Test: Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 - Hybridenhet som lämnar ett gott intryck trots att tangentbordet ger efter (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 394 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1432:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Dell Latitude 7200 SHP14A3 LQ123N1, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -5% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.6 | 68.1 -5% 67.8 -5% | 67.5 -6% | 67.1 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 99.4 0% 99.1 0% | 96.7 -3% | 95.5 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.6 | 69.9 -4% 69.3 -5% | 68.2 -6% | 67.9 -6% |
| Response Times | -7% | 18% | 427% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 47.2 ? 9% | 47 ? 10% | 43 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.8 ? | 42.4 ? -22% | 26 ? 25% | 25 ? 28% |
| PWM Frequency | 1645 ? | 22000 ? 1237% | ||
| Screen | -30% | -51% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 401 | 474 18% | 452 13% | 484 21% |
| Brightness | 385 | 418 9% | 412 7% | 473 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 76 -14% | 85 -3% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.33 -18% | 0.48 -71% | 0.33 -18% |
| Contrast | 1432 | 1436 0% | 942 -34% | 1467 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.2 -78% | 4.05 -125% | 4.29 -138% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 6.1 -79% | 6.64 -95% | 6.46 -90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 1.56 -42% | 1.34 -22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 4.5 -181% | 4.87 -204% | 4.3 -169% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.07 106% | 2.71 81% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6702 97% | 5881 111% | 7160 91% | 7315 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.6 | 64 -4% | 62 -7% | 62 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 99.4 0% | 97 -2% | 95 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-19% | -13% /
-34% | 129% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1645 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1645 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1645 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3392 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4858 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3782 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 7200 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -2% | 9% | -29% | 7% | |
| Write 4K | 131.9 | 95.4 -28% | 91 -31% | 83.2 -37% | 138.5 ? 5% |
| Read 4K | 45.47 | 39.19 -14% | 36.84 -19% | 43.84 -4% | 44.2 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 1021 | 1197 17% | 636 -38% | 1265 ? 24% | |
| Read Seq | 1085 | 1705 57% | 900 -17% | 1237 ? 14% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 444.9 | 399.2 -10% | 355.8 -20% | 192.9 -57% | 404 ? -9% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 366.6 | 260.7 -29% | 256.9 -30% | 247.4 -33% | 421 ? 15% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1458 | 1287 -12% | 1222 -16% | 861 -41% | 1491 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1640 | 3025 84% | 3460 111% | 1615 -2% | 1741 ? 6% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1992 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7916 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1071 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 67.6 | 34.6 | 29.2 | 9.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16.4 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73 | 43.3 | 19.9 | 17.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.9 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22.1 | 14.7 | 13.1 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).
Dell Latitude 7200 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.37 / 0.74 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.3 / 5.8 / 6.5 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
37 / 51.3 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 7200 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -25% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.8 -45% | 4.9 -48% | 3.2 3% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 9 -55% | 8.9 -53% | 8.7 -50% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 10.5 -62% | 11 -69% | 10.4 -60% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 42.8 -16% | 32 14% | 29.2 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.3 | 57.8 -13% | 36 30% | 40.8 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7200 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 6% | 23% | 36% | |
| H.264 | 489 | 523 7% | 389 -20% | 765 ? 56% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 417 | 395 -5% | 459 10% | 509 22% | 599 ? 44% |
| Load | 106 | 83 -22% | 137 29% | 131 24% | 113.1 ? 7% |
| Reader / Idle | 790 | 781 | 1083 | 1330 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
En Surface-klon? Dell hade nog undvikit att beskriva Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 så även om det passar. Dell utgår fram samma grundkoncept som Microsoft Surface Pro 6, med både styrkor och svagheter.
En av styrkorna med enheter från den här kategorin är definitivt skärmarna, där även Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 använder det bekväma 3:2-formatet och har hög färgrymdstäckning. Nackdelar är istället en blank yta och lägre ljusstyrka jämfört med konkurrenterna, även om Dells dator definitivt inte presterar allt för dåligt på det området. Däremot är tangentbordet en svag punkt. Tangentbordsöverdraget saknar stabilitet vilket påverkar skrivupplevelsen negativt. Dessa två saker utgör de största skillnaderna gentemot en "riktig" laptop som Dell Latitude 7300.
För att vara en omvandlingsbar enhet imponerar Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 med bra anslutbarhet och goda servicemöjligheter. Andra saker vi uppskattade med Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 var den tysta driften, det högkvalitativa höljet, den bekväma styrplattan och den utförliga garantin. En snabb microSD-kortläsare och inbyggt WWAN är ytterligare fördelar. På den negativa sidan finns CPU-prestandan, som är sämre än på exempelvis Microsoft Surface Pro 6.
Dell gör inga misstag här, så vi kan med gott samvete rekommendera Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1.
För att sammanfatta så kan vi rekommendera Dell Latitude 7200 2-in-1 då det är en riktigt bra surfplatta för företaget. Men om du vill köpa den får du fundera igenom vad du prioriterar. Om du tycker skärmen är det viktigaste kanske en surfplatta är en bättre lösning. Om det är tangentbordet är det istället bättre du skaffar en vanlig laptop såsom Dell Latitude 7300.
Dell Latitude 7200
- 09/26/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
