XMG Neo 17 E24 recension - Snabb bärbar dator för spel med vattenkylning som tillval

Name: SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Brand: SCHENKER

RTX 4080 bärbar dator och mekaniskt tangentbord.

Med XMG Neo 17 får du en fullblodsspelare som kan utrustas med de snabbaste komponenterna på marknaden. Ett mekaniskt Cherry-tangentbord och ett externt vattenkylningssystem finns också som tillval, vilket inte bara sänker temperaturerna utan också bakgrundsljudet.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Thunderbolt Windows

Utlåtande - XMG Neo 17 fokuserar på spelprestanda

XMG Neo 17 presenterar sig i testet som en kraftfull bärbar speldator med ett uppenbart fokus på komponenternas maximala prestanda. Intel Core i9-14900HX används som processor i alla konfigurationer, medan de dedikerade Nvidia GPU:erna kan överklockas. Resultatet är en av de snabbaste bärbara RTX 4080-datorerna som vi har testat hittills. Detta ger tillräcklig prestanda för den snabba 240 Hz QHD-panelen, som också är mycket lämplig för spel. Kretsen för den externa Oasis-vattenkylningen (tillval) har förbättrats och täcker nu även processorn. Resultatet är betydligt lägre temperaturer och därmed en lägre ljudnivå när du spelar.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Spelaren gör också bra ifrån sig på andra områden: det finns tillräckligt med portar, höljet är av god kvalitet och det mekaniska Cherry-tangentbordet (tillval) är mycket bra, men också mycket högljutt. RAM/SSD-kapaciteten kan också konfigureras och det är inga problem att uppgradera vid ett senare tillfälle. Den bärbara 17-tumsdatorn är relativt stor och väger knappt 3 kg, vilket inte är någon lättvikt. Kylaggregatet gör ett bra jobb även utan Oasis vattenkylning, men fläktarna blir väldigt högljudda när man spelar och då bör man använda hörlurar.

När det gäller pris är mer än 3 000 euro naturligtvis inget fynd, men det beror främst på GeForce GPU. Om du letar efter en fullblodsspelare och också vill dra nytta av vattenkylningen är XMG Neo 17 definitivt ett bra val.

För

+ QHD+ skärm (16:10, 240 Hz, G-Sync)

+ hög systemprestanda

+ robust metallhölje

+ Avancerad Optimus

+ 2x SO-DIMM/2x M.2-2280

+ Termisk förening av flytande metall

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ mekaniskt tangentbord

+ vattenkylning finns som tillval

Emot

- högljudda fläktar när du spelar

- enstaka spole som gnisslar

- högt mekaniskt tangentbord

- ingen Wi-Fi 7

Pris och tillgänglighet

Schenker Neo 17 E24 kan konfigureras och beställas direkt från Bestware. Startpriset är 1 949 euro för konfigurationen med den bärbara datorn RTX 4060 och 2 924 euro för den bärbara datorn RTX 4080.

Jämförelse av möjliga alternativ

Image	Model / Review	Geizhals	Weight	Height	Display
1. 84.6%	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 3189€	2.9 kg	27 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS
2. 89.2% ^{v7 (old)}	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 4000 Euro	2.9 kg	36 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS
3. 80.4%	HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 1900€	2.8 kg	30.1 mm	17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS
4. 85.2% ^{v7 (old)}	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 2048 GB SSD	Listenpreis 4500 USD	3.4 kg	24.9 mm	17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS
5. 88.3% ^{v7 (old)}	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 2048 GB SSD	Listenpreis 3600 USD	3 kg	23 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS

Utlåtande - XMG Neo 17 fokuserar på spelprestanda
Specifikationer
Väska & utrustning
Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt Cherry-tangentbord
Skärm - QHD med 240 Hz
Prestanda - Raptor Lake-HX
Utsläpp & Energi
Notebookcheck övergripande betyg

Med XMG Neo 17 E24 erbjuder Schenker en kraftfull 17-tums gaming notebook med en 240 Hz QHD-panel (G-Sync). Processorn är alltid Intels Core i9-14900HX och för grafikkortet har du valet mellan Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 bärbar dator och alla andra modeller upp till GeForce RTX 4090 bärbar dator. RAM/SSD-minnet kan konfigureras i stor utsträckning och förutom ett mekaniskt tangentbord finns också det externa Oasis-vattenkylsystemet som tillval, vilket kan öka den bärbara datorns kylkapacitet avsevärt.

Vår testenhet är utrustad med den dedikerade GeForce RTX 4080 bärbar dator GPU, 32 GB RAM och en 1 TB SSD från Samsung, vilket ökar priset inklusive det mekaniska Cherry-tangentbordet till 3 182 euro (baspris 1 948 euro). Vi tar också en titt på några riktmärken för Neo 17 med RTX 4090 bärbar dator i kombination med Oasis vattenkylningssystem (199 euro).

Specifikationer

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 (XMG Neo 17 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 MB VRAM, Kärna: 2385 MHz, Minne: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 565.90, Advanced Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, max. 64 GB

Skärm

17.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 178 PPI, NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Hårddisk

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 864 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Anslutningar

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kortläsare: SDXC

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 27 x 381.7 x 272.8

Batteri

99 Wh, 6450 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, mechanical, Cherry MX ULP Tactile, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 330W PSU, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.893 kg, Strömförsörjning: 974 g

Pris

3189 Kr

Länkar

SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Väska & utrustning

Vi känner redan till det svarta metallchassit och den gummerade basenheten från Medion Erazer Beastsom är baserad på samma barebone. Det finns en LED-remsa på baksidan och en XMG-logotyp på locket, men annars finns det inga irriterande klistermärken från tillverkaren. Den övergripande stabiliteten är mycket bra, men med en vikt på strax under 2,9 kg och en höjd på 2,7 cm är Neo 17 inte heller lätt. Det nedre höljet kan tas bort relativt enkelt (de två skruvarna på vattenkylningsanslutningen måste också lossas) och du kan komma åt alla viktiga komponenter, inklusive RAM, 2x M.2-2280 SSD eller WLAN-modulen.

Utbudet av anslutningar är mycket omfattande eftersom, förutom tillräckliga USB-portar, Thunderbolt 4 och HDMI också finns tillgängliga. Kortläsaren uppnår genomsnittliga överföringshastigheter i kombination med vårt referenskort (Angelbird AV Pro V60) och 1080p-webbkameran tar tillräckligt skarpa bilder. Wi-Fi 6E-modulen från Intel (AX211) uppnår mycket bra överföringshastigheter tillsammans med vår referensrouter, men den senaste Wi-Fi 7-standarden stöds ännu inte.

Jämförelse av storlek

HP Omen 17-db0079ng Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s), hörlursutgång, mikrofoningång

Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)

Baksida: anslutning för Oasis vattenkylning (självtätande), USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge 1.4, G-Sync-kompatibel, Power Delivery)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	77.2 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s 0%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	61.4 MB/s -20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	90 MB/s +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	88.7 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	80.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1679 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1715 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	636 (min: 501) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1650 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼96%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	850 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	930 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼54%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	793 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1214 (min: 1011) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	691 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1227 (min: 1158) MBit/s ∼84%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1145 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1194 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1192 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1465 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼100%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1679 (1606-1733)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1650-1733)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24: 13.28 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 22.57 ∆E

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt Cherry-tangentbord

Neo 17 finns tillgänglig med antingen ett konventionellt membrantangentbord med 4 belysningszoner eller ett mekaniskt tangentbord med individuell tangentbelysning (tilläggsavgift på 95 euro). Detta är också installerat i vår testenhet, där taktila brytare från Cherry (MX ULP) används. Dessa lever upp till sitt namn och erbjuder en mycket taktil och exakt skrivkänsla, men knapparna är också mycket högljudda. Detta bör definitivt tas med i beräkningen när du gör ditt val. Den stora ClickPad i glas (15 x 9,5 cm) fungerar utan problem.

Skärm - QHD med 240 Hz

Minimal blödning från bakgrundsbelysningen

Den 17-tums IPS-skärmen med matt yta erbjuder en upplösning på 2.560 x 1.600 pixlar (16:10) och är mycket lämplig för spel tack vare de snabba svarstiderna och frekvensen på 240 Hz. Den subjektiva bildkvaliteten är också mycket bra. PWM används inte och det finns inga större problem med halos.

Den genomsnittliga ljusstyrkan är cirka 400 cd/m², även om svartnivån är något högre på 0,39. Detta resulterar i ett maximalt kontrastförhållande på drygt 1.000:1, vilket är bra. Panelen bör vara ännu ljusare utomhus. Fabrikskalibreringen är redan mycket bra, men vi kan optimera skärmen ytterligare med vår kalibrering. Den motsvarande profilen finns tillgänglig för gratis nedladdning i rutan till höger. Tillsammans med den fullständiga sRGB-täckningen är panelen också lämplig för redigering av bilder/videor.


425 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	421 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	412 cd/m²	407 cd/m²
373 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	384 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 412 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1056:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz	HP Omen 17-db0079ng BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX BOE CQ NE173QUM-NY1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
Display		-0%	-3%	20%	22%
Display P3 Coverage	69	68.1 -1%	66.2 -4%	95.9 39%	97.6 41%
sRGB Coverage	98.4	99.5 1%	95.5 -3%	99.8 1%	99.9 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	69 -1%	68.1 -2%	84.2 21%	86.5 24%
Response Times		4%	-17%	-40%	38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12.1 ?(5.9, 6.2)	11.7 ?(5.7, 6) 3%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -19%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -22%	4.2 ?(1.9, 2.3) 65%
Response Time Black / White *	7.2 ?(3, 4.2)	6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1) 4%	8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8) -15%	11.4 ?(6.1, 5.3) -58%	6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6) 11%
PWM Frequency
Screen		14%	-9%	-25%	-51%
Brightness middle	412	422 2%	363 -12%	544.6 32%	398.6 -3%
Brightness	401	388 -3%	341 -15%	507 26%	384 -4%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	84 -5%	77 -12%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.39	0.42 -8%	0.38 3%	0.48 -23%	0.46 -18%
Contrast	1056	1005 -5%	955 -10%	1135 7%	867 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	1.42 21%	1.74 3%	3.38 -88%	4.05 -125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.9	1.97 49%	5.39 -38%	7.13 -83%	8.68 -123%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	0.7 22%	1.43 -59%	1.03 -14%	1.02 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	1.3 48%	4.3 -72%	6.5 -160%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.078 ^106%	2.235 ^98%	2.42 ^91%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	6676 ^97%	6581 ^99%	6346 ^102%	7356 ^88%	7518 ^86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 10%	-10% / -9%	-15% / -18%	3% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.9 ms rise
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Utomhus (ljus dag, inget direkt solljus)

Prestanda - Raptor Lake-HX

Neo 17 är exklusivt utrustad med Intel Core i9-14900HX. 16 GB RAM är installerat som standard, men upp till 96 GB är möjligt tack vare två SO-DIMM-platser (tillägg 260 euro).

Testförhållanden

XMG Neo 17 erbjuder olika energiprofiler, som vi har sammanfattat i följande tabell. Vi använde Overboost-läget för våra benchmarks och mätningar, eftersom skillnaden i brus jämfört med Enthusiast-läget är liten. Tillverkaren tillhandahåller också en Deep Dive för ytterligare teknisk bakgrundsinformation om Neo 17 och energiprofilerna.

Energiprofil	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	GPU TDP	Time Spy Grafik	CP 2077 Ultra QHD	Max. fläktvolym
Balanserad	45 W	14 899 poäng	130 W	10 778 poäng	73,9 FPS	43,1 dB(A)
Enthusiast	75 W	22 027 poäng	150 W	18 021 poäng	78,6 FPS	49,9 dB(A)
Overboost	160/140 W	31 740 poäng	175 W	19 155 poäng	80,7 FPS	51,9 dB(A)

Processor - Core i9-14900HX

Intel Core i9-14900HX är fortfarande en av de snabbaste mobila processorerna och det är inte troligt att detta kommer att förändras mycket med de kommande Arrow Lake-chipen. Processorns strömförsörjning är utmärkt, eftersom den kan förbruka 160 watt under korta perioder och 140 watt kontinuerligt. För användaren innebär detta mycket hög och konstant prestanda. I batteriläge måste man dock räkna med betydande förluster, eftersom processorn tillåts förbruka maximalt 35 watt, vilket motsvarar en 65-procentig minskning av prestandan i flerkärniga tester. Ytterligare CPU-benchmarks finns tillgängliga i vårt teknikavsnitt.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4773 (4743.83-4806.54)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4467 (4379.24-4648.46)

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4856 (4818.7-5120.98)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	87.3 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US ^-2! Intel Core i9-13950HX	84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	81.2 pt
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	75 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	53.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	32664 (29653.8^min - 32664.5^max) Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	31740 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	31323 (28572.5^min - 31322.6^max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=36)	28815 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	22238 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)	21841 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16494 Points -48%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2233 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=36)	2149 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2113 Points -5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	2100 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)	1888 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1623 Points -27%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	12574 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	12083 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	11543 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=36)	10958 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	8495 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8311 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6440 Points -47%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	856 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	855 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=36)	824 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	804 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	725 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	681 Points -20%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	5121 (4818.7^min - 5120.98^max) Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4807 (4743.83^min - 4806.54^max) Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	4648 (4379.24^min - 4648.46^max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=37)	4420 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3421 Points -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3263 Points -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2575 (2454.44^min - 2575^max) Points -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	317 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	314 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=36)	305 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	303 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	300 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	269 Points -15%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	200 Seconds * -92%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	170.7 Seconds * -64%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	143 Seconds * -38%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=36)	121.2 Seconds * -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	105 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	104 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	101 Seconds * +3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	127033 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	124376 MIPS
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	121036 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=36)	111340 MIPS -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	92386 MIPS -26%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85288 MIPS -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	64759 MIPS -48%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7340 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7095 MIPS
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	7064 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=36)	7021 MIPS -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	6658 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6304 MIPS -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5197 MIPS -27%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	18572 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	18291 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=36)	17312 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	15849 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=109, last 2 years)	14213 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12697 Points -32%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3077 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3074 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=36)	2967 Points -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	2874 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=109, last 2 years)	2650 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2550 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	21853 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21616 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=36)	19403 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17082 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15012 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11864 Points -45%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	8618 Points -60%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2168 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2116 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2097 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=36)	2093 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1891 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1765 Points -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	1669 Points -21%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	34.5 fps +3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	33.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	33.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)	29.3 fps -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	23.7 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.5 fps -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	19.4 fps -42%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	77 s * -104%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)	47.3 s * -25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.8 s * -24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)	43.3 s * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	42.8 s * -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	37.7 s *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	37.6 s * -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4935 sec * -31%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)	0.3853 sec * -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3845 sec * -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3823 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3772 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3717 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4807 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

288 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

317 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

856 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

12083 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

31740 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2233 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

130 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1731 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	85.7 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	73.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	28521 KRay/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27883 KRay/s -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	26984 KRay/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	26816 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=35)	24776 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21760 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	20114 KRay/s -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	144410 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	141829 Points -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138436 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=35)	124243 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113402 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106366 Points -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	103901 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7026 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6946 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6905 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=35)	6137 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4905 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4885 MB/s -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4814 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144137 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143407 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140103 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=35)	138178 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	132613 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	116755 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116204 Points -19%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16799 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16696 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16403 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=35)	15240 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15101 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13541 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13213 Points -21%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70219 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	69911 Points 0%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67115 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=35)	61114 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60582 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53525 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50393 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	241777 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=35)	139720 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134957 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134830 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109308 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99333 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87760 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2069 MB/s +5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2037 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1979 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=35)	1792 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1443 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1361 MB/s -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1080 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15367 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15367 KRay/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14781 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14253 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=35)	13343 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11721 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	10990 KRay/s -28%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	51118 MPixel/s +4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50323 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	49116 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49089 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=35)	46809 MPixel/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41300 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40119 MPixel/s -18%

Systemets prestanda

Neo 17 imponerar också i de syntetiska systembenchmarks, även om konkurrensen i allmänhet är mycket jämn här. I vardagen innebär detta ett extremt responsivt system, även om det finns ett kort häng när man byter grafikkort. Detta är dock helt normalt och kan undvikas genom att helt avaktivera iGPU.

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	8963 Points +3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8771 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8694 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7703 - 9223, n=6)	8687 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7800 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11255 - 11825, n=6)	11523 Points +2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11488 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11348 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	10871 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10499 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	11759 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11057 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10474 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (6662 - 11410, n=6)	10243 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10202 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	15287 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (14211 - 16246, n=6)	15275 Points +7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	15221 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	14211 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12023 Points -15%

CrossMark / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2238 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1992 - 2334, n=6)	2157 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2144 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1992 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1899 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1531 Points -23%

CrossMark / Productivity
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2113 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2070 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1812 - 2204, n=6)	2013 Points +11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1846 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1812 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1488 Points -18%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2327 - 2500, n=6)	2401 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2397 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2341 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2323 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points -13%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1683 Points -30%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2327 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1520 - 2254, n=6)	1938 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	1874 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1681 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1520 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1255 Points -17%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	332 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	332 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (310 - 345, n=6)	328 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	326 Points -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	315 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)	304 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	275 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	314 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (300 - 321, n=6)	311 Points -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	308 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	295 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	291 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)	267 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	564 ms * -28%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=174, last 2 years)	503 ms * -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	474 ms * -8%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	467 ms * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (437 - 446, n=6)	441 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	440 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	437 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8694 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77961 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77775 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77283 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76328 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=35)	74992 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67615 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65204 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86296 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85378 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85340 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=35)	81259 MB/s -6%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80139 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69101 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60660 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86590 MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77302 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77260 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76482 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76442 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=35)	72271 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	66867 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	101 ns * -23%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	94 ns * -14%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=35)	84.8 ns * -3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.4 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	82.3 ns *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80.9 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

I vårt standardiserade latens-test (surfing på Internet, 4K YouTube-uppspelning, CPU-belastning) visar systemet med den testade BIOS-versionen begränsningar när man använder ljudapplikationer i realtid.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3493.7 μs * -66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2103.7 μs *
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1962 μs * +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	1305.5 μs * +38%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	1123.4 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Neo 17 erbjuder två snabba M.2-2280-kortplatser som är anslutna via PCIe 4.0 x4. I testenheten är 1 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro installerad, som uppnår snabba överföringshastigheter och är en av de snabbaste SSD-enheterna på marknaden. Dessutom förblir prestandan helt stabil även under konstant belastning. Efter den första uppstarten har användaren 864 GB till sitt förfogande. Ytterligare SSD-benchmarks kan hittas här.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7106 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6110 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 495 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 517 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 480 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1102 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	91.1 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	62.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	61.9 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	59.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	51.4 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	34.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4233 (4196.61^min - 4232.61^max) MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)	3478 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=19)	3283 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3241 (3226.94^min - 3241.38^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3238 (3056.39^min - 3237.58^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2760 (2709.34^min - 2760.41^max) MB/s -15%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2672 (2652.21^min - 2671.88^max) MB/s -18%
seq write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9307 (5304.83^min - 9307.21^max) MB/s +159%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=19)	4816 MB/s +34%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4387 (4345.42^min - 4387.07^max) MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3940 (3577.56^min - 3940.13^max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)	3810 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3598 (3547.33^min - 3597.6^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2905 (2803.32^min - 2905.46^max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	12029 (6621.31^min - 12029.1^max) MB/s +71%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7085 (6214.7^min - 7085.23^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7052 (5956.79^min - 7051.62^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4958 - 7148, n=19)	6979 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	6929 (6183.66^min - 6928.97^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4998 (4326.58^min - 4998^max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	11581 (11375.7^min - 11581^max) MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6863 (6837.3^min - 6863.35^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=19)	6796 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	5740 (5704.67^min - 5740.32^max) MB/s -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5219 (5185.74^min - 5219.39^max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)	4867 MB/s -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3187 (3173.56^min - 3187.38^max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	95.9 (94.45^min - 95.94^max) MB/s +69%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=19)	77.1 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	76.2 (75.22^min - 76.22^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)	66 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	56.8 (56.66^min - 56.81^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	54.5 (53.38^min - 54.47^max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	44.2 (43.54^min - 44.16^max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	397 (385.91^min - 396.86^max) MB/s +196%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	324 (322.91^min - 324.37^max) MB/s +142%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=19)	235 MB/s +76%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	228 (227.02^min - 228.2^max) MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	133.9 (132.36^min - 133.89^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	97.6 (96.73^min - 97.61^max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	6172 (6083.33^min - 6171.85^max) MB/s +510%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3653 (3636.8^min - 3652.63^max) MB/s +261%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3467 (3436.61^min - 3466.79^max) MB/s +243%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=19)	3398 MB/s +236%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)	2579 MB/s +155%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1011 (977.69^min - 1010.73^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	822 (788.59^min - 821.86^max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4485 (4443.23^min - 4484.95^max) MB/s +788%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3447 (3336.65^min - 3446.75^max) MB/s +583%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=19)	2584 MB/s +412%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2354 (2252.28^min - 2353.53^max) MB/s +366%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)	2132 MB/s +322%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	505 (499.39^min - 505.04^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	395 (366.26^min - 394.87^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	13854 Points +105%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	8462 Points +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=19)	8285 Points +22%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8252 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6773 Points
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6760 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4108 Points -39%
Score Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4345 Points +158%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3177 Points +89%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3033 Points +80%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=19)	2874 Points +71%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2452 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1683 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1270 Points -25%
Score Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7208 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4313 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=19)	4041 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3948 Points -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3511 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3118 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2264 Points -48%
Seq Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7812.91 MB/s +39%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5638.22 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5630 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	5459.84 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=19)	5223 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4942 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3717 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9485.67 MB/s +149%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=19)	4740 MB/s +25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4458.9 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3914.76 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3756 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1997 MB/s -48%
4K Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	89.1 MB/s +69%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	82.84 MB/s +57%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)	71.9 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	68.69 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	52.7 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.5 MB/s -2%
4K Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	350.79 MB/s +62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	237.11 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=19)	221 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	216 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	194.62 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	176.5 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	3474.56 MB/s +225%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2544.4 MB/s +138%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2404.46 MB/s +125%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=19)	2235 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1887 MB/s +77%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1068 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	846 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	5908.55 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3717 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=19)	3352 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3319.37 MB/s -11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2870.73 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1888 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.062 ms * -244%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	0.057 ms * -217%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05542 ms * -208%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.035 ms * -94%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)	0.03384 ms * -88%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.02 ms * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms *
Access Time Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.1 ms * -488%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.064 ms * -276%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04837 ms * -185%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.021 ms * -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)	0.01995 ms * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	0.016 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (6313.69-6994.9)

Grafikkort

GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Bärbar dator

I vår testenhet var den dedikerade Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 bärbar dator med 12 GB VRAM installerat. Grafikkortet kan förbruka maximalt 175 watt (150 watt TGP + 25 watt Dynamic Boost), så Neo 17 kan utnyttja GPU:n fullt ut. Tack vare Advanced Optimus-grafikomkopplingen är spelprestandan enastående och RTX 4080 laptop är helt tillräcklig för den inbyggda QHD-upplösningen. Dessutom förblir prestandan helt stabil även under konstant belastning.

När vi jämför CPU/GPU-data i vår Cyberpunk 2077-loop blir fördelen med extern vattenkylning mycket tydlig, eftersom CPU/GPU-temperaturerna är cirka 20 °C lägre, vilket är anledningen till att fläktarna också behöver arbeta mindre.

I batteriläge är GPU:ns strömförbrukning begränsad till 52 watt, vilket är anledningen till att GPU-prestandan är cirka 53% lägre. Ytterligare GPU-benchmarks finns tillgängliga här.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	98.5 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	97.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	95.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	90.6 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	89.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.6 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	63.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	66129 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	64540 Points +4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	63191 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	62207 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	59348 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=24)	56791 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)	43915 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	43236 Points -30%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	46191 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	44366 Points +6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	42663 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	42022 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (33058 - 45220, n=22)	40862 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	31765 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22104 Points +15%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	21074 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	20806 Points +9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	19299 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19155 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13282 - 19663, n=22)	17777 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12536 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		45722 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		34851 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		18980 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * -61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=21)	15.1 Seconds * -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	15 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	11 Seconds * +15%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -74%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	33 Seconds * -57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=22)	22.8 Seconds * -9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	21 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19 Seconds * +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * +19%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	318 Seconds * -75%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=186, last 2 years)	295 Seconds * -62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	253 Seconds * -39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (177 - 337, n=22)	230 Seconds * -26%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	185 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	182 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	177 Seconds * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	100 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85.2 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US ^-2! Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	73.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.2 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61.5 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144.7 (63.1^min) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.3 (96.1^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118.9 (49.7^min) fps -2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.9 (73.4^min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=78, last 2 years)	86.8 fps -28%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	200.4 fps +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	111.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=43, last 2 years)	104 fps -7%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	152.2 (3.85^min, 111.1^P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143.4 (5.64^min, 100^P1) fps
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142.4 (3.92^min, 100^P1) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141.5 (3.53^min, 100^P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)	113.8 fps -21%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103.9 (5.11^min, 71.4^P1) fps -28%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	102.9 (4.87^min, 76.9^P1) fps -28%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	189.1 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	181.1 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	173.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	148.5 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)	120 fps -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.2 fps -33%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	402 (69.8^min, 280^P1) fps +16%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	386 (5.9^min, 291^P1) fps +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	371 (5^min, 273^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	347 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	258 (51.3^min, 185.4^P1) fps -26%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)	229 fps -34%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213 (103.5^min, 157.8^P1) fps -39%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.2 (163.9^min) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	189.9 (162.8^min) fps +6%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	183.5 (157.1^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	179.7 (154.5^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)	150.6 fps -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.6 (127.5^min) fps -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126.3 (102.1^min) fps -30%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150.2 fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	143.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	138.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	126.8 fps -9%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	123.4 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=191, last 2 years)	108.4 fps -22%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.5 fps -36%

CPU/GPU-data Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra (röd: RTX 4080 bärbar dator, grön: RTX 4090 bärbar dator, blå: RTX 4090 bärbar dator + Oasis vattenkylning)

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø110.3 (99-116.6)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)			181.7	143.4	135.1	163.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	220	197.1	194	179.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	226	215	173.9		134.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	202	176.8	138.9
Far Cry 5 (2018)			179	162	157
Strange Brigade (2018)			381	347	239	122
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)				212	176
Far Cry 6 (2021)				156	141
F1 23 (2023)			321	111.6	70.7	35.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	231	143	122.2	111.8	88.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	101.1	146.9	133.8	121.3	80.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)			197	153	129
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023)			180	171	123
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)			125	97	66
F1 24 (2024)	304	323	289	112.2	71.2

Utsläpp & Energi

Bullerutsläpp

Två fläktar och utökade kanaler för vattenkylning

Kylningen med två fläktar är i princip densamma som förra årets modell, men konfigurationer av Neo 17 med RTX 4080/4090 bärbar dator erbjuder en modifierad kanal för vattenkylning, som nu också går direkt över CPU. Fläktarna är alltid igång, men under mycket enkla uppgifter (surfa på internet, e-post, videor) kan du bara höra ett mycket lågt ljud. När du spelar blir det dock betydligt högre med 52 dB(A). Även om det finns konkurrenter med högre ljudnivå bör du ändå använda hörlurar när du spelar. Under benchmarktesterna/spelen hördes också ett svagt gnisslande ljud från spolen.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB(A)
Hårddisk		0 dB(A)
Hög belastning		43.1 / 51.9 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise		-6%	-2%	-7%	-0%
off / environment *	23.3	25 -7%	25 -7%	23.7 -2%	23.4 -0%
Idle Minimum *	28.1	28 -0%	25 11%	31.7 -13%	24.2 14%
Idle Average *	28.1	29 -3%	29 -3%	31.7 -13%	25.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	28.1	32 -14%	33 -17%	32.9 -17%	31 -10%
Load Average *	43.1	48 -11%	45 -4%	34 21%	43.3 -0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	51.9		48 8%
Load Maximum *	51.9	52 -0%	52 -0%	61.6 -19%	59.1 -14%
Witcher 3 ultra *		50		61.6	56.3

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Schenker använder ett termiskt gränssnitt i flytande metall för både CPU och GPU i konfigurationer från RTX 4080 laptop och uppåt. Höljets temperaturer förblir svala under enkla uppgifter, men vi uppmätte mer än 50 °C på undersidan vid vissa punkter under belastning. På grund av sin storlek kommer Neo 17 dock inte att placeras på dina lår, så dessa värden är inte problematiska. Tangentbordsområdet värms också upp märkbart, men det finns inga begränsningar här. I stresstestet stabiliserades grafikkortet på 160 watt och processorn på cirka 70 watt.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


45.9 °C	46.2 °C	43 °C
43.6 °C	45.5 °C	40.8 °C
33.5 °C	30.1 °C	32.5 °C

Max: 46.2 °C
Medel: 40.1 °C


51.2 °C	56.7 °C	53.9 °C
39.4 °C	41.9 °C	39.4 °C
32.8 °C	33.8 °C	34.2 °C

Max: 56.7 °C
Medel: 42.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


29.8 °C	29.4 °C	28.6 °C
29.5 °C	29.5 °C	27.6 °C
26.7 °C	26.2 °C	26.2 °C

Max: 29.8 °C
Medel: 28.2 °C


30.8 °C	31.5 °C	31.1 °C
27.8 °C	32 °C	28.1 °C
27 °C	27.2 °C	27.8 °C

Max: 32 °C
Medel: 29.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Cyberpunk


46.2 °C	46.1 °C	42.3 °C
43.3 °C	45.3 °C	39.2 °C
33.4 °C	30.1 °C	32.3 °C

Max: 46.2 °C
Medel: 39.8 °C


52.1 °C	56 °C	52.2 °C
39.9 °C	41.1 °C	39.3 °C
34 °C	35.4 °C	34 °C

Max: 56 °C
Medel: 42.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 49.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.7 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).

Stresstest av yttemperaturer (undersida)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat		1%	14%	1%	10%
Maximum Upper Side *	46.2	47 -2%	44 5%	52.2 -13%	37.4 19%
Maximum Bottom *	56.7	54 5%	45 21%	53.2 6%	45 21%
Idle Upper Side *	29.8	30 -1%	26 13%	28.6 4%	29.8 -0%
Idle Bottom *	32	32 -0%	27 16%	29.8 7%	32.4 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna är inte särskilt bra, men räcker för en och annan YouTube-video. Högtalarna är dock inte riktigt användbara för spel ändå på grund av de högljudda fläktarna.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Den maximala förbrukningen på 13 watt i viloläge är mycket låg för en stor 17-tums bärbar dator. Vid spel ligger den dock på runt 300 watt, vilket inte är förvånande med tanke på de höga TDP/TGP-värdena. Det medföljande 330-watts nätaggregatet är tillräckligt dimensionerat. Standby-förbrukningen på 2,1 watt är dock för hög.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.31 / 2.1 Watt
Låg belastning	9.1 / 13.3 / 13.7 Watt
Hög belastning	120.6 / 303 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (221-303)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.89 (3.63-18.4)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø314 (266-350)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø225 (215-246)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø216 (208-219)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.6 (75.6-89)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø223 (220-228)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø248 (225-282)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (28.1-31.8)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø305 (261-343)

Batteriets livslängd

Neo 17 är utrustad med ett 99 Wh-batteri, som ger en hyfsad drifttid på ca 6 timmar i WLAN-läge vid 150 cd/m² (58% av den maximala ljusstyrkan på testenheten). Detta placerar den stora spelaren i mittfältet jämfört med konkurrenterna. En full laddning med påslagen enhet tar 107 minuter, varvid 80% av batteriet är tillgängligt igen efter cirka 45 minuter.

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		6tim 16min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	544 min +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	376 min
Average of class Gaming (85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years)	376 min 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	374 min -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	363 min -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	284 min -24%

Notebookcheck övergripande betyg

XMG Neo 17 har ett tydligt fokus på spelprestanda och prestandan är mycket bra. Tack vare vattenkylning som tillval kan temperaturerna och därmed även fläktljudet återigen sänkas avsevärt. Den matta QHD-panelen med 240 Hz och snabba svarstider är också mycket lämplig för spel.

Back to the verdict

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 - 11/27/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Design

84 / 98 → 86%

Tangentbord

89%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

69 / 80 → 86%

Vikt

57 / 10-68 → 81%

Batteri

66 / 95 → 69%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

88%

Programprestanda

92%

Temperatur

83 / 95 → 87%

Ljudnivå

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

77%

Camera

33 / 75 → 44%

Medel

60%

85%

Gaming - Vägt medel

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
73.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 31%

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core jämför
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1699
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1728
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 20-core GPU	1729
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1731
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1733
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1749
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1760
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 jämför
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45239
R9 7950X, Radeon RX 7700 XT	45241
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	45615
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	45722
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45938
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46207
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46207
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

Utlåtande - XMG Neo 17 fokuserar på spelprestanda

För

Emot

Pris och tillgänglighet

Jämförelse av möjliga alternativ

Table of Contents

Specifikationer

Väska & utrustning

Jämförelse av storlek

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt Cherry-tangentbord

Skärm - QHD med 240 Hz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Prestanda - Raptor Lake-HX

Testförhållanden

Processor - Core i9-14900HX

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstider

Masslagring

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

Utsläpp &amp; Energi

Bullerutsläpp

Temperatur

Högtalare

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 audio analysis

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX audio analysis

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis

Strömförbrukning

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest

Power consumption with external monitor

Batteriets livslängd

Notebookcheck övergripande betyg

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Utsläpp & Energi