Test: Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus GL504GS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
Asus GL504GS | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 271 cd/m²
Kontrast: 847:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.33
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -1% | 1% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.3 -3% | 63.6 -4% | 66.2 0% | 64.3 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.2 | 93.7 4% | 93.8 4% | 92.1 2% | 94.1 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 65.5 -1% | 64.9 -2% | 67.2 2% | 65.3 -1% |
Response Times | -88% | -80% | -95% | -66% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 17.2 ? -139% | 16.8 ? -133% | 17.6 ? -144% | 16 ? -122% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 12 ? -36% | 11.2 ? -27% | 12.8 ? -45% | 9.6 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 2% | 21% | 11% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 271 | 290 7% | 313 15% | 254 -6% | 325 20% |
Brightness | 261 | 281 8% | 300 15% | 262 0% | 303 16% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 82 -5% | 78 -9% | 89 3% | 90 5% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.3 6% | 0.33 -3% | 0.22 31% | 0.33 -3% |
Contrast | 847 | 967 14% | 948 12% | 1155 36% | 985 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.61 | 2.85 -9% | 1.29 51% | 2.37 9% | 2.69 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.93 | 6.27 -27% | 2.04 59% | 4.71 4% | 4.91 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.33 | 1.39 40% | 1.84 21% | 1.27 45% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 2.4 -22% | 0.69 65% | 1.58 20% | 2.34 -19% |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.38 92% |
CCT | 6398 102% | 6718 97% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 6872 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 94 4% | 94 4% | 92 2% | 94 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-10% | -20% /
3% | -28% /
-4% | -19% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
Asus GL504GS |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5390 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5673 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4854 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -6% | -31% | -7% | 13% | |
Seq Read | 1837 | 2376 29% | 2213 20% | 1266 -31% | 1915 4% |
Seq Write | 1730 | 1521 -12% | 1163 -33% | 1834 6% | 2324 34% |
4K Read | 53.3 | 46.45 -13% | 23.36 -56% | 48.94 -8% | 48.03 -10% |
4K Write | 105.7 | 93.6 -11% | 80.4 -24% | 107.2 1% | 106 0% |
Score Read | 1542 | 1584 3% | 1092 -29% | 1346 -13% | 1837 19% |
Score Write | 1983 | 1450 -27% | 939 -53% | 2051 3% | 2423 22% |
Score Total | 4318 | 3806 -12% | 2536 -41% | 4122 -5% | 5224 21% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17775 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36818 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14394 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Asus GL504GS | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus GL504GS | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Asus GL504GS | |
Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 102 | 55.6 | ||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 247 | 218 | ||
Destiny 2 (2017) | 135 | 116 | ||
Fortnite (2018) | 148 | 111 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 57.2 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 92 | 87 | ||
The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 32 / 33 / 40 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 49 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 3% | 10% | -2% | 16% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 24 ? 17% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 29 9% | 30 6% | 30 6% | 29 9% | 25.4 ? 21% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 30 9% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 35 -6% | 27.1 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 38 5% | 35 12% | 34 15% | 40 -0% | 30.1 ? 25% |
Load Average * | 49 | 46 6% | 49 -0% | 43 12% | 50 -2% | 42.4 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 49 4% | 51 -0% | 42 18% | 53 -4% | |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 46 13% | 54 -2% | 44 17% | 58 -9% | 53.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 8% | 15% | 4% | 13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 56 -2% | 53 4% | 49 11% | 56 -2% | 46.2 ? 16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 65 -18% | 63 -15% | 68 -24% | 49.2 ? 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 33 8% | 26 28% | 24 33% | 28 22% | 31.1 ? 14% |
Idle Bottom * | 36 | 34 6% | 30 17% | 25 31% | 29 19% | 32.2 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GL504GS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.8 / 2.4 Watt |
Låg belastning | 29 / 32 / 38 Watt |
Hög belastning |
100 / 217 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | 31% | 38% | 39% | 20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 14 52% | 14 52% | 7 76% | 10 66% | 13.5 ? 53% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 17 47% | 18 44% | 11 66% | 13 59% | 19 ? 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 38 | 21 45% | 22 42% | 20 47% | 18 53% | 26.7 ? 30% |
Load Average * | 100 | 95 5% | 91 9% | 98 2% | 95 5% | 106.7 ? -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 170 | 141 17% | 142 16% | 132 22% | 114 33% | |
Load Maximum * | 217 | 179 18% | 173 20% | 182 16% | 179 18% | 251 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 89% | 235% | 122% | 89% | 143% | |
Reader / Idle | 176 | 382 117% | 762 333% | 507 188% | 400 127% | 565 ? 221% |
H.264 | 150 | 324 116% | 504 236% | 356 137% | 288 92% | 408 ? 172% |
WiFi v1.3 | 146 | 322 121% | 513 251% | 362 148% | 262 79% | 375 ? 157% |
Load | 71 | 72 1% | 156 120% | 81 14% | 111 56% | 85.3 ? 20% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vi kan se att det kommer att bli hård konkurrens i segmentet av tunna spellaptops som har en design med tunn infattning. Efter att Gigabyte Aero 15X och Razer Blade 15 redan övertygat oss helt och hållet de senaste månaderna kommer nu Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II som en tredje kandidat och får ett totalt omdöme på 87 eller 88 procent.
Denna 15-tummare har inte bara ett tjusigt hölje med 144 Hz-skärm att tacka för sitt goda omdöme utan även bra inmatningsenheter och högtalare med förvånansvärt omfångsrikt ljud.
Å andra sidan går det att ifrågasätta varför Asus har valt ett vanligt GeForce GTX 1070 istället för Max-Q versionen. Även om standardmodellen har aningen mer kraft så blir höljets höjd och vikt lidande på grund av värmeutvecklingen och faller i många fall efter konkurrenterna på den punkten.
Men i praktiken är avsaknaden av grafikbyte ett ännu större problem. Utan Optimus-tekniken är det svårt att tänka på GL504GS som en mobil spelplattform, då man blir väldigt beroende av nätadaptern (enligt Asus ska åtminstone GL504GM med GTX 1060 ha stöd för Optimus). Tillverkaren kunde också ha gjort förbättringar när det gäller anslutningar. 2018 förväntar vi oss en Thunderbolt 3-port i prisskiktet över 10.000 kronor.
Trots dessa brister kan denna 15-tummare gå om MSI GS65, vars hölje visade upp ett flertal brister. Och i slutändan vinner den även över Schenker XMG Neo 15.
Asus GL504GS
-
08/21/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser