Test: Dell Alienware m15 R2 - Mini me-versionen av Area-51m (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 324.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 853:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.64
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -0% | 4% | -3% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 66.9 2% | 65.6 0% | 67.6 4% | 63.5 -3% | 63.5 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.1 | 98.1 3% | 92.2 -3% | 97.5 3% | 92.4 -3% | 89.4 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 68.5 4% | 66.9 2% | 68.9 5% | 64.7 -2% | 64.5 -2% |
| Response Times | 1% | 24% | -7% | -33% | -23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 12.8 ? 22% | 7 ? 57% | 13.6 ? 17% | 18.8 ? -15% | 18 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 10.4 ? -18% | 9.6 ? -9% | 12 ? -36% | 13.2 ? -50% | 12 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 23810 ? | 23810 ? 0% | 23260 ? -2% | |||
| Screen | 24% | 13% | 25% | 6% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 324.2 | 293 -10% | 323.6 0% | 282.3 -13% | 320.4 -1% | 353.6 9% |
| Brightness | 304 | 270 -11% | 315 4% | 269 -12% | 298 -2% | 346 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 85 -6% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.29 24% | 0.29 24% | 0.32 16% | 0.42 -11% | 0.3 21% |
| Contrast | 853 | 1010 18% | 1116 31% | 882 3% | 763 -11% | 1179 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.01 | 1.69 66% | 3.31 34% | 1.17 77% | 3.21 36% | 4.55 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.7 | 3.37 73% | 5.74 55% | 3.29 74% | 5.54 56% | 7.91 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.64 | 1.24 24% | 2.73 -66% | 1.06 35% | 2.36 -44% | 3.37 -105% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 2.3 71% | 2.9 63% | 1.3 84% | 3.6 54% | 4.1 48% |
| Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 8455 77% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6643 98% | 6503 100% | 7434 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.8 | 63 4% | 59.7 -2% | 63.8 5% | 59 -3% | 57.9 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.5 | 98.5 3% | 91.8 -4% | 97.5 2% | 92 -4% | 88.9 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
16% | 12% /
12% | 7% /
15% | -10% /
-1% | -7% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23810 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4207 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5706 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5374 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Alienware m15 P79F Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -12% | 12% | -26% | 20% | -49% | |
| Seq Read | 1925 | 1937 1% | 1832 -5% | 1239 -36% | 2005 4% | 2289 19% |
| Seq Write | 2371 | 1066 -55% | 1864 -21% | 920 -61% | 1580 -33% | 1163 -51% |
| 4K Read | 37.2 | 31.76 -15% | 52.1 40% | 45.74 23% | 49.33 33% | 22.29 -40% |
| 4K Write | 108.9 | 102.6 -6% | 108.3 -1% | 95.7 -12% | 103.8 -5% | 28.92 -73% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1177 | 1140 -3% | 1159 -2% | 322 -73% | 1241 5% | 415.6 -65% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1135 | 938 -17% | 1807 59% | 722 -36% | 1730 52% | 199.5 -82% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.065 | 0.058 11% | 0.05 23% | 0.073 -12% | 0.054 17% | 0.122 -88% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.108 | 0.04 63% | 0.034 69% | 0.047 56% | 0.036 67% | 0.143 -32% |
| Score Read | 1407 | 1366 -3% | 1394 -1% | 492 -65% | 1490 6% | 667 -53% |
| Score Write | 1481 | 1147 -23% | 2102 42% | 910 -39% | 1991 34% | 345 -77% |
| Score Total | 3633 | 3168 -13% | 4221 16% | 1654 -54% | 4230 16% | 1300 -64% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2073 | 946 -54% | 2083 0% | 1236 -40% | 3025 46% | 1767 -15% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 576 | 452.8 -21% | 496.5 -14% | 703 22% | 713 24% | 379.4 -34% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1426 | 1013 -29% | 977 -31% | 812 -43% | 1554 9% | 1055 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19885 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33900 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17504 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7785 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 314.6 | 273.1 | 251.7 | 166.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 274.5 | 215.4 | 144.5 | 81.3 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 248.7 | 239.3 | 218.5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 114 | 91 | 89 | 87 |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 14% | 1% | 8% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28.7 -1% | 28.3 -0% | 28 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 30.3 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 29.8 -5% | 30.4 -7% | 32.6 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 35.4 -24% | 28.8 -1% | 32.4 -14% | 30.5 -7% | 32.7 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 49 | 50.3 -3% | 29 41% | 38 22% | 30.6 38% | 32.7 33% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 50.3 -3% | 33.5 32% | 38.2 22% | 37.6 23% | 33.3 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 50.2 -2% | 45 8% | 56.6 -16% | 46 6% | 41.6 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 50.2 9% | 45.2 18% | 56.6 -3% | 55.1 -0% | 45.2 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 49 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 49 / 55 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Alienware m15 R2 P87F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.18 / 0.5 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 19 / 40.5 / 52 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
132.3 / 217.2 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 35% | 34% | 24% | 31% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 19 | 10.9 43% | 12.5 34% | 22.9 -21% | 13.6 28% | 22 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 40.5 | 12.3 70% | 15.3 62% | 27.2 33% | 17.9 56% | 26 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 52 | 19 63% | 20.7 60% | 27.5 47% | 20.6 60% | 33 37% |
| Load Average * | 132.3 | 96 27% | 90.2 32% | 83.4 37% | 96 27% | 86 35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 183.3 | 161.7 12% | 162 12% | 143.6 22% | 154.6 16% | 159 13% |
| Load Maximum * | 217.2 | 229.1 -5% | 209.3 4% | 160.5 26% | 218.6 -1% | 215 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 74% | -45% | 9% | -34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 554 | 953 72% | 235 -58% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 332 | 309 -7% | 393 18% | 181 -45% | 362 9% | 166 -50% |
| Load | 44 | 102 132% | 46 5% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I egenskap av att vara en modell från andra generationen av den här serien hade vi förväntat oss att Alienware m15 R2 skulle vara objektivt sett bättre på alla sätt än första generationens Alienware m15 R1. Det är inte ens säkert att så är fallet på papperet; både RAM och WLAN är nu fastlödda samtidigt som batteriet den här gången är mindre. I gengäld får man 2.5 Gbit Ethernet, ett tangentbord med bättre återkoppling, WiFi 6 som tillval, tangentspecifik RGB-belysning och ett (diskuterbart) bättre utseende som varken känns svagare eller starkare än den utgående designen den ersätter.
Om du tittar närmare på m15 R2 börjar bristerna visa sig. I synnerhet är CPU-temperaturerna för höga och ligger nästan på 100 C när man spelar trots att fläktarna är inställda på maximum. De höga temperaturerna hade varit okej om de hade inneburit tystare fläktar eller snabbare prestanda än hos konkurrenterna, men så är inte fallet. Om alternativ som Asus Zephyrus S GX531, HP Omen 15, Razer Blade 15 eller MSI GS65 kan hålla sig 20 C svalare finns det ingen anledning till att Alienware m15 R2 inte också skulle kunna göra det. Tyvärr noterade vi samma sak på den äldre modellen Alienware m15 R1, vilket antyder att chassit på m15 R2 fortfarande inte löser en av de största anledningarna till kritik vi haft mot den relativt nya Alienware m15-serien.
Kanske som ett resultat av de höga CPU-temperaturerna presterar Core i7-9750H processorn i m15 R2 en aning långsammare än genomsnittet för i7-9750H i vår databas och den presterar till och med långsammare än den Core i7-8750H som satt i Alienware m15 R1. Processorns klockfrekvenser varierade mer än vi hade förväntat oss och bilduppdateringen i spel är som ett resultat av detta en aning lägre när processorn är kraftigt belastad.
Om du letar efter en Alienware-laptop kan du lika gärna välja den äldare Alienware m15 R1 då m15 R2 känns som ett steg i sidled i fråga om generell prestanda, uppgraderingsmöjligheter och funktionalitet. Vi rekommenderar att du investerar i en skärm med snabb bilduppdatering och undviker konfigurationerna med Core i9 och 8 GB RAM.
Nyheterna jämfört med förra generationens Alienware m15 R1 sitter i huvudsak på ytan. Även om Alienware m15 R2 ser tjusigare ut med tangentspecifik RGB-belysning så har interna attribut som ljudnivån och den riktigt höga CPU-temperaturen inte riktigt förändrats.
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
- 09/05/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
