Test: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G - Nästan för bra för en Lite-smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

Snabbare än Xiaomi Mi 11?!

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G är en tunn och lätt smartphone från mittenskiktet som kommer med nya Snapdragon 780G. Trots ett lägre pris lyckas den slå Xiaomi Mi 11 på en del områden.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/20/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Mi 11 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G 8 x 1.9 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 642

Minne

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.55 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Tryckkänslig, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, 240 Hz bilduppdatering, glansig: ja, HDR, 90 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ-C, Kortläsare: microSD-plats (delat, upp till 512GB, exFAT-stöd), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, OTG, IR-Sändare, Miracast

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.81 x 160.53 x 75.72

Batteri

4250 mAh Litiumjon

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.79, fasjämförande AF, dubbel LED-blixt) + 8.0 MP (f/2.2, vidvinkelslins) + 5.0 MP (f/2.4, makrolins)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24)

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dubbla, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Fodral, 33 W Laddare, USB-kabel, MiUI 12, 12 Månader Garanti, Widevine L1, fanless

Vikt

159 g

Pris

400 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.9 % v7 ^(old)	05/2021	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642	159 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
83 % v7 ^(old)	04/2021	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
82.5 % v7 ^(old)	03/2021	Oppo Find X3 Lite SD 765G, Adreno 620	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620	184 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.44"	2440x1080
85.4 % v7 ^(old)	05/2021	Motorola Moto G100 SD 870, Adreno 650	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2520x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Motorola Moto G100 Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Oppo Find X3 Lite OnePlus Nord DIN A6 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	50.3 MB/s +178%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	18.08 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.9 (34.8-52.4)

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø86.8 (31.3-92.5)

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	891 (847^min - 921^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	692 (643^min - 704^max) MBit/s -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 (618^min - 677^max) MBit/s -25%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	563 (275^min - 666^max) MBit/s -37%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	303 (164^min - 328^max) MBit/s -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	282 (275^min - 287^max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	874 (833^min - 900^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	788 (733^min - 833^max) MBit/s -10%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (563^min - 668^max) MBit/s -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (545^min - 662^max) MBit/s -28%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	342 (335^min - 348^max) MBit/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	331 (322^min - 337^max) MBit/s -62%

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (833-900)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (847-921)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Weitwinkel Weitwinkel Low Light 5x-Zoom Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


834 cd/m²	856 cd/m²	879 cd/m²
834 cd/m²	863 cd/m²	883 cd/m²
838 cd/m²	861 cd/m²	894 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Max: 894 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 860.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.01 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 863 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33

	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Oppo Find X3 Lite OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4"	Motorola Moto G100 IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen		3%	-15%	2%	-43%	17%
Brightness middle	863	744 -14%	569 -34%	529 -39%	562 -35%	584 -32%
Brightness	860	749 -13%	572 -33%	531 -38%	535 -38%	583 -32%
Brightness Distribution	93	98 5%	97 4%	94 1%	90 -3%	97 4%
Black Level *					0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	2.2 31%	3.2 -0%	2.53 21%	3.99 -25%	1.17 63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.2	7 -35%	6 -15%	4.52 13%	9.74 -87%	2.95 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	2.1 46%	4.3 -10%	1.7 56%	6.5 -67%	1.7 56%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.06 ^107%	2.23 ^99%	2.249 ^98%	2.174 ^101%	2.231 ^99%
CCT	7299 ^89%	6516 ^100%	6607 ^98%	6462 ^101%	6882 ^94%	6341 ^103%
Contrast					986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

367.6 Hz

≤ 68 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 68 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	809 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	636 Points -21%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	615 Points -24%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	611 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	972 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	673 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	809 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +23%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2998 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1878 Points -37%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1810 Points -40%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1966 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	2870 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1908 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2998 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +10%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2805 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1272 Points -55%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1172 Points -58%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1169 Points -58%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3369 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1183 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2805 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points +141%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2809 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1304 Points -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1231 Points -56%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1242 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3555 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1293 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2809 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points +152%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	9712 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10998 Points +13%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	11041 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	10876 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	14754 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8730 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	9712 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	10689 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9573 Points -10%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	9800 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9427 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	11166 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7786 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	10689 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	47838 Points
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	45872 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	45304 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	70216 Points
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69285 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	69506 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	22614 Points
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21016 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20429 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	6989 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3902 Points -44%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4606 Points -34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4665 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4693 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	6989 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	8588 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4076 Points -53%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5144 Points -40%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5171 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5832 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	8588 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	4233 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3394 Points -20%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3371 Points -20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3476 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3452 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	4233 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	5587 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4040 Points -28%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4783 Points -14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4815 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	8035 Points +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4893 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	5587 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	8380 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4239 Points -49%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5383 Points -36%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5357 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	13531 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5335 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	8380 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2567 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3469 Points +35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3441 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3555 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3318 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3492 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2567 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	5098 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2750 Points -46%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3299 Points -35%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3330 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3346 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	5098 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	6087 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2603 Points -57%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3286 Points -46%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3284 Points -46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3321 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	6087 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	3144 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3428 Points +9%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3345 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3503 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3425 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	3144 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	4478 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2927 Points -35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3535 Points -21%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3553 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	6960 Points +55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3605 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	4478 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	6148 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2802 Points -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3557 Points -42%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3556 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	10199 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3589 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	6148 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2354 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3466 Points +47%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3459 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3544 Points +51%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3296 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3495 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2354 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	4699 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2582 Points -45%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3094 Points -34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3108 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3130 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	4699 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	5785 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2520 Points -56%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3186 Points -45%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3185 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3198 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	5785 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	2795 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2823 Points +1%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2809 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2867 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2893 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	2795 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -3%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	3196 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1103 Points -65%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1681 Points -47%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	4166 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	3196 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)	2840 Points -11%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	3212 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1097 Points -66%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1681 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	4152 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	3212 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)	7533 Points +135%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	90 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	53 fps -41%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	59 fps -34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	60 fps -33%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	90 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	153 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	56 fps -63%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	96 fps -37%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	97 fps -37%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	224 fps +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	95 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	153 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +83%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	79 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	33 fps -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	53 fps -33%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps -37%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	89 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	79 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	90 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	33 fps -63%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	55 fps -39%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	55 fps -39%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	131 fps +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	49 fps -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	90 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +84%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	57 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	25 fps -56%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	37 fps -35%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps -40%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	79 fps +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	33 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	57 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +15%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	65 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	26 fps -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	37 fps -43%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps -42%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	92 fps +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	38 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	65 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +80%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	35 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	16 fps -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps -40%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps -46%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	35 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +37%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	16 fps -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps -47%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	57 fps +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	40 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +77%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	18 fps -57%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	23 fps -45%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	49 fps +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	42 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +18%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	50 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	20 fps -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	23 fps -54%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps -52%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	57 fps +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	24 fps -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	50 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +60%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	11 fps -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	15 fps -42%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	31 fps +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	13 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	26 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +44%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7.6 fps -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8.4 fps -53%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps -53%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	22 fps +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	18 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +78%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	468196 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	334292 Points -29%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	332305 Points -29%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	332074 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	588115 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	318669 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	468196 Points 0%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	6472 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	42629 Points +559%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	6472 Points 0%

Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	55 (26.87^min - 84.59^max) fps
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	80.6 fps +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	55 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.08 - 13860, n=58, last 2 years)	324 fps +489%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	49.69 (25.09^min - 83.87^max) fps
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	68.5 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	49.7 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.3 - 9309, n=55, last 2 years)	241 fps +385%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	327.6 (128.58^min - 2098.43^max) fps
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	518 fps +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	328 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70.3 - 39496, n=58, last 2 years)	1363 fps +316%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	47.98 (24.754^min - 71.53^max) fps
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	74.2 fps +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	48 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.75 - 15712, n=58, last 2 years)	400 fps +734%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	52.6 (25.32^min - 86.8^max) fps
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	63.8 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	52.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 14706, n=57, last 2 years)	332 fps +531%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	5068 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3459 Points -32%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4025 Points -21%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4054 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5916 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4094 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	5068 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +24%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	9557 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	6242 Points -35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	6774 Points -29%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6801 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	8852 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6069 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	9557 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +6%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	6172 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4211 Points -32%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5102 Points -17%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5296 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	6757 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5683 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	6172 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	7202 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3989 Points -45%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5206 Points -28%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5203 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	11431 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5201 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	7202 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +135%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192	1563 Points
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1365 Points -13%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1459 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1441 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1791 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1462 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	1563 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points 0%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)	91.2 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	75.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	75.8 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	58.7 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	56.5 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.2 Points -34%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)	160.9 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	135.7 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	135.7 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	94.5 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	93.6 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	92.3 Points -32%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	80 Points -41%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +92%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)	73.6 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	70.8 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	70.8 runs/min 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)	53.6 runs/min -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.7 runs/min -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	45.44 runs/min -36%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)	147 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	106 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	106 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	101 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	82 Points -23%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	78 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	76 Points -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)	34161 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	26943 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	26943 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	19143 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	18556 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	17730 Points -34%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	15422 Points -43%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)	2941 ms * -63%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	2835 ms * -57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	2602 ms * -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)	2393 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)	1802 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G ()	1802 ms * -0%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)	1589 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G	Oppo Find X3 Lite	OnePlus Nord	Motorola Moto G100	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-15%	-30%	32%	-22%	-17%	69%
Sequential Read 256KB	949	927 -2%	953 0%	956 1%	1730 82%	980 3%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -23%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 94%
Sequential Write 256KB	710	484.6 -32%	466.2 -34%	473.1 -33%	717 1%	476.9 -33%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -26%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 101%
Random Read 4KB	207.9	176.1 -15%	194.7 -6%	126.7 -39%	253.6 22%	156.4 -25%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -8%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 33%
Random Write 4KB	206.9	179.2 -13%	166 -20%	104.5 -49%	252.9 22%	138.5 -33%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -10%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 49%

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; Armajet: Ø30.1 (29-31)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø59.6 (56-61)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø59.8 (56-61)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (52-61)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.1 (36-61)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (56-61)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (37-41)

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 (3150^min - 3144^max) %
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.7 (1097^min - 1100^max) % 0%
Oppo Find X3 Lite Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.5 (1673^min - 1681^max) % 0%
Motorola Moto G100 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.2 (4109^min - 4141^max) % -1%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


39.1 °C	38.1 °C	35 °C
39 °C	37.2 °C	35.9 °C
37.6 °C	36.4 °C	34 °C

Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 36.9 °C


35 °C	38 °C	38.6 °C
34.5 °C	36.7 °C	39 °C
33.6 °C	37.2 °C	36.7 °C

Max: 39 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 27.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Låg belastning	0.83 / 1.92 / 1.97 Watt
Hög belastning	3.84 / 8.6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 4500 mAh	Oppo Find X3 Lite 4300 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Motorola Moto G100 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		6%	6%	-18%	-13%	-28%	0%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	0.83	0.92 -11%	0.92 -11%	1.8 -117%	0.9 -8%	1.5 -81%	0.83 ?() -0%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Average *	1.92	1.78 7%	1.97 -3%	2.1 -9%	1.5 22%	2.2 -15%	1.92 ?() -0%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	1.97	1.81 8%	1.98 -1%	2.3 -17%	2.1 -7%	2.9 -47%	1.97 ?() -0%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 18%
Load Average *	3.84	3.86 -1%	3.33 13%	3.4 11%	6.7 -74%	4.4 -15%	3.84 ?() -0%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -68%
Load Maximum *	8.6	6.14 29%	5.77 33%	5.2 40%	8.5 1%	7.2 16%	8.6 ?() -0%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		25tim 9min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20tim 48min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 43min

	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 4500 mAh	Oppo Find X3 Lite 4300 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Motorola Moto G100 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh
Battery Runtime		13%	14%	13%	43%	36%
Reader / Idle	1509	1917 27%		2003 33%	2846 89%	1683 12%
H.264	1248	1052 -16%		1064 -15%	1285 3%	1403 12%
WiFi v1.3	734	710 -3%	834 14%	869 18%	1049 43%	884 20%
Load	223	324 45%		261 17%	302 35%	448 101%

För

+ Ljusstark OLED-skärm med 90 Hz bilduppdatering

+ Tunn och lätt design

+ Snabbt WiFi

+ Kraftfull SoC

Emot

- Mediokra kameror

- Batteritiden vid belastning

Omdöme - Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G är en väldigt tunn och lätt mittenskiktstelefon. Huruvida detta är något bra går att debattera. Den tunna konstruktionen och den låga vikten kommer på bekostnad av batteritid, men gör också att Xiaomis telefon står ut från mängden.

Totalt sett ger Xiaomi Mi 11 en lite bättre upplevelse. Men vid vardagsbruk kommer de flesta inte ens notera att Mi 11 har en lite snabbare SoC eller en lite bättre skärm. Mi 11 Lite 5G är så kraftfull att den kan hantera de flesta uppgifterna nästan lika snabbt som Mi 11. Vidare känns OLED-skärmen med 90 Hz bilduppdatering väldigt responsiv, och skärmen är ungefär lika ljusstark som på Mi 11.

Mi 11 Lite har väldigt kraftfull hårdvara och är riktigt tunn – många intresserade köpare lär finna blandningen av kraft och tunn konstruktion lockande.

Mi 11 Lite 5G är inte en perfekt mittenskiktstelefon. Den saknar många funktioner – exempelvis trådlös laddning, sann Always on Display-funktionalitet, hög IP-certifiering samt optisk bildstabilisering – som andra mittenskiktstelefoner har. Som exempel kunde kameran på Mi 11 Lite 5G ha varit mycket bättre om den hade haft stöd för optisk bildstabilisering.

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Design

88%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

94%

Anslutningar

56 / 70 → 80%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

52 / 64 → 82%

Programprestanda

80 / 86 → 92%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

62%

Medel

80%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 81 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G - Nästan för bra för en Lite-smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 2021-05-20 (Update: 2021-05-20)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

More articles related to this device

Price comparison