Test: Motorola Moto E7 Plus - Uppdaterad mobil från instegsklassen (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Motorola Moto E7 Plus SD 460, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 74.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Motorola Moto E7 Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320 | 180 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 78 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 SD 662, Adreno 610 | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
| 74.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M11 SD 450, Adreno 506 | 197 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 471 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1239:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.285
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E7 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Poco M3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy M11 PLS TFT LCD, 1560x720, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -14% | 19% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 59 ? | 61 ? -3% | 44 ? 25% | 49 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 40 ? | 50 ? -25% | 28 ? 30% | 32 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 870 ? | 893 ? 3% | ||
| Screen | -9% | 35% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 471 | 470 0% | 465 -1% | 430 -9% |
| Brightness | 446 | 445 0% | 428 -4% | 406 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 89 -1% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.35 8% | 0.21 45% | 0.52 -37% |
| Contrast | 1239 | 1343 8% | 2214 79% | 827 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.97 | 5.69 -43% | 1.7 57% | 4.55 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.47 | 13.4 -79% | 3.5 53% | 7.93 -6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 3.5 33% | 2.4 54% | 5.4 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.285 96% | 2.264 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.103 105% |
| CCT | 7791 83% | 7089 92% | 6664 98% | 7793 83% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-10% | 27% /
31% | 3% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 870 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 870 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 870 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (5316 - 5869, n=5) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11 - 11, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (6 - 6.1, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (6.5 - 6.8, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M11 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (2 - 2, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus | Motorola Moto E7 | Xiaomi Poco M3 | Samsung Galaxy M11 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | 38% | -17% | -23% | 398% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 313.8 | 261 -17% | 509 62% | 297.6 -5% | 274 ? -13% | 1893 ? 503% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 192.7 | 101 -48% | 269.2 40% | 81.4 -58% | 176.6 ? -8% | 1478 ? 667% |
| Random Read 4KB | 92.4 | 58 -37% | 147 59% | 73.9 -20% | 59.4 ? -36% | 278 ? 201% |
| Random Write 4KB | 97.1 | 13.5 -86% | 154.1 59% | 78.1 -20% | 32.2 ? -67% | 312 ? 221% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.5 ? | 81.5 ? 0% | 85.9 ? 5% | 82.4 ? 1% | 77.4 ? -5% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.4 ? | 62 ? -4% | 64.2 ? 0% | 64.5 ? 0% | 58.3 ? -9% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 75.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 75.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 75.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Moto E7 Plus 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto E7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M11 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 946 | 867 -8% | 1249 32% | 880 -7% | 997 ? 5% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Instegstelefon med mervärde
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Motorolas Moto E7 Plus kostar 400 kronor mer än Moto E7, men du får i gengäld en hel del uppgraderingar: Till att börja med har den en betydligt snabbare SoC, dubbelt så mycket lagring, längre batteritid, en bättre högtalare och aningen snabbare WiFi. Således står sig Moto E7 Plus bra i sitt prisskikt, även om Xiaomi Poco M3 har lite mer att erbjuda här och där.
Gillar man mobila betallösningar kan det vara att problem att den saknar NFC, men faktum är att det är väldig sällsynt i det här prisskiktet. På samma gång är kameran skaplig och ger bra resultat vid låg ljusnivå. Men vi måste återigen vara tydliga med att man inte kan förvänta sig mirakel för såpass lite pengar, även om resultatet är skapligt tack vare pixel-binning.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus är en bra smartphone på instegsnivå som inte har några större svagheter.
Så om du väljer mellan Moto E7 och E7 Plus och inte är orolig för de extra slantarna borde du definitivt välja Moto E7 Plus. Även om man bara letar efter en gedigen och billig instegstelefon kommer man få valuta för pengarna.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
- 02/13/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
