Test: HP Omen 15t-ce000 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, UHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 358.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 919:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -39% | -42% | -0% | -5% | -1% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 39.01 -41% | 37.07 -44% | 65.2 -1% | 65.8 0% | 65.8 0% | 65.3 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 58.4 -36% | 55.6 -39% | 92.5 1% | 85.1 -7% | 90.9 -1% | 91.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 40.34 -40% | 38.32 -43% | 66.5 -1% | 62.2 -7% | 66.5 -1% | 66.3 -1% |
Response Times | -11% | -3% | -22% | -23% | -21% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 39 ? -4% | 35.6 ? 5% | 42.8 ? -14% | 41 ? -9% | 43.2 ? -15% | 44 ? -17% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 29 ? -17% | 27.6 ? -11% | 32 ? -29% | 34 ? -37% | 31.2 ? -26% | 26.4 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 26000 ? | |||||
Screen | -22% | -27% | -6% | -3% | 9% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 358.5 | 283 -21% | 235.4 -34% | 320 -11% | 322 -10% | 304 -15% | 307 -14% |
Brightness | 350 | 281 -20% | 223 -36% | 316 -10% | 297 -15% | 289 -17% | 297 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 91 -4% | 90 -5% | 86 -9% | 86 -9% | 92 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.39 -0% | 0.28 28% | 0.36 8% | 0.31 21% | 0.26 33% | 0.3 23% |
Contrast | 919 | 726 -21% | 841 -8% | 889 -3% | 1039 13% | 1169 27% | 1023 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 6.1 -33% | 5.6 -22% | 4.62 -0% | 4.73 -3% | 3.46 25% | 4.72 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 11.08 -30% | 20.3 -139% | 9.75 -15% | 12.37 -46% | 7.72 9% | 8.07 5% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5.69 -9% | 3.6 31% | 6 -15% | 2.99 42% | 2.46 53% | 4.79 8% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.38 92% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6410 101% | 6702 97% | 7214 90% | 6761 96% | 6905 94% | 6915 94% | 7690 85% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.9 | 37 -45% | 35.2 -47% | 60 -10% | 56 -16% | 59 -12% | 60 -10% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 58 -37% | 55.4 -40% | 92 0% | 85 -7% | 91 -1% | 92 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-24% | -24% /
-27% | -9% /
-7% | -10% /
-6% | -4% /
3% | -4% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4325 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6901 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2484 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3969 poäng | |
Hjälp |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -9% | 32% | -436% | 133% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 736 | 197.3 -73% | 382.5 -48% | 988 34% | 1134 54% |
Copy Program MB/s | 195.4 | 127.3 -35% | 274.8 41% | 424.4 117% | 534 173% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1087 | 497.6 -54% | 814 -25% | 1482 36% | 1936 78% |
Score Total | 1515 | 1434 -5% | 2405 59% | 490 -68% | 3781 150% |
Score Write | 361 | 368 2% | 594 65% | 24 -93% | 1556 331% |
Score Read | 789 | 746 -5% | 1241 57% | 361 -54% | 1493 89% |
Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.032 6% | 0.037 -9% | 1.987 -5744% | 0.026 24% |
Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.07 1% | 0.058 18% | 0.067 6% | 0.04 44% |
4K-64 Write | 175.9 | 158.6 -10% | 375.8 114% | 2.12 -99% | 1262 617% |
4K-64 Read | 568 | 463.2 -18% | 929 64% | 112.5 -80% | 1206 112% |
4K Write | 111.2 | 127.9 15% | 100.2 -10% | 2.03 -98% | 141.1 27% |
4K Read | 43.09 | 46.98 9% | 46.95 9% | 38.45 -11% | 51.9 20% |
Seq Write | 743 | 814 10% | 1181 59% | 200.3 -73% | 1530 106% |
Seq Read | 1774 | 2362 33% | 2652 49% | 2103 19% | 2342 32% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11761 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21508 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8725 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4487 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 |
The Witcher 3 | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dirt 3 (2011) | 140.1 | 126.3 | 112.2 | 64.5 | |
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 218.4 | 192.7 | 164.7 | 69.5 | |
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 105.8 | 101 | 88.7 | 70 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 308.4 | 277.7 | 170.5 | 115.6 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 209 | 193.3 | 180.1 | 102.4 | |
GRID 2 (2013) | 210.8 | 152.8 | 143.3 | 116.7 | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 68.9 | 65.7 | 63.4 | 40 | |
Thief (2014) | 117.2 | 112 | 107.6 | 69 | |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 170.2 | 139.9 | 96.7 | 76.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 172.3 | 133.8 | 68.5 | 35 | 23.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 148.1 | 117.8 | 67.6 | 54.6 | 24 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 75.8 | 62.2 | 53.2 | 20.8 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 110.3 | 93 | 52 | 27.6 | 16.3 |
Prey (2017) | 116 | 92.9 | 80.2 | 30.7 | |
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 109 | 48 | 35.5 | 25.6 | 8.5 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 128 | 81 | 62 | 46 | 27 |
ELEX (2017) | 108.1 | 83.5 | 69.6 | 57.2 | 17 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.5 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 38.5 / 49 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 7% | -7% | -5% | -8% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.6 -9% | 28 1% | 31 -10% | 30.4 -8% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 32 -5% | 30.9 -2% | 30 1% | 35 -15% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 33 -9% | 30.9 -2% | 33 -9% | 36 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 34 -11% | 31.5 -3% | 37 -21% | 40 -31% |
Load Average * | 38.5 | 34.6 10% | 30.3 21% | 39 -1% | 40.7 -6% | 41 -6% | 43 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 39.3 -5% | 39.5 -5% | 43 -14% | 45.5 -21% | 42 -12% | 49 -30% |
Load Maximum * | 49 | 41.7 15% | 46.5 5% | 50 -2% | 43.9 10% | 50 -2% | 55 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.33 / 0.64 Watt |
Låg belastning | 15.4 / 22.4 / 22.4 Watt |
Hög belastning |
78.1 / 133.52 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 39% | 39% | 4% | 15% | -13% | -58% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 5.2 66% | 7.1 54% | 12 22% | 7.2 53% | 18 -17% | 26 -69% |
Idle Average * | 22.4 | 8.3 63% | 7.6 66% | 15 33% | 10.5 53% | 23 -3% | 31 -38% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 10.1 55% | 8.6 62% | 20 11% | 16 29% | 30 -34% | 36 -61% |
Load Average * | 78.1 | 62.7 20% | 59.5 24% | 82 -5% | 82 -5% | 85 -9% | 93 -19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97.5 | 94 4% | 89 9% | 111 -14% | 124 -27% | 96 2% | 176 -81% |
Load Maximum * | 133.52 | 100 25% | 112.8 16% | 161 -21% | 155 -16% | 158 -18% | 240 -80% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 79% | 84% | 71% | -8% | -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 298 | 634 113% | 659 121% | 638 114% | 501 68% | 256 -14% | 208 -30% |
WiFi v1.3 | 208 | 310 49% | 416 100% | 422 103% | 357 72% | 198 -5% | 151 -27% |
Load | 83 | 81 -2% | 96 16% | 112 35% | 144 73% | 80 -4% | 84 1% |
För
Emot
Det är inte särskilt svårt att hitta brister när man tittar på billigare spellaptops, då tillverkaren måste gå en svår balansgång för att balansera jämförelsevis billiga material med ett bra utseende och tillräckligt potent hårdvara för att tilltala så många användare som möjligt. När det gäller Omen 15 är vi lockade att kritisera det pressade övre metallhöljet med sina rätt så skarpa kanter, de tydliga problemen med bleeding på skärmen och det påträngande fläktsystemet. Men ingen av nackdelarna är avgörande när det rör sig om ett spelsystem: allt som allt så är HP Omen 15 ett billigt Max-Q system med tillräcklig prestanda för att hantera många aktuella spel i åtminstone Full HD-upplösning.
Den nyare designen med sin "i ditt ansikte"-utformning kanske inte tilltalar alla, men det är ingen tvekan om att byggkvaliteten själv är fullt duglig med en bas som har bra motstånd mot vridning och inget sviktande på tangentbordsplattan. Inmatningsenheterna fungerar bra, hårdvaran är kraftfull och den ljusstarka UHD IPS-skärmen är - särskilt efter kalibrering - rätt så fantastisk för priset. Omen 15 blir fortfarande ganska varm, men inte i närheten så varm som en del andra system. Fläktarna är, däremot, ganska irriterande då dom spinner upp regelbundet och ofta producerar ett oscillerande ljud som tär på nerverna.
Användare som vill köpa en billig spellaptop i låg till mellanskiktet med 4K-skärm borde definitivt skriva upp Omen 15 på sin lista över potentiella kandidater.
Spellaptopen Dell Inspiron 15 kommer med en sämre skärm, men har ändå väldigt duglig prestanda och håller dubbelt så länge på en batteriladdning.
HP Omen 15t-ce000
- 12/01/2017 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner