Test: MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 240 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1091:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.54
ΔE Greyscale 1.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080 | Aorus X9 DT AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -20% | -24% | -23% | -27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 90.9 | 66.8 -27% | 65.5 -28% | 66 -27% | 63.7 -30% | 61.2 -33% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 92.1 -8% | 92.4 -8% | 83.7 -16% | 88.2 -12% | 82.9 -17% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.2 | 67.3 -22% | 66.6 -23% | 61.2 -29% | 64.2 -26% | 60.5 -30% |
Response Times | -122% | -110% | -432% | -457% | -202% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 18.4 ? -130% | 17.6 ? -120% | 45 ? -463% | 44 ? -450% | 30 ? -275% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 12 ? -114% | 11.2 ? -100% | 28 ? -400% | 31.6 ? -464% | 12.8 ? -129% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | |||||
Screen | 11% | -33% | -31% | -19% | -60% | |
Brightness middle | 240 | 280 17% | 274 14% | 380 58% | 343 43% | 402.3 68% |
Brightness | 248 | 262 6% | 268 8% | 362 46% | 332 34% | 372 50% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 86 4% | 80 -4% | 91 10% | 83 0% | 86 4% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.29 -32% | 0.37 -68% | 0.35 -59% | 0.62 -182% |
Contrast | 1091 | 1273 17% | 945 -13% | 1027 -6% | 980 -10% | 649 -41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 1.78 17% | 3.99 -86% | 4.12 -93% | 3.35 -57% | 5.6 -162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.04 | 3.91 22% | 7.33 -45% | 8.19 -63% | 5.62 -12% | 9.8 -94% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.54 | 1.79 -16% | 2.5 -62% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.62 | 0.74 54% | 4.14 -156% | 3.95 -144% | 2.4 -48% | 4.7 -190% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.43 91% | 2.58 85% | 2.47 89% | 2.35 94% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6846 95% | 6494 100% | 7352 88% | 6539 99% | 6495 100% | 7519 86% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77 | 60 -22% | 60 -22% | 55 -29% | 57 -26% | 53.7 -30% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 92 -8% | 92 -8% | 84 -16% | 88 -12% | 82.2 -18% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -43% /
-13% | -54% /
-40% | -162% /
-83% | -166% /
-74% | -96% /
-72% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise | |
↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26000 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Asus G703 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5720 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5801 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6558 poäng | |
Hjälp |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Aorus X9 DT Transcend TS1TMTE850 | Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -41% | 13% | -19% | -18% | -35% | |
Seq Read | 3058 | 1518 -50% | 3177 4% | 2261 -26% | 2352 -23% | 1752 -43% |
Seq Write | 2196 | 1019 -54% | 2556 16% | 1338 -39% | 1145 -48% | 735 -67% |
4K Read | 38.37 | 22.23 -42% | 47.61 24% | 39.52 3% | 44.81 17% | 35.61 -7% |
4K Write | 97.7 | 98.9 1% | 148.4 52% | 133.8 37% | 116.2 19% | 113.4 16% |
Score Read | 1691 | 828 -51% | 1633 -3% | 1118 -34% | 1248 -26% | 831 -51% |
Score Write | 1553 | 916 -41% | 1519 -2% | 930 -40% | 1029 -34% | 858 -45% |
Score Total | 4066 | 2145 -47% | 3962 -3% | 2581 -37% | 2862 -30% | 2072 -49% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
Asus G703 | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx |
3DMark 11 Performance | 23175 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 193287 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42660 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18738 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Asus G703 | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 148 | 76.8 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 110 | 60.5 | ||
FIFA 18 (2017) | 427 | 418 | ||
Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 145 | 141 | ||
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 139 | 121 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 120 | 113 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 32 / 34 / 37 dB(A) |
Hårddisk |
| 34 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 43 / 62 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 1% | 3% | 11% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.3 6% | 28.2 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 36 -13% | 35 -9% | 33 -3% | 31.5 2% | 35.6 -11% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 37 -9% | 36 -6% | 35 -3% | 31.6 7% | 35.6 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 43 -16% | 38 -3% | 37 -0% | 31.6 15% | 35.7 4% |
Load Average * | 43 | 50 -16% | 46 -7% | 40 7% | 36.8 14% | 50.2 -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 57 -0% | 48 16% | 48.2 15% | 50.2 12% | |
Load Maximum * | 62 | 61 2% | 54 13% | 50 19% | 52.1 16% | 50.2 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -13% | -5% | 14% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 43 9% | 55 -17% | 44.2 6% | 35.6 24% | 49.6 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 55 -4% | 54 -2% | 43 19% | 39 26% | 56 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 27 -4% | 29 -12% | 32.4 -25% | 24.2 7% | 29.6 -14% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 32.8 -21% | 27.4 -1% | 29.2 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Aorus X9 DT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 31 / 35 / 45 Watt |
Hög belastning |
130 / 374 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 11% | 17% | 31% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28 10% | 26 16% | 27 13% | 21.6 30% | 37.5 -21% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 37 -6% | 30 14% | 32 9% | 26.4 25% | 37.6 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 45 | 40 11% | 37 18% | 41 9% | 26.6 41% | 37.6 16% |
Load Average * | 130 | 109 16% | 123 5% | 102 22% | 95.6 26% | 122.4 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 268 | 256 4% | 257 4% | 221.7 17% | 180.3 33% | |
Load Maximum * | 374 | 353 6% | 341 9% | 248 34% | 199.6 47% | 277.4 26% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 17% | -14% | 33% | 71% | 17% | |
Reader / Idle | 225 | 252 12% | 200 -11% | 313 39% | 348 55% | 276 23% |
H.264 | 174 | 143 -18% | 204 17% | |||
Load | 63 | 77 22% | 54 -14% | 90 43% | 117 86% | 69 10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 190 | 151 | 251 | 333 | 181 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Om du kan komma över dess storlek och vikt så är MSI GT75 8RG en högkvalitativ, välutrustad och extremt kraftfull desktop-ersättning som påminner om en klassisk tower-PC. GT75 har bland annat omfattande möjligheter till service och uppgraderingar samt rikligt med anslutningar.
Till det har MSI byggt in en blixtsnabb och färgexakt 120 Hz-skärm och ett skapligt ljudsystem. Inmatningsenheterna är precis lika imponerande. En av höjdpunkterna med GT75 är det mekaniska tangentbordet; vars skrivupplevelse är mil framför konkurrensen.
Vi kan inte rekommendera GT75 8RG tillräckligt. Likt hos föregångaren är fläktljudet en svår punkt. Även om denna enhet på 17 tum praktiskt taget är 6 cm tjock så är fläktarna extremt högljudda vid belastning. Dom låter så mycket att du kommer behöva ett headset när du spelar. Detsamma gäller Aorus X9 DT, men den enheten är bara 3 cm tjock. Dess jämförbara prestanda visar att MSI:s kyllösning är aningen bristfällig.
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
-
05/16/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser