Test: Lenovo ThinkPad T570 (Core i7, 4K, 940MX) (sammanfattning)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 (ThinkPad T570 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1149.7 MHz, Minne: 1252.8 MHz, GDDR5-minne, GM108-GPU, 376.54, Optimus
Minne
8 GB
, DDR4 2400, 1 av 2 platser används
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 282 PPI, BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB
, 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, 448 GB ledigt
Vikt
2.019 kg, Strömförsörjning: 351 g
Pris
1599 Euro
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV156QUM-N44 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 339 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 314.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 339 cd/m²
Kontrast: 942:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 926 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 926 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 926 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 BOE NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Panasonic VVX16T028J00, , 2880x1620, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu LifeBook U757 LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -32% | -5% | -13% | -7% | 29% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 70 | 44.08 -37% | 64.4 -8% | 56.8 -19% | 65.8 -6% | 89.7 28% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.1 | 65.6 -28% | 87.8 -4% | 83.7 -8% | 84.8 -7% | 100 10% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.7 | 45.66 -32% | 64.1 -4% | 58.7 -12% | 62 -7% | 100 50% | |
| Response Times | 892% | -34% | -30% | -31% | 4139% | -64% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 41.6 ? -0% | 32.8 ? 21% | 47.2 ? -13% | 36 ? 13% | 47.3 ? -14% | 57.2 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 20.8 ? -37% | 22.4 ? -47% | 15.2 ? -0% | 26.4 ? -74% | 31.2 ? -105% | 39.2 ? -158% |
| PWM Frequency | 926 ? | 26040 ? 2712% | 220 ? -76% | 199.2 ? -78% | 117000 ? 12535% | 962 4% | |
| Screen | -6% | -11% | -65% | -1% | 45% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 339 | 262 -23% | 339 0% | 338 0% | 313 -8% | 483 42% | 370.1 9% |
| Brightness | 314 | 245 -22% | 322 3% | 341 9% | 294 -6% | 465 48% | 356 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 88 -1% | 90 1% | 84 -6% | 92 3% | 87 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.24 33% | 0.32 11% | 0.81 -125% | 0.27 25% | 0.33 8% | 0.37 -3% |
| Contrast | 942 | 1092 16% | 1059 12% | 417 -56% | 1159 23% | 1464 55% | 1000 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.5 -7% | 5.88 -40% | 10.9 -160% | 4.5 -7% | 1.4 67% | 5.3 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 10.5 -35% | 11.08 -42% | 18.7 -140% | 10.5 -35% | 3 62% | 9.9 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 3.5 31% | 7.41 -45% | 13.3 -161% | 4 22% | 1.5 71% | 4.6 10% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.32 95% | 2.36 93% | 2.11 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.34 94% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6569 99% | 6524 100% | 6036 108% | 16030 41% | 6387 102% | 6650 98% | 6284 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 42.04 -29% | 57.14 -4% | 53.8 -9% | 55.3 -7% | 88.3 49% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 65.4 -28% | 87.68 -4% | 83.4 -8% | 84.74 -7% | 100 10% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 285% /
157% | -17% /
-14% | -36% /
-49% | -13% /
-6% | 2092% /
1161% | -10% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3049 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3892 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP | HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) Apple SSD SM0256L | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -50% | -29% | -47% | -16% | 4% | 18% | |
| Read Seq | 1210 | 513 -58% | 1245 3% | 509 -58% | 1298 7% | 1684 39% | 1760 45% |
| Write Seq | 1134 | 306.1 -73% | 298.6 -74% | 488.4 -57% | 1343 18% | 1106 -2% | 1666 47% |
| Read 512 | 789 | 450.6 -43% | 673 -15% | 414.3 -47% | 842 7% | 977 24% | 832 5% |
| Write 512 | 903 | 305.5 -66% | 298.8 -67% | 321.7 -64% | 945 5% | 1119 24% | 1064 18% |
| Read 4k | 58.4 | 33.4 -43% | 41.79 -28% | 36.43 -38% | 9.8 -83% | 45.14 -23% | 53.2 -9% |
| Write 4k | 144.1 | 85.6 -41% | 138.4 -4% | 88.4 -39% | 13 -91% | 134.1 -7% | 167.4 16% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 559 | 346.9 -38% | 495 -11% | 402.8 -28% | 630 13% | 509 -9% | 630 13% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 474.4 | 278.9 -41% | 297.5 -37% | 256.7 -46% | 443 -7% | 398.1 -16% | 533 12% |
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Sequential Read:
1210 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1134 MB/s
512K Read:
789 MB/s
512K Write:
903 MB/s
4K Read:
58.4 MB/s
4K Write:
144.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
559 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
474.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U757 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2931 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8308 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2098 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE | |
| HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 137.9 | 72.4 | 64.3 | 21.5 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 42.5 | 25.7 | 11.5 | ||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 52.1 | 30.7 | 16.4 | 12.6 | 10.1 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 31.1 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35.2 / 41.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-11.9 °C / -21.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-11.9 °C / -21.4 F).
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.24 / 0.33 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.7 / 9.9 / 10.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
56.1 / 75 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 39% | 33% | 2% | -83% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3.6 23% | 3.58 24% | 3.96 16% | 2.9 38% | 11.9 -153% |
| Idle Average * | 9.9 | 7.7 22% | 5.97 40% | 7.74 22% | 9.7 2% | 17.1 -73% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 8.2 25% | 6.81 38% | 8.64 21% | 10.1 7% | 17.3 -59% |
| Load Average * | 56.1 | 30.8 45% | 29.4 48% | 28.8 49% | 65 -16% | 94.7 -69% |
| Load Maximum * | 75 | 46.1 39% | 39.7 47% | 32 57% | 89.5 -19% | 122 -63% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 104.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 22% | 6% | -5% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 799 | 1167 46% | 1081 35% | 831 4% | ||
| H.264 | 484 | 587 21% | 637 32% | 516 7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 414 | 454 10% | 530 28% | 440 6% | 602 45% | 434 5% |
| Load | 171 | 201 18% | 160 -6% | 55 -68% | 103 -40% |
För
+ stabilt, välgjort chassi
+ utmärkta inmatningsenheter
+ matt, ljusstark 4K-skärm
+ gott om anslutningsmöjligheter
+ 3 års garanti
+ snabbt WiFi
+ mestadels tyst
+ klar för modem
+ bra CPU-prestanda
Emot
- kraftig reduktion av CPU-prestandan vid batteridrift
- lång laddningstid
- otillräcklig adapter
- värmeutveckling på botten under belastning
- dyr
Läs originaltestet på engelska här.
Den dyrare varianten av T570 har samma fördelar som den billigare modellen, inklusive det robusta, relativt kompakta chassit, de bekväma inmatningsenheterna och de många anslutningsalternativen. Praktiska funktioner som PowerBridge och den infraröda kameran gör T570 till en mycket flexibel bärbar dator. Förutom fördelarna med den billigare T570 tillkommer 4K-skärmen i den här modellen samt en Nvidia-GPU, som trots att den är en äldre modell är betydligt mer kraftfull än en integrerad Intel-GPU.
Men den här modellen är inte heller fri från problem. Vår största invändning är CPU-prestandan vid batteridrift. Ett annat nytt problem är värmeutvecklingen på bottenplattan under belastning, vilket troligen beror på grafikkortet. Dessutom är priset högt, och den medföljande strömförsörjningen räcker inte till under hög belastning.
Sammanfattningsvis kan T570 med 4K-skärm rekommenderas. Med den här skärmen har datorn förbättrats markant på en avgörande punkt där den billigare modellen var en besvikelse. Om det inte vore för prestandaminskningen under batteridrift skulle datorn ha fått omdömet "mycket bra". Med detta sagt är minskningen något mindre än med den första testenheten, eftersom grafikkortet inte påverkas av prestandastrypningen.
Det finns otaliga alternativ med 15,6-tums skärm, även om företagsmarknaden är mer fokuserad på 14-tumsformatet. MacBook Pro 15 och Dell XPS 15 är starka konkurrenter, som visserligen inte har samma företagsfunktioner, T570:s utmärkta tangentbord, men betydligt starkare GPU- och CPU-alternativ istället.
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
- 04/25/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Office - Vägt medel
Price comparison
