Test: Nokia 9 PureView Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 648 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Nokia 9 PureView P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4" | Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | 8% | -6% | -74% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 648 | 656 1% | 597 -8% | 567 -12% | 543 -16% | 593 -8% |
| Brightness | 641 | 659 3% | 608 -5% | 559 -13% | 542 -15% | 587 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 92 0% | 94 2% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 2.2 4% | 3.3 -43% | 6.6 -187% | 0.9 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 2.8 46% | 3.6 31% | 6.1 -17% | 11 -112% | 2 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.7 23% | 1.6 27% | 1.1 50% | 4.7 -114% | 1.5 32% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 1.998 110% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 1.835 120% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6592 99% | 6487 100% | 6268 104% | 6495 100% | 6817 95% | 6548 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 235.8 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| LG V40 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.7 - 48.9, n=4) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Firefox 67) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (46.4 - 54.1, n=4) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 9 PureView | Huawei P30 Pro | LG V40 ThinQ | Sony Xperia XZ3 | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 191% | 3% | 1% | 204% | 155% | 589% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 728 | 849 17% | 690 -5% | 681 -6% | 666 -9% | 760 ? 4% | 1894 ? 160% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 200.3 | 250.8 25% | 203.9 2% | 196.1 -2% | 388.3 94% | 297 ? 48% | 1476 ? 637% |
| Random Read 4KB | 132 | 174.4 32% | 130.1 -1% | 135.7 3% | 149.4 13% | 152.9 ? 16% | 278 ? 111% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20.18 | 159.2 689% | 23.36 16% | 22.22 10% | 165.3 719% | 131.6 ? 552% | 312 ? 1446% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.6 ? | 84.9 ? | 34.2 ? | 76 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 68.2 ? | 63.1 ? | 30.4 ? | 59.6 ? |
Dead Trigger 2
PUBG Mobile
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 9 PureView audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.06 / 0.56 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.65 / 2.34 / 2.43 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.02 / 6.51 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 11% | 24% | 30% | 27% | 10% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.65 | 1 39% | 0.68 59% | 0.87 47% | 0.8 52% | 0.67 59% | 0.862 ? 48% | 0.883 ? 46% |
| Idle Average * | 2.34 | 1.4 40% | 2.6 -11% | 1.39 41% | 1.2 49% | 1.26 46% | 1.728 ? 26% | 1.467 ? 37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.43 | 1.7 30% | 2.77 -14% | 1.41 42% | 1.5 38% | 1.29 47% | 2.07 ? 15% | 1.621 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 5.02 | 4.6 8% | 3.74 25% | 3.96 21% | 4.8 4% | 3.71 26% | 4.87 ? 3% | 6.58 ? -31% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.51 | 6.7 -3% | 6.82 -5% | 8.6 -32% | 6.2 5% | 9.3 -43% | 9.27 ? -42% | 9.91 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 19% | 66% | 11% | -14% | 20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1250 | 1305 4% | 1966 57% | 1140 -9% | 1270 2% | 1650 32% |
| H.264 | 732 | 801 9% | 1193 63% | 659 -10% | 420 -43% | 1008 38% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 486 | 742 53% | 838 72% | 510 5% | 419 -14% | 546 12% |
| Load | 202 | 223 10% | 344 70% | 320 58% | 202 0% | 194 -4% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Det som började som en ambitiös idé slutade i besvikelse. Nokia 9 PureViews femdubbla kamera är definitivt inte speciell eller ens särskilt bra. Kamera-appen är dessutom långsam och oresponsiv, vilket ytterligare försämrar kamerans helhetsintryck.
Vi kan bara hoppas att HMD Global kommer att förbättra båda dessa saker med en mjukvaruuppdatering. Det är verkligen synd, för den innovativa idén att kombinera tre monokroma bilder med två RGB-foton har mycket potential. De häpnadsväckande bokeh-effekterna är ett levande bevis på det.
Nokia 9 PureView utnyttjar inte sin innovativa femdubbla kameradesign fullt ut. Således är det definitivt inte en av de bästa smartphone-kamerorna som finns att tillgå.
Om kamerans kvalitet är väldigt viktig för dig bör du leta någon annanstans. Xiaomis flaggskepp Mi 9 dyker upp i minnet och den råkar dessutom vara en hel del billigare.
Nokia 9 PureView lyckades ändå lämna ett skapligt intryck. Det högkvalitativa och IP67-certifierade aluminiumhöljet är värdigt en flaggskeppstelefon och tack vare Android One är uppdateringar för både funktioner och säkerhet garanterade under de kommande åren. Dessutom erbjuder LTE Cat. 16-modemet snabb mobil kommunikation. Telefonen har också ett bra och exakt GPS-modem, en riktigt ljusstark OLED-skärm och allmänt hög systemprestanda.
Men trots detta är listan över nackdelar helt enkelt för lång för en flaggskeppstelefon. Även om bristen på en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning kan hanteras med den medföljande USB C-adaptern så är andra problem svårare att svälja, som den tjurskalliga fingeravtrycksläsaren som ibland misslyckades helt med att känna igen våra fingrar och den jämförelsevis korta batteritiden.
Nokia 9 PureView
- 04/18/2019 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
