Test: HP ProBook 440 G5 (i5-8250U, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 234 cd/m²
Kontrast: 908:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES LGD04B2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, , 1366x768, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 2% | 4% | -5% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.56 | 41.88 6% | 40.21 2% | 41.04 4% | 37.6 -5% | 41.56 5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 62.8 6% | 60.5 2% | 61.2 3% | 56.6 -5% | 62.2 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.88 | 43.29 6% | 41.55 2% | 42.47 4% | 38.85 -5% | 42.96 5% |
| Response Times | -9% | -4% | 3% | 4% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 44 ? -10% | 47 ? -18% | 39 ? 2% | 43.2 ? -8% | 44.8 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 31.2 ? -8% | 26 ? 10% | 28 ? 3% | 24.4 ? 15% | 31.2 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 24880 ? | 25000 ? | 25000 ? | |||
| Screen | 13% | -45% | -1% | -34% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 236 | 251 6% | 206 -13% | 271 15% | 216 -8% | 262 11% |
| Brightness | 221 | 231 5% | 193 -13% | 256 16% | 203 -8% | 245 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 80 -9% | 87 -1% | 85 -3% | 83 -6% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.19 27% | 0.48 -85% | 0.43 -65% | 0.47 -81% | 0.19 27% |
| Contrast | 908 | 1321 45% | 429 -53% | 630 -31% | 460 -49% | 1379 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 5.1 11% | 11 -93% | 5.03 12% | 8.98 -58% | 7 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22 | 10.6 52% | 19.57 11% | 11.9 46% | 14.07 36% | 23.6 -7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.5 -18% | 11.51 -203% | 4.02 -6% | 9.61 -153% | 6.4 -68% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.63 84% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7318 89% | 6146 106% | 13671 48% | 6659 98% | 11265 58% | 6065 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.7 | 39.8 6% | 38.46 2% | 39 3% | 35.9 -5% | 39.5 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.2 | 62.5 6% | 60.61 2% | 61 3% | 56.7 -4% | 61.9 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
9% | -16% /
-30% | 2% /
0% | -12% /
-23% | -1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2613 - 3082, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Productivity | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3851 - 6653, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Essentials | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5855 - 9289, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Score | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3358 - 4081, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3774 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4922 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3577 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Average Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -31% | -95% | 2% | -51% | -12% | |
| Read Seq | 1181 | 1295 10% | 108.9 -91% | 1086 -8% | 491.2 -58% | 1122 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 602 | 160.6 -73% | 103.2 -83% | 581 -3% | 322.2 -46% | 524 ? -13% |
| Read 512 | 923 | 872 -6% | 869 -6% | 310.1 -66% | 767 ? -17% | |
| Write 512 | 600 | 122 -80% | 584 -3% | 276 -54% | 541 ? -10% | |
| Read 4k | 35.48 | 25.72 -28% | 0.362 -99% | 35.89 1% | 19.57 -45% | 29.9 ? -16% |
| Write 4k | 139.8 | 95.2 -32% | 0.946 -99% | 122.4 -12% | 77.8 -44% | 114.5 ? -18% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 287.8 | 389.9 35% | 0.721 -100% | 462.9 61% | 146.3 -49% | 279 ? -3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 417.1 | 118.3 -72% | 0.901 -100% | 370.9 -11% | 241.4 -42% | 356 ? -15% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1736 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7127 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 873 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 53.6 | 28.19 | 23.14 | |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 25 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.26 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 30.7 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 34.5 / 36 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.5 °C / 76.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ProBook 450 G5-2UB53EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.52 / 0.69 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.4 / 7.1 / 10.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
36.5 / 48.7 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 13% | 10% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.5 20% | 5 -14% | 4.5 -2% | 3 32% |
| Idle Average * | 7.1 | 5.3 25% | 6.8 4% | 7.1 -0% | 5.4 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 6.1 40% | 8.9 13% | 10.2 -0% | 6.3 38% |
| Load Average * | 36.5 | 30 18% | 26.2 28% | 29.8 18% | 37.5 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.7 | 42.3 13% | 31.8 35% | 31 36% | 61.1 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | -25% | 21% | 42% | 70% | |
| Reader / Idle | 821 | 1164 42% | 668 -19% | 976 19% | 1083 32% | 1239 ? 51% |
| H.264 | 224 | 536 139% | 503 125% | 571 155% | 716 ? 220% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 341 -18% | 278 -33% | 341 -18% | 414 0% | 608 ? 46% |
| Load | 185 | 88 -52% | 140 -24% | 104 -44% | 151 -18% | 117.4 ? -37% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Likt sitt större syskon så erbjuder ProBook 440 G5 ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. Det är synd att HP motarbetar detta utmärkta arbete genom att låta tangentbordet ge efter vid tryck.
Men låt oss först börja med dom positiva aspekterna: Vi gillar definitivt ProBook:s styrplatta, precis som CPU-prestandan som är långt framför dess konkurrent från Lenovo. ProBook kan också erbjuda ett aningen bättre utbud av portar jämfört med ThinkPad E480, då den inte bara kommer med VGA, HDMI och DisplayPort (via USB Typ-C) utan också med en kortläsare i fullstorlek. Precis som med den större ProBook kan vi berömma högtalarna så väl som enhetens expansionsmöjligheter - även om det finns ett frågetecken kring 2.5-tumsplatsen på grund av den saknade hållaren. Tyvärr slutar fördelarna här. Även om skärmen tillslut är en IPS-panel så kan vi inte riktigt hylla den på grund av dess låga ljusstyrkenivåer. Fläkten är betydligt mer högljudd och har en högre frekvens än på ProBook 450 G5. Kylsystemet och skärmen är därför inte positiva aspekter hos denna enhet.
Tangentbordet var en stor besvikelse, då det ger efter vid tryck. Detta förstör skrivupplevelsen, vilket är ett stort problem för en kontorslaptop. Vi besvärades också av hantverket kring handledsstödet på ProBook 450 G5, precis där man normalt lägger händerna. Hur bra portutbudet än är så kunde HP valt bättre platser för portarna. Särskilt för USB C-porten, som är placerad alldeles för nära fronten. Expansionsmöjligheter är bra, men möjligheterna till allmän service besviker då det är svårt att komma åt batteriet och kylfläkten. Tillslut måste vi också påpeka den korta garantin på bara ett år.
ProBook 440 G5 kunde ha varit ett bra val om det inte vore för det svaga tangentbordet.
Sammanfattningsvis kan vi inte riktigt rekommendera ProBook på grund av dess instabila tangentbord. Vi förväntar oss att tangentbordet på en kontorslaptop håller sig stadigt vid normalt skrivande, vilket inte är fallet här. Ett bra alternativ kan vara Lenovo ThinkPad E480 med en Intel-GPU, som vi för tillfället testar, eller Dell Latitude 3490 (recension kommer snart).
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES
- 02/23/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
