Test: Xiaomi Mi A3 - Pris/Prestanda-Kungens återkomst! (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Nokia 4.2 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 348 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1" | Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Mi 6X LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 15% | 14% | 34% | -3% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 348 | 455 31% | 471 35% | 427 23% | 459 32% | 445 28% |
Brightness | 355 | 456 28% | 453 28% | 415 17% | 441 24% | 424 19% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 94 3% | 84 -8% | 91 0% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.47 | 0.26 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.86 | 4.43 24% | 5.5 6% | 1.95 67% | 5.8 1% | 5.9 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.6 | 6.81 56% | 7.95 49% | 4.47 71% | 10.7 31% | 9.3 40% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 5.4 -50% | 5 -39% | 2.3 36% | 7.3 -103% | 6.8 -89% |
Gamma | 2.232 99% | 2.248 98% | 2.326 95% | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7051 92% | 7336 89% | 7654 85% | 6414 101% | 7984 81% | 8443 77% |
Contrast | 784 | 942 | 2135 | 977 | 1712 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 219 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 219 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 219 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 () | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi A3 | Honor 20 Lite | Motorola Moto G7 | Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 | Xiaomi Mi 6X | Nokia 4.2 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | -7% | -19% | -43% | -45% | 8% | 305% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 502 | 288.1 -43% | 297 -41% | 295.4 -41% | 272 -46% | 220.4 -56% | 696 ? 39% | 1839 ? 266% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 184 | 200.9 9% | 216 17% | 152.8 -17% | 203.7 11% | 18.17 -90% | 224 ? 22% | 1425 ? 674% |
Random Read 4KB | 126.9 | 38.7 -70% | 69.3 -45% | 40.3 -68% | 73 -42% | 17.51 -86% | 137.2 ? 8% | 277 ? 118% |
Random Write 4KB | 117.4 | 73.1 -38% | 75.6 -36% | 77.3 -34% | 6.89 -94% | 4.31 -96% | 84.7 ? -28% | 309 ? 163% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 67.8 ? | 75.7 ? 12% | 86.9 ? 28% | 76.3 ? 13% | 86.7 ? 28% | 68.6 ? 1% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.1 ? | 66.9 ? 34% | 66.8 ? 33% | 66.7 ? 33% | 65.9 ? 32% | 52.2 ? 4% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (126% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.8 / 2 / 3.3 Watt |
Hög belastning |
4.1 / 7.7 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | 1% | 13% | 14% | 23% | 6% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.9 -13% | 1.1 -38% | 0.8 -0% | 0.65 19% | 0.74 7% | 1.017 ? -27% | 0.894 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 2 | 1.6 20% | 1.8 10% | 1.2 40% | 1.94 3% | 1.9 5% | 1.893 ? 5% | 1.456 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 3.3 | 2.2 33% | 2.6 21% | 2.3 30% | 1.97 40% | 2.21 33% | 2.36 ? 28% | 1.616 ? 51% |
Load Average * | 4.1 | 6 -46% | 4.2 -2% | 4.5 -10% | 4.65 -13% | 3.04 26% | 3.77 ? 8% | 6.45 ? -57% |
Load Maximum * | 7.7 | 9.1 -18% | 6.8 12% | 7.3 5% | 5.93 23% | 4.15 46% | 6.66 ? 14% | 9.8 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -30% | -19% | -33% | -41% | -29% | |
Reader / Idle | 1724 | 1548 -10% | 1346 -22% | 1046 -39% | ||
H.264 | 1023 | 819 -20% | 536 -48% | 608 -41% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 985 | 685 -30% | 798 -19% | 523 -47% | 495 -50% | 696 -29% |
Load | 297 | 219 -26% | 249 -16% | 192 -35% |
För
Emot
Verdict – Mostly more, but sometimes less
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Frågan vi ställde oss i början av testet är inte så lätt att besvara: Har Mi A3 förbättrats eller försämrats jämfört med sin föregångare? Det finns tecken på båda fallen. Å ena sidan har vi en lågupplöst skärm, en viss sänkning i 3D-prestanda och högre energiförbrukning. Å andra sidan har den en modernare design, betydligt längre batteritid, bättre kamerautrustning och en förbättrad högtalare.
Mi A3 lider också av haltande WLAN, vilket Xiaomi snabbt får ta och fixa med en uppdatering, för annars går det knappt att använda telefonen till appar som använder WLAN-kommunikation såsom Skype.
På en del sätt är Xiaomi Mi A3 bättre än sin föregångare. Men Xiaomi får snabbt ta och fixa problemen med haltande WLAN genom en uppdatering.
Konkurrenterna får hålla sig på tårna, för till ett pris av 2.000 kronor finns det knappt någon som har så mycket datorkraft, en OLED-skärm, ett batteri som håller i evigheter och dessutom en modern design. I slutändan väger fördelarna över även om föregångaren Mi A2 fortfarande har ett bättre förhållande mellan pris och prestanda eftersom den för tillfället kostar 500 kronor mindre.
Observera: Xiaomi Mi A3 är en av de första telefonerna som vi utvärderat utifrån nya Version 7 av vårt omdömessystem. Eftersom en del kriterier blivit striktare och en del gränser har flyttats så att framtida enheter inte kommer att spränga skalan är omdömen givna enligt Version 7 lägre än i tidigare tester. Under de kommande veckorna utvärderar vi de viktigaste enheterna med det nya systemet så du enkelt kan jämföra dem.
Xiaomi Mi A3
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt