Test: HP Spectre x360 15 (i7-8705G, Radeon RX Vega M GL) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 349.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1205:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.22
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 BOE0730, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G Sharp SHP148D, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr BOE0730, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 33% | 18% | 4% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 85.9 29% | 78.7 18% | 68.5 3% | 66.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.4 | 100 14% | 97.9 12% | 90.7 4% | 92.1 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.8 | 99.1 55% | 79.2 24% | 66.3 4% | 67.2 5% |
Response Times | -10% | -25% | -8% | 49% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 44 ? -22% | 48.4 ? -34% | 38 ? -6% | 17.6 ? 51% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.6 ? | 22.8 ? 3% | 34.8 ? -47% | 27.6 ? -17% | 12.8 ? 46% |
PWM Frequency | 943 ? | 1000 ? 6% | 943 ? 0% | ||
Screen | 6% | 17% | -15% | 17% | |
Brightness middle | 349.5 | 357.6 2% | 488 40% | 329.3 -6% | 254 -27% |
Brightness | 331 | 350 6% | 440 33% | 316 -5% | 262 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 81 -10% | 84 -7% | 89 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.35 -21% | 0.3 -3% | 0.31 -7% | 0.22 24% |
Contrast | 1205 | 1022 -15% | 1627 35% | 1062 -12% | 1155 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.06 | 4.12 -1% | 3.16 22% | 4.78 -18% | 2.37 42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.68 | 9.91 -29% | 8.8 -15% | 11.75 -53% | 4.71 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.22 | 4.23 -0% | 3.51 17% | 1.84 56% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 1.8 59% | 3.3 25% | 7.9 -80% | 1.58 64% |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.178 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 7422 88% | 6613 98% | 6811 95% | 8323 78% | 6785 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.5 | 87.5 55% | 71.7 27% | 58.8 4% | 60 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.9 | 100 15% | 97.9 13% | 90.4 4% | 92 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
9% | 3% /
9% | -6% /
-10% | 23% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 943 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 943 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 943 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3946 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4329 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4958 poäng | |
Hjälp |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Apple SSD AP0512 | HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 30% | 1% | 0% | -60% | -19% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 698 | 728 4% | 944 35% | 1042 49% | 736 5% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 463.7 | 430.9 -7% | 487.9 5% | 486.8 5% | 195.4 -58% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1674 | 1045 -38% | 1523 -9% | 1668 0% | 1087 -35% | |
Score Total | 2720 | 4065 49% | 2132 -22% | 2037 -25% | 2119 -22% | 1515 -44% |
Score Write | 1145 | 1547 35% | 807 -30% | 757 -34% | 347 -70% | 361 -68% |
Score Read | 1087 | 1679 54% | 921 -15% | 859 -21% | 1199 10% | 789 -27% |
Access Time Write * | 0.065 | 0.036 45% | 0.051 22% | 0.051 22% | 0.034 48% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.04 15% | 0.044 6% | 0.054 -15% | 0.225 -379% | 0.071 -51% |
4K-64 Write | 950 | 1273 34% | 637 -33% | 545 -43% | 163.5 -83% | 175.9 -81% |
4K-64 Read | 840 | 1431 70% | 649 -23% | 646 -23% | 965 15% | 568 -32% |
4K Write | 96.9 | 100.9 4% | 94.3 -3% | 93.2 -4% | 18.78 -81% | 111.2 15% |
4K Read | 20.21 | 37.78 87% | 41.38 105% | 38.76 92% | 9.46 -53% | 43.09 113% |
Seq Write | 980 | 1729 76% | 752 -23% | 1189 21% | 1644 68% | 743 -24% |
Seq Read | 2269 | 2099 -7% | 2302 1% | 1739 -23% | 2239 -1% | 1774 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 9380 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19473 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5951 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Dell G3 15 3579 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 (26.9 - 32.8, n=2) | |
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 | |
Asus GL552VW-DH74 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 208 | 177.3 | 157 | 51.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 79 | 40.8 | 21.5 | 13 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 80.2 | 35 | 26.9 | 12 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.8 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 31.8 / 44.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell G7 15-7588 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 6% | 5% | -5% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 28.1 | 28 -0% | 28.6 -2% | 28.2 -0% | 30 -7% | 28.1 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.8 | 28.6 7% | 29.2 5% | 28.2 8% | 30 3% | 29 6% |
Idle Average * | 30.9 | 29.9 3% | 29.2 6% | 28.2 9% | 31 -0% | 29 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 30.5 1% | 29.2 6% | 28.2 9% | 34 -10% | 29.2 6% |
Load Average * | 31.8 | 42.5 -34% | 29.2 8% | 29 9% | 43 -35% | 40.6 -28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.1 | 44.8 7% | 38.4 20% | 44.7 7% | 42 13% | 49.8 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 44.8 -1% | 45.7 -3% | 47.4 -7% | 44 -0% | 49.8 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.09 / 0.89 Watt |
Låg belastning | 11.7 / 16.8 / 18.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
82.3 / 94.9 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 30% | -23% | -14% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.7 | 6.2 47% | 5.3 55% | 14.9 -27% | 11.7 -0% | 3.4 71% |
Idle Average * | 16.8 | 12.9 23% | 9.8 42% | 17.5 -4% | 18.5 -10% | 11 35% |
Idle Maximum * | 18.9 | 13.6 28% | 12.6 33% | 19.2 -2% | 22.8 -21% | 14.9 21% |
Load Average * | 82.3 | 76.1 8% | 73 11% | 103.2 -25% | 97.5 -18% | 78.9 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 87.2 | 84.3 3% | 67.6 22% | 123.1 -41% | 102.9 -18% | |
Load Maximum * | 94.9 | 99.4 -5% | 80 16% | 132.7 -40% | 111.1 -17% | 91.2 4% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 84 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | 14% | 86% | 17% | 78% | |
Reader / Idle | 540 | 842 56% | 673 25% | 927 72% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 375 9% | 420 22% | 625 82% | 402 17% | 614 78% |
Load | 66 | 76 15% | 63 -5% | 135 105% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 88 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
En omvandlingsbar på 15 tum är en hård nöt att knäcka, helt enkelt på grund av att den stora skärmstorleken i sig gör surfplatteläget mycket krångligare att använda jämfört med mindre alternativ. HP Spectre x360 15 kan vara aningen större än konkurrenten XPS 15 9575, men dess design och kvalitet behöver inte känna sig underlägsen någon annan i den här kategorin.
Om du gräver djupare i hur Spectre med Kaby Lake-G presterar märker du att systemet är en besvikelse jämfört med Kaby Lake-R konfigurationen. På papperet borde Core i7-8705G och Radeon RX Vega M GL vara betydligt snabbare än i7-8550U och GeForce MX150. I praktiken lider dock Kaby Lake-G varianten av betydande problem med strypning som i slutändan dämpar många av de prestandafördelar som detta chip har att komma med. Den som i huvudsak planerar att använda datorn för ordbehandling, strömning eller surfande kommer inte att märka strypningen, men att köra krävande applikationer med ihållande belastning såsom spel kommer att få den att gå på knäna.
De låga kraftprofilerna som i7-8550U och GeForce MX150 har är också till fördel för den billigare konfigurationen med Kaby Lake-R. Vår Kaby Lake-G enhet är i allmänhet mycket mer högljudd och har mycket kortare batteritid jämfört med Kaby Lake-R versionen.
Om du planerar att spela mycket eller är känslig för skärmflimmer så klarar du dig bättre med XPS 15 9575 alternativt en dedikerad spellaptop med GTX 1050 Ti grafik om 2-i-1 funktionaliteten inte är av intresse. Om surfande och lätt multimedia är ditt syfte är Spectre med Kaby Lake-R mer än tillräcklig.
Kaby Lake-G är imponerande teknik, vilket har bevisats av Intel Hades Canyon NUC och Dell XPS 15 9575. Spectre x360 15 är den minst imponerande implementeringen av detta chip vi sett hittills. Om du vill ha Kaby Lake-G är Dells motsvarighet ett bättre val. Annars kan du bespara dig problemen med prestandastrypning genom att välja den billigare och mer stabila Kaby Lake R-konfigurerade Spectre x360 15.
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
-
08/20/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo