Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) - Finjustering av flaggskeppet (Sammanfattning)

Mer än bara en surfplatta.

Trots att iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) är billigare än sin föregångare har den överlägsen hårdvara. Apple har till exempel utrustat sin proffsplatta med en kraftigare SoC samt en ny 12 MP-kamera med LiDAR-sensor. Enheten påstår sig fortfarande kunna ersätta en traditionell laptop.
Apple Tablet Touchscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (iPad Pro Serie)
Processor
Apple A12Z Bionic 8 x - 2.5 GHz, Vortex, Tempest
Grafikkort
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU
Minne
6 GB 
Skärm
12.90 tum 4:3, 2732 x 2048 pixlar 265 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, native pen support, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, Skärm med brett färgomfång (P3), Fingeravtrycksskyddad fettavvisande beläggning, Helt laminerad, Antireflexbehandlad, 1.8% reflektion, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
, 248 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutmatning genom USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Face ID, LiDAR-scanner, Gyroskop med tre axlar, Accelerometer, Barometer
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 5.9 x 280.6 x 214.9
Batteri
36.71 Wh, 9720 mAh Litiumpolymer, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 10 tim
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Apple iPadOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12MP vidvinkel (f/1.8, 1/3", 1.22µm) + 10MP ultra-vidvinkel (f/2.4, 11mm), Smart HDR, Autofokus, True Tone-blixt, 4K-video i upp till 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, Smart HDR, Video i upp till 1080p@30FPS, Automatisk bildstabilisering
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4 högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Apple Trackpad som tillval, Modulär nätadapter (18 watt, USB-C), USB-C kabel, Snabbstartsguide, iPadOS 13.4, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
641 g, Strömförsörjning: 30 g
Pris
1099 Kr
Länkar
Apple hemsida
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.3 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU		641 g5.9 mm12.90"2732x2048
90.2 %
v7 (old)
11/2018
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU		633 g5.9 mm12.90"2732x2048
90.4 %
v7 (old)
04/2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU		471 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668
88.1 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)		790 g8.5 mm12.30"2736x1824
87.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640		420 g5.7 mm10.50"2560x1600

Storleksjämförelse

❌
292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 790 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 641 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 633 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
827 (400min - 880max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
643 (596min - 662max) MBit/s -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
634 (561min - 705max) MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (534min - 612max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
836 (743min - 888max) MBit/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (600min - 714max) MBit/s +11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
612 (573min - 630max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, 256 GB NVMe
590 (549min - 608max) MBit/s -4%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø611 (573-630)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (400-880)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
ColorChecker
0 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020: 4.25 ∆E min: 0 - max: 8.91 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
58.2 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
60.9 ∆E
61 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
71.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
74.8 ∆E
68 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020: 44.54 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 74.8 ∆E
638
cd/m²		623
cd/m²		605
cd/m²
615
cd/m²		625
cd/m²		594
cd/m²
558
cd/m²		578
cd/m²		552
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Liquid Retina Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 638 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 598.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.53 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 625 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1330:1 (Svärta: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11"		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5"
Screen
15%
16%
5%
-47%
Brightness middle
625
632
1%
617
-1%
435
-30%
446
-29%
Brightness
599
605
1%
585
-2%
422
-30%
445
-26%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
84
-3%
90
3%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.47
0.32
32%
0.36
23%
0.32
32%
Contrast
1330
1975
48%
1714
29%
1359
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.1
15%
0.94
28%
1.18
9%
2.7
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.4
11%
1.87
31%
2.27
16%
5.4
-100%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.7
6%
1.4
22%
1.12
38%
2.1
-17%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.156 102%
2.3 96%
2.05 107%
CCT
6765 96%
6794 96%
6733 97%
6502 100%
6468 100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.49
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 58820 Hz ≤ 13 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 58820 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 13 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 58820 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | 3DMark | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points +1%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2)
1122 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
1117 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
4712 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=2)
4710 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points -47%
Metal Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)
29543 Points +195%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
10011 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2)
9998 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
9984 Points 0%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points 0%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2)
110714 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
110582 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
103813 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points +1%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2)
221182 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
220422 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
194856 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
40299 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2)
40289 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
39393 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points -14%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
751846 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2)
732032 Points -3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points -5%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
5709 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2)
5683 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
5657 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
5300 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years)
1440 Points -75%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Average Apple A12Z Bionic
 
Average of class Tablet
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
127.4 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.5 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
126.1 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (124.5 - 127.4, n=3)
126 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
67 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
279.1 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points +1%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2)
273 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
271.9 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
255.5 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.1 Points -57%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
194 Points +39%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
182 Points +30%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3)
158.3 Points +13%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
155.2 Points +11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
140 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points -26%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
154 runs/min +14%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2)
144.5 runs/min +7%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
135 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
45734 Points +6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
43057 Points
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=3)
42618 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1)
42425 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
35408 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -478%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2176 ms * -237%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
984 ms * -52%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646 ms * -0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13)
646 ms *
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2)
646 ms * -0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12)
614 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø31.7 (28-34)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2: Ø59.3 (50-60)
Hög belastning
 34.1 °C37.2 °C35.7 °C 
 37.3 °C38.2 °C36.6 °C 
 37.5 °C39.1 °C37.7 °C 
Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 37 °C
33.8 °C36.5 °C34.1 °C
35.6 °C37.4 °C37.4 °C
35.1 °C36.3 °C36.1 °C
Max: 37.4 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  31.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.829.72526.223.13123.319.44021.921.1502825.26319.9238019.135.410019.946.212516.556.116019.662.620017.560.725017.562.431513.96440013.965.350015.870.663015.2718001469.810001470.6125013.972.9160013.470.1200013.865.5250014.36731501469.4400014.570.3500014.669.6630014.563.4800014.762.91000015.155.61250015571600014.862.2SPL26.581N0.852.6median 14.6median 65.3Delta1.14.833.834.533.833.833.733.83133.33128.331.628.329.33029.327.526.727.529.326.229.336.524.736.544.924.644.949.424.249.450.422.550.444.720.644.744.720.944.755.319.955.355.419.355.460.618.560.665.218.565.261.817.861.859.117.859.161.417.861.460.217.560.259.317.659.356.517.856.558.817.958.859185950.81850.851.818.151.854.218.254.239.718.239.733.41833.471.430.371.428.31.428.3median 55.3median 18.2median 55.37.21.27.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 12.9 2020Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.22 / 8.68 / 8.75 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 11.72 / 15.25 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
11%
-169%
30%
Idle Minimum *
1.22
1.42
-16%
1.3
-7%
4.4
-261%
1.96
-61%
Idle Average *
8.68
9.35
-8%
3.5
60%
8.7
-0%
2.8
68%
Idle Maximum *
8.75
9.38
-7%
5.6
36%
9.6
-10%
2.82
68%
Load Average *
11.72
12.75
-9%
12.5
-7%
44
-275%
5.31
55%
Load Maximum *
15.25
14.96
2%
19.2
-26%
61
-300%
11.91
22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 27min
WiFi Websurfing
15tim 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 47min
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020
9720 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
14%
-43%
13%
Reader / Idle
1827
1888
3%
2001
10%
690
-62%
1276
-30%
H.264
738
899
22%
936
27%
403
-45%
872
18%
WiFi v1.3
905
796
-12%
902
0%
586
-35%
556
-39%
Load
167
184
10%
197
18%
115
-31%
340
104%

För

+ Tilltalande design
+ Snabbt och pålitligt WiFi
+ Bra kamera på 12 MP
+ Brett utbud av tillbehör
+ 120 Hz-skärm med hög färgprecision
+ Hög prestanda
+ De fyra högtalarna är kraftfulla
+ Lång batteritid

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering
- Höljet böjer sig en aning för mycket
- Lagringen går inte att utöka
- Endast 12 månaders garanti
- Dyr surfplatta, dyra tillbehör

Omdöme: Ökar sin ledning

Recension av Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020. Recensionsex från
Recension av Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

iPad Pro är den för tillfället bästa surfplattan på marknaden. Den är extremt snabb, den välkalibrerade True Tone-skärmen är en välsignelse för kreatörer, användarupplevelsen är fantastiskt smidigt, de fyra inbyggda högtalarna ger utmärkt stereoljud och plattan är dessutom bland de bästa när det kommer till batteritid.

Apple har med några försiktiga uppdateringar ytterligare optimerat vad som redan var marknadens bästa surfplatta.

Alla dessa saker fanns redan på den tidigare versionen. Men ett fåtal konservativa uppdateringar som en uppdaterad kamera med LiDAR-sensor, en aningen snabbare CPU och 6 GB RAM som standard oavsett lagringskonfiguration får iPad Pro att skilja sig ytterligare från Apples andra surfplattor, för att inte tala om Android-alternativen.

Tack vare en större skärm är iPad Pro 12.9 (2020), i egenskap av att vara det senaste flaggskeppet från iPad Pro-serien, ännu bättre lämpad för proffsbruk än iPad Pro 11 (2020). Men med det sagt går dess fulla potential bara att komma åt genom tillbehör, vilka precis som själva surfplattan är ganska dyra. Magic Keyboard, som släpps i slutet av Maj, bör göra den ganska lik en laptop.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 - 05/13/2020 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Design
84 / 98 → 86%
Tangentbord
79 / 80 → 98%
Mus
99%
Anslutningar
50 / 70 → 71%
Vikt
81 / 40-88 → 85%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
61 / 78 → 78%
Programprestanda
82 / 92 → 89%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 95%
Camera
68 / 85 → 80%
Medel
81%
89%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) - Finjustering av flaggskeppet (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-05-17 (Update: 2020-05-17)