Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Brand: Asus

Premiär för Coffee Lake. Efter att Intels nya CPU-arkitektur hade sin debut i desktop-segmentet för ett par månader sedan så finns nu Coffee Lake tillslut tillgänglig för laptops. Gamers kan se fram mot enheter såsom ROG Zephyrus M GM501 från Asus, som vi har tagit en närmare titt på i den här recensionen.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 04/04/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 (Zephyrus M GM501 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1443 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Kanal, båda platserna upptagna, max. 32 GB

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, AHVA, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel HM370

Hårddisk

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

, NVMe-SSD + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Platser: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 tum

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Anslutningar

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad (hörlurar & mikrofon)

Nätverk

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 384 x 261

Batteri

55 Wh, 3605 mAh Litiumjon, 4 celler

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: HD

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet 4 zoners RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230 watts nätadapter, flertalet verktyg från tillverkaren, McAfee Security testversion, XSplit Gamecaster testversion, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.51 kg, Strömförsörjning: 630 g

Pris

2399 EUR

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Triton 700 Asus Zephyrus M GM501 MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Asus Zephyrus GX501 Gigabyte Aero 15X DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	585 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	551 MBit/s -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	524 MBit/s -10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	413 MBit/s -29%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	354 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	698 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	684 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	683 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	682 MBit/s 0%


292 cd/m²	306 cd/m²	278 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	286 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	302 cd/m²	311 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 311 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 295.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 307 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1228:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080
Display		-2%	-5%	-2%	25%
Display P3 Coverage	66.1	64.8 -2%	62.5 -5%	64.7 -2%	91.6 39%
sRGB Coverage	92.7	91.8 -1%	88.7 -4%	90.4 -2%	100 8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.2	65.9 -2%	63.5 -6%	65.7 -2%	86.6 29%
Response Times		-322%	-382%	-364%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)	40.4 ?(23.2, 17.2) -512%	44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6) -579%	43.2 ?(22.8, 20.4) -555%	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) -58%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)	24 ?(11.6, 12.4) -131%	29.6 ?(15.6, 14) -185%	28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8) -173%	6.6 ?(4.4, 2.2) 37%
PWM Frequency				26000 ?(20)	25510 ?(25)
Screen		2%	0%	-7%	18%
Brightness middle	307	328 7%	291 -5%	338 10%	269 -12%
Brightness	296	305 3%	277 -6%	324 9%	254 -14%
Brightness Distribution	89	83 -7%	84 -6%	88 -1%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.25	0.25 -0%	0.22 12%	0.34 -36%	0.21 16%
Contrast	1228	1312 7%	1323 8%	994 -19%	1281 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.74	6.02 -5%	5.52 4%	5.92 -3%	3 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.32	10.14 10%	10.72 5%	11.77 -4%	5.62 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.94
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.44	6.32 2%	6.59 -2%	7.45 -16%	3.18 51%
Gamma	2.48 ^89%	2.28 ^96%	2.44 ^90%	2.58 ^85%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	8395 ^77%	8194 ^79%	7816 ^83%	6366 ^102%	7274 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	58 -3%	59 -2%	77 28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	92 -1%	89 -4%	90 -3%	100 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-107% / -42%	-129% / -52%	-124% / -53%	11% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +64%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	158 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +193%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1168 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points -36%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points -37%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +73%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +180%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	13.29 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.21 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points -39%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points -39%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.13 Points -39%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6426

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

34892

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.29 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1168 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +50%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (4854 - 5939, n=6)	5414 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5277 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5194 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5125 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4933 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4542 Points -13%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5160 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5057 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (4271 - 5557, n=6)	4962 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4627 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4394 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4193 Points -9%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5662 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (5210 - 5968, n=6)	5621 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5289 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5211 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5195 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5176 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4627 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5662 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		5194 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	Average Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		5%	2%	8%	5%
Seq Read	2091	2517 20%	2508 20%	2382 14%	2576 ?(1369 - 2826, n=15) 23%
Seq Write	1580	2372 50%	1124 -29%	1281 -19%	1438 ?(350 - 1694, n=15) -9%
4K Read	43.42	41.47 -4%	46.56 7%	51 17%	47.8 ?(38.9 - 51.5, n=15) 10%
4K Write	90.2	93 3%	113.8 26%	124.7 38%	114.2 ?(1.6 - 155.3, n=15) 27%
Score Read	1471	1350 -8%	1522 3%	1795 22%	1475 ?(1072 - 2067, n=15) 0%
Score Write	1446	1243 -14%	1333 -8%	1185 -18%	1267 ?(104 - 1507, n=15) -12%
Score Total	3649	3282 -10%	3570 -2%	3848 5%	3447 ?(1852 - 4020, n=15) -6%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3157 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 325.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1104 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1652 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 96 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +84%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18219 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18120 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (15718 - 19059, n=56)	17228 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17046 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14607 Points -14%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14394 Points -16%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +100%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23694 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23540 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (13760 - 25604, n=58)	22405 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21925 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18689 Points -15%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18205 Points -17%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		31045 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		18278 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36015 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14945 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +116%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	62.9 fps +6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	61.9 fps +4%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	59.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)	59.1 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	52.4 fps -12%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	50.2 fps -15%

	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	106	59.4
Rocket League (2017)	143
Dirt 4 (2017)	126	78.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)	131	86.2
F1 2017 (2017)	119	88
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	102	75
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	59.6	58.1
ELEX (2017)	99.1	75
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	144	117
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	75.6	54.2

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30 / 31 / 33 dB(A)
Hög belastning		49 / 52 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	-1%	2%	2%	-3%	10%
off / environment *	29	31 -7%	31 -7%	30 -3%	30 -3%	29.8 ?(27.8 - 32, n=48) -3%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	30	32 -7%	33 -10%	31 -3%	31 -3%	31.9 ?(28.2 - 35, n=54) -6%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	31	33 -6%	34 -10%	32 -3%	34 -10%	33.4 ?(29.2 - 37, n=54) -8%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Maximum *	33	34 -3%	40 -21%	36 -9%	35 -6%	36.3 ?(30.1 - 50, n=54) -10%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 8%
Load Average *	49	39 20%	41 16%	39 20%	42 14%	44.5 ?(33.2 - 55, n=54) 9%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50	42 16%	43 14%	44 12%	44 12%
Load Maximum *	52	46 12%	48 8%	52 -0%	46 12%	51.4 ?(42.2 - 62, n=54) 1%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


49 °C	50 °C	52 °C
41 °C	47 °C	45 °C
37 °C	38 °C	37 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 44 °C


43 °C	43 °C	49 °C
44 °C	45 °C	48 °C
33 °C	35 °C	31 °C

Max: 49 °C
Medel: 41.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
28 °C	31 °C	31 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Max: 31 °C
Medel: 28.8 °C


28 °C	28 °C	26 °C
31 °C	30 °C	27 °C
29 °C	28 °C	25 °C

Max: 31 °C
Medel: 28 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 34 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


51 °C	49 °C	53 °C
40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
36 °C	37 °C	37 °C

Max: 53 °C
Medel: 43.3 °C


40 °C	40 °C	49 °C
41 °C	41 °C	47 °C
35 °C	35 °C	32 °C

Max: 49 °C
Medel: 40 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 51 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-6%	-14%	6%	3%	2%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	52	57 -10%	61 -17%	51 2%	47 10%	47.1 ?(37.1 - 65, n=54) 9%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 11%
Maximum Bottom *	49	54 -10%	69 -41%	58 -18%	63 -29%	50.9 ?(37.2 - 71, n=54) -4%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Upper Side *	31	32 -3%	29 6%	25 19%	25 19%	30.6 ?(25 - 40, n=54) 1%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Bottom *	31	31 -0%	32 -3%	25 19%	27 13%	30.3 ?(24.3 - 41, n=54) 2%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) -4%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastning	16 / 19 / 26 Watt
Hög belastning	103 / 223 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-1%	-33%	28%	21%	-21%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	16	18 -13%	28 -75%	10 37%	12 25%	21 ?(9 - 31, n=54) -31%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	19	23 -21%	33 -74%	13 32%	16 16%	26.4 ?(14 - 38.6, n=54) -39%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Maximum *	26	31 -19%	41 -58%	20 23%	21 19%	31.8 ?(19 - 49.2, n=54) -22%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	103	79 23%	94 9%	79 23%	85 17%	117.7 ?(82 - 234, n=54) -14%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	164	148 10%	160 2%	120 27%	128 22%
Load Maximum *	223	196 12%	222 -0%	165 26%	162 27%	219 ?(170.1 - 309, n=54) 2%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		3tim 57min
WiFi Websurfing		2tim 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		2tim 39min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 10min

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 50 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-24%	-21%	185%	29%	112%
Reader / Idle	237	188 -21%	150 -37%	781 230%	340 43%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 138%
H.264	159	132 -17%	106 -33%	456 187%	229 44%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 157%
WiFi v1.3	164	130 -21%	144 -12%	491 199%	232 41%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) 129%
Load	70	44 -37%	70 0%	157 124%	61 -13%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 22%

För

+ val mellan G-Sync och Optimus

+ tunt, högkvalitativt hölje

+ förstklassig prestanda

+ bra inmatningsenheter

+ hyfsat ljud

+ RGB-bakgrundsbelysning

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ 144-Hz panel

+ NVMe SSD

Emot

- GTX 1070 Max-Q hade passat konceptet bättre

- irriterande startljud (kan stängas av i BIOS)

- hög ljudutveckling vid belastning

- kort batteritid på grund av litet batteri

- ingen RJ45-LAN, ingen kortläsare

ROG Zephyrus M GM501, test unit provided by Asus Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Om du behöver välja mellan ROG Zephyrus GX501VI (GTX 1080 Max-Q) och ROG Zephyrus M GM501GS (GeForce GTX 1070) så hade vi personligen valt det senare alternativet. Även om GM501 är betydligt mer högljudd när den kör 3D-applikationer så är den mycket billigare samtidigt som den erbjuder nästan identisk spelprestanda och har, tycker vi, bättre inmatningsenheter. 144 Hz-skärmen har hög kontrast och stöd för G-Sync, och möjligheten till grafik-byte (Optimus) är också en stark anledning till köp.

Tyvärr kan GM501 inte klara av särskilt långa batteritider på grund av sin Optimus-teknik. Den hade behövt ett större batteri. På grund av det förblir Aero 15X nummer 1 när det kommer till portabla toppskikts-laptops på 15 tum. Konkurrensen från Acer (Predator Triton 700) samt MSI:s GS63VR kan hållas i shack av vår Zephyrus M. Gamers som reser mycket och förväntar sig hög prestanda såväl som ett tunt, behagligt lätt och snyggt hölje borde bli nöjda med GM501.

Intels sexkärniga arkitektur, som vi nu för första gången har testat i en mobil enhet, garanterar en generös ökning i prestandan hos applikationer med stöd för flera kärnor. Detta behövdes verkligen efter att AMD släppt Ryzen-baserade chips med sex och åtta kärnor. Eller som man säger: Konkurrens är bra för affärerna.

Förresten, recensioner för den splitter nya MSI GS65 och den uppdaterade Gigabyte Aero 15X (båda med Coffee Lake) kommer snart finnas tillgängliga - och dom kommer troligen vara starka konkurrenter till Zephyrus M.

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 - 04/02/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Design

86 / 98 → 87%

Tangentbord

81%

Mus

75%

Anslutningar

59 / 81 → 73%

Vikt

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Batteri

67%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

97%

Programprestanda

97%

Temperatur

80 / 95 → 84%

Ljudnivå

73 / 90 → 81%

Audio

80%

Medel

78%

86%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 2018-04- 4 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison