Test: MSI WT75 8SM (Xeon E-2176G, Quadro P5200) Arbetsstation (Sammanfattning)

Name: MSI WT75 8SM
Brand: MSI

Gamer som blivit arbetsstation.

WT75 tar de bästa aspekterna från GT75 och förvandlar dessa till en formidabel mobil arbetsstation. Om du inte är särskilt oroad över vikt, tjocklek eller batteritid så kommer du verkligen att uppskatta den hittills största bärbara arbetsstationen från MSI.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/09/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Coffee Lake Laptop / Notebook Workstation MSI

Test device courtesy of MSI

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI WT75 8SM

Processor

Intel Xeon E-2176G 6 x 3.7 - 4.7 GHz, Coffee Lake-ER

Grafikkort

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 - 16 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1582 MHz, Minne: 1804 MHz, GDDR5, 391.74, Manual graphics switch

Minne

64 GB

, DDR4-2400, 17-17-17-39, Dubbla kanaler

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, AUO109B, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel C246 (Cannon Lake-H)

Hårddisk

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB

, Sekundär: HGST HTS721010A9E630

Ljudkort

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Anslutningar

6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1x Hörlurar, 1x Mikrofon, 1x Line-in, 1x Line-ut, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare

Nätverk

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 51 x 428 x 314

Batteri

90 Wh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: FHD (1080p, 30 fps)

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2x 3W Högtalare + 1x 5W Woofer, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Dragon Center, MSI True Color, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

4.14 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.368 kg

Pris

5200 USD

Länkar

MSI hemsida
MSI kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI WT75 8SM Eurocom Tornado F7W MSI WT72-6QJ Dell Precision 7720 Fujitsu Celsius H980 Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 DIN A4 ❌

Höger: Smart Card-läsare, 2x USB 3.0 Typ A, SD-kortläsare, Kensington-lås

Baksidan: Gigabit RJ-45, mini-DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, AC-adapter

Vänster: 3x USB 3.0 Typ A, 1x Mikrofon-in, Hörlurar - ESS Sabre HiFi, Line-ut, Line-in

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197 MB/s +9%
Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	186.9 MB/s +4%
MSI WT75 8SM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	180.3 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	171 MB/s -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	148 MB/s -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	203.3 MB/s +3%
Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	200 MB/s +1%
MSI WT75 8SM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197.5 MB/s
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	176.9 MB/s -10%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	652 (330^min - 712^max) MBit/s +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	642 (629^min - 650^max) MBit/s +44%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	518 MBit/s +16%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Wireless-AC 9260	446 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 (345^min - 697^max) MBit/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	681 (341^min - 686^max) MBit/s +11%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Wireless-AC 9260	614 MBit/s
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	587 MBit/s -4%


317.8 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	307.4 cd/m²
306.7 cd/m²	327.9 cd/m²	329 cd/m²
290.9 cd/m²	289.4 cd/m²	304.3 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 329 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 311.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.43 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 327.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 763:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.43
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
95.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI WT75 8SM AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Fujitsu Celsius H980 LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Eurocom Tornado F7W AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Dell Precision 7720 SHP1446 (LQ173D1), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE LP173WF4_SPF7, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI WT72-6QM LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		-22%	4%	5%	-22%	-21%
Display P3 Coverage	80.8	67.3 -17%	85.9 6%	87.6 8%	67.4 -17%	67.3 -17%
sRGB Coverage	98.3	85 -14%	100 2%	100 2%	85 -14%	85.4 -13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	95.3	62.2 -35%	98.3 3%	99.2 4%	62.2 -35%	62.5 -34%
Response Times		0%	-19%	-77%	-15%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(18.8, 17.2)	38 ?(19.2, 18.8) -6%	40 ?(18.8, 21.2) -11%	60 ?(26.8, 33.2) -67%	40.8 ?(22, 18.8) -13%	42 ?(13, 29) -17%
Response Time Black / White *	24.8 ?(14.8, 10)	23.2 ?(10, 13.2) 6%	31.6 ?(18, 13.6) -27%	46.4 ?(28.4, 18) -87%	28.8 ?(15.6, 13.2) -16%	26 ?(7, 19) -5%
PWM Frequency		120500 ?(99)		1020 ?(20)		86 ?(10, 15)
Screen		-25%	-28%	14%	-8%	-19%
Brightness middle	327.9	400 22%	328.2 0%	464 42%	338 3%	303 -8%
Brightness	311	394 27%	310 0%	441 42%	317 2%	298 -4%
Brightness Distribution	88	92 5%	92 5%	89 1%	86 -2%	94 7%
Black Level *	0.43	0.51 -19%	0.37 14%	0.45 -5%	0.28 35%	0.46 -7%
Contrast	763	784 3%	887 16%	1031 35%	1207 58%	659 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.41	5.3 -20%	6.62 -50%	3.2 27%	4.3 2%	5.77 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.07	9.3 8%	9.49 6%	6.1 39%	10.2 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.43	3.8 -166%	3.93 -175%		3.7 -159%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	5.5 -90%	6.7 -131%	4.2 -45%	2.2 24%	4.87 -68%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.17 ^101%	2.44 ^90%	2.01 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	1.99 ^111%
CCT	6916 ^94%	6686 ^97%	6462 ^101%	6736 ^96%	6621 ^98%	7363 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	84.2	55.8 -34%	87.9 4%	88.1 5%	55.8 -34%	56.04 -33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99	84.9 -14%	100 1%	100 1%	84.7 -14%	85.27 -14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / -22%	-14% / -21%	-19% / 0%	-15% / -11%	-17% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1282 (1258.46-1324.2)

Eurocom Sky X9C GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1345 (1314.02-1362.31)

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1130 (1100.35-1178.83)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	214 Points +7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	207 Points +4%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	200 Points
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	190 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	190 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	187 Points -6%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	179 Points -10%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points -12%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	173 Points -13%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	159 Points -20%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	157 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	4376 Points +231%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	2997 Points +126%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	1979 Points +49%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	1623 Points +23%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	1362 Points +3%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	1324 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	1167 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	1118 Points -16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1090 Points -18%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	848 Points -36%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	724 Points -45%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	2.43 Points +10%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	2.23 Points +1%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	2.2 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	2.18 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	2.12 Points -4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points -10%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	1.9 Points -14%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	1.77 Points -20%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	1.73 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	23.13 Points +59%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	21.6 Points +48%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	17.37 Points +19%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	15.02 Points +3%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	14.58 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	12.9 Points -12%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.62 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	12.29 Points -16%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7.85 Points -46%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	43681 Points +12%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	41814 Points +7%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	39382 Points +1%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	39053 Points
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	37522 Points -4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	36683 Points -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	35116 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	34532 Points -12%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	21475 Points -45%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M	9142 Points +24%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	8042 Points +9%
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	7423 Points +1%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	7369 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Intel Core i7-8700	7171 Points -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	6561 Points -11%
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	5627 Points -24%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	5241 Points -29%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	4754 Points -35%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G	132.1 s *
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K	116.6 s * +12%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	98.7 s * +25%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	55.1 s * +58%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX	38.49 s * +71%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6830

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

39053

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7369

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

145.4 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

14.58 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.2 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

219 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1324 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

200 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	7006 Points +13%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6208 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5335 Points -14%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5248 Points -15%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5206 Points -16%
Essentials
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	10150 Points +4%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9802 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	9121 Points -7%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8077 Points -18%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8032 Points -18%
Productivity
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	8416 Points +8%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7768 Points
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	7544 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	7459 Points -4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7203 Points -7%
Digital Content Creation
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	10929 Points +28%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8528 Points
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6622 Points -22%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6437 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	6058 Points -29%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	5607 Points +12%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5006 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	4550 Points -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4376 Points -13%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	3772 Points -25%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	6140 Points +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5503 Points +12%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5132 Points +4%
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4930 Points
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4460 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5006 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4930 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		6208 poäng
Hjälp

	MSI WT75 8SM Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Eurocom Tornado F7W 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	MSI WT72-6QM Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
AS SSD		-11%	-6%	0%	-30%
Seq Read	1839	2082 13%	1082 -41%	2139 16%	2638 43%
Seq Write	1831	2335 28%	1781 -3%	2447 34%	810 -56%
4K Read	47.89	24.14 -50%	46.09 -4%	29.7 -38%	37.5 -22%
4K Write	105.8	91.8 -13%	100.4 -5%	102.5 -3%	96.4 -9%
4K-64 Read	1162	1561 34%	1209 4%	1299 12%	935 -20%
4K-64 Write	1743	1350 -23%	1622 -7%	1236 -29%	473.5 -73%
Access Time Read *	0.057	0.121 -112%	0.053 7%	0.045 21%	0.092 -61%
Access Time Write *	0.035	0.039 -11%	0.037 -6%	0.033 6%	0.04 -14%
Score Read	1394	1793 29%	1363 -2%	1543 11%	1237 -11%
Score Write	2032	1675 -18%	1901 -6%	1583 -22%	651 -68%
Score Total	4146	4390 6%	4003 -3%	3928 -5%	2433 -41%
Copy ISO MB/s		2175	1396	2320	1777
Copy Program MB/s		582	354.3	621	554
Copy Game MB/s		1479	691	1585	1025

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3374 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1984 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 426.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 361.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1787 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1584 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.15 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.4 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	161161 Points +50%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	130202 Points +21%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	107472 Points
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	105184 Points -2%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	102781 Points -4%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	86679 Points -19%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	82300 Points -23%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	66653 Points -38%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	61789 Points -43%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	38986 Points -64%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	28679 Points -73%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	27349 Points +47%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	27080 Points +46%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	21366 Points +15%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	19875 Points +7%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	19234 Points +4%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	18544 Points
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	18390 Points -1%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	14666 Points -21%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	12554 Points -32%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	9087 Points -51%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	7333 Points -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	6742 Points -64%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	10720 Points +66%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	9635 Points +49%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	7587 Points +18%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	7166 Points +11%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	6824 Points +6%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	6454 Points
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	6390 Points -1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	4356 Points -33%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	2898 Points -55%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	2062 Points -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	2049 Points -68%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	6911 Points +54%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	5993 Points +34%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	5166 Points +15%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	4479 Points
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	2889 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	1548 Points -65%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	38485 Points +52%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	29109 Points +15%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	28493 Points +13%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	27632 Points +9%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	26449 Points +5%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	25266 Points
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	24934 Points -1%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	19569 Points -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	16805 Points -33%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	11820 Points -53%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	10020 Points -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	8148 Points -68%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	17290 Points +25%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	16418 Points +19%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	13804 Points
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	13202 Points -4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	11292 Points -18%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	10893 Points -21%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	10778 Points -22%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	9878 Points -28%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	9613 Points -30%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	9356 Points -32%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	8166 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	7777 Points -44%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	212 fps +6%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	199.8 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	144.9 fps -27%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	142.3 fps -29%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	101 fps -49%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	77.1 fps -61%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	75.2 fps -62%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	72.4 fps -64%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	71.3 fps -64%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	217.9 fps +2%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	213.7 fps
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	206.8 fps -3%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	157.4 fps -26%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	134.5 fps -37%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	86.9 fps -59%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	60 fps -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	57 fps -73%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	23.16 fps -89%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	137 fps +81%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	110.8 fps +47%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	75.6 fps
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	75 fps -1%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	68.8 fps -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	59 fps -22%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	44.14 fps -42%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	38.31 fps -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	30.01 fps -60%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	79.6 fps +1%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	79.4 fps 0%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	79.1 fps
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	62.7 fps -21%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	48.7 fps -38%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	45.66 fps -42%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	31.35 fps -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	26.61 fps -66%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	19.94 fps -75%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	147.9 fps +3%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	143.4 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	90.3 fps -37%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	88.8 fps -38%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	79.7 fps -44%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	74.5 fps -48%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	69.6 fps -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	47.2 fps -67%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	42.84 fps -70%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	19.78 fps +17%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	16.88 fps 0%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	16.88 fps
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	14.22 fps -16%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	12.13 fps -28%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	10.72 fps -36%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	6.86 fps -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	6.43 fps -62%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	2.94 fps -83%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	160 fps +5%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	152 fps
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	117.2 fps -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	109.5 fps -28%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	81.3 fps -47%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	75.4 fps -50%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	57.4 fps -62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	55.7 fps -63%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	52.1 fps -66%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	196.6 fps +4%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	188.6 fps
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	150.6 fps -20%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6	139.9 fps -26%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	125.4 fps -34%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	100.3 fps -47%
MSI WT72-6QM NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5	94.4 fps -50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	64.5 fps -66%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G	64.4 fps -66%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	151.9 fps
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	144.5 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	110 fps

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	189.2 fps +6%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	178.3 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	131.5 fps -26%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	92.8 fps -48%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	82.1 fps -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	72.8 fps -59%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	396.3 fps +2%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	386.7 fps
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	370.9 fps -4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	243.5 fps -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	102.9 fps -73%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	41.72 fps -89%
Showcase (showcase-02)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	136.8 fps +81%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	108.2 fps +43%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	75.5 fps
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	74.7 fps -1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	58.8 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	29.94 fps -60%
Medical (medical-02)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	71.4 fps +16%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	61.7 fps 0%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	61.5 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	30.91 fps -50%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	30.86 fps -50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	16.21 fps -74%
Maya (maya-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	255 fps +1%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	251.9 fps
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	236.5 fps -6%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	195.6 fps -22%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	168.6 fps -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	81.4 fps -68%
Energy (energy-02)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	32.46 fps +89%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	22.98 fps +34%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	17.28 fps +1%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	17.14 fps
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	8.5 fps -50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	4.97 fps -71%
Creo (creo-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	247.7 fps +3%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	241.6 fps
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	185.2 fps -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	158.8 fps -34%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	107.1 fps -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	74.1 fps -69%
Catia (catia-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	302.4 fps +4%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	291.7 fps
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	225.1 fps -23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	190.8 fps -35%
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	161.4 fps -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	96.4 fps -67%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X	153.4 fps +3%
Eurocom Tornado F7W NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K	149.6 fps 0%
MSI WT75 8SM NVIDIA Quadro P5200, E-2176G	149.6 fps
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, TR 2970WX	140.8 fps -6%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8750H	107.5 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q, E-2176M	63.8 fps -57%

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13

3DMark 11 Performance		21204 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		39077 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16528 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		6580 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Sky X9C Intel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)	106.4 fps +60%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	101.1 fps +52%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	78.8 (51^min - 86^max) fps +18%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	75.9 fps +14%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	75.4 (62^min) fps +13%
MSI WT75 8SM Intel Xeon E-2176G, NVIDIA Quadro P5200	66.7 fps
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA Quadro P5200	63.4 fps -5%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6, NVIDIA Quadro P5000	53.4 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	46.1 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Intel Xeon E-2176M, NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q	25 fps -63%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8706G, AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL	23.9 fps -64%
MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	13.4 fps -80%

MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.8 (59-68)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	395	341.6	315.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	327.2	228.7	120.2	66.7	47.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	289	220.6	125.5	105.2	46.6

	MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise		-7%	6%	-5%	11%	4%
off / environment *	28.6	28.1 2%	29.6 -3%	28.2 1%	29.5 -3%
Idle Minimum *	33.4	28.1 16%	29.6 11%	33.2 1%	29.5 12%	33.3 -0%
Idle Average *	33.4	28.6 14%	32.5 3%	33.2 1%	29.5 12%	33.4 -0%
Idle Maximum *	33.4	51 -53%	32.5 3%	33.2 1%	29.5 12%	33.5 -0%
Load Average *	33.5	51 -52%	34.9 -4%	47 -40%	35 -4%	38.8 -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51.4	51 1%		52.2 -2%	41 20%
Load Maximum *	64	51 20%	49.1 23%	64 -0%	47.8 25%	40.2 37%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		33.4 / 33.4 / 33.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning		33.5 / 64 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


35.6 °C	36.4 °C	37.2 °C
29 °C	39.2 °C	30 °C
25 °C	23.4 °C	25 °C

Max: 39.2 °C
Medel: 31.2 °C


49.2 °C	30.8 °C	40.6 °C
35.6 °C	30 °C	35 °C
22.8 °C	23.2 °C	22.4 °C

Max: 49.2 °C
Medel: 32.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 46 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


28.6 °C	30.6 °C	30 °C
28.2 °C	34.4 °C	29 °C
25.8 °C	25.8 °C	27.4 °C

Max: 34.4 °C
Medel: 28.9 °C


31 °C	26.6 °C	28 °C
28.6 °C	25.2 °C	26.6 °C
26 °C	25 °C	24.8 °C

Max: 31 °C
Medel: 26.9 °C

Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


33.2 °C	33.2 °C	32.8 °C
27.2 °C	37 °C	26.4 °C
22 °C	19.6 °C	21.2 °C

Max: 37 °C
Medel: 28.1 °C


48.4 °C	32 °C	43.4 °C
33.6 °C	28.6 °C	34 °C
22.4 °C	22.8 °C	23.2 °C

Max: 48.4 °C
Medel: 32 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI WT75 8SM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	1.43 / 2.22 Watt
Låg belastning	29 / 37.1 / 39.5 Watt
Hög belastning	133.6 / 310 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI WT75 8SM E-2176G, Quadro P5200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI WT72-6QM E3-1505M v5, Quadro M5000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-9%	39%	-0%	43%	23%
Idle Minimum *	29	23.3 20%	14.8 49%	28.5 2%	9.6 67%	24.8 14%
Idle Average *	37.1	33.5 10%	20.4 45%	36.7 1%	20.5 45%	29.7 20%
Idle Maximum *	39.5	38.4 3%	21.5 46%	37.8 4%	22.9 42%	30.1 24%
Load Average *	133.6	114.1 15%	98.4 26%	144.6 -8%	96.8 28%	105.2 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	236.3	339.5 -44%		218.9 7%
Load Maximum *	310	485.1 -56%	213.5 31%	336 -8%	202.1 35%	192.2 38%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		4tim 00min
WiFi Websurfing		3tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 9min

	MSI WT75 8SM E-2176G, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, 96 Wh	Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh	Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, 91 Wh	MSI WT72-6QM E3-1505M v5, Quadro M5000M, Wh
Battery Runtime		-27%	126%	-19%	85%	31%
Reader / Idle	240	155 -35%	811 238%		685 185%	413 72%
WiFi v1.3	223	127 -43%	496 122%	180 -19%	379 70%	245 10%
Load	69	66 -4%	82 19%		70 1%	76 10%

För

+ löstagbar LGA 1151 CPU och MXM 3.0 GPU

+ kraftiga interna högtalare med subwoofer

+ Xeon CPU; stöd för ECC-RAM

+ innanmäte som är lätt att utföra service på

+ manuellt grafikbyte

+ snabb SD-kortläsare

Emot

- service kräver att man bryter ett förseglingsklistermärke

- kort batteritid; tar lång tid att ladda

- grynig matt skärm

- klumpig AC-adapter

- ingen VGA-port

Recension av MSI WT75. Recensionsex från MSI

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Den största anledningen att ha en MSI WT75 istället för någon annan bärbar arbetsstation är att den är lätt att utföra service på. Fem lagringsplatser, fyra SODIMM-platser och löstagbar CPU och GPU gör den mer uthållig jämfört med den "fastare" naturen hos Lenovos, HP:s och Dells lösningar. Om du planerar att mecka en del med din arbetsstation så kommer WT75 att passa bra.

Prestandan är bra med resonabla kärntemperaturer på ~80 C och ingen strypning sker när den ligger under 100 procent belastning. Det är dock synd att Xeon-processorn inte kan köras i Turbo Boost-klockfrekvenser under längre stunder. Utgå från att processorn bara kommer att ligga en aning över sin basklockfrekvens vid extrem beräkningsstress.

Garantin är ytterligare en faktor som är värd att överväga. MSI kan inte riktigt matcha det breda utbudet av garanti- och servicealternativ som erbjuds av Lenovos ThinkPad P-serie, HP ZBook eller Dell Precision, då dessa har en fördel tack vare sin stora ekonomiska skala. Återigen, du bör känna dig bekväm med att utföra din egen service på WT75 om så krävs.

De övriga klagomålen är små. Ljudet är antagligen av bättre kvalitet än vad de flesta arbetsstationsanvändare behöver och detsamma gäller de extra ljudanslutningarna. 4K UHD-skärmen ser en aning grynig ut, de bakre portarna är svåra att se, lock och gångjärn kunde varit fastare och systemet är ganska stort, till och med för en laptop på 17 tum. I övrigt är kärnprestandan och servicemöjligheterna överlägsna det du får från de större tillverkarna.

Kraftfull, uppgraderingsbar och oförlåtligt tjock - Monstret MSI WT75 passar bäst åt den som vill ha frihet att lätt kunna utföra service på så många delar av sin mobila arbetsstation som möjligt.

MSI WT75 8SM - 01/08/2020 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

75 / 98 → 77%

Tangentbord

89%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

68 / 80 → 85%

Vikt

48 / 10-66 → 68%

Batteri

56 / 95 → 59%

Skärm

86%

Spelprestanda

94%

Programprestanda

93%

Workstation

94%

Temperatur

90 / 95 → 95%

Ljudnivå

68 / 90 → 75%

Audio

84%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Medel

77%

85%

Workstation - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5246 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI WT75 8SM (Xeon E-2176G, Quadro P5200) Arbetsstation (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2019-05- 9 (Update: 2019-05- 9)