Test: Asus VivoBook 15 K570UD (i7-8550U. GTX 1050) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 240.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1044:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 5587 LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GL63 8RC-069US LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE LG Philips LGD0533, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 1% | 2% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.66 | 38.13 -1% | 38.97 1% | 39.4 2% | 39.53 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.9 | 56.8 -2% | 58.2 1% | 59.2 2% | 59.2 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.94 | 39.47 -1% | 40.3 1% | 40.72 2% | 40.86 2% |
| Response Times | 8% | 6% | 7% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 33 ? -3% | 32 ? -0% | 33.6 ? -5% | 42 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 24 ? 18% | 25.6 ? 12% | 24 ? 18% | 27 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 24900 ? | |||
| Screen | -21% | -30% | -12% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 240.1 | 229 -5% | 248.4 3% | 286.5 19% | 243 1% |
| Brightness | 233 | 224 -4% | 241 3% | 258 11% | 231 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 84 -8% | 82 -10% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.28 -22% | 0.3 -30% | 0.34 -48% | 0.24 -4% |
| Contrast | 1044 | 818 -22% | 828 -21% | 843 -19% | 1013 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.25 | 6.1 -44% | 7.5 -76% | 5.57 -31% | 6.36 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.84 | 12.2 32% | 25.2 -41% | 16.8 6% | 12.76 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4 | 6.12 -53% | 4.16 -4% | 6.51 -63% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.68 -103% | 6.5 -132% | 4.6 -64% | 5.63 -101% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.19 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.47 89% |
| CCT | 6503 100% | 6989 93% | 7852 83% | 7564 86% | 7411 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.8 | 36 -2% | 37 1% | 37.4 2% | 38 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.8 | 57 -1% | 57.9 0% | 58.9 2% | 59 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-14% | -8% /
-19% | -1% /
-7% | -9% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76) | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (11694 - 24180, n=31) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (4202 - 8211, n=31) | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (258 - 435, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4188 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4458 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell G5 15 5587 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128 | MSI GL63 8RC-069US Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -63% | -55% | -66% | 58% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 792 | 130.9 -83% | 323.5 -59% | 202.6 -74% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 334.3 | 95.7 -71% | 195.3 -42% | 84.8 -75% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1265 | 146.6 -88% | 446.8 -65% | 325.6 -74% | |
| Score Total | 2249 | 557 -75% | 752 -67% | 850 -62% | 3806 69% |
| Score Write | 836 | 199 -76% | 234 -72% | 230 -72% | 1450 73% |
| Score Read | 968 | 240 -75% | 337 -65% | 410 -58% | 1584 64% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.127 | 0.066 48% | 0.073 43% | 0.061 52% | 0.038 70% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.059 | 0.128 -117% | 0.141 -139% | 0.197 -234% | 0.051 14% |
| 4K-64 Write | 677 | 112.4 -83% | 132.2 -80% | 127.3 -81% | 1204 78% |
| 4K-64 Read | 756 | 164.1 -78% | 257 -66% | 342.3 -55% | 1300 72% |
| 4K Write | 85.8 | 62.2 -28% | 53.8 -37% | 57.1 -33% | 93.6 9% |
| 4K Read | 30.78 | 24.44 -21% | 28.3 -8% | 16.18 -47% | 46.45 51% |
| Seq Write | 735 | 243.7 -67% | 479.8 -35% | 456.4 -38% | 1521 107% |
| Seq Read | 1817 | 511 -72% | 516 -72% | 512 -72% | 2376 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (6744 - 8903, n=42) | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (4446 - 7607, n=42) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7625 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 227 | 172.2 | 152.9 | 61.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 19 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.3 / 29.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 41.2 / 47.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2 | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Asus FX503VM-EH73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002 | MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | -5% | -10% | -2% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.2 | 30.3 -4% | 27.8 5% | 28.2 3% | 27.8 5% | 28.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 31.1 -6% | 32.1 -10% | 33 -13% | 29.6 -1% | 28.6 2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.5 | 31.1 -5% | 32.2 -9% | 33.3 -13% | 29.6 -0% | 31.6 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 34.2 -12% | 32.2 -6% | 34.7 -14% | 29.6 3% | 31.6 -4% |
| Load Average * | 41.2 | 34.9 15% | 43.3 -5% | 44.5 -8% | 37.3 9% | 38.6 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 42.7 3% | 45 -2% | 49.2 -12% | 49.8 -13% | 40.6 8% |
| Load Maximum * | 47.2 | 44 7% | 49.6 -5% | 52.8 -12% | 53.7 -14% | 56.8 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.44 / 0.89 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 5.1 / 6.3 / 10.5 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
82.2 / 103.2 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX503VM-EH73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -24% | -23% | -68% | -92% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 4.9 4% | 8 -57% | 7.1 -39% | 12.8 -151% | 14.9 -192% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 8.5 -35% | 10.9 -73% | 9.8 -56% | 15.4 -144% | 17.5 -178% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 9.1 13% | 11 -5% | 10.4 1% | 15.9 -51% | 19.2 -83% |
| Load Average * | 82.2 | 90.7 -10% | 76.7 7% | 88.8 -8% | 78 5% | 103.2 -26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 85.9 | 110 -28% | 94.9 -10% | 93.3 -9% | 107.3 -25% | 123.1 -43% |
| Load Maximum * | 103.2 | 144 -40% | 106.4 -3% | 132.5 -28% | 143.4 -39% | 132.7 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 R7 2700U, Vega 10, 49 Wh | Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T i7-7500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 23% | -18% | -20% | 0% | 16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 318 | 391 23% | 261 -18% | 255 -20% | 317 0% | 370 16% |
| Reader / Idle | 705 | 493 | 440 | 795 | 526 | |
| Load | 133 | 77 | 41 | 75 | 105 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Asus X570UD bevisar att man inte behöver en Intel HQ-klassad CPU för att spela dom senaste spelen. Kaby Lake R-serien på 15W erbjuder en prestandanivå som ligger mellan 45 wattsmodellerna Core i5-7300HQ och i7-7700HQ som ofta återfinns i billigare spellaptops. Dom lägre kylkraven innebär ett lättare och mer portabelt system utan att kärntemperaturerna blir obekväma eller att spelprestandan behöver offras. Kombinationen av i7-8550U och GTX 1050 är något vi gärna ser i fler tunna och lätta modeller, inte olikt den äldre Blade 14 med sin kombination av i7-7500U och GTX 960M.
Det finns förstås några nedskärningar som man behöver vara medveten om då Vivobook är ett budget/mitten-alternativ. Ett svagt tangentbord och en svag styrplatta lämnar ett billigt intryck och dom dåliga servicemöjligheterna står i vägen för användare som vill uppgradera lagring eller RAM. Men utöver dessa nackdelar är X570UD/K570UD en välbalanserad enhet för studenter på resande fot som vill ha något billigt och lätt som dessutom klarar av att spela dom senaste spelen.
Lättare än Dell G5, Lenovo Legion Y520 och Gigabyte Sabre 15 samtidigt som den är precis lika kraftfull och billig. Asus Vivobook K570UD/X570UD byter ut lyxen mot en skaplig kärnupplevelse och respektabel spelförmåga.
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
- 07/22/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
