Test: Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus GL504GS
Brand: Asus

Stjärnfall

Med ROG Strix GL504 släpper Asus en toppskiktslaptop på 15 tum som har nästan alla funktioner man kan önska sig från en spelplattform. En 144 Hz-skärm? Japp. Skärm med tunn infattning? Japp. RGB-tangentbord? Japp. Sexkärnig CPU och DirectX 12-GPU? Japp. I vårt test förklarar vi varför detta ändå inte räcker för att få betyget "väldigt bra".

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 08/23/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus GL504GS (GL504 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1443 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 397.31

Minne

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, alla platser upptagna, 32 GB max

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, FullHD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel HM370

Hårddisk

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB

, NVMe + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Platser: 1x M.2 Typ 2280 + 1x 2.5 tum

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC

Nätverk

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26 x 361 x 262

Batteri

66 Wh, 4210 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: HD

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2x 3.5 watt, Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 W, nyckelring, klistermärke, Olika verktyg från tillverkaren, XSplit Gamecaster, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.456 kg, Strömförsörjning: 613 g

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Asus GL504GS SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Razer Blade 15 2018 DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: Nätadapter, RJ45 LAN, Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI, 2x USB-A, USB-C, ljud

Höger: kortläsare, USB-A, Kensington-lås

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	191 MB/s +142%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +21%
Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s +195%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +46%
Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s -61%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus GL504GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	697 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	665 MBit/s -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s -5%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	643 MBit/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	694 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	681 MBit/s +1%
Asus GL504GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	672 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -2%


238 cd/m²	252 cd/m²	247 cd/m²
257 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
265 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	276 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 278 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 261.1 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 271 cd/m²
Kontrast: 847:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.33
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		0%	-1%	1%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	66.4	64.3 -3%	63.6 -4%	66.2 0%	64.3 -3%
sRGB Coverage	90.2	93.7 4%	93.8 4%	92.1 2%	94.1 4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66	65.5 -1%	64.9 -2%	67.2 2%	65.3 -1%
Response Times		-88%	-80%	-95%	-66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4) -139%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -133%	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) -144%	16 ?(8.4, 7.6) -122%
Response Time Black / White *	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -36%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -27%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -45%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -9%
PWM Frequency
Screen		2%	21%	11%	8%
Brightness middle	271	290 7%	313 15%	254 -6%	325 20%
Brightness	261	281 8%	300 15%	262 0%	303 16%
Brightness Distribution	86	82 -5%	78 -9%	89 3%	90 5%
Black Level *	0.32	0.3 6%	0.33 -3%	0.22 31%	0.33 -3%
Contrast	847	967 14%	948 12%	1155 36%	985 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.61	2.85 -9%	1.29 51%	2.37 9%	2.69 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.93	6.27 -27%	2.04 59%	4.71 4%	4.91 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.33	1.39 40%		1.84 21%	1.27 45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.97	2.4 -22%	0.69 65%	1.58 20%	2.34 -19%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.34 ^94%	2.43 ^91%	2.48 ^89%	2.38 ^92%
CCT	6398 ^102%	6718 ^97%	6550 ^99%	6785 ^96%	6872 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	60 2%	60 2%	60 2%	60 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90	94 4%	94 4%	92 2%	94 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-29% / -10%	-20% / 3%	-28% / -4%	-19% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.8 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +64%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	172 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	172 Points +1%
Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +187%
Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1190 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	1154 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1133 Points -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	983 Points -17%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +73%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.96 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.95 Points +2%
Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +181%
Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H	13.26 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.93 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.89 Points -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	11.82 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 2018 Intel Core i7-8750H	10.51 Points -21%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.26 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1190 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +61%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	5191 Points +7%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5059 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5046 Points +4%
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4854 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5390 Points
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4665 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4658 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	4585 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4504 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5676 Points 0%
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5673 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	5669 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	5637 Points -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5621 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5390 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5673 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		4854 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
AS SSD		-6%	-31%	-7%	13%
Seq Read	1837	2376 29%	2213 20%	1266 -31%	1915 4%
Seq Write	1730	1521 -12%	1163 -33%	1834 6%	2324 34%
4K Read	53.3	46.45 -13%	23.36 -56%	48.94 -8%	48.03 -10%
4K Write	105.7	93.6 -11%	80.4 -24%	107.2 1%	106 0%
Score Read	1542	1584 3%	1092 -29%	1346 -13%	1837 19%
Score Write	1983	1450 -27%	939 -53%	2051 3%	2423 22%
Score Total	4318	3806 -12%	2536 -41%	4122 -5%	5224 21%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1864 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 344.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 297.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1761 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1852 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.23 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.9 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		17775 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36818 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14394 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 ultra

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +92%
Asus GL504GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16345 Points
Razer Blade 15 2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15748 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15156 Points -7%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14780 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11558 Points -29%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +108%
Asus GL504GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21058 Points
Razer Blade 15 2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19969 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19162 Points -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14367 Points -32%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +131%
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	55.6 fps
Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	53.5 fps -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.7 fps -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.4 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	38.6 fps -31%

	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	102	55.6
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	247	218
Destiny 2 (2017)	135	116
Fortnite (2018)	148	111
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	57.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	92	87
The Crew 2 (2018)	60	60

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		32 / 33 / 40 dB(A)
Hög belastning		49 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		7%	3%	10%	-2%	15%
off / environment *	29	29 -0%	29 -0%	30 -3%	29 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	32	29 9%	30 6%	30 6%	29 9%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	33	30 9%	31 6%	31 6%	35 -6%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	40	38 5%	35 12%	34 15%	40 -0%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 24%
Load Average *	49	46 6%	49 -0%	43 12%	50 -2%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	49 4%	51 -0%	42 18%	53 -4%
Load Maximum *	53	46 13%	54 -2%	44 17%	58 -9%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -1%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


52 °C	51 °C	55 °C
45 °C	47 °C	47 °C
36 °C	34 °C	34 °C

Max: 55 °C
Medel: 44.6 °C


55 °C	52 °C	53 °C
48 °C	53 °C	50 °C
34 °C	38 °C	32 °C

Max: 55 °C
Medel: 46.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 60 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


35 °C	34 °C	34 °C
34 °C	36 °C	35 °C
32 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Max: 36 °C
Medel: 33.7 °C


36 °C	35 °C	35 °C
35 °C	35 °C	34 °C
30 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Max: 36 °C
Medel: 32.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 37 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


48 °C	47 °C	50 °C
42 °C	44 °C	43 °C
31 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Max: 50 °C
Medel: 41.8 °C


52 °C	49 °C	50 °C
47 °C	46 °C	43 °C
37 °C	37 °C	36 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 44.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 56 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		1%	8%	15%	4%	13%
Maximum Upper Side *	55	56 -2%	53 4%	49 11%	56 -2%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 16%
Maximum Bottom *	55	59 -7%	65 -18%	63 -15%	68 -24%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Upper Side *	36	33 8%	26 28%	24 33%	28 22%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) 13%
Idle Bottom *	36	34 6%	30 17%	25 31%	29 19%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) 10%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus GL504GS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.8 / 2.4 Watt
Låg belastning	29 / 32 / 38 Watt
Hög belastning	100 / 217 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		31%	31%	38%	39%	21%
Idle Minimum *	29	14 52%	14 52%	7 76%	10 66%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 53%
Idle Average *	32	17 47%	18 44%	11 66%	13 59%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	38	21 45%	22 42%	20 47%	18 53%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	100	95 5%	91 9%	98 2%	95 5%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	170	141 17%	142 16%	132 22%	114 33%
Load Maximum *	217	179 18%	173 20%	182 16%	179 18%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		2tim 56min
WiFi Websurfing		2tim 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		2tim 30min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 11min

	Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh	Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		89%	235%	122%	89%	143%
Reader / Idle	176	382 117%	762 333%	507 188%	400 127%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 221%
H.264	150	324 116%	504 236%	356 137%	288 92%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 173%
WiFi v1.3	146	322 121%	513 251%	362 148%	262 79%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) 157%
Load	71	72 1%	156 120%	81 14%	111 56%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 21%

För

+ väldigt responsiv 144 Hz-skärm

+ NVMe-SSD + SSHD

+ bra inmatningsenheter

+ väldigt snabbt WLAN

+ RGB-belysning

+ kraftfullt ljud

+ kraftfulla verktyg

+ tunn infattning

Emot

- olycklig placering av webbkameran

- begränsad CPU- och GPU-Turbo

- hög ljudnivå vid belastning

- varken Optimus eller G-Sync

- svag batteritid

- ingen Thunderbolt 3

ROG Strix GL504, recensionsex från Asus Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vi kan se att det kommer att bli hård konkurrens i segmentet av tunna spellaptops som har en design med tunn infattning. Efter att Gigabyte Aero 15X och Razer Blade 15 redan övertygat oss helt och hållet de senaste månaderna kommer nu Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II som en tredje kandidat och får ett totalt omdöme på 87 eller 88 procent.

Denna 15-tummare har inte bara ett tjusigt hölje med 144 Hz-skärm att tacka för sitt goda omdöme utan även bra inmatningsenheter och högtalare med förvånansvärt omfångsrikt ljud.

Å andra sidan går det att ifrågasätta varför Asus har valt ett vanligt GeForce GTX 1070 istället för Max-Q versionen. Även om standardmodellen har aningen mer kraft så blir höljets höjd och vikt lidande på grund av värmeutvecklingen och faller i många fall efter konkurrenterna på den punkten.

Men i praktiken är avsaknaden av grafikbyte ett ännu större problem. Utan Optimus-tekniken är det svårt att tänka på GL504GS som en mobil spelplattform, då man blir väldigt beroende av nätadaptern (enligt Asus ska åtminstone GL504GM med GTX 1060 ha stöd för Optimus). Tillverkaren kunde också ha gjort förbättringar när det gäller anslutningar. 2018 förväntar vi oss en Thunderbolt 3-port i prisskiktet över 10.000 kronor.

Trots dessa brister kan denna 15-tummare gå om MSI GS65, vars hölje visade upp ett flertal brister. Och i slutändan vinner den även över Schenker XMG Neo 15.

Asus GL504GS - 08/21/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Design

82 / 98 → 83%

Tangentbord

85%

Mus

81%

Anslutningar

64 / 81 → 79%

Vikt

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Batteri

65%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

96%

Programprestanda

99%

Temperatur

79 / 95 → 83%

Ljudnivå

63 / 90 → 70%

Audio

86%

Medel

79%

87%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 2018-08-23 (Update: 2018-08-23)

Storleksjämförelse

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus GL504GS audio analysis

Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison