Test: HP Pavilion Gaming 17 - Äntligen en tyst spellaptop
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 299.6 cd/m²
Kontrast: 908:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.15
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl BOE0825, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 2% | -1% | 2% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.3 | 64 1% | 65.4 3% | 62.3 -2% | 63.4 0% | 60.6 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.2 | 90.4 0% | 90 0% | 89.1 -1% | 94.9 5% | 89 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.3 | 64.8 1% | 65.8 2% | 63.7 -1% | 65.1 1% | 62.1 -3% |
Response Times | 43% | 47% | -42% | 65% | 65% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.6 ? | 15.6 ? 51% | 17.6 ? 44% | 41 ? -30% | 8 ? 75% | 6.8 ? 78% |
Response Time Black / White * | 19.6 ? | 12.8 ? 35% | 10 ? 49% | 30 ? -53% | 8.8 ? 55% | 9.6 ? 51% |
PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | |||||
Screen | -11% | 5% | 8% | 22% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 299.6 | 299.1 0% | 343.6 15% | 316 5% | 420 40% | 299.3 0% |
Brightness | 285 | 273 -4% | 320 12% | 294 3% | 393 38% | 294 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 81 -6% | 87 1% | 84 -2% | 91 6% | 94 9% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.27 18% | 0.34 -3% | 0.32 3% | 0.32 3% | 0.29 12% |
Contrast | 908 | 1108 22% | 1011 11% | 988 9% | 1313 45% | 1032 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.68 | 5.07 -38% | 3.74 -2% | 3.39 8% | 3.04 17% | 2.55 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.05 | 10.55 -31% | 5.33 34% | 5.56 31% | 7.22 10% | 4.73 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.15 | 3.31 -5% | 3.49 -11% | 2.14 32% | 0.89 72% | 2.9 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 6.8 -79% | 3.7 3% | 3.17 17% | 3.91 -3% | 3.5 8% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.46 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.39 92% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 7240 90% | 7805 83% | 6388 102% | 7098 92% | 7138 91% | 7101 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.1 | 58.5 1% | 58 0% | 51 -12% | 60 3% | 57 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.8 | 89.9 0% | 90 0% | 89 -1% | 95 6% | 88.7 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
-2% | 18% /
10% | -12% /
0% | 30% /
23% | 24% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4148 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5222 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5429 poäng | |
Hjälp |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 8% | -35% | -30% | 51% | |
Seq Read | 1709 | 1473 -14% | 1546 -10% | 907 -47% | 2739 60% |
Seq Write | 1345 | 1962 46% | 1182 -12% | 926 -31% | 2650 97% |
4K Read | 49.73 | 31.66 -36% | 36.54 -27% | 47.26 -5% | 27.86 -44% |
4K Write | 108.2 | 84.4 -22% | 109.2 1% | 98.7 -9% | 134.7 24% |
4K-64 Read | 731 | 1125 54% | 612 -16% | 321.5 -56% | 1651 126% |
4K-64 Write | 1233 | 1866 51% | 436.6 -65% | 736 -40% | 2190 78% |
Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.071 3% | 0.113 -55% | 0.064 12% | 0.031 58% |
Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.047 -38% | 0.034 -0% | 0.045 -32% | 0.028 18% |
Score Read | 951 | 1304 37% | 803 -16% | 459 -52% | 1953 105% |
Score Write | 1476 | 2147 45% | 664 -55% | 927 -37% | 2590 75% |
Score Total | 2909 | 4142 42% | 1869 -36% | 1641 -44% | 5529 90% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1284 | 1080 -16% | 698 -46% | 905 -30% | 2031 58% |
Copy Program MB/s | 589 | 481.1 -18% | 114.1 -81% | 496.9 -16% | 452.1 -23% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1107 | 875 -21% | 379.6 -66% | 819 -26% | 1043 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T | |
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16005 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35562 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11904 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5245 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 331.3 | 282 | 259.9 | 130 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 256.8 | 173.3 | 92.1 | 48.5 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 126 | 83 | 74 | 64 |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -11% | -6% | -24% | -15% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.3 -0% | 27.8 1% | 30.8 -9% | 29 -3% | 28 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 31.5 -5% | 31.1 -3% | 30.8 -2% | 29 4% | 28 7% |
Idle Average * | 30.1 | 31.6 -5% | 31.1 -3% | 30.8 -2% | 34 -13% | 28.4 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 31.6 -5% | 35 -16% | 32.2 -7% | 37 -23% | 32.9 -9% |
Load Average * | 34.2 | 32.3 6% | 42 -23% | 38.6 -13% | 53 -55% | 45 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 | 43 -26% | 44.5 -30% | 51 -49% | 53.2 -56% | |
Load Maximum * | 43.8 | 45.5 -4% | 46.5 -6% | 44.8 -2% | 55 -26% | 53.2 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 34.2 / 43.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.013 / 0.7 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5.4 / 9.2 / 13 Watt |
Hög belastning |
85.9 / 182.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -105% | -101% | -48% | -96% | -31% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 20.2 -274% | 17.8 -230% | 10 -85% | 18.6 -244% | 7.4 -37% |
Idle Average * | 9.2 | 27.2 -196% | 24.7 -168% | 15 -63% | 22.6 -146% | 8.6 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 13 | 28.7 -121% | 29.6 -128% | 22 -69% | 23 -77% | 39.1 -201% |
Load Average * | 85.9 | 90.8 -6% | 110 -28% | 92 -7% | 93.4 -9% | 65.9 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 107.9 | 152.1 -41% | 167.8 -56% | 153 -42% | 186.4 -73% | 106.9 1% |
Load Maximum * | 182.2 | 165.4 9% | 178.6 2% | 216 -19% | 233.6 -28% | 141.3 22% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh | MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -44% | -7% | 55% | -46% | -10% | -37% | |
Reader / Idle | 695 | 268 -61% | 815 17% | 286 -59% | 295 -58% | 251 -64% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 339 | 190 -44% | 253 -25% | 469 38% | 190 -44% | 280 -17% | 120 -65% |
Load | 59 | 97 64% | 124 110% | 38 -36% | 86 46% | 69 17% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
En ord beskriver vår upplevelse av Pavilion Gaming 17: förvånad. Pavilion-serien är HP:s enklaste alternativ designad för användare som behöver tänka på budgeten, så vi brukar alltid justera våra förväntningar därefter. Den här modellen överraskade oss genom att vara en av de tystaste bärbara speldatorerna som vi testat och den är dessutom en av de mest eleganta och ordentligt designade Pavilion-modellerna hittills. Det verkar som att HP har börjat lägga mer tid och energi på sina instegsmodeller och det syns verkligen på Pavilion Gaming 17.
Det finns fortfarande en del "budget"-karaktärsdrag som dröjer kvar och som hade behövt lite mer arbete. Den trånga klickplattan, det böjliga locket, de medelmåttiga högtalarna och det sköra ventilgallret på baksidan känns snarare som att de hör hemma på en ännu billigare laptop.
Den största asterisken här är att Pavilion Gaming 17 med en i9-9750H och GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q grafik inte är särskilt mycket billigare än tävlande system med motsvarande specifikationer. För 13.000 kronor är den bara runt 1.000 - 2.000 kronor billigare än MSI GL73, MSI GP75, Asus TUF FX705 eller Asus ROG GL731GU, beroende på konfigurationen av RAM, lagring och skärm. Men vi tycker ändå att Pavilion är ett bättre alternativ helt enkelt för att den är så mycket tystare när man spelar.
En Pavilion som slår över sin budgetkategori. Den är inte bara relativt tyst för en spellaptop utan den starka designen höjer ribban för vad framtida Pavilion-modeller kan tänkas vara kapabla till.
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo