Notebookcheck Logo

Test: MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 9RE-051US (GTX 1060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Tunn, snabb och skör. Trots sina nackdelar förblir MSI GS65 en av de bästa tunna bärbara speldatorerna som finns tillgänglig för tillfället. Dagens uppdaterade, aningen billigare konfiguration (18.490 kronor) har en Core i7-8750H, 16 GB RAM, ett GTX 1060 och en NVMe SSD på 256 GB. Hur står den sig?
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US (GS65 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1670 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, 23.21.13.9094 - nVIDIA ForceWare 390.94
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400 dual-kanal
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO80ED, IPS, 144 Hz bilduppdatering, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 x Mikrofon in, 1 x Hörlurar ut
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 358 x 248
Batteri
82 Wh Litiumpolymer, 4 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.838 kg, Strömförsörjning: 420 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s +1%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
633 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s -8%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s -9%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -40%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
666 MBit/s
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s -21%
277.5
cd/m²
271.9
cd/m²
258.1
cd/m²
258.5
cd/m²
250.9
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
271.7
cd/m²
255.8
cd/m²
237.1
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO80ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Max: 277.5 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.41 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 250.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 784:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
0%
-1%
0%
15%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
65.8
66.2
1%
63.6
-3%
66.1
0%
79.1
20%
64.4
-2%
sRGB Coverage
92.1
92.1
0%
93.8
2%
92.7
1%
98.8
7%
93.4
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67
67.2
0%
64.9
-3%
67.2
0%
79.2
18%
65.5
-2%
Response Times
3%
12%
40%
-150%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
20 ?(10, 10)
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
12%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
16%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
67%
46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6)
-132%
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
7%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
13%
32 ?(18, 14)
-167%
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-0%
PWM Frequency
980 ?(25)
Screen
19%
26%
-10%
3%
16%
Brightness middle
250.9
254
1%
313
25%
307
22%
494
97%
304.3
21%
Brightness
257
262
2%
300
17%
296
15%
457
78%
293
14%
Brightness Distribution
83
89
7%
78
-6%
89
7%
88
6%
80
-4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.22
31%
0.33
-3%
0.25
22%
0.34
-6%
0.38
-19%
Contrast
784
1155
47%
948
21%
1228
57%
1453
85%
801
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.77
2.37
14%
1.29
53%
5.74
-107%
5.2
-88%
1.79
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.89
4.71
20%
2.04
65%
11.32
-92%
17.5
-197%
3.69
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.5
1.84
26%
1.94
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
1.58
60%
0.69
83%
6.44
-61%
2.7
32%
1.1
72%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.48 89%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6901 94%
6785 96%
6550 99%
8395 77%
7038 92%
6665 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
71.2
19%
59.8
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
92
0%
94
2%
93
1%
98.8
7%
92.8
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 13%
12% / 18%
10% / -2%
-44% / -15%
10% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Minne
CPU-Z Minne
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Octane v2
Octane v2
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +58%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -3%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +213%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points +3%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H
1083 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
1008 Points -7%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points -32%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points -32%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1083 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
111.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +67%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5277 Points +14%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5184 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (4646 - 5525, n=14)
5132 Points +10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4966 Points +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4646 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4542 Points -2%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points +10%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4676 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4650 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (4119 - 5371, n=15)
4511 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points -4%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4193 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3631 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5731 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5705 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5111 - 5731, n=15)
5504 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5176 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4676 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5731 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
4646 poäng
Hjälp
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
AS SSD
Score Total
2039
2536
24%
3649
79%
3282
61%
4095
101%
Score Write
802
939
17%
1446
80%
1243
55%
1955
144%
Score Read
815
1092
34%
1471
80%
1350
66%
1407
73%
Access Time Write *
0.045
0.046
-2%
0.041
9%
0.041
9%
0.037
18%
Access Time Read *
0.071
0.119
-68%
0.046
35%
0.062
13%
0.05
30%
4K-64 Write
570
742
30%
1198
110%
913
60%
1664
192%
4K-64 Read
611
847
39%
1218
99%
1057
73%
1177
93%
4K Write
83.8
80.4
-4%
90.2
8%
93
11%
99.2
18%
4K Read
43.09
23.36
-46%
43.42
1%
41.47
-4%
48.56
13%
Seq Write
1475
1163
-21%
1580
7%
2372
61%
1917
30%
Seq Read
1612
2213
37%
2091
30%
2517
56%
1820
13%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3472 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 364.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 259 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1235 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1528 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 91.5 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +192%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
23694 Points +59%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
21925 Points +47%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
19162 Points +29%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18687 Points +26%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18205 Points +22%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14879 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (12620 - 15607, n=77)
14692 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14180 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
9079 Points -39%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Gaming
  (1251 - 26759, n=186, last 2 years)
20827 Points +99%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11707 Points +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10663 Points +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
10475 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9720 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9075 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8935 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
8877 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5655 - 12930, n=76)
8458 Points -19%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
7573 Points -28%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +71%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
115638 Points +38%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
115579 Points +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
104942 Points +25%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
98013 Points +17%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
95118 Points +14%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
83747 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
80748 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (26770 - 86193, n=68)
71237 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +164%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18120 Points +53%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17046 Points +44%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
15156 Points +28%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14780 Points +25%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
14394 Points +22%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11814 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (10708 - 12298, n=77)
11547 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11315 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
7428 Points -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
13554 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29930 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10311 poäng
Hjälp
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
lågmed.högultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 274 223 220 159
Metro: Last Light (2013) 139 135 132 78
The Witcher 3 (2015) 40
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 113 101 73 62

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.4 / 28.4 / 29.6 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43.5 / 45.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-11%
-9%
-10%
-3%
-3%
off / environment *
28.4
29
-2%
29
-2%
31
-9%
30
-6%
28.1
1%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
30
-6%
30
-6%
33
-16%
30
-6%
28.1
1%
Idle Average *
28.4
31
-9%
31
-9%
34
-20%
31
-9%
33
-16%
Idle Maximum *
29.6
35
-18%
33
-11%
40
-35%
34
-15%
33.5
-13%
Load Average *
43.5
49
-13%
49
-13%
41
6%
43
1%
42.2
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.7
51
-12%
50
-9%
43
6%
42
8%
45.3
1%
Load Maximum *
45.7
54
-18%
52
-14%
48
-5%
44
4%
45.7
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 42.4 °C46.8 °C38 °C 
 35 °C42.4 °C36 °C 
 28.2 °C26 °C28.2 °C 
Max: 46.8 °C
Medel: 35.9 °C
40 °C59.8 °C41.6 °C
39.6 °C44.4 °C39.4 °C
31.4 °C34 °C33.4 °C
Max: 59.8 °C
Medel: 40.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  54.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
Värmeprofil, basenhetens ovansida (Witcher 3)
Värmeprofil, basenhetens ovansida (Witcher 3)
Värmeprofil, sidan (Witcher 3)
Värmeprofil, sidan (Witcher 3)
Värmeprofil, undersidan (Witcher 3)
Värmeprofil, undersidan (Witcher 3)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.338.135.3253535.1353132.732.332.740333133503331.9336334.933.634.98029.630.229.610031.228.231.212532.32832.316042.327.242.320047.226.247.225050.12650.131551.525.651.540047.425.247.45005524.45563058.224.358.280062.223.962.210006423.564125066.623.366.616006523.265200067.123.267.125006023.160315055.62355.6400064.32364.3500062.52362.5630059.422.959.4800057.62357.61000060.22360.21250064.422.964.41600065.922.965.9SPL75.135.575.1N33.72.533.7median 59.4median 23.3median 59.4Delta8.31.18.339.144.635.64028.430.433.537.726.428.525.527.429.23028.932.324.532.921.141.520.748.520.955.919.561.218.465.118.366.417.567.61867.918.665.317.469.216.765.817.264.517.365.917.26817.257.317.256.417.261.117.36617.262.217.259.61754.129.777.51.342.2median 17.4median 62.21.86.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051USGigabyte Aero 15X v8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1 / 1.34 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 8.7 / 13 / 14.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 107.4 / 151.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-27%
-47%
-16%
-104%
-3%
-5%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
8.7
14
-61%
16
-84%
12
-38%
28
-222%
7
20%
9.48
-9%
14.9
-71%
Idle Average *
13
18
-38%
19
-46%
16
-23%
33
-154%
11
15%
16.1
-24%
17.5
-35%
Idle Maximum *
14.3
22
-54%
26
-82%
21
-47%
41
-187%
20
-40%
16.9
-18%
19.2
-34%
Load Average *
107.4
91
15%
103
4%
85
21%
94
12%
98
9%
90.8
15%
103.2
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
129
142
-10%
164
-27%
128
1%
160
-24%
132
-2%
123.1
5%
Load Maximum *
151.5
173
-14%
223
-47%
162
-7%
222
-47%
182
-20%
134.4
11%
132.7
12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
6tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 10min
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 52.4 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Battery Runtime
81%
-28%
-26%
-31%
7%
32%
8%
WiFi v1.3
372
513
38%
164
-56%
232
-38%
144
-61%
362
-3%
576
55%
402
8%
Load
70
156
123%
70
0%
61
-13%
70
0%
81
16%
76
9%
Reader / Idle
762
237
340
150
507
Witcher 3 ultra
62

För

+ snabb GPU-prestanda
+ gedigen CPU-prestanda
+ tunn och lätt konstruktion
+ 144 Hz-skärm med bra responstider
+ skärmen har skaplig färgprecision
+ hyfsat bra batteritid
+ grafikbyte
+ tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ estetiskt tilltalande design

Emot

- slapp konstruktionskvalitet och skör konstruktion
- höljet knarrar ljudligt vid lätt användning
- service är begränsad och överdrivet svår
- ingen kortläsare
- Fn-knappen har en besvärlig placering på tangentbordets högra sida
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 9RE-051US
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 9RE-051US

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I ärlighetens namn gör dagens konfiguration av MSI GS65 inte särskilt mycket för att åtgärda de klagomål vi lyfte fram i vår recension från i Maj av en annan SKU. De största nackdelarna är fortfarande tveksamt hantverk, en konstruktion som inte känns robust (vilket leder till att höljet knarrar oundvikligt vid användning) samt de svåra serviceprocedurerna och de medelmåttiga inmatningsenheterna. Men dagens jämförelsevis enklare konfiguration, driven av ett GTX 1060 och en Core i7-8750H (samt en mindre NVMe SSD på 256 GB), lyckas överleva vårt syntetiska stress-test utan att varken behöva strypa CPU:n eller GPU:n, vilket är en välkommen förbättring jämfört med den GTX 1070 Max-Q-modell vi recenserat tidigare. Således har även yttemperaturen sjunkit en del, ett resultat av vad som verkar vara en aning mer aggresiv kylning i kombination med en märkbart mindre energi-slukande GPU.

Resten av paketet är dock i huvudsak bra. GS65 är förvånansvärt lätt och ganska tyst vid belastning. Den antireflex-behandlade 144 Hz-skärmen har bra färgprecision och mättnad tillsammans med utmärkta betraktningsvinklar (även om ljusstyrka och kontrast kunde varit bättre). Bortsett från placeringen och avsaknaden av en kortläsare så är anslutbarheten nästan på samma nivå som Aero 15X. Och dessutom lyckas maskinen prestera bra med tanke på dess konfiguration — även om GTX 1060 inte är kraftfull nog för att dra full nytta av prakten från 144 Hz bilduppdatering i moderna spel (även om allt över 60 bilder per sekund kommer till nytta).

Från en rent statistisk synvinkel, och trots dess påfallande brister, förblir MSI GS65 en av de bästa tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorer som finns att tillgå för tillfället.

För 18.490 kronor är den definitivt inte billig — men priset är i linje med andra liknande modeller och kanske till och med en aning lägre. Innan du bestämmer dig för ett köp är det också värt att överväga bättre konstruerade konkurrenter såsom Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 och Razer Blade 15 — men kom ihåg att du behöver betala en del extra för den förmånen.

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US - 09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein

Design
70 / 98 → 71%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
64 / 81 → 79%
Vikt
65 / 10-66 → 98%
Batteri
88%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
94%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
84 / 95 → 88%
Ljudnivå
86 / 90 → 95%
Audio
74%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Medel
78%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 9RE-051US (GTX 1060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Steve Schardein, 2018-09-19 (Update: 2018-09-19)