Test: Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q) - 4K-skärmen, batteritiden och CPU-prestandan var en besvikelse (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.5 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 353 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1412:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | 2% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 69.9 9% | 66 3% | 66.2 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.8 | 99.2 4% | 97.9 2% | 97.2 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 71.5 9% | 67.3 2% | 67.1 2% |
| Response Times | 24% | 22% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62 ? | 47.6 ? 23% | 49.6 ? 20% | 45.2 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39 ? | 29.2 ? 25% | 30 ? 23% | 33.2 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 22730 ? | ||
| Screen | 17% | 17% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 353 | 549.8 56% | 384 9% | 422.6 20% |
| Brightness | 335 | 520 55% | 363 8% | 404 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 90 0% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.39 -56% | 0.17 32% | 0.35 -40% |
| Contrast | 1412 | 1410 0% | 2259 60% | 1207 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.12 52% | 3.5 20% | 1.02 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.21 | 3.66 49% | 5.5 24% | 3.06 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.37 -25% | 1 9% | 0.95 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 2.6 53% | 4.6 16% | 1 82% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7689 85% | 6884 94% | 6884 94% | 6502 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 65.4 7% | 62 2% | 62.1 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 99.7 4% | 97.7 2% | 97.1 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
16% | 14% /
15% | 14% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3029 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4099 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4484 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Lite-On CA3-8D512 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average Lite-On CA3-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -22% | 1% | -10% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 153 | 106.7 -30% | 128.4 -16% | 176.8 16% | 153 ? 0% |
| Read 4K | 59.5 | 49.94 -16% | 46.37 -22% | 48.38 -19% | 59.5 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 1608 | 1223 -24% | 1863 16% | 1332 -17% | 1608 ? 0% |
| Read Seq | 2293 | 1801 -21% | 2340 2% | 1644 -28% | 2293 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 497 | 325.3 -35% | 451.1 -9% | 440.6 -11% | 497 ? 0% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 544 | 551 1% | 415.3 -24% | 559 3% | 544 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1640 | 1224 -25% | 2985 82% | 1104 -33% | 1640 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3158 | 2350 -26% | 2565 -19% | 3481 10% | 3158 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9381 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2859 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (41.5 - 65.1, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 71, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 230.7 | 186.6 | 169.3 | 70.3 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 137.5 | 84.9 | 46.3 | 27.5 | 17.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 134.6 | 93 | 50.9 | 41.7 | 18.3 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 33.9 / 38.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7 °C / -12.6 F).
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.6 / 0.7 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 10.7 / 13.6 / 15.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
60 / 71 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 47% | 39% | 34% | -8% | 34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.7 | 2.6 76% | 3.2 70% | 5.9 45% | 7.75 ? 28% | 4.43 ? 59% |
| Idle Average * | 13.6 | 5.3 61% | 7 49% | 8.1 40% | 11.8 ? 13% | 7.58 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.7 | 7 55% | 8.9 43% | 11.2 29% | 16.6 ? -6% | 9.43 ? 40% |
| Load Average * | 60 | 43.1 28% | 47.6 21% | 44.3 26% | 75.2 ? -25% | 45.8 ? 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 64 | 43.1 33% | 41.9 35% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 71 | 49 31% | 63.1 11% | 50.2 29% | 105.5 ? -49% | 68.7 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 63% | 53% | 77% | 133% | |
| Reader / Idle | 500 | 1808 ? 262% | |||
| H.264 | 376 | 793 111% | 917 ? 144% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 329 | 537 63% | 636 93% | 583 77% | 729 ? 122% |
| Load | 114 | 64 -44% | 116.5 ? 2% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Razer Blade Stealth lyckas uppnå balans: Den är inte bara ultrakompakt; Razers ultrabook är dessutom riktigt kraftfull. Detta gäller dock bara GPU-prestandan – vi var inte nöjda med hur processorn presterade i modellen med ett Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Att begränsa CPU-prestandan var förstås ett medvetet val från Razers sida. Begränsningen på 15 W är tänkt att hålla värme- och ljudnivåerna låga, vilket man också lyckas med. Men vi förstår inte varför processorn är låst till 15W även när GPU:n inte är aktiv.
En annan viktig skillnad med den här modellen jämfört med iGPU-varianten av Razer Blade Stealth är 4K UHD-skärmen. Tyvärr upplevde vi att kvaliteten var en besvikelse. Det är inte en dålig skärm, men jämfört med FHD-skärmen från iGPU-varianten av Razer Blade har den inga andra fördelar utöver en högre upplösning och tryckkänslighet. På en del områden är det tvärtom: Den billigare FHD-skärmen är märkbart mer ljusstark än 4K-skärmen. Den högupplösta skärmen resulterar i ytterligare en nackdel: den har mycket högre energiförbrukning. Detta leder till kort batteritid, vilket är synd på en såpass liten laptop. Sist men inte minst måste vi återigen klaga på den korta standardgarantin som bara är på ett år.
Trots totalt sett lyxiga specifikationer kan vi inte rekommendera den här specifika varianten av Razer Blade Stealth. Den största anledningen är den medelmåttiga 4K-skärmen.
Därför kan vi inte rekommendera Razer Blade Stealth 13 – men det gäller bara varianten med 4K-skärm. Intresserade köpare bör istället ta en titt på FHD-varianten som använder samma GeForce GTX GPU. Den är billigare och kombinerar de bästa egenskaperna från Razer Blade Stealth med prestandan från en dedikerad GPU. Med lägre upplösning på skärmen bör den dessutom ha bättre batteritid.
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
- 11/11/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
