Test: Dell Alienware m17 R2 - Får Core i9 att löna sig (Sammanfattning)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E (m17 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 990 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 442.19, Optimus
Minne
16 GB
, Fastlött, DDR4, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, Dell P/N: 8TV4Y, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB
Vikt
2.586 kg, Strömförsörjning: 940 g
Pris
3900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 18.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.6 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (625-645)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (459-531)
7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
18 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 385.6 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 356.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Kontrast: 1325:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.42
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 AU Optronics B173ZAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | -9% | -13% | 21% | -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.8 | 86.4 22% | 62.6 -12% | 60.6 -14% | 86.8 23% | 62.9 -11% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 99.9 1% | 93.5 -5% | 89 -10% | 100 2% | 87.1 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.2 | 99.1 37% | 64.7 -10% | 62.1 -14% | 99.5 38% | 63.7 -12% |
| Response Times | -133% | 21% | 36% | -173% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.2 ? | 35.6 ? -107% | 7.2 ? 58% | 6.8 ? 60% | 45.6 ? -165% | 17.6 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 28 ? -159% | 10 ? 7% | 9.6 ? 11% | 30.4 ? -181% | 11.2 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 26320 ? | 25510 ? -3% | ||||
| Screen | -110% | -4% | -46% | -24% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle | 384.2 | 357.9 -7% | 366 -5% | 299.3 -22% | 667.3 74% | 295 -23% |
| Brightness | 357 | 347 -3% | 343 -4% | 294 -18% | 633 77% | 291 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 91 1% | 94 4% | 90 0% | 96 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.29 -0% | 0.29 -0% | 0.46 -59% | 0.24 17% |
| Contrast | 1325 | 1085 -18% | 1262 -5% | 1032 -22% | 1451 10% | 1229 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.35 | 6.57 -387% | 1.51 -12% | 2.55 -89% | 3.53 -161% | 3.2 -137% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.45 | 9.86 -186% | 3.22 7% | 4.73 -37% | 6.88 -99% | 6.64 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.42 | 6.74 -375% | 0.71 50% | 2.9 -104% | 3.79 -167% | 2.52 -77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 4.3 -258% | 1.93 -61% | 3.5 -192% | 0.9 25% | 2.16 -80% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.6 85% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6580 99% | 6403 102% | 6881 94% | 7101 92% | 6533 99% | 6872 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.5 | 88.4 35% | 60 -8% | 57 -13% | 87.1 33% | 57 -13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.5 | 100 2% | 94 -5% | 88.7 -10% | 100 2% | 87 -12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -74% /
-88% | 3% /
-0% | -8% /
-29% | -59% /
-34% | -18% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26320 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26320 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26320 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 20, i9-9980HK, Apple SSD AP1024; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1308 (1257.47-1327.02)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (2.25 - 2.4, n=3) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (14.8 - 18, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (39440 - 50439, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (7709 - 9734, n=4) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (110.4 - 120.2, n=2) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4384 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5818 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5502 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -23% | 13% | -34% | -26% | 28% | |
| Seq Read | 1938 | 1835 -5% | 2855 47% | 1812 -7% | 1315 -32% | 2564 32% |
| Seq Write | 2094 | 1121 -46% | 2687 28% | 1512 -28% | 927 -56% | 2268 8% |
| 4K Read | 25.88 | 23.98 -7% | 30.31 17% | 32.68 26% | 52.4 102% | 57 120% |
| 4K Write | 100.8 | 100 -1% | 96.3 -4% | 107.7 7% | 122.8 22% | 141.4 40% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1217 | 687 -44% | 1460 20% | 504 -59% | 326.5 -73% | 1175 -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1137 | 776 -32% | 1224 8% | 534 -53% | 727 -36% | 1665 46% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.047 8% | 0.054 -6% | 0.05 2% | 0.11 -116% | 0.032 37% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.107 | 0.053 50% | 0.038 64% | 0.227 -112% | 0.045 58% | 0.025 77% |
| Score Read | 1437 | 895 -38% | 1776 24% | 718 -50% | 510 -65% | 1488 4% |
| Score Write | 1447 | 988 -32% | 1589 10% | 793 -45% | 942 -35% | 2033 40% |
| Score Total | 3624 | 2306 -36% | 4259 18% | 1871 -48% | 1715 -53% | 4279 18% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1926 | 773 -60% | 2226 16% | 946 -51% | 2118 10% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 626 | 493 -21% | 426.4 -32% | 414.3 -34% | 495.6 -21% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1533 | 647 -58% | 1152 -25% | 1263 -18% | 1174 -23% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -18% | 6% | 2% | -33% | 6% | |
| Write 4K | 110.6 | 120.2 9% | 95.5 -14% | 169.6 53% | 99.6 -10% | 176.3 59% |
| Read 4K | 41.46 | 44.3 7% | 42.59 3% | 58 40% | 48.99 18% | 48.98 18% |
| Write Seq | 2378 | 1278 -46% | 2851 20% | 1516 -36% | 972 -59% | 1789 -25% |
| Read Seq | 2114 | 1389 -34% | 2696 28% | 2362 12% | 1515 -28% | 1671 -21% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.4 | 436.2 -2% | 402.6 -10% | 481.8 8% | 280.6 -37% | 433.5 -3% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 509 | 515 1% | 443.9 -13% | 506 -1% | 327.8 -36% | 526 3% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2735 | 1157 -58% | 3420 25% | 1530 -44% | 970 -65% | 2983 9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3206 | 2671 -17% | 3514 10% | 2645 -17% | 1757 -45% | 3555 11% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1688 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1036 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-21% | 10% /
11% | -16% /
-21% | -30% /
-29% | 17% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3206 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2735 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
509 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
445.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2114 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2378 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
110.6 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (38256 - 129506, n=17) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (18048 - 23032, n=19) | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (6464 - 8844, n=19) | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (23386 - 30910, n=20) | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (9212 - 14894, n=20) | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23774 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50705 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19583 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8604 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (114 - 142, n=5) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (71 - 105, n=8) | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0): Ø75 (60-80)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 396.1 | 337.3 | 321 | 179 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 326.6 | 239.3 | 149.6 | 78 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 142 | 110 | 105 | 99 |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -3% | 4% | -2% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 29.1 | 28.2 3% | 30 -3% | 28.2 3% | 29.3 -1% | 29 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.4 | 28.2 4% | 31 -5% | 28.2 4% | 33 -12% | 29 1% |
| Idle Average * | 29.4 | 28.2 4% | 32 -9% | 28.2 4% | 33 -12% | 32 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31 2% | 38 -21% | 30.8 2% | 33 -5% | 40 -27% |
| Load Average * | 49.7 | 50.8 -2% | 47 5% | 42 15% | 42.5 14% | 46 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 50.8 -3% | 48 3% | 51 -3% | 42 15% | 51 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.3 | 50.8 5% | 49 8% | 53 1% | 59.6 -12% | 52 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 31.5 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 49.7 / 53.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.4 °C / 143 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.4 °C / 143 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.18 / 0.3 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 24.7 / 35.9 / 69.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
141.8 / 235.4 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 35% | 30% | 25% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 21.2 14% | 13 47% | 16.2 34% | 13.9 44% | 19 23% |
| Idle Average * | 35.9 | 29.6 18% | 17 53% | 20.4 43% | 24.3 32% | 22 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 69.6 | 34 51% | 25 64% | 26.1 62% | 35.5 49% | 29 58% |
| Load Average * | 141.8 | 130.9 8% | 96 32% | 96.5 32% | 127.6 10% | 102 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 185.8 | 177.5 4% | 156 16% | 182.9 2% | 158 15% | 190 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 235.4 | 219.7 7% | 239 -2% | 214.3 9% | 237.5 -1% | 231 2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 29% | 57% | 48% | 111% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 426 | 543 27% | 461 8% | 295 -31% | 711 67% | 372 -13% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 296 2% | 357 23% | 280 -3% | 431 49% | 235 -19% |
| Load | 31 | 49 58% | 74 139% | 86 177% | 98 216% | 67 116% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
För
+ Utmärkt på att upprätthålla Turbo Boost trots liten storlek
+ Tillfredsställande tangentåterkoppling; numeriskt tangentbord i full storlek
+ Lågt fläktljud i Power Saver-läget
+ 2.5 Gbps Ethernet-port och Thunderbolt 3
+ 2x M.2 2280-platser med kopparplattor
+ Välkalibrerad skärm vid leverans
+ Tangentspecifik RGB-belysning
Emot
- Hög energiförbrukning vid låg processorbelastning
- Riktigt höga CPU-temperaturer vid full belastning
- RAM och WLAN går inte att uppgradera
- För tillfället begränsad till 16 GB RAM
- Batteritiden kunde varit bättre
- Inget alternativ för 2.5 tums SATA III
- Låter mycket när man spelar
- Inget alternativ för 4K UHD
- Stor AC-adapter
- Tar stor plats
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Man förväntar sig att andra generationens modeller är bättre än första generationens på alla sätt. Men i fallet Alienware m17 R2 är det snarare ett steg i sidled jämfört med Alienware m17 R1. Den senaste utgåvan både lägger till och tar bort funktioner, vilket kan irritera en del entusiaster. Man får byta löstagbart RAM, löstagbart WiFi, 2.5-tums SATA III-plats, möjlighet till 4K UHD-skärm och större batteri mot ett bättre tangentbord, en större klickplatta, tangentspecifik RGB-belysning och en ny chassidesign. Om ditt arbete kräver mycket RAM och lagring kan du istället vilja ta en titt på den större Alienware Area-51m.
När det kommer till prestandan så imponerades vi av hur bra processorn var på att upprätthålla Turbo Boost. Core i9-laptops — särskilt tunnare sådana — gör oss ofta besvikna eftersom designen inte alltid utnyttjar processorns potential fullt ut, men den här Alienware-modellen är ett undantag. De huvudsakliga bristerna är att den är större, har högre kärntemperaturer och högljudda fläktar som inte förbättrats alls jämfört med m17 R1. Detta är tyvärr konsekvenserna man får när man stoppar en Core i9 CPU i ett såpass tunt chassi. Men vi misstänker att modellerna med enklare utrustning i form av Core i5- eller Core i7-processorer kommer hålla sig svalare än vad vi uppmätt här.
Gör Alienware m17 R2 tillräckligt mycket för att få en stark rekommendation? Om du inte värderar bättre tangentbord, Core i9 och möjlighet till Tobii eye-tracking får du likvärdig spelprestanda från mindre och mer portabla Core i7-alternativ som Asus ROG Strix Scar GL704GW eller Razer Blade Pro 17.
Alienware m17 R2 handlar helt och hållet om att maximera prestandan från seriens tunnaste chassi. Vill man utnyttja vad det här systemet har att erbjuda får man leva med fläktar som låter mycket, höga kärntemperaturer och ett fotavtryck som är stort till och med för en spellaptop på 17.3 tum.
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
- 07/31/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Vägt medel
Price comparison
