Test: MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 9RE-051US (GTX 1060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 250.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 784:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -1% | 0% | 15% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.2 1% | 63.6 -3% | 66.1 0% | 79.1 20% | 64.4 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 92.1 0% | 93.8 2% | 92.7 1% | 98.8 7% | 93.4 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 67.2 0% | 64.9 -3% | 67.2 0% | 79.2 18% | 65.5 -2% |
Response Times | 3% | 12% | 40% | -150% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20 ? | 17.6 ? 12% | 16.8 ? 16% | 6.6 ? 67% | 46.4 ? -132% | 13.6 ? 32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 12.8 ? -7% | 11.2 ? 7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 32 ? -167% | 12 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 980 ? | |||||
Screen | 19% | 26% | -10% | 3% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 250.9 | 254 1% | 313 25% | 307 22% | 494 97% | 304.3 21% |
Brightness | 257 | 262 2% | 300 17% | 296 15% | 457 78% | 293 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 78 -6% | 89 7% | 88 6% | 80 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.22 31% | 0.33 -3% | 0.25 22% | 0.34 -6% | 0.38 -19% |
Contrast | 784 | 1155 47% | 948 21% | 1228 57% | 1453 85% | 801 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.77 | 2.37 14% | 1.29 53% | 5.74 -107% | 5.2 -88% | 1.79 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.89 | 4.71 20% | 2.04 65% | 11.32 -92% | 17.5 -197% | 3.69 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.5 | 1.84 26% | 1.94 22% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 1.58 60% | 0.69 83% | 6.44 -61% | 2.7 32% | 1.1 72% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.1 105% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6901 94% | 6785 96% | 6550 99% | 8395 77% | 7038 92% | 6665 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 60 0% | 71.2 19% | 59.8 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 92 0% | 94 2% | 93 1% | 98.8 7% | 92.8 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
13% | 12% /
18% | 10% /
-2% | -44% /
-15% | 10% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4676 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5731 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4646 poäng | |
Hjälp |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | |||||
Score Total | 2039 | 2536 24% | 3649 79% | 3282 61% | 4095 101% |
Score Write | 802 | 939 17% | 1446 80% | 1243 55% | 1955 144% |
Score Read | 815 | 1092 34% | 1471 80% | 1350 66% | 1407 73% |
Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.046 -2% | 0.041 9% | 0.041 9% | 0.037 18% |
Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.119 -68% | 0.046 35% | 0.062 13% | 0.05 30% |
4K-64 Write | 570 | 742 30% | 1198 110% | 913 60% | 1664 192% |
4K-64 Read | 611 | 847 39% | 1218 99% | 1057 73% | 1177 93% |
4K Write | 83.8 | 80.4 -4% | 90.2 8% | 93 11% | 99.2 18% |
4K Read | 43.09 | 23.36 -46% | 43.42 1% | 41.47 -4% | 48.56 13% |
Seq Write | 1475 | 1163 -21% | 1580 7% | 2372 61% | 1917 30% |
Seq Read | 1612 | 2213 37% | 2091 30% | 2517 56% | 1820 13% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 13554 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29930 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10311 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 274 | 223 | 220 | 159 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 139 | 135 | 132 | 78 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 40 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 113 | 101 | 73 | 62 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 29.6 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 43.5 / 45.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -9% | -10% | -3% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 29 -2% | 29 -2% | 31 -9% | 30 -6% | 28.1 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 33 -16% | 30 -6% | 28.1 1% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 31 -9% | 31 -9% | 34 -20% | 31 -9% | 33 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 35 -18% | 33 -11% | 40 -35% | 34 -15% | 33.5 -13% |
Load Average * | 43.5 | 49 -13% | 49 -13% | 41 6% | 43 1% | 42.2 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.7 | 51 -12% | 50 -9% | 43 6% | 42 8% | 45.3 1% |
Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 54 -18% | 52 -14% | 48 -5% | 44 4% | 45.7 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 1 / 1.34 Watt |
Låg belastning | 8.7 / 13 / 14.3 Watt |
Hög belastning |
107.4 / 151.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -27% | -47% | -16% | -104% | -3% | -5% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.7 | 14 -61% | 16 -84% | 12 -38% | 28 -222% | 7 20% | 9.48 -9% | 14.9 -71% |
Idle Average * | 13 | 18 -38% | 19 -46% | 16 -23% | 33 -154% | 11 15% | 16.1 -24% | 17.5 -35% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.3 | 22 -54% | 26 -82% | 21 -47% | 41 -187% | 20 -40% | 16.9 -18% | 19.2 -34% |
Load Average * | 107.4 | 91 15% | 103 4% | 85 21% | 94 12% | 98 9% | 90.8 15% | 103.2 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 129 | 142 -10% | 164 -27% | 128 1% | 160 -24% | 132 -2% | 123.1 5% | |
Load Maximum * | 151.5 | 173 -14% | 223 -47% | 162 -7% | 222 -47% | 182 -20% | 134.4 11% | 132.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 52.4 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 81% | -28% | -26% | -31% | 7% | 32% | 8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 372 | 513 38% | 164 -56% | 232 -38% | 144 -61% | 362 -3% | 576 55% | 402 8% |
Load | 70 | 156 123% | 70 0% | 61 -13% | 70 0% | 81 16% | 76 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 762 | 237 | 340 | 150 | 507 | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 62 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I ärlighetens namn gör dagens konfiguration av MSI GS65 inte särskilt mycket för att åtgärda de klagomål vi lyfte fram i vår recension från i Maj av en annan SKU. De största nackdelarna är fortfarande tveksamt hantverk, en konstruktion som inte känns robust (vilket leder till att höljet knarrar oundvikligt vid användning) samt de svåra serviceprocedurerna och de medelmåttiga inmatningsenheterna. Men dagens jämförelsevis enklare konfiguration, driven av ett GTX 1060 och en Core i7-8750H (samt en mindre NVMe SSD på 256 GB), lyckas överleva vårt syntetiska stress-test utan att varken behöva strypa CPU:n eller GPU:n, vilket är en välkommen förbättring jämfört med den GTX 1070 Max-Q-modell vi recenserat tidigare. Således har även yttemperaturen sjunkit en del, ett resultat av vad som verkar vara en aning mer aggresiv kylning i kombination med en märkbart mindre energi-slukande GPU.
Resten av paketet är dock i huvudsak bra. GS65 är förvånansvärt lätt och ganska tyst vid belastning. Den antireflex-behandlade 144 Hz-skärmen har bra färgprecision och mättnad tillsammans med utmärkta betraktningsvinklar (även om ljusstyrka och kontrast kunde varit bättre). Bortsett från placeringen och avsaknaden av en kortläsare så är anslutbarheten nästan på samma nivå som Aero 15X. Och dessutom lyckas maskinen prestera bra med tanke på dess konfiguration — även om GTX 1060 inte är kraftfull nog för att dra full nytta av prakten från 144 Hz bilduppdatering i moderna spel (även om allt över 60 bilder per sekund kommer till nytta).
Från en rent statistisk synvinkel, och trots dess påfallande brister, förblir MSI GS65 en av de bästa tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorer som finns att tillgå för tillfället.
För 18.490 kronor är den definitivt inte billig — men priset är i linje med andra liknande modeller och kanske till och med en aning lägre. Innan du bestämmer dig för ett köp är det också värt att överväga bättre konstruerade konkurrenter såsom Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 och Razer Blade 15 — men kom ihåg att du behöver betala en del extra för den förmånen.
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
- 09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein