1	72.42 3%	70.3 0%	98.6 41%	99.9 43%	71.1 1%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	99.79 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	100 2%	98.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.3	73.94 2%	72.1 0%	87.3 21%	98.9 37%	73.2 1%
Response Times		24%	3%	95%	97%	-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	31.1 ?(14.9, 16.2)	7 ?(3.5, 3.5) 77%	32.7 ?(14.8, 17.9) -5%	1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) 96%	0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3) 98%	37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5) -22%
Response Time Black / White *	17.1 ?(7, 10.1)	22 ?(18.5, 3.5) -29%	15.2 ?(5.1, 10.1) 11%	1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) 93%	0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33) 96%	23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7) -35%
PWM Frequency		238 ?(100)		480 ?(99)	240 ?(99)
Screen		181%	13%	320%	-5%	14%
Brightness middle	466	373 -20%	418 -10%	387 -17%	411 -12%	340 -27%
Brightness	467	377 -19%	408 -13%	386 -17%	414 -11%	338 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	90 -4%	98 4%	99 5%	84 -11%
Black Level *	0.29	0.015 95%	0.3 -3%	0.01 97%		0.16 45%
Contrast	1607	24867 1447%	1393 -13%	38700 2308%		2125 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.47 41%	1.6 36%	1 60%	2.8 -12%	1.7 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.1	2.49 59%	2.5 59%	2.4 61%	5.5 10%	3 51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.78 -37%	1.1 15%		2.2 -69%	1.3 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	1.7 59%	2 51%	1.4 66%	1.8 56%	2.9 29%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.179 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7386 ^88%	6556 ^99%	6851 ^95%	6466 ^101%	6319 ^103%	6729 ^97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		69% / 120%	6% / 9%	145% / 217%	40% / 20%	-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Vi mätte panelen med den professionella mjukvaran CalMAN och från fabrik har panelen ett synligt blått skimmer i kombination med en färgtemperatur som är för kall, även om detta har en positiv effekt på den maximala ljusstyrkan. Färgvisningen är dock redan okej. Med vår kalibrering (profilen finns tillgänglig för gratis nedladdning ovan) kan vi förbättra visningen avsevärt, men den maximala ljusstyrkan sjunker till cirka 425 cd/m². Tillsammans med den fullständiga sRGB-täckningen är den bärbara datorn också lämplig för redigering av bilder/videor.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.9 ms rise
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Utomhus (ljus dag, inget direkt solljus)

Bortsett från direkt solljus kan den matta panelen också användas utomhus på ljusa dagar. IPS-skärmens betraktningsvinkelstabilitet är god.

Prestanda - AMD Ryzen 8000 och 32 GB RAM

Testförhållanden

VIA 14 Pro (M24) är den första bärbara datorn från Schenker utan kommandocentral; i stället kan energiprofilerna växlas med F3-tangenten. Den aktiva energiprofilen visas då kort på skärmen. Totalt finns tre profiler tillgängliga: Tyst, Balanserad och Prestanda. Vi har sammanfattat motsvarande TDP-värden och prestandadata i följande tabell. Vi har utfört följande benchmarks och mätningar med Performance-profilen.

Energiprofil	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy Grafik	max. Fläktvolym
Tyst	25 -> 15 watt	10.593 poäng	2.492 poäng	30,6 dB(A)
Balanced	45 -> 35 watt	15.250 poäng	2.877 poäng	36,2 dB(A)
Power	54 watt	16.330 poäng	2.915 poäng	43,6 dB(A)

Processor - Ryzen 7 8845HS

Processorn ändrades från den AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS till Ryzen 7 8845HS, som fortfarande använder 8 Zen4-kärnor (16 trådar) med en maximal klockhastighet på 5,1 GHz. Föga förvånande är prestandan därför också jämförbar och alla jämförelseenheter ligger mycket nära varandra totalt sett. Prestandan är mycket bra i både flerkärniga och enkärniga tester och det finns inga flaskhalsar här, inte ens med krävande uppgifter. I batteriläge är den maximala förbrukningen begränsad till 35 watt, vilket är anledningen till att prestandan för flera kärnor är 12% lägre.

Ytterligare CPU-benchmarks kan hittas här.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.4 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	83 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	81.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.3 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	78.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	67.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17077 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16387 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11)	16146 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16145 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	15889 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15515 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13888 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years)	11654 Points -29%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1776 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1774 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11)	1747 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1746 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1742 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1716 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years)	1668 Points -6%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6575 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6424 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11)	6309 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6251 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6231 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6061 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5414 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years)	4530 Points -29%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	685 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11)	685 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	679 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	678 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	677 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	674 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)	636 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2731 (2302.42^min - 2731.12^max) Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2595 (2132.08^min - 2595.21^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2568 (2508.31^min - 2568.38^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11)	2556 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 (2513.19^min - 2555.42^max) Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2482 (2389.2^min - 2482.31^max) Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2176 (2149.96^min - 2176.16^max) Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)	1978 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11)	276 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	274 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	268 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	250 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)	250 Points -10%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years)	359 Seconds * -83%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	226 Seconds * -15%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	218 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	216 Seconds * -10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	208 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11)	202 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	196 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	68354 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11)	67906 MIPS -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67444 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66807 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	65072 MIPS -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61780 MIPS -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	61047 MIPS -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years)	48297 MIPS -29%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6403 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11)	6288 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6278 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6274 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6205 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years)	5478 MIPS -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5372 MIPS -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5245 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13417 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12940 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12700 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12796 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15)	12791 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12643 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12578 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=58, last 2 years)	11604 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11279 Points -13%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13)	2617 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2612 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2604 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2552 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2540 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=53, last 2 years)	2501 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2372 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2369 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13137 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12189 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12)	11855 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11802 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11780 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11754 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years)	10099 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9897 Points -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1965 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1945 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1942 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12)	1924 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1875 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years)	1790 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1754 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1750 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11)	20 fps -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.4 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.6 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	17 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years)	12.9 fps -38%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79.2 s * -78%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years)	54.5 s * -22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11)	51 s * -15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	50.4 s * -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	47.8 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.1 s * -6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	44.5 s *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	43.9 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years)	0.519 sec * -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.478 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4753 sec * -1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4716 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11)	0.4528 sec * +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4521 sec * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4477 sec * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4464 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

277 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2568 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

176.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6424 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

685 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1774 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16387 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

912 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

102 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93.5 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	91.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69.5 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	56.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	26362 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25961 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11)	25839 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	24712 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	22269 KRay/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14196 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13188 KRay/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years)	12716 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	110027 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11)	109203 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107613 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	103755 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	93550 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75664 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69098 Points -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years)	60467 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4732 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11)	4708 MB/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4646 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4627 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	4132 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3507 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3348 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years)	2890 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11)	116188 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115682 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	114899 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	114236 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	99874 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89759 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	82364 Points -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years)	79151 Points -32%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	15226 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14941 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11)	14859 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14385 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13731 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9873 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9291 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years)	7967 Points -48%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58765 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11)	58328 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	57671 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	55540 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	49687 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37090 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33802 Points -41%
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years)	31473 Points -45%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	161430 MB/s +87%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	124284 MB/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11)	95038 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86256 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76247 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73336 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67393 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years)	59846 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1085 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1058 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1021 MB/s -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1005 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11)	979 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years)	741 MB/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	627 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	468 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13999 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13896 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11)	13740 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13100 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11637 KRay/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7521 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6835 KRay/s -51%
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years)	6591 KRay/s -53%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51390 MPixel/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	40779 MPixel/s +6%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years)	40471 MPixel/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	39002 MPixel/s +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11)	38987 MPixel/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38837 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	38580 MPixel/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	35861 MPixel/s -7%

Systemets prestanda

Resultaten i systembenchmarks är överlag bra och VIA 14 Pro var alltid en responsiv följeslagare i vardagen. Även om RAM-minnet inte kan uppgraderas är 32 GB redan installerat som standard, vilket bör vara tillräckligt för de allra flesta användare under många år framöver.

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7428 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7)	7320 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7157 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	7120 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	7045 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	7028 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)	6447 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11168 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7)	11015 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10946 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	10894 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	10855 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10732 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	10685 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)	10480 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10449 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	10279 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7)	10170 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9969 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9787 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8837 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	8804 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)	8633 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	9823 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9812 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7)	9506 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9423 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9367 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8873 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)	8124 Points -13%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1852 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1840 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1810 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1779 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7)	1776 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1698 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1694 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years)	1578 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1784 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1770 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1745 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1716 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7)	1711 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1658 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1598 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years)	1520 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1999 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1978 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1942 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1925 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7)	1912 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1909 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1842 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years)	1732 Points -11%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1721 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1703 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1612 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7)	1595 Points +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1523 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1428 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1377 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years)	1345 Points -12%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	440 Points +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	324 Points +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	308 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7)	307 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years)	306 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	295 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	278 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	276 Points -10%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	319 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7)	263 Points +7%
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years)	256 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	254 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	248 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	247 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	247 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	245 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	544 ms * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7)	541 ms * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	531 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	530 ms * -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years)	526 ms * -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	518 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	516 ms *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	508 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7120 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93396 MB/s +35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76766 MB/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76483 MB/s +11%
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years)	71417 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69522 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69160 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67660 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11)	67394 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84853 MB/s +70%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70384 MB/s +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years)	68938 MB/s +38%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	58321 MB/s +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11)	58208 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	50572 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49971 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	49866 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107658 MB/s +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93323 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93239 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11)	85626 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years)	74273 MB/s -20%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67847 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	58692 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	187.8 ns * -75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.4 ns * -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	114.5 ns * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107.1 ns *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	106 ns * +1%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years)	105.2 ns * +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	101.8 ns * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11)	96.9 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

I vårt standardiserade latensprov (surfing på Internet, 4K YouTube-uppspelning, CPU-belastning) visar testenheten med den aktuella BIOS-versionen inga begränsningar. Även om en drivrutin misslyckas något, är det viktiga latensvärdet för avbrott-till-process mycket lågt.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1219.5 μs * -156%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1102.5 μs * -131%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1045.4 μs * -119%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	848.9 μs * -78%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	476.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

VIA 14 Pro erbjuder två snabba PCIe 4.0-kortplatser för M.2 2280 SSD-enheter. En 500 GB SSD är installerad i grundkonfigurationen, men vår testenhet innehåller 2 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro (tilläggsavgift 138 euro). 990 Pro uppnår höga överföringshastigheter och prestandan förblir helt stabil även under långvarig belastning. Efter den första uppstarten har användaren 1,76 TB till sitt förfogande. Ytterligare SSD-benchmarks kan hittas här.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7124 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6890 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 388 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1211 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	89.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	87.6 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	71.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	70.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	69.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	52.5 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	45.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	44.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4269 (4234.28^min - 4269.44^max) MB/s +29%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4057 (4023.18^min - 4057.01^max) MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3322 (3294.63^min - 3322.45^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3300 (3279.05^min - 3299.87^max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (2985 - 3322, n=2)	3154 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 4852, n=59, last 2 years)	2962 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2498 (2465.72^min - 2497.5^max) MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2379 (2365.59^min - 2378.73^max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4695 (4542.57^min - 4694.68^max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4138 - 5099, n=2)	4619 MB/s +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4317 (4288.28^min - 4317.37^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4138 (4046.54^min - 4137.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3660 (3614.13^min - 3659.97^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 5344, n=59, last 2 years)	2933 MB/s -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2604 (2525.41^min - 2604.03^max) MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2211 (2136.92^min - 2210.59^max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6844 (6027.53^min - 6843.85^max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (5761 - 7102, n=2)	6432 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	5761 (5244.77^min - 5760.67^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 13544, n=59, last 2 years)	5252 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	5251 (4849.66^min - 5251.27^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4911 (4608.27^min - 4910.87^max) MB/s -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4504 (3696.49^min - 4504.05^max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3857 (3120.3^min - 3857.29^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6810 (6778.41^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6801 - 6810, n=2)	6806 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4955 (4919.92^min - 4955.1^max) MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4676 (4556.48^min - 4675.9^max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4467 (4437.85^min - 4466.6^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 9702, n=59, last 2 years)	4111 MB/s -40%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3105 (3076.1^min - 3105.46^max) MB/s -54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2871 (2734.06^min - 2871.34^max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	82.2 (81.81^min - 82.16^max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	77.8 (73.1^min - 77.81^max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (67.3 - 80.7, n=2)	74 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	67.3 (66.81^min - 67.29^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	62.2 (61.77^min - 62.19^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.27 - 87.4, n=59, last 2 years)	61.4 MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	58.8 (58.1^min - 58.81^max) MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	34.6 (34.41^min - 34.64^max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (159.4 - 352, n=2)	256 MB/s +61%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	245 (242.81^min - 244.56^max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	221 (220.34^min - 221.44^max) MB/s +39%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	205 (203.95^min - 205.23^max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	159.4 (155.73^min - 159.37^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 360, n=59, last 2 years)	158.9 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	157.7 (151.37^min - 157.68^max) MB/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	112.5 (111.01^min - 112.51^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4286 (4274.43^min - 4286.07^max) MB/s +313%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3460 (3433.29^min - 3460.15^max) MB/s +234%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1037 - 5735, n=2)	3386 MB/s +227%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	3048 (2829.43^min - 3047.69^max) MB/s +194%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.1 - 4286, n=59, last 2 years)	1267 MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1037 (1017.69^min - 1037.34^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	909 (848.35^min - 908.51^max) MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	850 (824.69^min - 850.28^max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4189 (4136.14^min - 4188.97^max) MB/s +769%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3266 (3227.93^min - 3265.61^max) MB/s +578%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2980 (2752.98^min - 2980.38^max) MB/s +518%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (482 - 4869, n=2)	2676 MB/s +455%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.2 - 4189, n=59, last 2 years)	870 MB/s +80%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	482 (476.35^min - 481.55^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435 (416.7^min - 435.33^max) MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	375 (355.65^min - 375.1^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	8892 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6556 - 10745, n=2)	8651 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7325 Points +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6556 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4927 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 8892, n=58, last 2 years)	4325 Points -34%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3819 Points -42%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3408 Points -48%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3307 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2782 Points +100%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1391 - 3980, n=2)	2686 Points +93%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1784 Points +28%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1391 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 3307, n=58, last 2 years)	1372 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1217 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1195 Points -14%
Score Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4469 - 4734, n=2)	4602 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4469 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3972 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3203 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=58, last 2 years)	2309 Points -48%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2223 Points -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2070 Points -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1632 Points -63%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	5525 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4336 - 5066, n=2)	4701 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4336 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4310 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4109 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=58, last 2 years)	4057 MB/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3675 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3304 MB/s -24%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3714 - 5119, n=2)	4416 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4104 MB/s +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4004 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3714 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2791 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 5120, n=58, last 2 years)	2631 MB/s -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2172 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1828 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	72.3 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (64.2 - 77.8, n=2)	71 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	64.2 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	58.5 MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=58, last 2 years)	58.5 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	57.8 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51 MB/s -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	49.9 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (192.8 - 307, n=2)	250 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	192.8 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	180.6 MB/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	177.1 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 256, n=58, last 2 years)	176 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	173.1 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	167.9 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	161 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	2682 MB/s +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2301 MB/s +158%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (893 - 3395, n=2)	2144 MB/s +140%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1315 MB/s +47%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 2682, n=58, last 2 years)	908 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	893 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	806 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	798 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3905 - 3915, n=2)	3910 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3905 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3410 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2743 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=58, last 2 years)	1867 MB/s -52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1719 MB/s -56%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1639 MB/s -58%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1238 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.058 ms * -190%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=58, last 2 years)	0.05717 ms * -186%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.02 - 0.052, n=2)	0.036 ms * -80%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.027 ms * -35%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.024 ms * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.023 ms * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.11 ms * -450%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.108 ms * -440%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.1 ms * -400%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=58, last 2 years)	0.07341 ms * -267%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.025 ms * -25%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.013 - 0.02, n=2)	0.0165 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)

Grafikkort

Ryzen 8000-serien förlitar sig fortfarande på den välkända Radeon 780Msom drar nytta av RAM-minnets dubbelkanaliga konfiguration. IGPU är mycket lämplig för daglig användning och spel är också möjligt, även om du ofta måste vara nöjd med låga detaljer i aktuella titlar. I de syntetiska benchmarks, den nya Intel Arc Graphics iGPU (med 8 Xe-kärnor) något bättre än 780M, men spelprestandan är på samma nivå.

Grafikprestandan förblir helt stabil även under långvarig belastning, och vårt Cyberpunk 2077-test (30 minuter) visar inte heller någon prestandaförlust. I batteriläge reduceras dock GPU-prestandan minimalt (~11%). Ytterligare GPU-benchmarks finns tillgängliga i vårt teknikavsnitt.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.3

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	90 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	87.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	85.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	82.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	72.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13734 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13524 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13321 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13316 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12999 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14249, n=56)	12460 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12375 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)	9532 Points -31%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9548 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8538 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8513 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	8441 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8438 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8345 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8816, n=58)	7747 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)	6964 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3671 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3411 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3027 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2915 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2876 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2847 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=58)	2713 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years)	2566 Points -12%

Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34669 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	31025 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	30818 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27410 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	29233 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15316 - 33077, n=53)	28703 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	28473 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (10125 - 52427, n=52, last 2 years)	26860 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26058 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		13077 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7731 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		3234 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2788 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=61, last 2 years)	561 Seconds * -79%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	385 Seconds * -23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54)	375 Seconds * -19%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	369 Seconds * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	352 Seconds * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	341 Seconds * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	336 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	314 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook (210 - 364, n=5, last 2 years)	245 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	223 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	93.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	92.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.3 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	75 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	72.4 pt

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (3.56^min, 19.2^P1) fps +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (3.98^min, 18.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (3.05^min, 18.2^P1) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (2.69^min, 16.4^P1) fps -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.6 (2.88^min, 15.9^P1) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years)	19.6 fps -25%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.6 fps +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.4 fps -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.5 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=62, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -19%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 fps +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 (35.6^min, 39^P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.9 (6.3^min, 16.2^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.1 (10.9^min, 15.3^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=61, last 2 years)	40.1 fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.1 (75.2^min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	76.8 (67.2^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75.1 (65.6^min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75 (63.4^min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74 (46.7^min) fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years)	62.5 fps -17%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.2 (33.9^min) fps -53%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.5 fps +28%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.4 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years)	34 fps +10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.7 fps +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.9 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	147.5	133.8	64.1	26.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	122.9	102.7	84.1	75.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	75.6	38.2	28.8		20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	53	38.1	30.9
Strange Brigade (2018)	155	66	57	49
F1 23 (2023)	85.9	76.7	53	11.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.1	31.5	25.8	25.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	41.5	32.2	25.8	22.4
F1 24 (2024)	85.9	71.9	51.4	11.1

Utsläpp & Energi

Bullerutsläpp

Kylningen av VIA 14 Pro sker med hjälp av två fläktar och volymen beror till stor del på den valda energiprofilen. I viloläge och vid enkla uppgifter är enheten mestadels tyst, även i prestandaläget. Under högre belastning märks dock de två fläktarna tydligt och ett maximum på 43,6 dB(A) är inte särskilt tyst. Resultaten för de andra energiprofilerna listas i följande tabell. Fläktarna förblir avaktiverade under mycket lång tid, särskilt i Quiet-profilen. Det fanns inga andra elektroniska ljud i vår testenhet.

Energiprofil	3DMark 06	Cyberpunk 2077	Stresstest
Tyst	Fläkt av	28,8 dB(A)	30,6 dB(A)
Balanserad	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)
Ström	36,2 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A)
Hög belastning		36.2 / 43.6 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Noise		1%	3%	2%	1%	9%
off / environment *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Minimum *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Average *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Maximum *	25.7	27.2 -6%	27.1 -5%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	25.1 2%
Load Average *	36.2	31.3 14%	34.9 4%	35.9 1%	44.3 -22%	32.4 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	43.6		43.7 -0%
Load Maximum *	43.6	46.61 -7%	43.7 -0%	42.2 3%	44.3 -2%	37.3 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *				39.3	41.3	34.9

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Höljet på VIA 14 Pro värms knappt upp i viloläge och under lätta uppgifter, men detta förändras under belastning. På undersidan uppmätte vi nästan 50 °C i mittområdet både under spel och i stresstestet, vilket är anledningen till att du inte bör placera enheten på låren i ett sådant scenario. Tangentbordsområdet blir också märkbart varmt med upp till 43 °C, men här finns inga begränsningar. I stresstestet arbetar processorn med en konstant effekt på 54 watt.

På den negativa sidan noterade vi 100-watts strömförsörjning, som skiljer sig något från Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3-strömförsörjningen. Även om den bärbara datorns totala förbrukning under stresstestet är cirka 92 watt och därför ännu inte ligger på strömförsörjningens gräns, är temperaturer på strax under 60 °C definitivt för höga.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


44.1 °C	44.6 °C	43.2 °C
41.7 °C	43.6 °C	40.1 °C
31.9 °C	33 °C	32.8 °C

Max: 44.6 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C


44.6 °C	50.9 °C	42.2 °C
39.3 °C	50 °C	34.4 °C
34.3 °C	35.5 °C	32.6 °C

Max: 50.9 °C
Medel: 40.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 59.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


26.3 °C	26.5 °C	26.3 °C
25.7 °C	26.2 °C	26 °C
25.2 °C	25.5 °C	25.3 °C

Max: 26.5 °C
Medel: 25.9 °C


26.1 °C	26.3 °C	25.8 °C
25.7 °C	26.3 °C	25.3 °C
25.6 °C	25.6 °C	25.5 °C

Max: 26.3 °C
Medel: 25.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


42.3 °C	42.9 °C	41.4 °C
38.1 °C	42.8 °C	38.2 °C
32.3 °C	33.8 °C	30.7 °C

Max: 42.9 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C


43.1 °C	49.5 °C	38.6 °C
37.2 °C	48.3 °C	33.2 °C
32.4 °C	33.5 °C	31.5 °C

Max: 49.5 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 57.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).

Stresstest av yttemperaturer (undersida)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-6%	-2%	2%	11%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.6	45.2 -1%	43.7 2%	43.1 3%	39.6 11%	41.5 7%
Maximum Bottom *	50.9	49.2 3%	49.4 3%	50.2 1%	38.6 24%	45.7 10%
Idle Upper Side *	26.5	29.6 -12%	27.7 -5%	25.8 3%	24.8 6%	24.7 7%
Idle Bottom *	26.3	30.2 -15%	28.6 -9%	26.4 -0%	25.3 4%	24.9 5%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Den högre ljusstyrkan i panelen märks inte negativt jämfört med Tuxedo Pulse 14 och den maximala förbrukningen på 94 watt är också något lägre. Allt som allt finns det inga överraskningar här och den medföljande 100 watt strömförsörjningen är tillräckligt dimensionerad. Förbrukningen när den är avstängd har dock fortfarande inte förbättrats och 0,8 watt är lite högt.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.8 / 0.86 Watt
Låg belastning	4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Hög belastning	63.2 / 94.5 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Power Consumption		11%	2%	27%	5%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.4 8%	3.6 25%	5.3 -10%	5.6 -17%
Idle Average *	8.7	5.6 36%	9.2 -6%	6.6 24%	7.2 17%	9.2 -6%
Idle Maximum *	9.2	12.5 -36%	9.6 -4%	7.4 20%	7.5 18%	9.7 -5%
Load Average *	63.2	52.1 18%	62.6 1%	47.1 25%	65.6 -4%	65.2 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	81.3		71.5 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	80.2		71.9 10%
Load Maximum *	94.5	67.3 29%	101.7 -8%	54.3 43%	89.6 5%	101 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		46.7		47.4	73	70

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)

Batteriets livslängd

Batteritiderna i kombination med 60 Wh-batteriet är inte dåliga i sig, men VIA 14 Pro får se sig slaget av konkurrenterna. Frekvensen har endast ett minimalt inflytande på batteritiderna, vilket också framgår av följande tabell. Ljusstyrkan på 150 cd/m² för WLAN- och videotestet motsvarar 32% av den maximala ljusstyrkan på testenheten.

Frekvens	WLAN-test 150 cd/m²	WLAN-test maximal ljusstyrka
60 Hz	9:31 timmar	6:16 timmar
120 Hz	9:28 timmar	6:06 timmar

En full laddning med påslagen enhet tar 141 minuter. 80% av kapaciteten är tillgänglig igen efter ca 55 minuter.

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing		9tim 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 04min

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		118%	73%	66%	55%	6%	52%
H.264	612		1251 104%	1046 71%	1031 68%	595 -3%	911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years) 49%
WiFi v1.3	571	758 33%	888 56%	774 36%	710 24%	620 9%	726 ?(389 - 1585, n=62, last 2 years) 27%
Load	64	194 203%	101 58%	123 92%	110 72%	72 13%	115.4 ?(57 - 197, n=48, last 2 years) 80%

För

+ mycket hög systemprestanda

+ bra 120 Hz IPS-skärm utan PWM

+ 32 GB RAM-minne som standard

+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4 för upp till 8 TB lagringsutrymme

+ bekvämt tangentbord

+ bra utbud av anslutningar

Emot

- ingen USB 4.0

- långsam microSD-kortläsare

- Fodralet är känsligt för fingeravtryck

- dålig 720p webbkamera

- RAM lödd

- höga strömförsörjningstemperaturer

Omdöme - Schenker VIA 14 Pro nu med en ljusstarkare skärm

I recension: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Testanordning tillhandahållen av: Schenker Tyskland

Med VIA 14 Pro erbjuder Schenker en snabb och kompakt 14-tums enhet, som förutom den kraftfulla Ryzen-processorn och standard RAM-konfigurationen på 32 GB framför allt kännetecknas av de goda expansionsmöjligheterna (2x M.2-2280). Det finns också ett tillräckligt antal portar tillgängliga, även om du måste klara dig utan moderna standarder som USB 4.0. MicroSD-kortläsaren är dock mycket långsam och den svaga 720p-webbkameran är inte längre uppdaterad. Trots den nya ytan är fingeravtryck fortfarande ett problem.

Den nya Ryzen-processorn erbjuder gott om prestanda och den snabba Radeon 780M GPU, men det finns ingen fördel jämfört med den gamla Ryzen 7 7840HS i föregångarmodellen. Den stora uppgraderingen för modellåret 2024 är IPS-skärmen, som nu är betydligt ljusstarkare. Tillverkarens specifikation ökar från 300 till 400 cd/m², och vår testenhet nådde till och med ett genomsnitt på strax under 470 cd/m². Efter kalibrering är bildkvaliteten också mycket bra.

Schenker VIA Pro 14 är en snabb 14-tums bärbar dator och erbjuder nu en ljusstarkare IPS-skärm, vilket är mycket lämpligt för produktiva aktiviteter. Pris-prestanda-förhållandet är anständigt, men det finns några områden där du måste göra uppoffringar (ingen USB 4.0, svag webbkamera, långsam kortläsare).

Jämfört med konkurrenterna får VIA 14 Pro särskilt bra betyg med sitt 32 GB RAM-minne och två SSD-kortplatser, vilket är ovanligt för 14-tumsmodeller. En del av konkurrenterna erbjuder dock OLED-paneler och har även fördelar när det gäller batteritid. Tuxedo erbjuder nu även den identiska Pulse 14 Gen4 med Linux från 1 230 euro.

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) - 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Design

85 / 98 → 87%

Tangentbord

88%

Mus

93%

Anslutningar

60 / 74 → 81%

Vikt

70 / 20-77 → 88%

Batteri

87%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

53 / 75 → 70%

Programprestanda

86 / 92 → 93%

Temperatur

81%

Ljudnivå

85%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

23 / 75 → 31%

Medel

62%

85%

Subnotebook - Vägt medel

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
76.9%

Repairability
90%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 39.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) recension - Kompakt AMD subnotebook nu med Ryzen 8000 och ljusstarkare skärm

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-13 (Update: 2024-07-13)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core jämför
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G5 21G3S00A00 Ultra 7 155H, Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	906
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	908
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	911
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	912
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	913
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	920
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	921
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 jämför
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13052
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13077
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13082
Geekom GT1 Mega Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	13104
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M	13118
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Skillnader jämfört med föregångaren

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

Skärm - IPS-panelen är nu ljusare

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Prestanda - AMD Ryzen 8000 och 32 GB RAM

Testförhållanden

Processor - Ryzen 7 8845HS

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstider

Masslagring

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

Utsläpp &amp; Energi

Bullerutsläpp

Temperatur

Högtalare

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

Strömförbrukning

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

Batteriets livslängd

För

Emot

Omdöme - Schenker VIA 14 Pro nu med en ljusstarkare skärm

Transparency

Price comparison

Utsläpp & Energi