Test: Aorus X5 v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1070, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 271 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1004:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.09 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Aorus X5 v8 AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -1% | -1% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 63.6 -5% | 66.2 -1% | 66.1 -1% | 62.5 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 93.8 0% | 92.1 -1% | 92.7 -1% | 88.7 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 64.9 -5% | 67.2 -1% | 67.2 -1% | 63.5 -7% |
| Response Times | 9% | -1% | 39% | -143% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.8 ? | 16.8 ? 11% | 17.6 ? 6% | 6.6 ? 65% | 44.8 ? -138% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 11.2 ? 7% | 12.8 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 29.6 ? -147% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 10% | -9% | -89% | -88% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 313 15% | 254 -6% | 307 13% | 291 7% |
| Brightness | 259 | 300 16% | 262 1% | 296 14% | 277 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 78 -10% | 89 2% | 89 2% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.33 -22% | 0.22 19% | 0.25 7% | 0.22 19% |
| Contrast | 1004 | 948 -6% | 1155 15% | 1228 22% | 1323 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 1.29 29% | 2.37 -31% | 5.74 -217% | 5.52 -205% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.33 | 2.04 39% | 4.71 -41% | 11.32 -240% | 10.72 -222% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.09 | 0.69 37% | 1.58 -45% | 6.44 -491% | 6.59 -505% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6435 101% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 8395 77% | 7816 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 58 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 89 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
7% | -4% /
-6% | -17% /
-54% | -79% /
-79% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5773 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5953 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6154 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Aorus X5 v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 6% | 58% | 44% | 52% | |
| Seq Read | 1813 | 2213 22% | 1266 -30% | 2091 15% | 2517 39% |
| Seq Write | 966 | 1163 20% | 1834 90% | 1580 64% | 2372 146% |
| 4K Read | 23.21 | 23.36 1% | 48.94 111% | 43.42 87% | 41.47 79% |
| 4K Write | 84.5 | 80.4 -5% | 107.2 27% | 90.2 7% | 93 10% |
| Score Read | 1061 | 1092 3% | 1346 27% | 1471 39% | 1350 27% |
| Score Write | 954 | 939 -2% | 2051 115% | 1446 52% | 1243 30% |
| Score Total | 2515 | 2536 1% | 4122 64% | 3649 45% | 3282 30% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38437 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18621 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 172098 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37234 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15226 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 113 | 60 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 166 | 127 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 53.3 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 87.8 | 65.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 94 | 90 |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 33 / 35 / 40 dB(A) |
| Hårddisk |
| 33 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 45 / 55 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30 9% | 30 9% | 30 9% | 33 -0% | 25.5 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 31 11% | 31 11% | 31 11% | 34 3% | 27.2 ? 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 35 12% | 34 15% | 33 17% | 40 -0% | 30.4 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 49 -9% | 43 4% | 49 -9% | 41 9% | 42.7 ? 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 51 -2% | 42 16% | 50 -0% | 43 14% | |
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 54 2% | 44 20% | 52 5% | 48 13% | 53.4 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | 6% | -1% | -13% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 53 -6% | 49 2% | 52 -4% | 61 -22% | 46.2 ? 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 62 | 65 -5% | 63 -2% | 49 21% | 69 -11% | 49.1 ? 21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 26 4% | 24 11% | 31 -15% | 29 -7% | 31.3 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 30 -3% | 25 14% | 31 -7% | 32 -10% | 32.3 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X5 v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.5 / 1 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 25 / 31 / 33 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
102 / 239 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 39% | 20% | -2% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 14 44% | 7 72% | 16 36% | 28 -12% | 13.5 ? 46% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 18 42% | 11 65% | 19 39% | 33 -6% | 18.9 ? 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 22 33% | 20 39% | 26 21% | 41 -24% | 26.7 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 102 | 91 11% | 98 4% | 103 -1% | 94 8% | 106.3 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 194 | 142 27% | 132 32% | 164 15% | 160 18% | |
| Load Maximum * | 239 | 173 28% | 182 24% | 223 7% | 222 7% | 249 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, 92.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 124% | 43% | -22% | -40% | 60% | |
| Reader / Idle | 294 | 762 159% | 507 72% | 237 -19% | 150 -49% | 565 ? 92% |
| H.264 | 216 | 504 133% | 356 65% | 159 -26% | 106 -51% | 409 ? 89% |
| Load | 87 | 156 79% | 81 -7% | 70 -20% | 70 -20% | 85.6 ? -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 513 | 362 | 164 | 144 | 375 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
2018 års version av Aorus X5 v8 kan stå upp mot sina rivaler på dom flesta områden. Inte bara det ganska robusta metallhöljet utan även anslutbarheten, inmatningsenheterna och skärmen övertygade. IPS-panelen på 144 Hz är en perfekt kompromiss mellan hastighet och bildkvalitet (slagordet är X-Rite Pantone).
Till dom största nackdelarna hör hög temperaturutveckling och ljudnivå, men det är ett problem som många tunna spelenheter har. Sammantaget skulle vi placera X5 v8 på samma nivå som Asus GM501, som har väldigt lika prestandaresultat.
Den starkaste rivalen kommer dock från samma tillverkare som X5 v8. Klarar man sig utan G-Sync i 3D-applikationer och inte har något emot att tappa några FPS kan man vilja överväga att köpa Aero 15X istället. Syskonet på 15 tum är utrustad med ett lättare och kompaktare hölje och har mycket bättre batteritid, för att inte tala om ett lägre pris (25 000 kr mot 27 000 kronor).
Aorus X5 v8
- 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
