Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro - Drömskärm till reapris för den som inte behöver 5G (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2021 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 193 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.1 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 215 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Oppo A73 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | OnePlus Nord N10 5G SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.49" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Motorola Moto G 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 212 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleLow light5x zoom Ultra wide angle
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 653 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Oppo A73 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | OnePlus Nord N10 5G IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G 5G LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -60% | -134% | -76% | -57% | -31% | -36% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 653 | 606 -7% | 543 -17% | 527 -19% | 450 -31% | 586 -10% | 623 -5% | 610 -7% |
| Brightness | 651 | 574 -12% | 512 -21% | 499 -23% | 422 -35% | 565 -13% | 600 -8% | 579 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 85 -13% | 87 -11% | 89 -9% | 88 -10% | 93 -5% | 92 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.37 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.4 -100% | 4.9 -308% | 3.5 -192% | 2.67 -123% | 1.74 -45% | 1.8 -50% | 1.8 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 5.3 -83% | 8.6 -197% | 7.3 -152% | 6.76 -133% | 4.09 -41% | 4.7 -62% | 3 -3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.5 -150% | 6.3 -250% | 2.9 -61% | 2 -11% | 3 -67% | 3.3 -83% | 2.5 -39% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.274 97% | 2.244 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6426 101% | 6224 104% | 8120 80% | 6502 100% | 6859 95% | 6000 108% | 6712 97% | 6864 95% |
| Contrast | 1377 | 862 | 1387 | 789 | 961 | 1154 | 1649 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 490.2 Hz | ≤ 54 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 490.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 54 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 490.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (49.5 - 53.4, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (89.8 - 92.4, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (41.4 - 43.9, n=3) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (71 - 73, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17293 - 17817, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87) | |
| Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2673 - 2832, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Oppo A73 5G | OnePlus Nord N10 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 51% | 40% | -5% | 4% | 23% | -16% | 56% | 54% | 238% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 512 | 938 83% | 858 68% | 860 68% | 865 69% | 822 61% | 506 -1% | 927 81% | 728 ? 42% | 1887 ? 269% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 268 | 463.5 73% | 381.7 42% | 193 -28% | 187.2 -30% | 243 -9% | 173.1 -35% | 484.6 81% | 527 ? 97% | 1471 ? 449% |
| Random Read 4KB | 146.5 | 176.6 21% | 174.6 19% | 102.2 -30% | 137 -6% | 157.8 8% | 123.4 -16% | 176.1 20% | 191.7 ? 31% | 278 ? 90% |
| Random Write 4KB | 126.7 | 162.3 28% | 167.1 32% | 88.1 -30% | 106 -16% | 167.8 32% | 112.6 -11% | 179.2 41% | 185.8 ? 47% | 311 ? 145% |
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo A73 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.05 / 1.8 / 1.85 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.2 / 6.29 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5020 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G 4820 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | OnePlus Nord N10 5G 4300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | -24% | 17% | -12% | -26% | -21% | -7% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.05 | 0.5 52% | 0.64 39% | 0.58 45% | 0.9 14% | 1.3 -24% | 0.93 11% | 0.93 ? 11% | 0.88 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.1 -17% | 1.95 -8% | 1.86 -3% | 1.6 11% | 1.5 17% | 2.47 -37% | 2.09 ? -16% | 1.444 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.85 | 2.13 -15% | 1.98 -7% | 1.88 -2% | 2.1 -14% | 2.1 -14% | 2.51 -36% | 2.13 ? -15% | 1.6 ? 14% |
| Load Average * | 4.2 | 5.39 -28% | 6.77 -61% | 3.1 26% | 6.2 -48% | 7 -67% | 5.62 -34% | 4.6 ? -10% | 6.57 ? -56% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.29 | 7.4 -18% | 11.42 -82% | 5.01 20% | 7.8 -24% | 8.9 -41% | 6.93 -10% | 6.5 ? -3% | 9.91 ? -58% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5020 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G 4820 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | OnePlus Nord N10 5G 4300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | 52% | 89% | 23% | 40% | 27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1489 | 2870 93% | 2958 99% | 2539 71% | 2427 63% | ||
| H.264 | 1232 | 1234 0% | 1323 7% | 1154 -6% | 1188 -4% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 753 | 1096 46% | 1235 64% | 1426 89% | 974 29% | 1056 40% | 1116 48% |
| Load | 283 | 250 -12% | 393 39% | 278 -2% | 280 -1% |
För
Emot
Omdöme: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro - Kungen över mittenskiktsskärmar har fått ett namn
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med Redmi Note 10 Pro har Xiaomi lyckats skapa en lyckad och välavrundad mittenskiktstelefon med fokus på skärmen. Den nya Redmi Note Pro-serien kostar 300 kronor mer än förra årets modell, som dock låg på en klart lägre nivå skärmmässigt med sin 60 Hz IPS-panel. Det är på det området Redmi Note 10 Pro istället övertygar på alla sätt. 120 Hz-panelen är inte bara riktigt smidig och kontrastrik utan också väldigt ljusstark.
Dessutom erbjuder Xiaomis telefon en bra kamera på 108 MP, stereohögtalare, en snabb fingeravtrycksläsare samt en tilltalande konfiguration. Batteritiden var också skapligt i ljuset av 120 Hz-skärmen, särskilt då telefonen går riktigt snabbt att ladda tack vare den medföljande nätadaptern på 33 Watt.
En av få svaga punkter hos Redmi Note 10 Pro är att den saknar stöd för 5G. WiFi-modulen och UFS-lagringen kunde också varit en aning snabbare.
Den som klarar sig utan 5G får en riktigt bra och dessutom billig mittenskiktstelefon i form av Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
