Test: Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 333 cd/m²
Kontrast: 833:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Eurocom Sky X7C AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Chimera G703GI B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -25% | -21% | -22% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86 | 90.9 6% | 66.9 -22% | 65.8 -23% | 65.3 -24% | 88.9 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 83.9 -16% | 92.6 -7% | 91.2 -9% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 86.2 -13% | 61.4 -38% | 67 -32% | 66.3 -33% | 99.7 1% |
| Response Times | 79% | 14% | 72% | 54% | -51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 8 ? 79% | 33 ? 14% | 6.4 ? 83% | 18 ? 53% | 60.8 ? -58% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 5.6 ? 79% | 23 ? 14% | 10.8 ? 60% | 12 ? 55% | 38.4 ? -43% |
| PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | 204.9 ? | ||||
| Screen | 22% | -3% | 19% | 21% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 333 | 240 -28% | 360 8% | 285 -14% | 297 -11% | 230 -31% |
| Brightness | 330 | 248 -25% | 336 2% | 275 -17% | 281 -15% | 207 -37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 83 -6% | 90 2% | 82 -7% | 84 -5% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.22 45% | 0.44 -10% | 0.22 45% | 0.23 42% | 0.2 50% |
| Contrast | 833 | 1091 31% | 818 -2% | 1295 55% | 1291 55% | 1150 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.87 | 2.14 64% | 4.76 19% | 3.18 46% | 2.19 63% | 5.62 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.74 | 5.04 48% | 10.8 -11% | 5.99 39% | 4.81 51% | 10.24 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.59 | 1.54 66% | 1.73 62% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 1.62 64% | 3.69 18% | 2.93 35% | 1.31 71% | 4.54 -1% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.45 90% | 2.42 91% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6384 102% | 6846 95% | 6091 107% | 7165 91% | 6464 101% | 6625 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 77 -12% | 55 -37% | 60 -32% | 59 -33% | 88 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 84 -16% | 93 -7% | 91 -9% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
25% | -5% /
-5% | 23% /
18% | 18% /
17% | -16% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| no name | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Aorus X5S v5 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| no name | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74 | |
| Aorus X5S v5 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74 | |
| Aorus X5S v5 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| no name | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4908 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6369 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Eurocom Sky X7C 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Asus Chimera G703GI 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Aorus X9 DT Transcend TS1TMTE850 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -20% | 30% | -43% | -28% | -45% | |
| Write 4K | 152.2 | 111.8 -27% | 130.2 -14% | 88.6 -42% | 124 -19% | 104.4 -31% |
| Read 4K | 60.4 | 42.09 -30% | 57.3 -5% | 30.76 -49% | 40.68 -33% | 35.69 -41% |
| Write Seq | 3002 | 2288 -24% | 4049 35% | 1340 -55% | 618 -79% | 1015 -66% |
| Read Seq | 3329 | 3321 0% | 5325 60% | 1362 -59% | 2446 -27% | 1283 -61% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 432.9 | 308.3 -29% | 383.2 -11% | 305.7 -29% | 554 28% | 308.9 -29% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 494 | 364.9 -26% | 424.9 -14% | 366.8 -26% | 627 27% | 371.9 -25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3391 | 2440 -28% | 4316 27% | 1562 -54% | 620 -82% | 1056 -69% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3405 | 3485 2% | 8905 162% | 2414 -29% | 2228 -35% | 2204 -35% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (24868 - 31412, n=26) | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Eurocom X8 | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Eurocom Q6 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (7533 - 16949, n=26) | |
| Eurocom Q6 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Eurocom X8 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22653 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 379.5 | 320.7 | 303.4 | 178.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 41.8 / 42.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| Eurocom Sky X7C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | Asus Chimera G703GI GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -22% | -9% | -21% | -22% | -15% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 29 -3% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 32 -13% | 31 -10% | 30 -6% | 35 -24% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 34 -21% | 32 -13% | 34 -21% | 36 -28% | 31 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 37 -28% | 33 -14% | 42 -45% | 41 -41% | 33 -14% |
| Load Average * | 41.8 | 43 -3% | 38 9% | 53 -27% | 43 -3% | 43 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.2 | 57 -35% | 51 -21% | 53 -26% | 55 -30% | |
| Load Maximum * | 42.2 | 62 -47% | 50 -18% | 53 -26% | 54 -28% | 58 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
Eurocom Sky X7C audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.33 / 1.84 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 33.3 / 40.1 / 42.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
95.6 / 220 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Transcend TS1TMTE850, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -28% | 35% | -27% | -6% | -9% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.3 | 31 7% | 12 64% | 29 13% | 23 31% | 31 7% | 28 16% |
| Idle Average * | 40.1 | 35 13% | 18 55% | 37 8% | 33 18% | 36 10% | 37 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 42.1 | 45 -7% | 26 38% | 46 -9% | 37 12% | 44 -5% | 40 5% |
| Load Average * | 95.6 | 130 -36% | 95 1% | 156 -63% | 115 -20% | 107 -12% | 109 -14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 152.9 | 268 -75% | 252 -65% | 225 -47% | 212 -39% | 256 -67% | |
| Load Maximum * | 220 | 374 -70% | 188 15% | 314 -43% | 281 -28% | 258 -17% | 353 -60% |
* ... smaller is better
| Eurocom Sky X7C i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Eurocom Sky X9C i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | 59% | 38% | -45% | 33% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 143 | 130 -9% | 228 59% | 197 38% | 78 -45% | 190 33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 225 | 169 | 296 | 253 | 83 | 252 | |
| Load | 63 | 51 | 80 | 81 | 47 | 77 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Innan vi delger våra tankar om Sky X7C är det av största vikt att den som köpt systemet uppdaterar sin mjukvara till den senaste versionen som finns här. Äldre versioner av Control Center har en bekräftad bugg som gör att GPU:n stryps i vissa spel såsom Witcher 3. Oturligt nog för oss så levererades vår testenhet med den buggiga versionen av mjukvaran och våra testresultat reflekterar således detta. Vi observerade samma resultat även i vår recension av Eurocom Q8.
Med den varningen överstökad så är den omodifierade Core i7-8086K i Eurocom som bäst 5 till 10 procent snabbare i rå prestanda än både i7-8700K i Sky X9C och i9-8950HK i Aorus X9 DT. Full belastning vid basklockfrekvensen på 4.0 GHz resulterar i en stabil kärntemperatur på 83 C. Prestandafördelarna i spel är minst sagt marginella.
Den bästa aspekten av Sky X7C är fortfarande dess modularitet. Entusiaster som önskar varje droppe av flerkärnig prestanda kan vilja överväga den billigare Ryzen 1800X framför i7-8086K. Innan sådana AMD-alternativ blir tillgängliga är Sky X7C dock den ultimata DTR-modellen på 17 tum.
Sky X7C inhyser en av de snabbaste processorerna från Intel som för tillfället finns tillgänglig i en mobil formfaktor. Men vi hoppas ändå på att Threadripper-alternativ kommer bli tillgängliga i framtiden helt enkelt för att AMD har varit extremt konkurrenskraftiga på desktop-marknaden det senaste.
Price comparison
