Test: OnePlus 3 (sammanfattning)
OnePlus 3 (3 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Kärna: 624 MHz
Minne
6 GB
, LPDDR4
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 401 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm 10 punkter, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, optic-AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB
, 52.49 GB ledigt
Vikt
161 g, Strömförsörjning: 100 g
Pris
399 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 475 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 431 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 419 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | 31% | -6% | 15% | 6% | 5% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 419 | 451 8% | 554 32% | 784 87% | 445 6% | 582 39% | 297 -29% | 583 39% |
| Brightness | 431 | 446 3% | 552 28% | 774 80% | 434 1% | 563 31% | 297 -31% | 560 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 96 14% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.46 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 3.84 6% | 1.59 61% | 6.5 -59% | 2.8 32% | 4.4 -7% | 2.67 35% | 3.55 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12 | 2.56 79% | 11.7 2% | 5.8 52% | 7.4 38% | 3.98 67% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.97 -20% | 2.01 39% | 8 -142% | 3.7 -12% | 4.8 -45% | 2.81 15% | 3.88 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.01 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6550 99% | 7283 89% | 6321 103% | 8699 75% | 7164 91% | 6175 105% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 58.07 -35% | 82.12 -8% | 68.08 -24% | 77.78 -13% | 66.31 -26% | 59.05 -34% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 90.14 -10% | 99.98 0% | 97.46 -3% | 99.44 -1% | 99.79 0% | 92.8 -7% | |
| Contrast | 1503 | 1823 | 1236 | 1532 | 1267 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Lightmark | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | Basemark X 1.1
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 35 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby |   0.07 / 0.27 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.57 / 1.24 / 1.36 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.92 / 10.53 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -4% | -13% | -19% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.63 -11% | 0.5 12% | 0.55 4% | 0.68 -19% | 0.87 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 1.24 | 1.1 11% | 1.9 -53% | 1.37 -10% | 1.49 -20% | 1.2 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.36 | 1.56 -15% | 2.2 -62% | 2.25 -65% | 1.91 -40% | 1.27 7% |
| Load Average * | 5.92 | 5.95 -1% | 3.2 46% | 6.24 -5% | 7.4 -25% | 4.69 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.53 | 6.7 36% | 6.4 39% | 9.12 13% | 9.71 8% | 5.63 47% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | OnePlus 2 mAh | Honor 7 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -30% | -26% | 16% | -14% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1338 | 1393 4% | 888 -34% | 1273 -5% | 1663 24% | 1655 24% | 1446 8% |
| H.264 | 847 | 580 -32% | 553 -35% | 648 -23% | 914 8% | 714 -16% | 776 -8% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 840 | 356 -58% | 484 -42% | 413 -51% | 732 -13% | 513 -39% | 530 -37% |
| Load | 268 | 229 -15% | 241 -10% | 203 -24% | 392 46% | 197 -26% | 263 -2% |
För
+ välbyggd
+ hög prestanda utan strypning
+ bra kamera
+ snabb lagring
+ snabbt WiFi
+ dual-SIM
+ USB Typ C
+ bra skärm
+ generöst med lagringsutrymme
+ snabbladdning
+ bra röstkvalitet med brusreducering
Emot
- Bara LTE Cat. 6
- frekvensband varierar regionalt
- ej minneskortplats
- ingen radio
- brusig högtalare
- oanvändbart sRGB-läge
Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här.
OnePlus 3 är en lyckad smartphone som inte bara erbjuder bra hårdvara, utan även ser bra ut och är välbyggd. Den har en snabb Snapdragon 820-krets, hela 6 GB RAM, fingeravtrycksläsare, stöd för dubbla SIM, NFC, en anständig kamera och snabbladdning – och den kan bli din för under 4 000 kr. Det finns knappast någon annan smartphone med samma ambitioner.
Även när man tittar på den kinesiska marknaden är alternativen få, särskilt inte med motsvarande kvalitet. Den starkaste utmanaren för närvarande är ZTE Axon 7. Fördelen med ZTE är att priset kommer att sjunka medan priserna på OnePlus brukar förbli oförändrade. Ett annat intressant alternativ är LG G5, vars pris redan har sjunkit avsevärt.
Allt med OnePlus 3 är inte perfekt och den utgör inget direkt hot mot marknadsledaren från Samsung. Skärmens upplösning och färgreproduktion räcker inte för det och kameran i S7 är minst en klass bättre, särskilt i dåliga ljusförhållanden. Anslutningar och sensorutrustning i OnePlus 3 är inte helt oklanderliga heller. LTE Cat.6 har varit standard sedan början av 2015 och mobilen är inte längre någon globetrotter, då frekvensbanden anpassas regionalt. Minneskortplats saknas och högtalaren är mindre imponerande.
Det här är visserligen invändningar på en mycket hög nivå – även om de tekniska aspekterna inte räcker till för att inta prispallen är OnePlus 3 en mycket tilltalande och prisvärd enhet.
OnePlus 3
- 07/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Price comparison
