Test: MSI GE65 Raider 9SF - Stora förbättringar jämfört med GE63 (Sammanfattning)

Name: MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Brand: MSI

LFG raid.

GE65 är 19 procent mindre och 12 procent lättare än den utgående modellen GE63 samtidigt som den behåller alla portar och de flesta fysiska egenskaperna. Utöver GS65 är detta en av de lättaste bärbara speldatorerna på 15.6 tum som går att köpa från MSI.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 12/29/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

MSI Laptop / Notebook Gaming Geforce

Test device courtesy of MSI US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (GE65 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1215 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 441.66, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dubbla kanaler

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, SHP14C5, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM370

Hårddisk

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

Ljudkort

Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller

Anslutningar

4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm mikrofon, 3.5 mm hörlurar (HiFi / SPDIF), Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare

Nätverk

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.9 x 357.7 x 248

Batteri

51 Wh Litiumjon, 6 celler

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Fyra högtalare: 2x 2 W + 2x 3 W, Tangentbord: SteelSeries chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, MSI Dragon Center, Driver and App Center, True Color, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.27 kg, Strömförsörjning: 988 g

Pris

2600 USD

Länkar

MSI hemsida
MSI kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.8 % v7 ^(old)		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.2 kg	18.3 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.1 % v7 ^(old)		Maingear Vector 15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	1.9 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.4 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.4 kg	25.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

MSI GE63 Raider 8SG Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 HP Omen 15-dc1303ng MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Alienware m15 R2 P87F MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG DIN A4 ❌

Höger: 2x USB Typ A 3.2 Gen 1, SD-kortläsare, AC-adapter

Vänster: Kensington-lås, 1 Gbps RJ-45, Mini-DisplayPort, USB Typ A 3.2 Gen 2, USB Typ C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm hörlurar, 3.5 mm mikrofon

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	172.4 MB/s +566%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	172 MB/s +564%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.4 MB/s +203%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.9 MB/s +4%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.9 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	215 MB/s +621%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192.1 MB/s +545%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.3 MB/s +186%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	31.34 MB/s +5%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	29.8 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1374 (720^min - 1484^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	629 (602^min - 651^max) MBit/s
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	548 MBit/s
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	507 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1291 (1212^min - 1379^max) MBit/s
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	660 MBit/s
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	656 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	615 (508^min - 642^max) MBit/s


256.6 cd/m²	268.8 cd/m²	248.7 cd/m²
269.3 cd/m²	277.4 cd/m²	266.9 cd/m²
265.7 cd/m²	267.4 cd/m²	255.9 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Sharp LQ156M1JW03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 277.4 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 264.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 277.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1156:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GE63 Raider 8SG AU Optronics B156HAN07.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-7%	-5%	-6%	-41%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	69.3	65.1 -6%	67.7 -2%	65.3 -6%	40.13 -42%	65.3 -6%
sRGB Coverage	98.9	91.7 -7%	91.6 -7%	95.1 -4%	60.3 -39%	91.8 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.7	65.9 -7%	67.1 -5%	65.9 -7%	41.48 -41%	66.5 -6%
Response Times		17%	-17%	0%	-113%	-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.2 ?(7.2, 6)	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 33%	19 ?(9, 10) -44%	16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) -24%	26 ?(13.6, 12.4) -97%	13.6 ?(7.2, 6.4) -3%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6, 5.2)	11.2 ?(5.2, 6) -0%	10 ?(6, 4) 11%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 21%	25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8) -129%	10 ?(6, 4) 11%
PWM Frequency	23150 ?(19)			23810 ?(24) 3%		200 ?(99) -99%
Screen		-7%	2%	-51%	-84%	-29%
Brightness middle	277.4	268.3 -3%	477 72%	324.2 17%	290.1 5%	312.7 13%
Brightness	264	261 -1%	431 63%	304 15%	274 4%	305 16%
Brightness Distribution	90	84 -7%	84 -7%	90 0%	86 -4%	90 0%
Black Level *	0.24	0.2 17%	0.175 27%	0.38 -58%	0.54 -125%	0.27 -13%
Contrast	1156	1342 16%	2726 136%	853 -26%	537 -54%	1158 0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.51	2.65 -75%	4.17 -176%	5.01 -232%	5.16 -242%	4.57 -203%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.93	4.67 5%	6.97 -41%	12.7 -158%	18.09 -267%	6.81 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.77	2.76 -56%	2.51 -42%	1.64 7%	4.35 -146%	2.91 -64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	2.2 41%	3.49 6%	7.9 -114%	4.4 -19%	4.3 -16%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.33 ^94%	2.5 ^88%	2.35 ^94%	2.1 ^105%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	7061 ^92%	6862 ^95%	7076 ^92%	8455 ^77%	7362 ^88%	7098 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	65.1	59.3 -9%	60 -8%	60.8 -7%	38.1 -41%	59.4 -9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.1	93.3 -6%	91 -8%	95.5 -4%	60 -39%	91.3 -8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / -4%	-7% / -2%	-19% / -34%	-79% / -80%	-22% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.2 ms rise
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

23150 Hz

≤ 19 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23150 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23150 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)

MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)

HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1291 (1278.24-1450)

Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	514 Points +8%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS	509 Points +7%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	498 Points +5%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	479 Points +1%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	474 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	460 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (441 - 474, n=7)	459 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points -8%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	422 Points -11%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	416 Points -12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	388 Points -18%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	382 Points -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	6910 Points +97%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS	4463 Points +27%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	3795 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	3505 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (2953 - 3712, n=7)	3271 Points -7%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	2924 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H	2643 Points -25%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	2598 Points -26%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	2333 Points -33%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	1864 Points -47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1765 Points -50%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	1411 Points -60%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS	215 Points +9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	209 Points +6%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	203 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points +2%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	198 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	191 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (181 - 198, n=11)	190.1 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H	184 Points -7%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	172 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	171 Points -14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points -19%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	149 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X	3049 Points +88%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS	1962 Points +21%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points +12%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	1623 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H (1317 - 1721, n=11)	1506 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H	1231 Points -24%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	1217 Points -25%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	1116 Points -31%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	1103 Points -32%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	790 Points -51%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -55%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7	676 Points -58%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

198 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1623 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

131 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3505 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

474 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6452 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	6283 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (5826 - 6452, n=2)	6139 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	5938 Points -8%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	5374 Points -17%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5316 Points -18%
Essentials
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9752 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	9518 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (9146 - 9752, n=2)	9449 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	9364 Points -4%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8917 Points -9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	8791 Points -10%
Productivity
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8273 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	8209 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (8025 - 8273, n=2)	8149 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	7381 Points -11%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	7180 Points -13%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6947 Points -16%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9034 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	8617 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	8220 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (7311 - 9034, n=2)	8173 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	6675 Points -26%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6584 Points -27%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	5661 Points +21%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4679 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (4578 - 4679, n=2)	4629 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	4207 Points -10%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4124 Points -12%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	3758 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6095 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (5919 - 6095, n=2)	6007 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	5870 Points -4%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	5706 Points -6%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5577 Points -8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	4677 Points -23%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4679 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6095 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		6452 poäng
Hjälp

	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI GE63 Raider 8SG WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD		-31%	-39%	-1%	-19%	2%
Seq Read	1211	904 -25%	1372 13%	1925 59%	1280 6%	1358 12%
Seq Write	2420	1344 -44%	746 -69%	2371 -2%	905 -63%	2381 -2%
4K Read	27.11	24.99 -8%	35.42 31%	37.2 37%	48.73 80%	27.02 0%
4K Write	88.9	107.4 21%	99.9 12%	108.9 22%	107 20%	89.2 0%
4K-64 Read	1665	631 -62%	302.1 -82%	1177 -29%	321.1 -81%	1642 -1%
4K-64 Write	1831	731 -60%	191.4 -90%	1135 -38%	761 -58%	1799 -2%
Access Time Read *	0.089	0.131 -47%	0.132 -48%	0.065 27%	0.058 35%	0.067 25%
Access Time Write *	0.208	0.099 52%	0.037 82%	0.108 48%	0.046 78%	0.05 76%
Score Read	1813	746 -59%	475 -74%	1407 -22%	498 -73%	1805 0%
Score Write	2162	973 -55%	366 -83%	1481 -31%	958 -56%	2127 -2%
Score Total	4956	2126 -57%	1065 -79%	3633 -27%	1711 -65%	4899 -1%
Copy ISO MB/s	2483	1187 -52%	1062 -57%	2073 -17%	1519 -39%	3193 29%
Copy Program MB/s	776	673 -13%	426 -45%	576 -26%	749 -3%	198.2 -74%
Copy Game MB/s	1621	1295 -20%	650 -60%	1426 -12%	943 -42%	1054 -35%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3309 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2398 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 537 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 407.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1987 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2361 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.04 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	33935 Points +62%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X	27228 Points +30%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	25497 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	23373 Points +11%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	20997 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	20917 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (18169 - 21138, n=19)	20123 Points -4%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	18055 Points -14%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	17792 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	17419 Points -17%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14718 Points -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9221 Points -56%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	14492 Points +81%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X	11099 Points +38%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	9854 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	9364 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8036 Points 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	8028 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (7006 - 8028, n=18)	7651 Points -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6910 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6387 Points -20%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	5689 Points -29%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5534 Points -31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points -55%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3517 Points -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	165374 Points +24%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	155800 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X	143576 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	132852 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	130614 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	129506 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64283 - 135881, n=18)	117543 Points -12%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	116593 Points -12%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	115714 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	114009 Points -14%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	97136 Points -27%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	80615 Points -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	54393 Points -59%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	9021 Points +108%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	5799 Points +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	4713 Points +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	4346 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (3958 - 4627, n=13)	4294 Points -1%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	3742 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	3738 Points -14%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	43576 Points +69%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X	39651 Points +53%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	34846 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	31595 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	29052 Points +12%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	25845 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (23335 - 27298, n=21)	25775 Points 0%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	23734 Points -8%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	23414 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	21861 Points -15%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19670 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	13270 Points -49%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points -51%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	18934 Points +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	18534 Points +13%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	16364 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13950 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13883 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (8716 - 16364, n=21)	12534 Points -23%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12450 Points -24%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12192 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12064 Points -26%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	11288 Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	9212 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	7593 Points -54%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points -58%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		22592 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		48855 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18601 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		8110 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	142 fps +49%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	124 fps +31%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	105 fps +11%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (74.2 - 97, n=11)	88.7 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	87 fps -8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	83 fps -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	67 fps -29%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	45 fps -53%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	43 fps -55%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	131 (110^min - 147^max) fps +67%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.5 fps +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	92.7 fps +18%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	78.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21)	74.3 fps -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.9 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	61.7 fps -21%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	51.6 fps -34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	40 fps -49%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	36.5 fps -53%

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø69.3 (64-76)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	325	309.3	292.5	170
The Witcher 3 (2015)	290.1	241.3	152.3	78.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	143	107	101	95

	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise		-3%	6%	2%	0%	13%
off / environment *	28.8	28.5 1%	30 -4%	28.2 2%	28.2 2%	28.3 2%
Idle Minimum *	33	33.9 -3%	31.3 5%	28.8 13%	28.2 15%	28.8 13%
Idle Average *	33	33.9 -3%	31.3 5%	31.4 5%	28.2 15%	28.8 13%
Idle Maximum *	33.1	34.3 -4%	31.3 5%	33.3 -1%	31.7 4%	29 12%
Load Average *	38	39.5 -4%	42 -11%	46.2 -22%	53.7 -41%	33.5 12%
Witcher 3 ultra *	52.9	56.2 -6%	42.1 20%	50.5 5%	53.7 -2%	45 15%
Load Maximum *	57.8	57.2 1%	46.5 20%	51.3 11%	53.7 7%	45.2 22%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		33 / 33 / 33.1 dB(A)
Hög belastning		38 / 57.8 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


37.6 °C	35.4 °C	32.6 °C
36 °C	45 °C	28.8 °C
25.4 °C	23.6 °C	24.6 °C

Max: 45 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C


49.6 °C	28.2 °C	53 °C
23.4 °C	36.8 °C	36.6 °C
22 °C	26.6 °C	24.8 °C

Max: 53 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27 °C	26.4 °C	26.4 °C
27 °C	31.2 °C	24.6 °C
22.8 °C	22.8 °C	24.2 °C

Max: 31.2 °C
Medel: 25.8 °C


39 °C	26.8 °C	39 °C
23.8 °C	32 °C	32.6 °C
22 °C	25 °C	25.8 °C

Max: 39 °C
Medel: 29.6 °C

Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


38.4 °C	35 °C	33 °C
37.2 °C	42.8 °C	29.8 °C
27.2 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Max: 42.8 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C


51 °C	29.6 °C	52 °C
33 °C	39.4 °C	32.6 °C
23.8 °C	28 °C	30.2 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 45 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.05 / 1.3 Watt
Låg belastning	15 / 18.5 / 20.2 Watt
Hög belastning	110.9 / 260 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Maingear Vector 15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-13%	2%	14%	14%	17%
Idle Minimum *	15	12.6 16%	16.2 -8%	12.5 17%	9.4 37%	9 40%
Idle Average *	18.5	21.4 -16%	21.1 -14%	15.3 17%	17.4 6%	14 24%
Idle Maximum *	20.2	34.4 -70%	26.4 -31%	20.7 -2%	19.6 3%	19 6%
Load Average *	110.9	123.2 -11%	85.1 23%	90.2 19%	103 7%	91 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	187.3	192.4 -3%	158.2 16%	162 14%		182 3%
Load Maximum *	260	246.6 5%	188 28%	209.3 19%	216 17%	238 8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		6tim 11min
WiFi Websurfing		3tim 36min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		0tim 35min

	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh	MSI GE63 Raider 8SG i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 51 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh	Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46 Wh	Maingear Vector 15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime		14%	143%	15%	68%	23%
Reader / Idle	371	373 1%	953 157%			301 -19%
WiFi v1.3	216	237 10%	393 82%	249 15%	362 68%	197 -9%
Load	35	46 31%	102 191%			69 97%

För

+ Litet fotavtryck för en spellaptop på 15.6 tum

+ Lätt att serva, 3x lagring, 2x SODIMM

+ Välkalibrerad IPS-skärm på 240 Hz

+ Hög CPU- och GPU-prestanda

+ Traditionellt placerad webbkamera

+ Fyra kraftfulla högtalare

+ Guldpläterade ljudanslutningar

+ Dedikerade musknappar

+ Piltangenter i full storlek

Emot

- Inga alternativ för 4K UHD eller OLED

- Riktigt långsam SD-kortläsare

- Fläktarna låter mycket när man spelar

- Fläktljudet hörs alltid

- Litet numeriskt tangentbord

- Portarna sitter tätt

- Locket kunde varit fastare

- Saknar Thunderbolt 3

- Kort batteritid

- Relativt tjock

Recension av MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US. Recensionsex från MSI

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Ta GE63, skär av lite från kanterna och du får GE65. MSI:s senaste mittenskiktsmaskin behåller allt vi gillade med GE63 samtidigt som den uppdaterar en del aspekter som vi inte gillade. I huvudsak handlar detta om att serien nu är betydligt kompaktare och resevänlig än innan utan att därmed låta mer eller bli varmare.

Å andra sidan har en del oönskade egenskaper inte förbättrats alls mellan generationerna. Skärmens ljusstyrka, portarna, batteritiden, chassits stabilitet och ljudnivån är i princip likadana som på GE63. Därmed är det i huvudsak ett ytligt beslut att välja GE65 framför GE63.

Intresserade köpare kan tänkas vilja jämföra MSI GE65 med Asus ROG Strix Scar III G531GW eftersom båda har samma Core i9 CPU och RTX 2070 GPU. Efter att ha testat båda systemen har MSI:s lösning en fördel då den är lättare att serva med fler lagringsalternativ, har fler portar, ett bättre tangentbord, en faktisk webbkamera och generellt tystare fläktar vid belastning. Asus system har istället ett starkare chassi och en mer ljusstark skärm.

För 26.000 kronor kan vår i9-konfiguration vara svårsåld för en mittenskiktslaptop. Vi rekommenderar att du istället väljer Core i7-varianten och sen själv uppgraderar lagringen för att spara in på kostnaden då servicen är så mycket enklare att utföra jämfört med GS65. Det är svårt att gå tillbaka till en 60 Hz-skärm efter att ha vant sig vid modeller med 144 eller 240 Hz.

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US - 12/23/2019 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

78 / 98 → 80%

Tangentbord

83%

Mus

88%

Anslutningar

60 / 80 → 75%

Vikt

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Batteri

55 / 95 → 58%

Skärm

86%

Spelprestanda

95%

Programprestanda

93%

Temperatur

86 / 95 → 91%

Ljudnivå

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

83%

Camera

35 / 85 → 41%

Medel

75%

85%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GE65 Raider 9SF - Stora förbättringar jämfört med GE63 (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2019-12-29 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison