Test: Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB71RF) (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Q8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Q8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 298.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 995:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Q8 AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -5% | -2% | -12% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 60.6 -8% | 62.9 -5% | 63.6 -4% | 58.7 -11% | 64 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.1 | 89 -4% | 87.8 -6% | 95.4 2% | 81 -13% | 90.4 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 62.1 -8% | 63.9 -5% | 65.5 -3% | 58.9 -12% | 64.8 -4% |
| Response Times | 34% | 32% | 846% | -10% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 6.8 ? 59% | 7.2 ? 56% | 7.6 ? 54% | 21.6 ? -32% | 15.6 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 9.6 ? 8% | 9.6 ? 8% | 9.6 ? 8% | 9 ? 13% | 12.8 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 990 ? | 25510 ? 2477% | ||||
| Screen | 4% | 17% | 26% | -74% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 298.4 | 299.3 0% | 288 -3% | 355 19% | 367.9 23% | 299.1 0% |
| Brightness | 287 | 294 2% | 287 0% | 327 14% | 346 21% | 273 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 91 1% | 85 -6% | 84 -7% | 81 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.2 33% | 0.26 13% | 0.55 -83% | 0.27 10% |
| Contrast | 995 | 1032 4% | 1440 45% | 1365 37% | 669 -33% | 1108 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.58 | 2.55 29% | 2.33 35% | 1.54 57% | 9.86 -175% | 5.07 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.29 | 4.73 25% | 5.34 15% | 3 52% | 17.56 -179% | 10.55 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.82 | 2.9 -3% | 2.47 12% | 0.77 73% | 4.43 -57% | 3.31 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 3.5 -13% | 1.19 62% | 2.19 29% | 12.4 -300% | 6.8 -119% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.09 105% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7064 92% | 7101 92% | 6710 97% | 6893 94% | 11064 59% | 7805 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.2 | 57 -5% | 57 -5% | 61 1% | 52.5 -13% | 58.5 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.7 | 88.7 -4% | 88 -5% | 95 2% | 80.5 -13% | 89.9 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
6% | 15% /
15% | 290% /
166% | -32% /
-54% | -11% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 990 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 990 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 990 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4402 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5721 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5982 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Eurocom Q8 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -12% | -2% | -11% | -26% | |
| Seq Read | 2297 | 1831 -20% | 3005 31% | 2481 8% | 1153 -50% |
| Seq Write | 2860 | 1744 -39% | 2668 -7% | 1869 -35% | 1328 -54% |
| 4K Read | 52.2 | 45.16 -13% | 40.89 -22% | 35.57 -32% | 35.05 -33% |
| 4K Write | 125.8 | 107.1 -15% | 94.4 -25% | 107.9 -14% | 96 -24% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1412 | 1240 -12% | 1366 -3% | 1232 -13% | 727 -49% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1228 | 1695 38% | 1197 -3% | 1285 5% | 1212 -1% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.064 -60% | 0.055 -38% | 0.043 -8% | 0.063 -58% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.09 | 0.037 59% | 0.039 57% | 0.035 61% | 0.04 56% |
| Score Read | 1694 | 1468 -13% | 1708 1% | 1515 -11% | 878 -48% |
| Score Write | 1640 | 1977 21% | 1558 -5% | 1579 -4% | 1441 -12% |
| Score Total | 4235 | 4197 -1% | 4123 -3% | 3840 -9% | 2784 -34% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2514 | 2086 -17% | 1596 -37% | 1487 -41% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 592 | 425.5 -28% | 406.7 -31% | 608 3% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1494 | 555 -63% | 958 -36% | 1162 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21509 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 40478 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18195 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7863 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T | |
| Asus G752VY-GC110T | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 355 | 305.3 | 272.2 | 172.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 317.7 | 245.5 | 145.1 | 73.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 218.2 | 201.7 | 148.5 | 122 |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Eurocom Q8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -2% | -5% | -1% | -12% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 29 -4% | 30 -7% | 28 -0% | 29 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 29 -4% | 31 -11% | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 28.2 1% | 32 -13% | 32 -13% | 31.8 -12% | 37 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.9 | 30.8 6% | 33 -0% | 41 -25% | 36.3 -10% | 39 -19% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 42 7% | 47 -4% | 47 -4% | 46.7 -4% | 54 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.2 | 51 4% | 49 8% | 47 12% | 46.9 12% | 54 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.2 | 53 -0% | 51 4% | 48 10% | 49.7 7% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28 / 28.4 / 32.9 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 45 / 53.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 18.6 / 22.6 / 23 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
93.4 / 233.6 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Q8 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL73 8SE-010US i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | -12% | 18% | 25% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18.6 | 16.2 13% | 26.3 -41% | 9.5 49% | 8.8 53% | 37.5 -102% |
| Idle Average * | 22.6 | 20.4 10% | 29 -28% | 16.2 28% | 16.2 28% | 37.6 -66% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26.1 -13% | 32.3 -40% | 23.8 -3% | 18.3 20% | 37.6 -63% |
| Load Average * | 93.4 | 96.5 -3% | 82.4 12% | 101.7 -9% | 86.1 8% | 122.4 -31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 186.4 | 182.9 2% | 192 -3% | 155 17% | 146.7 21% | 180.3 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 233.6 | 214.3 8% | 170.2 27% | 172.2 26% | 186.4 20% | 277.4 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Eurocom Q8 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 59% | 29% | 75% | 28% | 58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 251 | 295 18% | 298 19% | 464 85% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 120 | 280 133% | 230 92% | 316 163% | 153 28% | 190 58% |
| Load | 69 | 86 25% | 52 -25% | 54 -22% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vi brukar alltid lyfta fram enkel service som en huvudanledning att äga en Clevo-baserad laptop istället för de mer populära alternativen från Asus, Alienware, Acer eller MSI. Detta gäller tyvärr inte Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Faktum att den har två till tre gånger så många skruvar att ta bort eller att man först behöver plocka loss tangentbordet bara för att kunna uppgradera något så enkelt som RAM eller lagring är ett steg i fel riktning. Clevos designer har alltid lyckats bra med att ge användaren tillgång till kärnkomponenterna, men vi känner inte att den kopplingen är närvarande i den mer stängda Nightsky RX17. När det är snabbare och lättare att lägga till en sticka RAM i en Razer Blade Pro 17 istället för i en större barebone från Clevo vet man att något har gått fel på resans gång.
Utöver att servicemöjligheterna är en besvikelse gör Nightsky RX17 inte särskilt mycket för att stå ut från den uppsjö av alternativ som finns i kategorin för 17 tumsmodeller. Ja, prestandan är enastående, men fläktens ljudnivå, batteritiden, styrplattans yta och chassits stabilitet skulle definitivt gå att förbättra. Asus ROG Strix Hero III G731GW går att köpa online med samma Core i7-9750H CPU, RTX 2070 GPU och 144 Hz-skärm som i vår Eurocom-konfiguration men kostar 2.000 - 3.000 kronor mindre. Om du bestämt dig för att skaffa det bästa som Clevo har att erbjuda är dock Eurocom Sky X4C eller X7C bättre alternativ än Nightsky RX17.
Nightsky RX17 presterar en aning snabbare än en genomsnittlig konkurrent med samma Core i7-9750H CPU och GeForce RTX 2070 GPU. Tyvärr är den också betydligt svårare att serva och uppgradera.
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
- 07/01/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
