Test: Razer Phone 2017 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 436 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2725:1 (Svärta: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Razer Phone 2017 IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 8 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 9% | 26% | 42% | 45% | |
| Brightness middle | 436 | 559 28% | 425 -3% | 560 28% | 629 44% |
| Brightness | 417 | 538 29% | 423 1% | 562 35% | 636 53% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 93 1% | 94 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.38 -138% | |||
| Contrast | 2725 | 1471 -46% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.88 | 1.3 66% | 2.1 46% | 1.7 56% | 1.7 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.96 | 2.7 66% | 3.4 57% | 3.4 57% | 3.6 55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 1.8 69% | 2.5 57% | 1.6 72% | 2.4 59% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.25 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 7657 85% | 6797 96% | 6455 101% | 6435 101% | 6337 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6854 - 9927, n=20) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (5603 - 7510, n=20) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (52.9 - 80.4, n=19) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3086 - 14300, n=20) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2425 - 4813, n=19) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Phone 2017 | OnePlus 5T | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -0% | 262% | 80% | 739% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 732 | 699 -5% | 788 8% | 732 0% | 696 ? -5% | 1887 ? 158% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 202.5 | 203.4 0% | 194.2 -4% | 208.7 3% | 224 ? 11% | 1471 ? 626% |
| Random Read 4KB | 142.5 | 138.1 -3% | 127.2 -11% | 132.3 -7% | 137.2 ? -4% | 278 ? 95% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.3 | 20 40% | 15.27 7% | 164.4 1050% | 84.7 ? 492% | 311 ? 2075% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.4 | 71.1 ? -10% | 68.6 ? -14% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52.5 | 57.2 ? 9% | 52.2 ? -1% |
| Arena of Valor | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| min | |
| high HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| high HD | |
| Battle Bay | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| half resolution | |
| full resolution | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| full resolution | |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| minimal | |
| high | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| high | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | |
| Razer Phone 2017 | |
| low AA:0x AF:0x | |
| high AA:0x AF:0x | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| high AA:0x AF:0x | |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 30 fps | ||
| Battle Bay | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| half resolution | 121 fps | ||
| full resolution | 121 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 62 fps | ||
| high HD | 61 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| low, 0xAA, 0xAF | 91 fps | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 91 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.15 / 0.21 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.83 / 2.11 / 2.24 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.94 / 9.08 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 27% | 32% | 22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 0.72 13% | 0.58 30% | 0.68 18% | 0.85 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 2.11 | 2.45 -16% | 1.44 32% | 1.13 46% | 1.15 45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.24 | 2.52 -13% | 1.53 32% | 1.16 48% | 1.23 45% |
| Load Average * | 4.94 | 3.84 22% | 3.17 36% | 4.69 5% | 4.12 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.08 | 9.02 1% | 8.54 6% | 5.24 42% | 8.42 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -6% | -3% | 7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 762 | 657 -14% | 718 -6% | 736 -3% | 818 7% |
| Reader / Idle | 2085 | 1754 | 1565 | 1744 | |
| H.264 | 733 | 799 | 742 | 929 | |
| Load | 211 | 257 | 275 | 398 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
På den gamla tiden var gamers inlåsta i sina mörka rum tills Game Boy, Razer Phones gammel-gammel-gammel-farfar dök upp. Idag tillåter Razer Phone mobilt spelande på resan i 120 FPS och dessutom med utmärkt stereoljud. Den högupplösta skärmen är tillräckligt ljusstark, batteriet håller tillräckligt länge och kamerorna håller jämna steg med andra toppskikts-smartphones, och även om den inte är särskilt billig så är Razer Phone ändå betydligt billigare än Samsung Galaxy S9 eller iPhone 8.
Razer Phone är en kraftfull, uthållig och konservativt designad spelenhet att ta med på resan.
Dom två saker som har förvånat oss mest är telefonens avsaknad av en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning och det faktum att Razer har valt att inte inkludera ett headset i lådan. Samtalskvaliteten utan headset var ganska dålig och mikrofonen förvrängde ivrigt och snabbt våra röster. Telefonen strypte också hårdvaran en aning vid belastning. Allt det är dock hårklyveri och i slutändan så är Razer Phone en telefon av hög kvalitet för ett rimligt pris och kommer definitivt hitta en publik även bland andra än gamers.
Razer Phone 2017
- 03/27/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
