Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Brand: Xiaomi

Quo Vadis.

Den Kinesiska telefonen Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 heter nu - på grund av Xiaomis nya marknadsföringsstrategier - bara Redmi Note 7. Den är svår att kategorisera då den har den mest högupplösta kameran som för tillfället finns i någon smartphone och en relativt svag Snapdragon 660. Vi har testat den första officiella telefonen från sub-märket Redmi för att avslöja dess sanna potential.

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Sabrina Hartmann (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 03/26/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Chinese Tech Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Redmi Note 12 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260, Åtta kärnor, 64 Bit

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 512

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.30 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, USB Typ C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Fingeravtrycksläsare, USB Typ C 2.0

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, FDD LTE: B1,B3,B5,B7,B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 159.21 x 75.21

Batteri

4000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Dual: 48MP (Samsung GM1, 1/2", 0.8 µm, f/1.8) PDAF + 5MP (f/2.4) djupsensor, Dual-LED, 1080p@30/60/120fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix HDR, AI-porträttläge, Video 1080p@30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, CHN AC-adapter, USB-laddare, Silikonhölje (+ EU-adapter och USB OTG-kabel), MIUI 10.2, Systemspråk: Engelska, Kinesiska; Game Speed Booster, 12 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, Infraröd, OTG, Wireless Display, Quick charge 4.0, fanless

Vikt

186 g, Strömförsörjning: 76 g

Pris

227 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Högtalaren mellan skärmen och det yttre chassit

Storleksjämförelse

Nokia 7 Plus Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Huawei P20 Lite DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 MBit/s +158%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	346 MBit/s +45%
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	307 MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	285 (142^min - 294^max) MBit/s +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	238 (189^min - 285^max) MBit/s
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	233 MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 MBit/s +76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	356 (342^min - 371^max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	350 (327^min - 361^max) MBit/s
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	281 MBit/s -20%
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s -29%
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	198 MBit/s -43%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø350 (327-361)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (342-371)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø238 (189-285)

Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (142-294)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


531 cd/m²	558 cd/m²	565 cd/m²
512 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	562 cd/m²
518 cd/m²	537 cd/m²	539 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 565 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 540.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 541 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1639:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3"	Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.7"	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Screen		-20%	-47%	-16%	-43%	-15%
Brightness middle	541	421 -22%	528 -2%	458 -15%	675 25%	429 -21%
Brightness	540	389 -28%	525 -3%	463 -14%	650 20%	432 -20%
Brightness Distribution	91	85 -7%	89 -2%	92 1%	92 1%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.33	0.33 -0%	0.51 -55%	0.22 33%	0.46 -39%
Contrast	1639	1276 -22%	1035 -37%	2082 27%	1467 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.7	3.4 -26%	4.7 -74%	4 -48%	5.9 -119%	3.39 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.6	5.9 -28%	8.9 -93%	7.4 -61%	9.5 -107%	5.25 -14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	3.9 -26%	6.4 -106%	4.7 -52%	6.6 -113%	3.3 -6%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.36 ^93%	2.238 ^98%
CCT	6853 ^95%	7330 ^89%	7987 ^81%	7425 ^88%	7846 ^83%	7135 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2336 Hz

≤ 18 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27.6 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1639 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1621 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	935 Points -43%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1646 Points 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1579 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2441 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)	1598 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)	5507 Points +236%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5913 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5893 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3749 Points -37%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5867 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5856 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8548 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)	5694 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)	15246 Points +158%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5576 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5640 Points +1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3116 Points -44%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5688 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14299 Points +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)	5524 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 24524, n=59, last 2 years)	12211 Points +119%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6870 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6274 Points -9%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5704 Points -17%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6825 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6332 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8967 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=11)	6676 Points -3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6187 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6052 Points -2%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	4793 Points -23%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6077 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5965 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7360 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6426, n=13)	6050 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26308 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	26605 Points +1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	12048 Points -54%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26610 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26175 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	57711 Points +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=12)	25633 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29496 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29116 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	11713 Points -60%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29333 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29306 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77003 Points +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=12)	28454 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	20437 Points +7%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	13387 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	20085 Points +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19050 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30765 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=12)	19093 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2062 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	138 Points -93%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2035 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2059 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4529 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2104, n=13)	2021 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1925 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1929 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	109 Points -94%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1895 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1938 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6554 Points +240%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1986, n=13)	1893 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2834 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2719 Points -4%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1760 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2734 Points -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2638 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2176 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=13)	2672 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2142 Points +3%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	704 Points -66%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2114 Points +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2151 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4232 Points +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1887 - 2161, n=13)	2062 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +436%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2006 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2015 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	604 Points -70%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1980 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2024 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5922 Points +195%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1734 - 2033, n=13)	1942 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +882%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2772 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2751 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1671 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2768 Points 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2756 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2145 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2238 - 2815, n=13)	2695 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1358 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1365 Points +1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	257 Points -81%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1332 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1361 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3197 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1124 - 1374, n=15)	1328 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)	3088 Points +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1189 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1193 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	207 Points -83%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1161 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1196 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3742 Points +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1206, n=14)	1172 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)	3272 Points +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2708 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2759 Points +2%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1757 Points -35%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2749 Points +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2628 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2118 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=14)	2587 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)	3285 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1436 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1438 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	482 Points -66%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1441 Points 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1432 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3512 Points +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1270 - 1442, n=14)	1400 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)	7911 Points +451%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1262 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1265 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	401 Points -68%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1239 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1268 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4209 Points +234%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1134 - 1268, n=14)	1237 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)	11758 Points +832%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2768 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2758 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1638 Points -41%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2789 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2615 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2227 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2121 - 2797, n=14)	2662 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)	4659 Points +68%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	44 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	47 fps +7%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	19 fps -57%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	48 fps +9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	51 fps +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 59, n=14)	48.1 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +97%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps -2%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	19 fps -63%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	50 fps -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	46 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	102 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=14)	48.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	286 fps +461%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps +5%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	8.9 fps -55%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	22 fps +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	22 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	51 fps +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 40, n=14)	22.6 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +282%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	22 fps -4%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	8.7 fps -62%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=14)	22.1 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	169.3 fps +636%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	13 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps +8%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5.6 fps -57%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps +15%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	14 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29 fps +123%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 30, n=15)	14.7 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.4 fps +411%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5.2 fps -65%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	14 fps -7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.2 - 15, n=14)	13.6 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120 fps +700%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.8 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.4 fps +8%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3.3 fps -58%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps +17%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.6 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	24 fps +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 18, n=15)	9.13 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.5 fps +522%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9 fps -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3.1 fps -66%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.3 fps -9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	25 fps +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8 - 9.1, n=14)	8.84 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.1 fps +692%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.6 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.1 fps +7%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.2 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 15, n=9)	8.86 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.4 fps +576%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.7 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.5 fps -2%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.6 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.9 - 8.8, n=9)	8.57 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	81.6 fps +838%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	4.8 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5.1 fps +6%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5.2 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4.7 - 10, n=9)	5.68 fps +18%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.3 fps +698%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	3.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3.2 fps 0%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	3.2 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3 - 3.3, n=9)	3.17 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +928%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	143352 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	143551 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	88550 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	141701 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	140875 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	288062 Points +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)	137699 Points -4%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	118368 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	118773 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	68232 Points -42%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	117165 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	115834 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	232931 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)	116194 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2342 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1445 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2369 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2394 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3923 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=12)	2307 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +172%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5141 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5237 Points +2%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3109 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	4976 Points -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5048 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6556 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=11)	4927 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +98%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2332 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2269 Points -3%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1930 Points -17%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2503 Points +7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2494 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3521 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=11)	2349 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +193%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2308 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2293 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	848 Points -63%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2298 Points 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2279 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7965 Points +245%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=11)	2241 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +651%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1086 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1086 Points 0%
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	858 Points -21%
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1101 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1146 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1288 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1334, n=11)	1114 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +44%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	80.9 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	54.7 Points
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	53.9 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	52.9 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12)	52 Points -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	49.4 Points -10%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	23.42 Points -57%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +252%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	14617 Points +37%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	10945 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	10679 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	10378 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14)	9973 Points -7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	9582 Points -10%
Huawei P20 Lite	4191 Points -61%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	10788 ms * -173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13)	4115 ms * -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	4094 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	3948 ms *
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	3937 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	3880 ms * +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	2317 ms * +41%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +61%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +144%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	63 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	62 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	61 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	58 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9)	57.1 Points -6%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	34 Points -44%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	251 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	174 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	171 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)	170.9 Points -2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	168 Points -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)	159 Points -9%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	86 Points -51%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite	Huawei P20 Lite	Nokia 7 Plus	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	53%	-1%	-7%	62%	8%	806%
Sequential Read 256KB	283.4	282.6 0%	293.9 4%	283.1 0%	280.8 -1%	692 144%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -3%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 557%
Sequential Write 256KB	204.7	172.4 -16%	198.3 -3%	211.6 3%	204.8 0%	205.2 0%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -14%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 606%
Random Read 4KB	82.9	81.3 -2%	48.19 -42%	54.7 -34%	51.3 -38%	135.2 63%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -28%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) 235%
Random Write 4KB	16.06	18.75 17%	71.1 343%	19.62 22%	15.43 -4%	22.65 41%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 99%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 1824%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	82.2 -1%	83.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%		77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 16%	62.3 5%	61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%		58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -2%

Asphalt 9 - Legends - Jämförelse

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø28 (24-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø28.2 (26-30)

Subway Surfers - Jämförelse

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7; 1.100.0: Ø59.7 (51-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.8 °C	32.8 °C	31.4 °C
33.1 °C	32.7 °C	32.2 °C
32.5 °C	32.9 °C	31.4 °C

Max: 33.8 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C


28.8 °C	31.1 °C	33.9 °C
28 °C	31.2 °C	34.2 °C
29.2 °C	31.1 °C	33.6 °C

Max: 34.2 °C
Medel: 31.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastning	0.61 / 1.95 / 2.03 Watt
Hög belastning	4.56 / 9.15 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		1%	-3%	3%	-1%	-69%	-32%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.56 8%	0.98 -61%	0.65 -7%	0.63 -3%	1.8 -195%	1.052 ?(0.56 - 2.9, n=14) -72%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Average *	1.95	1.99 -2%	2 -3%	1.76 10%	2.16 -11%	2.9 -49%	2.62 ?(1.4 - 8.6, n=14) -34%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 26%
Idle Maximum *	2.03	2.05 -1%	2.11 -4%	1.78 12%	2.18 -7%	3.5 -72%	2.88 ?(1.54 - 8.9, n=14) -42%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	4.56	4.62 -1%	3.9 14%	4.47 2%	4.48 2%	4.8 -5%	5.1 ?(3.47 - 9.4, n=14) -12%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -44%
Load Maximum *	9.15	8.94 2%	5.62 39%	9.13 -0%	7.87 14%	11.2 -22%	9.08 ?(5.93 - 18.5, n=14) 1%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		32tim 30min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15tim 40min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 19min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-29%	-35%	-22%	-31%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1950	1678 -14%	750 -62%	1703 -13%	1374 -30%	1401 -28%
H.264	940	662 -30%	470 -50%	706 -25%	658 -30%	921 -2%
WiFi v1.3	768	547 -29%	582 -24%	672 -12%	605 -21%	694 -10%
Load	259	150 -42%	247 -5%	158 -39%	145 -44%	191 -26%

För

+ kamera med upplösning på 48 MP

+ utmärkt uthållighet

+ i princip kantlös skärm

+ utökningsbar lagring

+ headset både genom USB Typ C och 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

+ prydligt chassi

+ dual-SIM

Emot

- hybridplats: antingen dual-SIM eller lagringsexpansion

- systemspråkets engelska (CHN-modellen)

- ingen IP-certifiering

- inget stöd för DRM L1

- inget stöd för NFC

- få LTE-band

- monohögtalare

- kameran sticker märkbart ut från höljet

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Så hur står sig Xiaomi-telefonen med den höga kameraupplösningen och den i övrigt genomsnittliga hårdvaran mot sina konkurrenter?

Note 7 har ett tydligt övertag över P20 Lite. Den presterar bättre inte bara i fråga om rå prestanda utan även i områden som WiFi-prestanda och batteritid.

Qualcomm-konkurrensen är ganska jämnt matchad. För mellan 2.000 och 2.500 kronor beroende på lagringskonfiguration så är priserna jämförbara med vad Note 7 kostar. Således handlar valet om detaljer som extra funktioner eller estetik, även om ingen av de andra tre kandidaterna kan rå på Note i fråga om kameraupplösning.

När vi genomförde testet kostade 64 GB-versionen av Xiaomi Mi 8 fortfarande 3.500 kronor och modellen med 128 GB kostade bara runt 100 - 150 kr mer. Utöver det högre priset behöver Mi 8:s prestanda utvärderas med en lägre uthållighet i åtanke, vilket är anledningen till att vi inte kan ge ett definitivt svar vid skrivande stund.

Redmi Note 7 är en bra mittenskiktstelefon, kameran på 48 MP är dess definierande egenskap.

I ett vakuum kan vi uppskatta Xiaomis funktionella MIUI, som erbjuder mer än vad vi kan täcka i den här recensionen. Men med det sagt så kommer den Kinesiska modellen också med mycket onödig mjukvara och en del av AI-funktionerna kan tydligen inte användas i Europa.

Framåt slutet av recensionen fick vi information om de tre nu tillgängliga versionerna av Redmi Note 7:

Redmi Note 7 China: kamera på 48 MP, upp till 6 GB RAM, inget stöd för LTE band 20
Redmi Note 7 Global India: kamera på 12 MP, upp till 4 GB RAM, LTE band 20
Redmi Note 7 Global Europe: kamera på 48 MP, upp till 4 GB RAM, LTE band 20

Detta bör göra den eleganta Kinesiska telefonen ännu mer tilltalande i Tyskland och övriga Europa.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - 11/04/2019 v7 ^(old)
Inge Schwabe

Design

78%

Tangentbord

66 / 75 → 88%

Mus

82%

Anslutningar

45 / 70 → 64%

Vikt

89%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

16 / 64 → 25%

Programprestanda

56 / 86 → 65%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 85%

Camera

60%

Medel

72%

77%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Inge Schwabe, 2019-03-26 (Update: 2019-03-26)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Asphalt 9 - Legends - Jämförelse

Subway Surfers - Jämförelse

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison