Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G - Billig 5G-telefon med stort batteri (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3 | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
79.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
80.2 % v7 (old) | 05/2021 | Realme 8 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
80.6 % v7 (old) | 05/2021 | Nokia X20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 220 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Low-light
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 550 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1719:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme 8 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Nokia X20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -53% | -81% | -63% | -85% | |
Brightness middle | 550 | 572 4% | 543 -1% | 576 5% | 646 17% |
Brightness | 515 | 540 5% | 512 -1% | 550 7% | 617 20% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 85 -1% | 91 6% | 89 3% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.42 -31% | 0.63 -97% | 0.7 -119% | 0.7 -119% |
Contrast | 1719 | 1362 -21% | 862 -50% | 823 -52% | 923 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.1 -128% | 4.9 -172% | 3.58 -99% | 5.71 -217% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 11.2 -261% | 8.6 -177% | 6.95 -124% | 8.9 -187% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.5 -0% | 6.3 -152% | 5.7 -128% | 6.2 -148% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.141 103% | 2.122 104% |
CCT | 6326 103% | 6525 100% | 8120 80% | 7922 82% | 8256 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench ML | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (215 - 1418, n=12, last 2 years) | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 2842, n=12, last 2 years) | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (344 - 3638, n=10, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (249843 - 261067, n=3) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Nokia X20 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (4108 - 12011, n=5) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8) | |
Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (69.5 - 78.4, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chome 90) | |
Realme 8 5G (Chome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93) | |
Realme 8 5G (Chrome 90) | |
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G | Realme 8 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T | Nokia X20 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 13% | -3% | 1% | -52% | -9% | 13% | 132% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 939 | 913 -3% | 969 3% | 858 -9% | 315.8 -66% | 489.3 -48% | 728 ? -22% | 1839 ? 96% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 398 | 483.5 21% | 201 -49% | 381.7 -4% | 173.9 -56% | 462.7 16% | 527 ? 32% | 1425 ? 258% |
Random Read 4KB | 151.6 | 171.1 13% | 192 27% | 174.6 15% | 90.4 -40% | 165.4 9% | 191.7 ? 26% | 277 ? 83% |
Random Write 4KB | 162.8 | 197 21% | 175 7% | 167.1 3% | 91.2 -44% | 144.6 -11% | 185.8 ? 14% | 309 ? 90% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.21 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.71 / 2.08 / 2.13 Watt |
Hög belastning |
3.44 / 5.58 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -36% | 7% | -13% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.71 | 0.68 4% | 0.64 10% | 0.62 13% | 0.841 ? -18% | 0.894 ? -26% |
Idle Average * | 2.08 | 2.16 -4% | 1.95 6% | 1.77 15% | 2.1 ? -1% | 1.456 ? 30% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.13 | 2.2 -3% | 1.98 7% | 1.8 15% | 2.26 ? -6% | 1.616 ? 24% |
Load Average * | 3.44 | 3.63 -6% | 6.77 -97% | 3.42 1% | 4.39 ? -28% | 6.45 ? -88% |
Load Maximum * | 5.58 | 5.78 -4% | 11.42 -105% | 6.14 -10% | 6.21 ? -11% | 9.8 ? -76% |
* ... smaller is better
Energiförbrukning: Geekbench, GFXBench och tomgång (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Realme 8 5G 5000 mAh | Nokia X20 4470 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | 14% | -1% | -21% | |
Reader / Idle | 2976 | 3564 20% | 2958 -1% | ||
H.264 | 1013 | 1216 20% | 1323 31% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1113 | 1133 2% | 1235 11% | 1104 -1% | 879 -21% |
Load | 341 | 302 -11% | 393 15% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Bra enklare 5G-enhet
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G är ett billigt och väldigt lockande steg in i 5G-världen och kostar under 2.000 kronor. Hårdvaran är i det stora hela komplett och inkluderar en snabb mittenskikts-SoC, ett kraftfullt batteri, FM-radio, microSD-stöd och NFC. Det enda vi kan kritisera är att den saknar notis-LED och fullfjädrat stöd för dual-SIM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G visade sig vara en hyfsat komplett instegstelefon.
Kameran förtjänar också viss kritik. Huvudsensorn nådde inte upp till sin potential i vårt test, särskilt i fråga om videoinspelning, och de två extra linserna tillför inte något direkt värde vid vardagsbruk.
På den punkten ligger Galaxy A32 5G betydligt bättre till. Den kompromissar däremot i fråga om skärmupplösning och bilduppdatering. realme 8 5G är också ett spännande alternativ som påminner mycket om Note 10 5G om vi tittar på specifikationerna, men som istället använder ColorOS, som är fritt från reklam, och har fullständigt stöd för dual-SIM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- 06/18/2021 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt