Test: Sony Xperia 5 III - En bra lätt och kompakt smartphone med variabel fokus (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2021 | Sony Xperia 5 III SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.10" | 2520x1080 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Xiaomi Mi 11 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 196 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.81" | 3200x1440 | |
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2021 | OnePlus 9 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 192 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | 06/2021 | Asus Zenfone 8 Flip SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 230 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 89.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14 | 169 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2400x1080 |
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraWeitwinkelkameraLow Light
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.193
| Sony Xperia 5 III OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1" | Xiaomi Mi 11 LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.8" | OnePlus 9 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Asus Zenfone 8 Flip Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S21 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 42% | 49% | 9% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 840 52% | 731 32% | 689 24% | 790 43% |
| Brightness | 559 | 845 51% | 739 32% | 686 23% | 793 42% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 98 3% | 96 1% | 96 1% | 97 2% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.22 | 1.2 46% | 0.59 73% | 3.1 -40% | 2.2 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.94 | 2.7 55% | 1.3 78% | 5.7 4% | 4.2 29% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 2 44% | 0.9 75% | 2.2 39% | 1.6 56% |
| Gamma | 2.193 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.243 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7000 93% | 6492 100% | 6573 99% | 6684 97% | 6497 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 490.2 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 490.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 490.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (36 - 105, n=20) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (69 - 126, n=20) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (171404 - 264766, n=15) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 125.1, n=13) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
| OnePlus 9 (MS Edge) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip (Chrome 92) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 223, n=19) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
| OnePlus 9 (MS Edge) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip (Chrome 92) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 47543, n=20) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
| OnePlus 9 (Chrome89) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
| OnePlus 9 (Chrome89) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (891 - 1841, n=20) | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip (Chrome 92) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III (Chrome93) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 5 III | Xiaomi Mi 11 | OnePlus 9 | Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | Samsung Galaxy S21 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -3% | 9% | 19% | -20% | 34% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1593 | 1615 1% | 1872 18% | 1798 13% | 1648 3% | 1520 ? -5% | 1863 ? 17% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 740 | 754 2% | 739 0% | 797 8% | 1095 48% | 546 ? -26% | 1446 ? 95% |
| Random Read 4KB | 253.4 | 278.5 10% | 225.4 -11% | 288.4 14% | 309.7 22% | 206 ? -19% | 278 ? 10% |
| Random Write 4KB | 271.3 | 289.3 7% | 221.4 -18% | 277.7 2% | 282.6 4% | 193.9 ? -29% | 309 ? 14% |
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
| OnePlus 9 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III | |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia 5 III audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.8 / 2.6 / 3.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.3 / 11.5 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia 5 III 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 4600 mAh | OnePlus 9 4500 mAh | Asus Zenfone 8 Flip 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 20% | 24% | 22% | 27% | 27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 1.57 13% | 0.9 50% | 1.05 42% | 1.1 39% | 1.066 ? 41% | 0.885 ? 51% |
| Idle Average * | 2.6 | 1.92 26% | 1.7 35% | 1.41 46% | 1.61 38% | 1.58 ? 39% | 1.451 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.1 | 1.94 37% | 2.7 13% | 1.81 42% | 1.78 43% | 1.733 ? 44% | 1.608 ? 48% |
| Load Average * | 5.3 | 6.32 -19% | 5.4 -2% | 6.44 -22% | 6.47 -22% | 5.46 ? -3% | 6.55 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 11.65 -1% | 11.1 3% | 10.23 11% | 10.12 12% | 9.79 ? 15% | 9.92 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Energiförbrukning: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energiförbrukning: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
| Sony Xperia 5 III 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 4600 mAh | OnePlus 9 4500 mAh | Asus Zenfone 8 Flip 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 727 | 527 -28% | 854 17% | 556 -24% | 544 -25% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Sony Xperia 5 III
Sony Xperia 5 III utskiljer sig genom att vara en konkurrenskraftig helhet i ett riktigt kompakt och således väldigt bekvämt hölje. Men med den kompakta konstruktionen får man också kompromissa en del jämfört med andra toppskiktstelefoner som Xiaomi Mi 11. Likt sin föregångare har Xperia 5 III bred infattning runt OLED-skärmen, som dessutom bara har 1080p-upplösning. Att den saknar stöd för Qi är också något som inte matchar den här prisklassens moderna standard.
Den som letar efter en kompakt toppskikts-smartphone får inte missa Xperia 5 III. Men det finns ett annat intressant alternativ i form av den betydligt billigare Asus Zenfone 8.
Dessutom leder den kompakta konstruktionen troligen till dålig kylprestanda, för värmeutvecklingen på Xperia 5 III får nog anses kritisk. I synnerhet blir glasbaksidan snabbt väldigt varm när man kör krävande appar eller när man spelar.
Sony Xperia 5 III
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
