Test: Google Pixel 4a 5G - Billig Pixel 5 (Sammanfattning)

Name: Google Pixel 4a 5G
Brand: Google

Bättre än flaggskeppet?

Google Pixel 4a 5G gör livet svårt för Pixel 5. Den har samma SoC och samma kamerasystem. Den har dessutom en större skärm på 6.2 tum och är mycket billigare.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Jesper Berg), Published 11/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 4a 5G (Pixel 4 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Minne

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.20 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 416 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, OLED, FHD+, 16 miljoner färger, Always-on skärm, Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 113.2 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Ljussensor, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Magnetometer, Barometer, Spektral- och flimmer-sensor, 2x2 MIMO, aptX, aptX HD, Google Cast, eSIM, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API: full

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66/71), 5G (Sub-6 Band n1/3/5/7/8/28/40/77/78), Huvud SAR 0,94 W/kg, Kropp SAR 1,40 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 153.9 x 74

Batteri

3885 mAh Litiumjon

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP Ultravid (1.0 μm pixelstorlek, ƒ/2.2, 107° synfält) + 12.2 MP dual-pixel (1.4 μm pixelstorlek, Dual Pixel-autofokus, Optisk + elektronisk bildstabilisering, ƒ/1.7, 77° synfält), videoinspelning i upp till 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP (1.12 μm pixelbredd, ƒ/2.0, , 83° synfält), videoinspelning upp till 1080p@30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, 18W-adapter med USB-PD 2.0, USB-C kabel, USB-C till USB-A adapter, SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, Minst 3 år av uppdateringar för OS och säkerhet, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

168 g, Strömförsörjning: 50 g

Pris

486 Kr

Länkar

Google hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.8 % v7 ^(old)	11/2020	Google Pixel 4a 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	168 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.20"	2340x1080
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	11/2020	Google Pixel 5 SD 765G, Adreno 620	151 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.00"	2340x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618	143 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.80"	2340x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.44"	2400x1080
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Oppo Find X2 Neo SD 765G, Adreno 620	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620	184 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.44"	2440x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	849 (414^min - 930^max) MBit/s +183%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 (618^min - 677^max) MBit/s +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (294^min - 639^max) MBit/s +109%
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	620 (560^min - 703^max) MBit/s +107%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	563 (275^min - 666^max) MBit/s +88%
Google Pixel 5 Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	483 (479^min - 493^max) MBit/s +61%
Google Pixel 4a 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	300 (211^min - 318^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	914 (888^min - 928^max) MBit/s +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (664^min - 686^max) MBit/s +12%
Google Pixel 4a Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	668 (592^min - 685^max) MBit/s +11%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (563^min - 668^max) MBit/s +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (545^min - 662^max) MBit/s +4%
Google Pixel 5 Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	625 (521^min - 652^max) MBit/s +4%
Google Pixel 4a 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	603 (517^min - 635^max) MBit/s

Google Pixel 4a 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø602 (517-635)

Google Pixel 4a 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (211-318)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photography 1 Daylight photography 2 Wide-angle 5X zoom Lowlight photography

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


651 cd/m²	653 cd/m²	684 cd/m²
663 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	694 cd/m²
662 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	691 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 694 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 670.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.86 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 669 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Google Pixel 4a 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Google Pixel 5 OLED, 2340x1080, 6"	Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Realme X50 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Oppo Find X2 Neo OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-4%	5%	-20%	-105%	-190%	-60%
Brightness middle	669	635 -5%	705 5%	584 -13%	679 1%	797 19%	529 -21%
Brightness	671	636 -5%	707 5%	583 -13%	690 3%	807 20%	531 -21%
Brightness Distribution	94	97 3%	96 2%	97 3%	97 3%	95 1%	94 0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	0.8 20%	0.9 10%	1.17 -17%	3.2 -220%	5.4 -440%	2.53 -153%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.8	2.2 -22%	1.9 -6%	2.95 -64%	6.2 -244%	9.2 -411%	4.52 -151%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.7 -13%	1.3 13%	1.7 -13%	4.1 -173%	6.4 -327%	1.7 -13%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.231 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.27 ^97%	2.249 ^98%
CCT	6685 ^97%	6492 ^100%	6576 ^99%	6341 ^103%	6604 ^98%	7245 ^90%	6462 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	601 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	598 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	549 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	673 Points +12%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	915 Points +52%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	620 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	611 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (554 - 673, n=17)	603 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +66%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1631 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1635 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1646 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1908 Points +17%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3087 Points +89%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1854 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1966 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1520 - 1966, n=17)	1781 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +103%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	10122 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	10007 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10200 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8730 Points -14%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	19711 Points +95%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9955 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	10876 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16)	9734 Points -4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8319 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8954 Points +8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8683 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7786 Points -6%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13202 Points +59%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8456 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9427 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17)	8308 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	46246 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	48201 Points +4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	34678 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	45304 Points -2%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	83917 Points +81%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	44531 Points -4%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	45872 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (38137 - 48201, n=17)	44398 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	56690 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	60281 Points +6%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53548 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	69506 Points +23%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	145603 Points +157%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69645 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69285 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (56690 - 70216, n=17)	67538 Points +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	28116 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	28331 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15527 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20429 Points -27%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	33793 Points +20%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19658 Points -30%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21016 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (14891 - 28331, n=17)	20632 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2983 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2972 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3543 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4693 Points +57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8947 Points +200%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4561 Points +53%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4665 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2972 - 4693, n=17)	4318 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2862 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2844 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3629 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5832 Points +104%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11533 Points +303%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5148 Points +80%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5171 Points +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2844 - 5832, n=17)	4882 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3501 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3529 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3273 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3452 Points -1%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5034 Points +44%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3476 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1689 - 3529, n=17)	3237 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3933 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3915 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4893 Points +24%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9910 Points +152%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4621 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4815 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3678 - 4893, n=17)	4562 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4053 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4036 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3750 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5335 Points +32%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12895 Points +218%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5356 Points +32%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5357 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4036 - 5437, n=17)	5181 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +386%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3563 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3544 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3492 Points -2%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5478 Points +54%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3099 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3555 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1790 - 3651, n=17)	3275 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2261 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2315 Points +2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2468 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3346 Points +48%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7293 Points +223%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points +46%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3330 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2261 - 3346, n=17)	3162 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2048 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2106 Points +3%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2310 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3321 Points +62%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8345 Points +307%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points +59%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3284 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2048 - 3342, n=17)	3137 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3556 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3547 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3247 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3425 Points -4%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5068 Points +43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3395 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3503 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2964 - 3556, n=17)	3331 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2948 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2964 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2615 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3605 Points +22%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points +178%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3501 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3553 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2934 - 3605, n=17)	3413 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +163%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2814 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2834 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2467 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3589 Points +28%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9567 Points +240%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3569 Points +27%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3556 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2814 - 3592, n=17)	3467 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +310%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3539 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3530 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3309 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3495 Points -1%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5523 Points +56%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3544 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1898 - 3765, n=17)	3288 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2287 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2478 Points +8%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2255 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3130 Points +37%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6644 Points +191%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3065 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3108 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2287 - 3130, n=17)	2966 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2145 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2364 Points +10%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2150 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3198 Points +49%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8263 Points +285%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3147 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3185 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 3198, n=17)	3053 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2978 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2979 Points 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2720 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2893 Points -3%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3947 Points +33%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2756 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2867 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 2979, n=17)	2742 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	43 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	45 fps +5%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps +37%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps +40%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	61 fps +42%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	60 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15)	62.5 fps +45%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +101%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	49 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	48 fps -2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps +71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	95 fps +94%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	204 fps +316%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	94 fps +92%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	97 fps +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15)	88.7 fps +81%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +471%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	30 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	30 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps +83%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +100%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps +67%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15)	46.5 fps +55%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +152%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	31 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	31 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	49 fps +58%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	124 fps +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	56 fps +81%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	55 fps +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15)	51.1 fps +65%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +433%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps +33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	33 fps +57%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +186%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps +62%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15)	31.5 fps +50%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +213%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	22 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	22 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	38 fps +73%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps +291%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps +73%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15)	35.3 fps +60%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +433%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	11 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps +18%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps +64%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps +300%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps +73%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (11 - 21, n=15)	17.7 fps +61%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +335%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	12 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	12 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps +75%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +325%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps +75%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 21, n=15)	19.7 fps +64%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +488%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	14 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps -7%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps +50%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps +229%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps +50%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (13 - 23, n=17)	20.2 fps +44%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +254%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	13 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps 0%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	24 fps +85%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps +308%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps +85%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 24, n=17)	21.6 fps +66%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +514%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.9 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8.8 fps -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	13 fps +46%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	30 fps +237%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps +46%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8.8 - 15, n=17)	12.3 fps +38%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +320%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5.5 fps
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5.3 fps -4%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.6 fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps +55%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps +264%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps +55%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5.3 - 13, n=17)	8.38 fps +52%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +482%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	287407 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	288970 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	269238 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	318669 Points +11%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	593933 Points +107%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	326795 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	332074 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14)	312767 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3237 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3290 Points +2%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3512 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4094 Points +26%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6205 Points +92%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3931 Points +21%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4054 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3237 - 4094, n=14)	3813 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +95%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5997 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5960 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6796 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6069 Points +1%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10147 Points +69%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6685 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6801 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5411 - 6936, n=14)	6506 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +69%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5046 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5381 Points +7%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4544 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5683 Points +13%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points +63%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4856 Points -4%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5296 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4556 - 5683, n=14)	5099 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2525 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2560 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3840 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5201 Points +106%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11688 Points +363%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5216 Points +107%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5203 Points +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2525 - 5247, n=14)	4732 Points +87%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +570%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 4a 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1436 Points
Google Pixel 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1428 Points -1%
Google Pixel 4a Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1283 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1462 Points +2%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1576 Points +10%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1412 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1441 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1139 - 1462, n=14)	1372 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +9%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +145%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	69.5 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	58.7 Points +20%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	50.8 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.2 Points +2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	49.09 Points
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	47.8 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)	47.7 Points -3%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	39.33 Points -20%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	116.7 Points +26%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	94.5 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	93.6 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	92.7 Points
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	88.9 Points -4%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	87.7 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)	81.1 Points -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +181%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.3 runs/min +39%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)	53.6 runs/min +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.7 runs/min +5%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	49.2 runs/min +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	48.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)	46.1 runs/min -5%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	44.2 runs/min -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +98%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	102 Points +36%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	101 Points +35%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	77 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	76 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	75 Points
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	74 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)	71.5 Points -5%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	71 Points -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +95%
Realme X50 Pro	23768 Points +25%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	19143 Points +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	19009 Points
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	18629 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	18556 Points -2%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	17768 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)	16671 Points -12%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	16523 Points -13%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)	3721 ms * -45%
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85)	2950 ms * -15%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	2835 ms * -11%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	2689 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	2602 ms * -2%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	2561 ms *
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)	2470 ms * +4%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	2000 ms * +22%
Realme X50 Pro	0 ms * +100%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +39%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 4a 5G	Google Pixel 5	Google Pixel 4a	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	Realme X50 Pro	Oppo Find X2 Neo	OnePlus Nord	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-15%	-11%	20%	97%	18%	10%	-7%	187%
Sequential Read 256KB	945	851 -10%	502 -47%	980 4%	1756 86%	943 0%	956 1%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -20%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 95%
Sequential Write 256KB	228.7	190 -17%	246.8 8%	476.9 109%	756 231%	454.4 99%	473.1 107%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 30%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 523%
Random Read 4KB	168.6	138.9 -18%	162.9 -3%	156.4 -7%	229.4 36%	160.5 -5%	126.7 -25%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) -9%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 64%
Random Write 4KB	186.7	155.9 -16%	187.4 0%	138.5 -26%	252 35%	143.8 -23%	104.5 -44%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -30%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 66%

Google Pixel 4a 5G; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø59.7 (57-60)

Google Pixel 4a 5G; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø29.9 (25-32)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


32.2 °C	32.4 °C	31.4 °C
32.7 °C	34.3 °C	31.2 °C
34.5 °C	35.1 °C	32.5 °C

Max: 35.1 °C
Medel: 32.9 °C


30.1 °C	31.9 °C	32 °C
29.3 °C	31.8 °C	33.3 °C
30.8 °C	34.7 °C	34.9 °C

Max: 34.9 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 26 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 4a 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastning	0.7 / 0.96 / 0.98 Watt
Hög belastning	2.95 / 5.2 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh	Google Pixel 5 4080 mAh	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	4%	-105%	-67%	-57%	-85%	-60%	-70%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.69 1%	0.49 30%	1.5 -114%	1 -43%	0.8 -14%	1.8 -157%	0.965 ?(0.66 - 1.8, n=15) -38%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	0.96	0.82 15%	0.96 -0%	2.2 -129%	1.77 -84%	2.21 -130%	2.1 -119%	1.899 ?(0.82 - 2.55, n=15) -98%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -52%
Idle Maximum *	0.98	0.85 13%	1 -2%	2.9 -196%	1.86 -90%	2.23 -128%	2.3 -135%	2.07 ?(0.85 - 2.9, n=15) -111%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -65%
Load Average *	2.95	2.73 7%	3.11 -5%	4.4 -49%	4.23 -43%	3.14 -6%	3.4 -15%	3.98 ?(2.73 - 6.8, n=15) -35%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -119%
Load Maximum *	5.2	4.4 15%	5.23 -1%	7.2 -38%	9.13 -76%	5.44 -5%	5.2 -0%	6.19 ?(4.4 - 10.3, n=15) -19%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -88%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		40tim 59min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22tim 17min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 41min

	Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh	Google Pixel 5 4080 mAh	Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	-19%	5%	-26%	-7%	-12%
Reader / Idle	2459	2245 -9%	2270 -8%	1683 -32%	1507 -39%		2003 -19%
H.264	1337	1466 10%	1045 -22%	1403 5%	1029 -23%		1064 -20%
WiFi v1.3	768	808 5%	669 -13%	884 15%	775 1%	712 -7%	869 13%
Load	341	333 -2%	225 -34%	448 31%	194 -43%		261 -23%

För

+ Kompakt och lätt hölje

+ 5G & NFC

+ Android 11 & förlängt mjukvarustöd

+ Snabb fingeravtrycksläsare

+ Riktigt bra kamera

+ Ljusstark OLED-skärm

+ Riktigt bra batteritid

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering

- Minnet går inte att utöka

- Saknar stöd för WiFi 6

- Tunt stereoljud

- Saknar stöd för trådlös laddning

Omdöme - En billigare version av Pixel 5

Recension av Google Pixel 4a 5G. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Pixel 4a 5G är en budgetversion av Pixel 5. Den har imponerande prestanda i förhållande till priset. Jämfört med tidigare "a"-telefoner har den egentliga inga svagheter.

Jämfört med Pixel 5 har Pixel 4a 5G exakt samma mittenskikts-SoC, exakt samma dualkamera-system och ett snarlikt batteri. Men den kostar 1.300 kronor mindre. Vidare har den en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, vilket den dyrare Pixel 5 saknar. Enligt Google kommer Pixel 4a 5G få uppdateringar för mjukvara och säkerhet i minst tre år framöver.

Högoddsare: Google Pixel 4a 5G får rejält med poäng, inte bara för sin stora OLED-skärm utan också för sin hårdvara, som påminner väldigt mycket om den som sitter i det 1.300 kronor dyrare flaggskeppet Pixel 5.

Det finns fler områden än skärmen där de båda Pixel-telefonerna skiljer sig åt. Pixel 4a 5G har bara 6 GB RAM medans Pixel 5 har 8 GB RAM. Vidare har Pixel 4a 5G stöd för färre 5G-frekvensband och använder en 60 Hz-skärm. Pixel 5 har istället en 90 Hz-skärm, IP-certifierat skydd mot vatten och damm, stöd för (omvänd) trådlös laddning och är dessutom gjord av lyxigare material och känns bättre i handen. Pixel 4a 5G har däremot bättre samtalskvalitet.

Om du inte behöver 5G är Pixel 4a på 5.8 tum ett bra alternativ till Pixel 4a 5G: Den är nästan lika snabb, har också en OLED-skärm och bra batteritid och den är betydligt billigare (online kostar den runt 4.000 kronor för tillfället). Om du inte behöver 5G men ändå vill ha en toppskikts-telefon är det värt att överväga Pixel 4 XL. Den kostar just nu lika mycket som Pixel 4a 5G.

Google Pixel 4a 5G - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Design

80%

Tangentbord

66 / 75 → 88%

Mus

96%

Anslutningar

50 / 70 → 71%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

92%

Spelprestanda

28 / 64 → 43%

Programprestanda

72 / 86 → 84%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

71%

Medel

78%

84%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 4a 5G - Billig Pixel 5 (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 2020-11-16 (Update: 2020-11-16)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Google Pixel 4a 5G audio analysis

Google Pixel 5 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - En billigare version av Pixel 5

More articles related to this device

Price comparison