Test: Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060 Max-Q, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1265 MHz, Minne: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 397.93, Optimus
Minne
16 GB
, Samsung DDR4, PC4-21300, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
Vikt
2.07 kg, Strömförsörjning: 680 g
Pris
2200 USD
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 292.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.04 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 304.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 801:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 15.4", 2880x1800 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 2% | -1% | 2% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 64.3 0% | 66.2 3% | 63.6 -1% | 66 2% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 93.7 0% | 92.1 -1% | 93.8 0% | 96.5 3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 65.5 0% | 67.2 3% | 64.9 -1% | 66.7 2% | |
| Response Times | -13% | -18% | -9% | -173% | -205% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 17.2 ? -26% | 17.6 ? -29% | 16.8 ? -24% | 42.4 ? -212% | 49 ? -260% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 12 ? -0% | 12.8 ? -7% | 11.2 ? 7% | 28 ? -133% | 30 ? -150% |
| PWM Frequency | 961 ? | |||||
| Screen | -21% | -4% | 15% | 20% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 304.3 | 290 -5% | 254 -17% | 313 3% | 534 75% | 413 36% |
| Brightness | 293 | 281 -4% | 262 -11% | 300 2% | 502 71% | 378 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 82 3% | 89 11% | 78 -2% | 86 8% | 86 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.3 21% | 0.22 42% | 0.33 13% | 0.31 18% | 0.29 24% |
| Contrast | 801 | 967 21% | 1155 44% | 948 18% | 1723 115% | 1424 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.79 | 2.85 -59% | 2.37 -32% | 1.29 28% | 1.8 -1% | 2.44 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.69 | 6.27 -70% | 4.71 -28% | 2.04 45% | 3.8 -3% | 4.46 -21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.4 -118% | 1.58 -44% | 0.69 37% | 2.4 -118% | 2.48 -125% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6665 98% | 6718 97% | 6785 96% | 6550 99% | 6563 99% | 7006 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.8 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 60 0% | 77.92 30% | 62 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.8 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 99.94 8% | 96 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.39 | 1.84 | 2.48 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-16% | -7% /
-4% | 2% /
8% | -77% /
-12% | -68% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4650 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5705 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5184 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -2% | 0% | -9% | -19% | 18% | |
| Write 4K | 97.9 | 94.2 -4% | 95.3 -3% | 94.4 -4% | 118.3 21% | 142.5 46% |
| Read 4K | 41.32 | 39.23 -5% | 40.13 -3% | 37.65 -9% | 26.93 -35% | 29.32 -29% |
| Write Seq | 1594 | 1483 -7% | 1883 18% | 1335 -16% | 350.2 -78% | 2078 30% |
| Read Seq | 1353 | 1371 1% | 1322 -2% | 1404 4% | 2125 57% | 1309 -3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 305.6 | 296.2 -3% | 309.9 1% | 268.6 -12% | 243.4 -20% | 362.6 19% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 354.1 | 342.5 -3% | 353.7 0% | 332.8 -6% | 275.8 -22% | 472.8 34% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2033 | 1527 -25% | 1919 -6% | 1375 -32% | 349 -83% | 2208 9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2543 | 3280 29% | 2466 -3% | 2627 3% | 2732 7% | 3474 37% |
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2543 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2033 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
354.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
305.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1353 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1594 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
97.9 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (12970 - 14487, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (6212 - 11735, n=10) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (42781 - 81720, n=10) | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus G701VO-CS74K | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q (9992 - 11366, n=10) | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12756 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23642 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9861 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 274.4 | 226.1 | 211.6 | 109.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 210.7 | 133.2 | 74.2 | 37 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 299.2 | 266.2 | 165 | 107.3 |
The Witcher 3 ultra
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.1 / 33 / 33.5 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 42.2 / 45.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 0% | -8% | -8% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 29 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 29 -3% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 30 9% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 31 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 38 -13% | 34 -1% | 35 -4% | 33 1% | 33 1% |
| Load Average * | 42.2 | 46 -9% | 43 -2% | 49 -16% | 43 -2% | 49 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.3 | 49 -8% | 42 7% | 51 -13% | 55 -21% | 50 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 46 -1% | 44 4% | 54 -18% | 58 -27% | 52 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.03 / 0.81 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 14.9 / 17.5 / 19.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
103.2 / 132.7 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 8% | -8% | -25% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14.9 | 14 6% | 7 53% | 14 6% | 16 -7% | 6.2 58% |
| Idle Average * | 17.5 | 17 3% | 11 37% | 18 -3% | 19 -9% | 12.9 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.2 | 21 -9% | 20 -4% | 22 -15% | 26 -35% | 13.6 29% |
| Load Average * | 103.2 | 95 8% | 98 5% | 91 12% | 103 -0% | 76.1 26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 123.1 | 141 -15% | 132 -7% | 142 -15% | 164 -33% | 84.3 32% |
| Load Maximum * | 132.7 | 179 -35% | 182 -37% | 173 -30% | 223 -68% | 99.4 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -10% | 28% | 68% | 134% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 402 | 322 -20% | 362 -10% | 513 28% | 677 68% | 942 134% |
| Reader / Idle | 382 | 507 | 762 | |||
| Load | 72 | 81 | 156 | 67 | 114 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 76 | 62 |
För
+ lätt att serva; uppgraderbar SSD, RAM
+ skarp, matt skärm med minimal ghosting
+ Thunderbolt 3 med stöd för Razer Core
+ svala WASD-knappar vid belastning
+ Synapse-mjukvara som är enkel att använda
+ utmärkt spelprestanda
+ grafikbyte med Optimus
+ stark och rigid design
+ knappspecifik RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ snabbt Intel 9260 WiFi
+ stor styrplatta
Emot
- CPU:n kan inte upprätthålla Turbo Boost under längre perioder
- Chroma-färgkontroll kräver ett användarkonto
- en viss ojämn bleeding hos bakgrundsbelysningen
- tangentbordets knappar kunde varit fastare och djupare
- ingen inbyggd RJ-45 eller SD-kortläsare
- ingen fingeravtrycksläsare i strömbrytaren
- ingen sekundär intern lagring
- batteritiden kunde varit bättre
- RGB-bakgrundsbelysningen använder PWM
- kunde varit svalare vid belastning
- medelmåttig ljudkvalitet
- ett visst elektroniskt ljud
- högljudd vid belastning
- inget stöd för G-Sync
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I slutändan är Blade 15 med GTX 1060 Max-Q bara runt 30 procent långsammare när det kommer till GPU-prestanda jämfört med Blade 15 med 1070 Max-Q. Resultatet är en konfiguration som med tydlig marginal faktiskt håller längre och är svalare och tystare. Det går därför att argumentera att modellen med GTX 1070 Max-Q bör ses som ett "prestanda till varje pris"-alternativ för entusiaster.
Elefanten i rummet är kostnaden för Blade 15 med GTX 1060 Max-Q. Man får betala extra för design, varumärke, estetik och chassits funktioner. På grund av detta kan till och med dom minsta småsakerna göra en besviken. Vår specifika enhet lider av måttlig bleeding hos bakgrundsbelysningen samt ett elektroniskt ljud, saker vi inte tycker hör hemma hos en laptop i detta prisskikt. Begränsad CPU Turbo Boost samt att den använder PWM för sin knappspecifika RGB-bakgrundsbelysning är andra mindre bakslag som entusiaster kan tänkas sörja. Bortsett från det är det svårt att inte bli imponerad över hur robust det minimalistiska chassit är, särskilt jämfört med MSI GS65 eller Aorus X5-serien.
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
- 07/08/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Vägt medel
Price comparison
