Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 - Hur står den sig jämfört med RTX 2080 Max-Q?
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 300.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 939:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS B173ZAN01.0, IPS LED, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 4% | -0% | 39% | 38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.1 | 62.9 3% | 62.6 2% | 61.9 1% | 88.9 45% | 86.7 42% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.4 | 87.8 -2% | 93.5 5% | 86.3 -3% | 100 12% | 100 12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.5 | 63.9 2% | 64.7 4% | 62.9 1% | 99.7 60% | 99.4 59% |
| Response Times | -8% | -10% | -19% | -565% | -303% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.8 ? | 7.2 ? -6% | 7.2 ? -6% | 7.2 ? -6% | 60.8 ? -794% | 36 ? -429% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 9.6 ? -9% | 10 ? -14% | 11.6 ? -32% | 38.4 ? -336% | 24.4 ? -177% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 204.9 ? | ||||
| Screen | 7% | 17% | -34% | -45% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 300.4 | 288 -4% | 366 22% | 297.4 -1% | 230 -23% | 366 22% |
| Brightness | 289 | 287 -1% | 343 19% | 306 6% | 207 -28% | 349 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 80 -14% | 83 -11% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.2 37% | 0.29 9% | 0.31 3% | 0.2 37% | 0.46 -44% |
| Contrast | 939 | 1440 53% | 1262 34% | 959 2% | 1150 22% | 796 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 2.33 -0% | 1.51 35% | 4.08 -76% | 5.62 -142% | 2.9 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.81 | 5.34 -40% | 3.22 15% | 6.88 -81% | 10.24 -169% | 5.4 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.95 | 2.47 16% | 0.71 76% | 4 -36% | 3.1 -5% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.19 21% | 1.93 -29% | 4 -167% | 4.54 -203% | 3.5 -133% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.38 92% | 2.259 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6764 96% | 6710 97% | 6881 94% | 7205 90% | 6625 98% | 6616 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.4 | 57 -1% | 60 5% | 56 -2% | 88 53% | 88.1 53% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 88 -1% | 94 6% | 86 -3% | 100 12% | 100 12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
4% | 4% /
11% | -18% /
-26% | -190% /
-98% | -93% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4401 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5676 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5641 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 5% | 6% | -34% | -19% | |
| Seq Read | 1810 | 911 -50% | 2855 58% | 1427 -21% | 2599 44% |
| Seq Write | 1797 | 2347 31% | 2687 50% | 1610 -10% | 588 -67% |
| 4K Read | 48.43 | 53 9% | 30.31 -37% | 25.63 -47% | 37.57 -22% |
| 4K Write | 106 | 122.5 16% | 96.3 -9% | 84.2 -21% | 104.4 -2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1156 | 1577 36% | 1460 26% | 588 -49% | 1116 -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1748 | 1734 -1% | 1224 -30% | 732 -58% | 513 -71% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.08 -40% | 0.054 5% | 0.054 5% | 0.051 11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.031 11% | 0.038 -9% | 0.071 -103% | 0.036 -3% |
| Score Read | 1385 | 1721 24% | 1776 28% | 756 -45% | 1414 2% |
| Score Write | 2033 | 2091 3% | 1589 -22% | 978 -52% | 676 -67% |
| Score Total | 4135 | 4771 15% | 4259 3% | 2134 -48% | 2715 -34% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1984 | 2226 12% | 1489 -25% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 588 | 426.4 -27% | 514 -13% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 835 | 1152 38% | 893 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18741 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37458 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15132 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6608 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 320.8 | 278 | 246.3 | 153.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 279.4 | 196.4 | 118.5 | 65 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 130 | 97 | 92 | 81 |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -9% | -6% | -9% | -2% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29 -3% | 31 -10% | 28.2 -0% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 32 -13% | 32 -13% | 28.5 -1% | 31 -10% | 28.2 -0% | 29.4 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 33 -17% | 38 -35% | 30 -6% | 33 -17% | 30.8 -9% | 30.1 -7% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 47 -9% | 47 -9% | 51.5 -20% | 43 -0% | 42 2% | 36 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 49 -1% | 48 1% | 55.3 -14% | 55 -14% | 51 -5% | 37.6 22% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 51 4% | 49 8% | 55.3 -4% | 58 -9% | 53 1% | 42.2 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 43 / 53.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.76 / 1.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 16 / 21.7 / 26.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
105.6 / 225.3 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Liteon CA1-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -16% | -46% | -31% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 16.2 -1% | 18.2 -14% | 31 -94% | 24.6 -54% | 15.2 5% |
| Idle Average * | 21.7 | 20.4 6% | 23 -6% | 36 -66% | 33.1 -53% | 20.4 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 26.1 -0% | 33.1 -27% | 44 -69% | 37.2 -43% | 27.3 -5% |
| Load Average * | 105.6 | 96.5 9% | 124.8 -18% | 107 -1% | 124 -17% | 92.9 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 161.8 | 182.9 -13% | 180.8 -12% | 212 -31% | 180 -11% | 143 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 225.3 | 214.3 5% | 263 -17% | 258 -15% | 236.5 -5% | 190.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | 31% | -13% | -28% | -37% | 3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 272 | 230 -15% | 357 31% | 236 -13% | 197 -28% | 172 -37% | 280 3% |
| Reader / Idle | 298 | 461 | 249 | 253 | 295 | ||
| Load | 52 | 74 | 84 | 81 | 86 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
För 25.000 kronor är Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 dyrare än de flesta alternativ med samma GPU, såsom Asus ROG Scar II GL704GV, Zephyrus S GX701GV eller MSI GS75. Det högre priset bidrar inte bara till Razers starka och minimalistiska chassi utan också till ångkammarkylaren, UHS-III kortläsaren, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45 och WiFi 6-anslutbarhet, vilket man sällan ser på konkurrerande laptops med RTX 2060. Måla Blade rymdgrå och det finns en anledning till att den lätt kan misstas för en upphottad MacBook Pro.
En liten men viktig fördel med Blade Pro 17 är att dess RTX 2060 körs i högre klockfrekvenser än på andra bärbara datorer med samma GPU, vilket leder till en aning bättre prestanda i spel. Skillnaden är tillräckligt stor för att spelprestandan ska närma sig RTX 2070 Max-Q, vilket faktiskt gör Blade Pro 17 med RTX 2070 Max-Q till lite mindre av ett fynd. När man jämför RTX 2060-varianten med den RTX 2080 Max-Q utrustade motsvarigheten så har den sistnämnda 35 procent högre prestanda i utbyte mot 13 procent högre energiförbrukning. När det kommer till andra nyckelaspekter som batteritid, fläktljud och temperatur är de olika varianterna av Blade Pro 17 nästan likadana trots skillnaderna i grafikprestanda.
Blade Pro 17 visar upp den bästa sidan av GeForce RTX 2060. Extrafunktioner som fyrdubbla fläktar, ångkammarkylning, UHS-III kortläsare, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45 och WiFi 6-anslutbarhet finns inte på någon annan spellaptop med samma RTX 2060 GPU.
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
-
08/05/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
