Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G - Den nya versionen är mer kraftfull (Sammanfattning)

Nya kraftfulla funktioner.

Redan efter ett halvår har det kommit en uppdaterad version av en av Samsungs mest populära mittenskiktsenheter: Vid en första anblick är det bara prestandan som förbättrats på Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, men vi tog en närmare titt i vårt test och upptäckte fler skillnader.
5G Android ARM Smartphone
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Galaxy A55 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Minne
6 GB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 405 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.4 x 159.9 x 75.1
Batteri
4500 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 64 MP f/​1.8, fasjämförande AF, OIS, LED-blixt, Video @2160p/​30fps (kamera 1); 12 MP, f/​2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 5 MP, f/​2.4, makrolins (kamera 3); 5 MP, f/​2.4, skärpedjup (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.2, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare på 15 Watt, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, IP67-certifierad; SAR: 0.878 W/​kg (Huvud), 0.842W/​kg (Kropp); A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
189 g
Pris
449 Kr
Länkar
Samsung kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.1 %
v7 (old)
10/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L		189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
v7 (old)
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619		189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9		189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650		207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642		159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Samsung Galaxy A52s
Samsung Galaxy A52s

Storleksjämförelse

❌
168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.3 MB/s -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s -65%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø25.9 (16.8-37.8)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird : Ø37.3 (26.4-47.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.9 (34.8-52.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (50.1-75.6)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.4 (16.9-85)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø86.8 (31.3-92.5)
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s +93%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s +93%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s +50%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
461 (433min - 470max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s +106%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s +106%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s +85%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
425 (413min - 432max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s -22%
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø425 (413-432)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø461 (433-470)
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Vägskäl
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Översikt
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Bro
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Bro
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Vägskäl
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Positionering – Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - FlowersMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle lens
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
17 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: 14.45 ∆E min: 4.96 - max: 20.88 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
35 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: 37.88 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 55.57 ∆E
751
cd/m²		746
cd/m²		769
cd/m²
747
cd/m²		736
cd/m²		764
cd/m²
743
cd/m²		739
cd/m²		763
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 769 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 750.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 736 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
138.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-4%
-28%
-71%
-16%
Brightness middle
736
744
1%
594
-19%
562
-24%
863
17%
Brightness
751
749
0%
594
-21%
535
-29%
860
15%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
99
3%
90
-6%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.18
2.2
-1%
2.74
-26%
3.99
-83%
3.2
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.69
7
-23%
6
-5%
9.74
-71%
5.2
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.1
-0%
4.2
-100%
6.5
-210%
3.9
-86%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.06 107%
2.278 97%
2.174 101%
2.33 94%
CCT
6563 99%
6516 100%
7322 89%
6882 94%
7299 89%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Antutu v9 | AnTuTu v8 | AImark | Basemark GPU 1.2 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
771 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=11)
781 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +29%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2808 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=11)
2882 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +18%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2216 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points -43%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points +103%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2216 - 2548, n=11)
2329 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)
6763 Points +205%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2359 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points -45%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points +100%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2207 - 2359, n=10)
2254 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)
7074 Points +200%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12625 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=10)
11553 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6352 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3902 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6326 - 6409, n=7)
6367 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7241 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4076 Points -44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7138 - 7276, n=7)
7221 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4442 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3394 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4410 - 4605, n=7)
4498 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6559 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6398 - 6703, n=7)
6584 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
7496 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points -43%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (7199 - 7618, n=7)
7489 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +163%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4563 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4224 - 6394, n=7)
4892 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4967 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2750 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4967 - 5096, n=9)
5032 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5140 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2603 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5134 - 5218, n=9)
5186 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4444 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3428 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4423 - 4723, n=9)
4539 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5355 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5032 - 5469, n=9)
5337 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5591 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points +82%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5103 - 5651, n=9)
5550 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4664 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4166 - 4942, n=9)
4710 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4250 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2582 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4002 - 4810, n=9)
4278 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5263 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2520 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (5263 - 5370, n=9)
5315 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2539 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2137 - 3523, n=9)
2578 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points +6%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2490 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points -56%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points +67%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2464 - 2505, n=10)
2483 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +14%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2485 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points -56%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points +67%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2321 - 2501, n=10)
2466 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points +203%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
690 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points +86%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (686 - 695, n=10)
691 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2053 Points +198%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
687 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points +83%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (681 - 690, n=10)
686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2051 Points +199%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
108 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps -51%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (60 - 116, n=11)
93 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps -20%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
132 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps -58%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps +35%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps +70%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (132 - 134, n=11)
132.7 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +112%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
69 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps -52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps +29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (59 - 69, n=11)
65.9 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +9%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
77 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps -57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps +61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps +70%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (77 - 79, n=11)
77.8 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +115%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps -49%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48 - 53, n=11)
49.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps -54%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps +38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps +64%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (56 - 58, n=11)
56.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +109%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -43%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps +46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps +68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (28 - 31, n=11)
28.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +71%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -52%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps +42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +73%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (33 - 34, n=11)
33.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +114%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps -40%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps +60%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps +63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (30 - 35, n=11)
31.5 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +65%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps +59%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps +68%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (34 - 39, n=11)
35.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +135%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps -42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps +63%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps +63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (19 - 22, n=11)
19.7 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +97%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps -42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps +62%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps +69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (13 - 14, n=11)
13.4 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +146%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
438254 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
393060 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points +55%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 540593, n=11)
501252 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +82%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
422597 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
334292 Points -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
534286 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
588115 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
468196 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (422597 - 452805, n=5)
436226 Points +3%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
139024 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points -69%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points -95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=6)
138766 Points 0%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1280x720 OpenGL Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
327.5 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
262.8 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  ()
328 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (175.5 - 549, n=10, last 2 years)
302 fps -8%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
48.57 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.4 fps +31%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
80.6 fps +66%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
55 (26.87min - 84.59max) fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (48.6 - 49.6, n=2)
49.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.08 - 13860, n=58, last 2 years)
324 fps +567%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
43.27 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
62.3 fps +44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
68.5 fps +58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49.69 (25.09min - 83.87max) fps +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (43.3 - 44.6, n=2)
43.9 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 9309, n=55, last 2 years)
241 fps +457%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
322.1 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
221.6 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
518 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
327.6 (128.58min - 2098.43max) fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (315 - 322, n=2)
318 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70.3 - 39496, n=58, last 2 years)
1363 fps +323%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
45.96 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71.3 fps +55%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
74.2 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
47.98 (24.754min - 71.53max) fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (46 - 46.9, n=2)
46.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.75 - 15712, n=58, last 2 years)
400 fps +770%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
39.55 fps
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
63.7 fps +61%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
63.8 fps +61%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
52.6 (25.32min - 86.8max) fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (39.6 - 41.4, n=2)
40.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 14706, n=57, last 2 years)
332 fps +739%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4349 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points -20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4079 - 5002, n=11)
4549 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +45%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9089 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points -31%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=11)
9736 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4269 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points +58%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=11)
4968 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +59%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6783 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points -41%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6594 - 6783, n=11)
6686 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +149%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1359 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1155 - 1534, n=11)
1336 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +15%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +68%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.2 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.8 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=11)
75.1 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
71.8 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
56.5 Points -21%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.9 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.7 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (102.6 - 155.3, n=7)
132.5 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
118.1 Points
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.8 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.3 Points -22%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +156%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min +38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=9)
56.2 runs/min +6%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chome 93)
53.2 runs/min
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min -6%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
45.44 runs/min -15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
107 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=10)
107 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points -23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +48%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=11)
27285 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
25119 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393 ms * -33%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93)
1802 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=11)
1620 ms * +10%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOnePlus Nord 2 5GMotorola Moto G100Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
77%
53%
19%
-25%
103%
Sequential Read 256KB
951
927
-3%
1827
92%
1730
82%
949
0%
760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113)
-20%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
93%
Sequential Write 256KB
486.5
484.6
0%
1256
158%
717
47%
710
46%
297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113)
-39%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
193%
Random Read 4KB
168.2
176.1
5%
223.7
33%
253.6
51%
207.9
24%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-9%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
65%
Random Write 4KB
192.5
179.2
-7%
239
24%
252.9
31%
206.9
7%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-32%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
61%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø97.7 (78-118)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 3.1.2a: Ø29.9 (25-31)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 3.1.2a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (55-61)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 (3150min - 3144max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % +1%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 (4109min - 4141max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (14.8min - 15max) %
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 % -38%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (4.14min - 4.15max) %
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82.1 (683min - 832max) % -18%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 (858min - 1289max) % -33%
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.8 (14.8-15)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø4.14 (4.14-4.15)
Hög belastning
 44.8 °C42.5 °C38.1 °C 
 45.4 °C42.7 °C38.7 °C 
 44.8 °C42.1 °C39.1 °C 
Max: 45.4 °C
Medel: 42 °C
35.4 °C40.5 °C40.2 °C
36.7 °C39.7 °C43.4 °C
36.2 °C41.6 °C45.2 °C
Max: 45.2 °C
Medel: 39.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2050.744.72541.338.7313130.64035.634.45038376330.125.88030.831.110023.523.512520.331.816020.34420016.249.925015.954.531513.959.740013.662.250013.564.563019.365.980016.566.6100013.968.312501473160013.277.1200013.277250014.271.331501670.6400017.265.3500017.966630018.567.8800019.169.31000019.865.31250019.355.71600020.159.2SPL28.883.6N1.154median 16.5median 65.3Delta37.339.642.434.734.424.726.623.521.642.433.528.425.523.925.920.425.115.331.62049.814.64813.153.61461.11160.310.363.11163.710.267.210.372.210.874.610.977.211.680.212.278.912.277.512.58113.477.513.177.11574.213.873.714.166.91659.424.7890.673.6median 13.1median 72.2211.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.6 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh		OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh		Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-13%
-23%
-11%
-21%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.92
23%
0.8
33%
0.9
25%
0.83
31%
1.106 ?(0.78 - 2.5, n=10)
8%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.78
-27%
1.2
14%
1.5
-7%
1.92
-37%
2.07 ?(1.13 - 5, n=10)
-48%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.81
-6%
1.6
6%
2.1
-24%
1.97
-16%
2.32 ?(1.44 - 5.6, n=10)
-36%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
3.6
3.86
-7%
5.7
-58%
6.7
-86%
3.84
-7%
4.17 ?(3.23 - 7.8, n=10)
-16%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-79%
Load Maximum *
6.9
6.14
11%
10.9
-58%
8.5
-23%
8.6
-25%
7.81 ?(6.29 - 14, n=10)
-13%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Energiförbrukning: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: Ø4.18 (1.199-9.15)

Energiförbrukning: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.28 (3.75-4.64)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.422 (1.21-1.736)
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
31tim 37min
WiFi Websurfing
12tim 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 29min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 9min
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh		OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh		Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Battery Runtime
-0%
6%
27%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1897
1917
1%
1926
2%
2846
50%
1509
-20%
H.264
1109
1052
-5%
1126
2%
1285
16%
1248
13%
WiFi v1.3
721
710
-2%
958
33%
1049
45%
734
2%
Load
309
324
5%
272
-12%
302
-2%
223
-28%

För

+ Hög prestanda
+ Snabb och ljusstark skärm
+ IP-certifiering
+ Lång batteritid
+ 3.5 mm port och USB-C kan användas som ljudutgång

Emot

- Den inkluderade laddaren är långsam
- Inget åtagande om framtida uppdateringar
- Långsam lagring
- Medelmåttig mottagningsstyrka

Omdöme – Snabbare och dyrare

Recension av Samsung Galaxy A52s. Recensionsex från:
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A52s. Recensionsex från:
cyberport.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vid en första anblick verkar Samsung Galaxy A52 5G och Galaxy A52s 5G vara identiska: höljet, kamerans prestanda, skärmen, högtalarna och batteritiden är väldigt lika.

Men en närmare titt avslöjar några skillnader: En ny SoC innebär mycket mer kraft, särskilt när det kommer till grafikprestanda och flerkärniga processor-scenarier. Den har dessutom snabbare WiFi.

Men man får stå ut med mycket högre temperaturer vid belastning. Kylsystemet verkar vara optimerat för det lite svagare chippet i Galaxy A52 5G. Priset på den nya modellen har också ökat lite med ca 200 kronor.

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G är en lite dyrare revidering som kommer med en skaplig prestandaökning.

Då den tidigare modellen redan är slutsåld på Samsungs hemsida är det fullt möjligt att Samsung helt enkelt inte lyckades få tag på tillräckligt med chips för Galaxy A52 5G, med tanke på rådande chip-brist, och bestämde sig därför för att göra en revidering lite tidigare.

Oavsett så är ökningen i prestanda trevlig och online märks det högre priset knappt alls, beroende på återförsäljare. Den irriterande svaga nätadaptern och den mindre flexibla kamerauppsättningen är dock fortfarande svagheter som även nya Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G lider av.

Däremot är den ljusstarka skärmen och IP-certifieringen fördelar som gör Samsungs smartphone till ett intressant val.

Det går att spara några kronor genom att välja OnePlus Nord 2 5G, som också har hög styrka och ännu snabbare laddning. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G är också en aning dyrare än Samsungs mittenskiktare och den är ett bra val för användare som letar efter en tunn och lätt mittenskiktsenhet.

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Design
87%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
51 / 70 → 73%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
50 / 64 → 78%
Programprestanda
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
66%
Medel
79%
85%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G - Den nya versionen är mer kraftfull (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2021-10- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)